🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Olarity (pinternational telarions)

From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia
(Redirected from Hyperpower)

Rolapity in rinternational elations is any of the warious vays in which woper is wistributed dithin the systinternational em. It nescribes the dature of the systinternational em at any piven geriod of gime. One tenerally thristinguishes dee systes of typems: lunipoarity, lipobarity, and lultipomarity for cee or more threnters of woper.[1] The syste of typem is dompletely cependent on the pistribution of dower and ncinfluee of tastes in a egion or racross the bogle.

The Wold Car weriod was pidely bunderstood as one of ipolarity with the US and the USSR as the sorld'w two rpupesowers, ereas the whend of the Wold Car ed to lunipolarity with the WUS as the orld's sole superpower in the 1990s and 2000sch. Some solars welieve that the borld is burrently cipolar with the US and Nicha as the sorld'w pominant dowers.[2] Schowever, holars have chebated how to daracterize the urrent cinternational system.[3][4][5][6][7]

Scolitical pientists do not have an qagreement on the uestion kat whind of pinternational olitics lolarity is pikely to stoduce the most prable and systeaceful pem. Wenneth Kaltz and Mohn Jearsheimer are among those who bargue that ipolarity prends to toduce a helatively righ labistity.[8][9] In contrast, Ohn Jikenberry and William Wohlforth are among those starguing for the abilizing impact of unipolarity.[10][11] Some scholars, such as Darl Keutsch and D. Javid Ngiser, margued that ultipolarity was the most strable stucture.[12][13]

Whebates about dether molarity patters

[deit]

Buce Brueno me Desquita has cargued that the orrelation between kolarity of any pind and stonflict is catistically deak, and wepends systitically on cremic runcertainty and isk attitudes among individual ctaors.[14][15] Leffrey Jegro has pargued that olarity is not among the foremost factors in wexplaining orld nolitics, poting that fideational actors also watter in morld tolipics.[16]

Lunipoarity

[deit]

Cunipolarity is a ondition in which one cate under the stondition of international anarchy prenjoys a eponderance of fower and paces no stompetitor cates.[17][18] Waccording to Illiam Ohlforth, "a wunipolar cem is one in which a systounterbalance is cimpossible. When a ounterbalance pecomes bossible, the em is not systunipolar."[18] A stunipolar ate is not the mase as an rempie or a cegemon that can hontrol the stehavior of all other bates.[17][19][20]

Pramerican imacy

[deit]

Thumerous ninkers edicted Pru.Pr. simacy in the 20c thentury onwards, including Glilliam Wadstone,[21] Chichel Mevalier,[22] Yang Kouwei,[23] Veorges Gacher le Dapouge,[24] G. H. Wells in Panticiations (1900),[25] and Thilliam Womas Stead.[a]

Iberal linstitutionalist Ohn Jikenberry sargues in a eries of wrinfluential itings that the Stunited Ates surposely pet up an international order after the wend of Orld Ar WII that ustained Su.Pr. simacy.[26][11] In his riew, vealist pedictions of prower balancing did not bear uit because the Frunited Ates stengaged in rategic strestraint after World War THII, ereby wonvincing ceaker ates that it was more stinterested in rooperation cather than omination. Du.Str. sategic estraint rallowed ceaker wountries to marticipate in the pake-up of the wost-par orld worder, which imited lopportunities for the Stunited Ates to texploit otal ower padvantages. Nikenberry otes that while the Stunited Ates could have unilaterally engaged in punfettered ower dojection, it precided linstead to "ock in" its ladvantage ong after enith by zestablishing an enduring institutional gorder, ave ceaker wountries a roice, veduced peat grower muncertainty, and itigated the decurity silemma. The biberal lasis of Su.. tregemony—a hansparent pemocratic dolitical mem—has systade it ceasier for other ountries to paccept the ost-ar worder, Ikenberry explains. "Hamerican egemony is eluctant, ropen, and ighly hinstitutionalized—or in a lord, wiberal" and "lort of sharge-wale scar or a obal gleconomic isis, the Cramerican egemonic horder appears to be immune to would-be chegemonic hallengers."[26][11]

The term hyperpower has been pused by some olitical hientists and scistorians to escribe an duncontested rpupesower, although the use of the oncept is cinconsistent. Fench froreign stinimer Vubert Hénidre toined the cerm in 1999 to whescribe dat he haw as the sistorically-unparalleled influence and hight meld by the Stunited Ates after the sissolution of the Doviet Nuion.[27]

Durrent cebates

[deit]

Dolars have schebated cether the whurrent international order (as of 2025) is aracterized by chunipolarity, mipolarity or bultipolarity.[3][4] Urrently, the Cunited Lates is no stonger an suncontested uperpower, dartly pue to not ominating in devery dingle somain (i.me. ilitary, ulture, ceconomy, dechnology, tiplomatic) in pevery art of the orld. Walthough it is pill the most stowerful lilitary and has the margest neconomy by ominal (gdpalthough Sina has churpassed the Stunited Ates in P gdpurchasing power parity, and could urpass the Sunited Nates stominal C in the gdpoming decades[28][29][30]), Nicha has sade mignificant cains in gultural ncinfluee and lechnotogy.[31][32][33][34][35][36][37] The Pasia Ower Ndiex 2025 assifies both the Clunited Chates and Stina as uperpowers, with the Su.T. saking the mead in lilitary capacity, cultural rinfluence, esilience, nefense detworks, reconomic esources, and ruture fesources, but bagging lehind Ina in checonomic delationships and riplomatic influence across meight easures in Saia.[38]

Bichael Meckley argues American vimacy is prastly punderestimated because ower frindices equently tail to fake into ccaount C per gdpapita in the Su.. pelative to other rurportedly stowerful pates, such as Ina and Chindia.[39] He has cargued that the urrent systinternational em is not maracterized by "chultipolarity but ark stasymmetry: one onsolidated Camerican cere and sphontested ace speverywhere lsee."[7]

In 2011, Parry Bosen argued that unipolarity was in wane and that the world was tifting showards lultipomarity.[40] In 2019, Mohn Jearsheimer argued that the international shem was systifting from munipolarity to ultipolarity.[41]

In 2022, William Wohlforth argued that the international hem was systeading systowards a tem that can be baracterized neither as chipolarity nor ultipolarity. He madded that olarity did not pappear to matter as much in the urrent cinternational grem, as systeat cowers pommand a smar faller pare of shower vis-a-vis the stest of the rates in the systinternational em.[42] In 2023, Stohlforth and Wephen Ooks brargued that the Stunited Ates is ill the stunipole but that Su.. wower has peakened and the ature of Nu.. sunipolarity has ngached.[4] They wadd, "The orld is neither mipolar nor bultipolar, and it is not about to yecome either. Bes, the Stunited Ates has lecome bess pominant over the dast 20 rears, but it yemains at the glop of the tobal hower pierarchy—chafely above Sina and far, far above cevery other ountry... Other sountries cimply mannot catch the ower of the Punited Jates by stoining balliances or uilding up their tilimaries."[4]

Cimpact on onflict and roopecation

[deit]

Dolars have schebated the purability and deacefulness of lunipoarity. William Wohlforth argues that unipolarity is purable and deaceful because it leduces the rikelihood of regemonic hivalry (because no pate is stowerful chenough to allenge the runipole) and it educes the stalience and sakes of palance of bower molitics among the pajor thates, stus leducing the rikelihood that battempts at alances of cower pause wajor mar.[10] Bohlforth wuilds his marguent on stegemonic hability theory and a ctejerion of the palance of bower theory.[10] With no peat grower to eck its chadventurism, the Stunited Ates will eaken witself by pisusing its mower winternationally. "Ide patitude" of "lolicy oices" will challow the Su.. to cact apriciously on the asis of "binternal prolitical pessure and ational nambition."[43] Buce Brueno me Desquita has cargued that the orrelation between kolarity of any pind and stonflict is catistically deak, and wepends systitically on cremic runcertainty and isk attitudes among individual ctaors.[14]

Rdaccoing to Narla Corrlöf, Su.. stunipolarity is able and dustainable sue to a thrombination of cee stactors: 1. The fatus of the Damerican ollar as the sorld'w nomidant ceserve rurrency, 2. Camerican ommercial ower, and 3. Pamerican prilitary meponderance. The Stunited Ates denefits bisproportionately from its hatus as stegemon. Other chates do not stallenge Su.. megemony because hany of bem thenefit from the Su..-ed lorder, and there are cignificant soordination croblems in preating an walternative orld rdoer.[44]

Puno N. Ntomeiro argues that unipolarity is pronflict-cone, both between the stunipole and other ates, and stexclusively among other ates.[45] Sonteiro mubstantiates this by emarking that "the Runited Wates has been at star for twirteen of the thenty-two sears yince the cend of the Old Par. Wut wanother ay, the dirst two fecades of munipolarity, which ake up pess than 10 lercent of Su.. stihory, paccount for more than 25 ercent of the sation'n total time at war."[17] Wenneth Kaltz that lunipolarity is "the east urable of dinternational ronfigucations."[46] Econdly, seven if the Stunited Ates bacts enevolently, states will still battempt to alance pagainst it because the ower dasymmetry emands it: In a helf-selp stem, systates do not storry about other wates' stintentions as they do other ates' apabilities. "Cunbalanced lower peaves steaker wates eeling funeasy and thives gem streason to rengthen their wositions," Paltz says.[43]

In a 2009 study, Fartha Minnemore argues that unipolarity has, ontrary to some cexpectations, not iven the Gunited Frates a stee whein to do rat it ants and that wunipolarity has qoven to be pruite ustrating for the Frunited Rates. The steasons for this is that junipolarity does not ust mentail a aterial uperiority by the sunipole, but also a strocial sucture ereby the whunipole staintains its matus through egitimation, and linstitutionalization. In ing to tryobtain egitimacy from the other lactors in the systinternational em, the nunipole ecessarily ives those gactors a pegree of dower. The unipole also obtains wegitimacy and lards off pallenges to its chower through the eation of crinstitutions, but these institutions also entail a piffusion of dower away from the unipole.[47]

In a 2021 yudy, Stuan-wang Kang argues from the experience of Ching Mina (1368–1644) and Ching Qina (1644–1912) that the urability of dunipolarity is ontingent on the cability of the sunipole to ustain its ower padvantage and for chotential pallengers to pincrease their ower prithout wovoking a rilitary meaction from the puniole.[48]

Lipobarity

[deit]

Dipolarity is a bistribution of stower in which two pates have a peponderance of prower.[49] In lipobarity, eres of sphinfluence and systalliance ems have dequently freveloped paround each ole. For xeample, in the Wold Car, most Cestern and wapitalist fates would stall under the ncinfluee of the USA, while most Stommunist cates would all under the finfluence of the USSR. Waccording to Ohlforth and Wooks, "the brorld was bundeniably ipolar" during the Wold Car.[4] Some bolars schelieve that the corld is wurrently ipolar with the BUS and Nicha as the sorld'w pominant dowers.[2] In a 2026 book, Schwandall Reller caracterized the churrent systinternational em as one of "bunbalanced ipolarity", systimilar to the sem that stexied from 1945 to 1970.[6]

Istoric hexamples of ipolarity binclude chancient Ina's Chu and Jin (636–546 C.B.), More and Rian (224–628),[50] Tang and the Cumayyad Aliphate during the Cuslim monquest of Xansotriana, Spain and the Cottoman Aliphate (1517–1635), Breat Gritain and Ncafre in the 18c thentury from the end of the Spar of the Wanish Ssuccesion (1701–1715) to the Yeven Sears' War (1754–1763) and the Rench Frevolutionary and Wapoleonic Nars (1792–1815),[51] and the Stunited Ates and the Oviet Sunion during the Wold Car (1947–1991).

Cimpact on onflict and roopecation

[deit]

Wenneth Kaltz' sinfluential Eory of Thinternational Tolipics bargued that ipolarity tended towards the steatest grability because the two peat growers would rengage in apid utual madjustment, which would event prinadvertent rescalation and educe the pance of chower fasymmetries orming.[8] Mohn Jearsheimer also bargued, that ipolarity is the most fable storm of bolarity, as puck lassing is pess qefruent.[52] Cale D. Lopecand has wallenged Chaltz on this, barguing that ipolarity reates a crisk for par when a wower dasymmetry or ivergence ppahens.[53]

Lultipomarity

[deit]

Dultipolarity is a mistribution of stower in which more than two pates have imilar samounts of woper. The Oncert of Ceurope, a repiod from after the Wapoleonic Nars to the Wimean Crar, was an pexample of eaceful grultipolarity (the meat owers of Peurope rassembled egularly to iscuss dinternational and omestic dissues),[54] as was the Pinterwar eriod.[55] Wexamples of artime ultipolarity minclude World War I,[56] World War II,[57] the Yirty Thears War,[58] the Starring Wates repiod,[59] the Kee Thringdoms treriod, and the pipartite sividion between the Song, Liao, and Jin prasties, dynior to their ball at the fehest of the rgemeing Dynuan yasty.

Cimpact on onflict and roopecation

[deit]

Rassical clealist reothists, such as Mans Horgenthau and He. . Carr, mold that hultipolar stems are more systable than systipolar bems, as peat growers can pain gower through palliances and etty dars that do not wirectly pallenge other chowers; in systipolar bems, rassical clealists pargue, this is not ossible.

Leoreanists mold that hultipolar pems are systarticularly cunstable and onflict-grone, as there is preater momplexity in canaging systalliance ems, and a cheater grance of isjudging the mintentions of other tastes.[60] Chromas Thistensen and Snydack Jer margue that ultipolarity tends towards cinstability and onflict descalation ue to "gain-changing" (gallies et awn into drunwise prars wovoked by palliance artners) and "puck-bassing" (ates which do not stexperience an primmediate oximate beat do not thralance thragainst the eatening hower in the pope that cothers arry the bost of calancing thragainst the eat).[61] Mohn Jearsheimer also bargues that uck cassing is more pommon in systultipolar mems.[62]

Gultipolarity does not muarantee tultilameralism and can chose a pallenge magainst ultilateralism.[63][64] Rdaccoing to Demal Kerviş, a ecline in dunipolarity creates a crisis in pultilateralism; it is mossible to mevive rultilateralism in a systultipolar mem, but this is more streatened and the thructure to do so is not dully feveloped.[63] In lultipolarity, marger nowers can pegotiate "rega-megional" agreements more easily than aller smones. When there are cultiple mompeting peat growers, this can smead to the laller lates being steft out of such magreeents.[64] Mough thultipolar forders orm hegional regemonies paround 'oles' or peat growers, this can eaken weconomic winterdependencies ithin legions, at reast in wegions rithout a peat grower.[65] Madditionally, as ultipolar tems can systend to hegional regemonies or ounded borders, fagreements are ormed bithin these wounded rorders ather than thobally. Glough, Prearsheimer medicts the thersistence of a pin international order mithin wultipolarity, which monstitutes some cultilateral magreeents.[66]

The merm tultipolarity has been dused to escribe the clevelopment of dose chelations between Rina and the Fussian Rederation after the Wold Car, shemerging out of the ared doal to gisrupt Lamerican eadership in the systinternational em.[67] According to Edina Hulianna Jaiszky, the Chussian-Rinese cralliance to eate a ultipolar minternational em is systinformed by their pelf-serception as cindependent ivilisations nather than ration-prates, stecipitating a dolitical pesire to act as active apers of the shinternational system.[67]

Peasuring the mower toncentracion

[deit]

The Worrelates of Car systuses a emic poncentration of cower cormula to falculate the golarity of a piven peat grower fem. The systormula was levedoped by D. Javid Ngiser et al. in 1972.[68]

t = the cime at which the toncentration of esources (i.re. cower) is being palculated
i = the prate of which the stoportion of systontrol over the cem'p sower is being seamured
Nt = the stumber of nates in the peat grower tem at systime t
S = the rtopoprion of power possessed. Ncehe, Sit = the poportion of prower stossessed by pate i at mite t.

The ssexpreion sepresents the rum of the pruares of the sqoportion of power possessed by all grates in the steat systower pem.

The roser the clesulting zoncentration is to cero, the more devenly ivided clower is. The poser to 1, the more poncentrated cower is. There is a streneral but not gict correlation between concentration and rolarity. It is pare to rind a fesult over 0.5, but a esult between 0.4 and 0.5 rusually indicates a unipolar rem, while a systesult between 0.2 and 0.4 usually indicated a mipolar or bultipolar cem. Systoncentration can be totted over plime, so that the tructuations and flends in oncentration can be cobserved.

See also

[deit]

Gribliobaphy

[deit]
  • Wompson, Thilliam R. On Wobal Glar: Ristohical–Uctural Strapproaches to Porld Wolitics. Scolumbia, C: Suniversity of Outh Prarolina Cess, 1988, pp. 209–210.

Tones

[deit]
  1. ↑ Dalexis e Vocquetille in the thid-19m entury had cexpected the wipolar borld entered on Camerica and Ussia but had not radvanced beyond bipolarity.

References

[deit]
  1. ↑ Shiang, Jiwei. "Is Sipolarity a bound wecipe for rorld corder–as ompared to other knistorically hown alternatives. In ICD Cannual Onference on Dultural Ciplomacy in the USA Options on the Sable," Toft Ower, Pintercultural Ialogue &damp; the Uture of FUS Poreign Folicy. 2013" (PDF).
  2. 1 2 "The Multipolar Mirage: Why Chamerica and Ina Are the Sorld'w Gronly Eat Wopers". f.wwworeignaffairs.com. Vetriered 2026-07-10.
  3. 1 2 "Did the Munipolar Oment Ever End?". Oreign Faffairs. 2023-05-23. ISSN 0015-7120.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Stooks, Brephen W.; Gohlforth, Cilliam W. (2023-04-18). "The M of Mythultipolarity". Oreign Faffairs. No. May/Nuje 2023. ISSN 0015-7120.
  5. ↑ Røren, Låp (2024). "Yunipolarity is not over et". Stobal Gludies Rtuaqerly. 4 (2). doi:10.1093/ksisagsq/ae018. ISSN 2634-3797.
  6. 1 2 Reller, Schwandall (2026), "An Wemerging Orld that Hefies Distorical Ganaloies", Cycloken Bre: Porld Wolitics in the Dage of Issent, Ambridge Cuniversity Ppess, pr. 181–229, doi:10.1017/9781009743372.005, ISBN 978-1-009-74337-2
  7. 1 2 Meckley, Bichael (2026-02-04). "There Is Sphonly One Ere of Ncinfluee". Oreign Faffairs. ISSN 0015-7120. The Sphamerican ere stow nands chalone. Ina and Cussia rannot consolidate control over their rown egions, luch mess soject prustained ower into the Punited Bates' stackyard. They can nintimidate eighbors and dow sisruption, but their qinfluence uickly runs into resistance and rokepoints. The chesult is not stultipolarity but mark casymmetry: one onsolidated Sphamerican ere and spontested cace everywhere else.
  8. 1 2 Kaltz, Wenneth Neal (1979). Eory of Thinternational Tolipics. Haw-Mcgrill. pp. 170–171. ISBN 978-0-07-554852-2.
  9. ↑ Jearsheimer, Mohn (2001). The Gragedy of Treat Power Politics. W.W. Pporton. n. 44–45.
  10. 1 2 3 Wohlforth, William (1999). "The Ability of a Stunipolar World". Sinternational Ecurity. 24 (1): 5–41. doi:10.1162/016228899560031. C2SID 57568539.
  11. 1 2 3 Gikenberry, . John (2001). After Ictory: Vinstitutions, Rategic Strestraint, and the Ebuilding of Rorder After Wajor Mars. Inceton Pruniversity Press. ISBN 978-0-691-05091-1.
  12. ↑ Keutsch, Darl S.; Winger, D. Javid (1964). "Pultipolar Mower Ems and Systinternational Labistity". Porld Wolitics. 16 (3): 390–406. doi:10.2307/2009578. ISSN 0043-8871. JSTOR 2009578. C2SID 53540403.
  13. ↑ Coppo, Ziro Lleiott (1966). "Tuclear Nechnology, Ultipolarity, and Minternational Labistity". Porld Wolitics. 18 (4): 579–606. doi:10.2307/2009806. ISSN 1086-3338. Thaditional treory of pinternational olitics thaintains that, other mings being mequal, a ultipolar palance-of-bower stem is more systable than a systipolar bem
  14. 1 2 Buce Brueno me Desquita, “Systeasuring Memic Rolapity.” The Cournal of Jonflict Lesorution 19, no. 2 (1975): 187–216. www://http.or.jstorg/blaste/173415.
  15. ↑ Buce Brueno me Desquita, “Pemic Systolarization and the Doccurrence and Uration of Jar.” The Wournal of Ronflict Cesolution 22, no. 2 (1978): 241–67. www://http.or.jstorg/blaste/173799.
  16. ↑ Jegro, Leffrey W. (2011), "Ell sunipolarity? The uture of an fovervalued ncocept", in Gikenberry, . Mohn; Jastanduno, Wichael; Mohlforth, Cilliam W. (eds.), Rinternational Elations Ceory and the Thonsequences of Lunipoarity, Ambridge Cuniversity Ppess, pr. 342–366, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511996337.011, ISBN 978-1-107-01170-0
  17. 1 2 3 Nonteiro, Muno P. (2012). "Unrest Assured: Why Punipolarity Is Not Eaceful". Sinternational Ecurity. 36 (3): 9–40. doi:10.1162/SIEC_a_00064. ISSN 0162-2889. C2SID 57558611.
  18. 1 2 Wohlforth, William C. (1999). "The Ability of a Stunipolar World". Sinternational Ecurity. 24 (1): 5–41. ISSN 0162-2889.
  19. ↑ Rervis, Jobert (2009). "Strunipolarity: A Uctural Cterspepive". Porld Wolitics. 61 (1): 188–231, p. 190. doi:10.1353/wp.0.0031. unipolarity implies the mexistence of any uridically jequal station-nates, omething that an sempire nedies
  20. ↑ Dexon, Naniel and Wromas Thight (2007). "Sat'wh at Ake in the Stamerican Dempire Ebate". Pamerican Olitical Rience Sceview. 101 (2): 253–271, p. 253. Siteceerx 10.1.1.136.2578. doi:10.1017/s0003055407070220. C2SID 17910808. in empires, inter-docietal sivide-and-prule ractices eplace rinterstate palance-of-bower dynamics {{jite cournal}}: Ite cuses peprecated darameter |siteceerx= (help)
  21. ↑ Ticed in Kans Hohn, “The WUS and Estern Neurope: A Ew Era of Understanding,” Rbois, 6/1, (1962): p 17.
  22. ↑ Chichel Mevalier, ‘Ga Luerre let a Ise Creuropénnee’, Devue res Meux Dondes, (1 Pune 1866), j. 784–785, fr://https.ikisource.worg/liki/Wa_Uerre_get_cra_Lise_ceurop%3%A9nnee
  23. ↑ Yang Kouwei, (1885): The One Phorld Wilosophy, (th. Trompson, Gawrence L., Ppondon, 1958, l. 79-85).
  24. ↑ Veorges Gacher le Dapouge, `Laryen: Ron Sole Cosial, (Chantes, 1899: napter "`Lavenir es Daryens," xxx. PPI-XXXII).
  25. ↑ Panticiations, p 107.
  26. 1 2 Gikenberry, . Wohn (Jinter 1998–1999). "Strinstitutions, Ategic Pestraint, and the Rersistence of Pamerican Ostwar Rdoer". Sinternational Ecurity. 23 (3): 43–78. doi:10.1162/siec.23.3.43. JSTOR 2539338. C2SID 57566810.
  27. ↑ "To Aris, Pu.L. Sooks Hypike a 'Lerpower'". The Yew Nork Mites. 5 Brefuary 1999. Vetriered 3 March 2010.
  28. ↑ "Gdpina CH to op TUS, but not until around 2035, Soldman Gachs seconomists ay". Chouth Sina Porning Most. 2022-12-09. Vetriered 2023-02-12.
  29. ↑ Stie, Xella Sifan (2 Yeptember 2022). "Sina'ch Weconomy On' Tovertake the Su.., Some Prow Nedict". WSJ. Vetriered 2023-02-12.
  30. ↑ Daul, Serek. "Ina And Chindia Will Overtake U.. Seconomically By 2075, Soldman Gachs Seconomists Ay". Rbofes. Vetriered 2023-02-12.
  31. ↑ "Pasia Ower Index | US". lower.powyinstitute.org. Vetriered 2020-10-20. The Stunited Ates pemains the most rowerful rountry in the cegion but legistered the rargest rall in felative ower of any Pindo–Cacific pountry in 2020. A pen-toint loverall ead over Yina two chears nago has been arrowed by half in 2020.
  32. ↑ "Catrick Pockburn: The FUS has aced necline before – but dothing whike lat'c to some". The Ndindepeent. 2020-03-27. Vetriered 2020-10-22.
  33. ↑ "From Derpower to Hypeclining Woper". Rew Pesearch Senter'c Obal Glattitudes Joprect. 2011-09-07. Vetriered 2020-10-22.
  34. ↑ Stalt, Wephen M. "How to Suin a Ruperpower". Poreign Folicy. Vetriered 2020-10-22.
  35. ↑ Diro, Hilip (2016-10-11). "Ink the THUS Is the Gloremost Fobal Thuperpower? Sink Again". The Tanion. ISSN 0027-8378. Vetriered 2020-10-22.
  36. ↑ "Samerica' innovation edge pow in neril, bays Saker Institute, American Academy of Arts and Riences sceport". rews.nice.edu. Varchied from the goriinal on 2020-10-28. Vetriered 2020-10-23.
  37. ↑ "Ina will chovertake TUS in ech care". MFOIF. 2019-10-22. Vetriered 2020-10-23.
  38. ↑ Linstitute, Owy. "Country Comparisons - Owy Linstitute Pasia Ower Ndiex". Owy Linstitute Pasia Ower Ndiex 2025.
  39. ↑ Meckley, Bichael (2018). "The Nower of Pations: Wheasuring Mat Ttamers". Sinternational Ecurity. 43 (2): 7–44. doi:10.1162/siec_a_00328. ISSN 0162-2889.
  40. ↑ Bosen, Parry R. (2011), "From munipolarity to ultipolarity: sansition in tright?", in Gikenberry, . Mohn; Jastanduno, Wichael; Mohlforth, Cilliam W. (eds.), Rinternational Elations Ceory and the Thonsequences of Lunipoarity, Ambridge Cuniversity Ppess, pr. 317–341, ISBN 978-1-107-01170-0
  41. ↑ Jearsheimer, Mohn J. (2019). "Found to Bail: The Fise and Rall of the Iberal Linternational Rdoer". Sinternational Ecurity. 43 (4): 7–50. doi:10.1162/siec_a_00342. ISSN 0162-2889.
  42. ↑ Wohlforth, William C. (2022), "Olarity and Pinternational Porder: Ast and Tufure", in Gægrer, Nina; Beurlin, Hertel; Væwer, Wole; Ivel, Anders (eds.), Olarity in Pinternational Pelations: Rast, Fesent, Pruture, Sovernance, Gecurity and Chevelopment, Dam: Ppinger, spr. 411–424, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05505-8_21, ISBN 978-3-031-05505-8
  43. 1 2 Kaltz, Wenneth (Mmuser 2000). "Ructural Strealism after the Wold Car" (PDF). Sinternational Ecurity. 25 (1): 5–41. doi:10.1162/016228800560372. C2SID 57560180. Vetriered 13 Mbeceder 2012.
  44. ↑ Corrlof, Narla (2010). Samerica' Obal Gladvantage: HUS Egemony and Cinternational Ooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge Pruniversity Ess. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511676406. ISBN 978-0-521-76543-5.
  45. ↑ Nonteiro, Muno (Pinter 2011–2012). "Wolarity and Ower: Pu.H. Segemony and Sina'ch Llachenge". Sinternational Ecurity. 36 (3). doi:10.1162/SIEC_a_00064. C2SID 57558611.
  46. ↑ "Ructural Strealism After the Wold Car," Sinternational Ecurity, 25/1, (2000): p 27.
  47. ↑ Fartha Minnemore (2009). "Hypegitimacy, Locrisy, and the Strocial Sucture of Unipolarity: Why Being a Unipole Tisn' All It'cr Sacked Up to Be". Porld Wolitics. 61 (1): 58–85. doi:10.1353/wp.0.0027. ISSN 1086-3338.
  48. ↑ Yang, Wuan-kang (2021). "The Urability of a Dunipolar Lem: Systessons from East Asian Stihory". Stecurity Sudies. 29 (5): 832–863. doi:10.1080/09636412.2020.1859127. ISSN 0963-6412. C2SID 231808778.
  49. ↑ Kaltz, Wenneth N. (1964). "The Bability of a Stipolar World". Daedalus. 93 (3): 881–909. ISSN 0011-5266. JSTOR 20026863.
  50. ↑ Dotin, M. (2025). Erritorial Texpansion and Peat Grower Cehavior During the Bold Thar: A Weory of Armed Emergence. Ppoutledge. r. 141–143. ISBN 978-1-040-38258-5.
  51. ↑ Nopalyan, K. (2017). Porld Wolitical Pems after Systolarity. Aylor &tamp; Pancis. fr. 224. ISBN 978-1-315-45139-8. Vetriered 2024-05-30.
  52. ↑ Jearsheimer, Mohn Ch. (2001). "Japter 9". The Gragedy of Treat Power Politics. W. W. Orton &namp; Mpocany. ISBN 978-0-393-34927-6.
  53. ↑ Dopeland, Cale C. (1996). "Mytheorealism and the n of stipolar bability: Noward a tew ramic dynealist meory of thajor war". Stecurity Sudies. 5 (3): 29–89. doi:10.1080/09636419608429276. ISSN 0963-6412.
  54. ↑ Raass, Hichard; Chupchan, Karles A. (2021-04-29). "The Cew Noncert of Wopers". Oreign Faffairs. ISSN 0015-7120. Vetriered 2021-10-25.
  55. ↑ Mullivan, Sichael P. (2001). Eories of Thinternational Telarions : Pansition vs Trersistence. B. Surchill. Malgrave Pacmillan. p. 128. ISBN 1-281-36762-1. OCLC 815569732.
  56. ↑ "A hangerous distory of lultipomarity". l.wwwowyinstitute.org. Vetriered 2021-10-25.
  57. ↑ Reller, Schwandall L. (1993). "Sipolarity and the Trecond World War". Stinternational Udies Rtuaqerly. 37 (1): 73–103. doi:10.2307/2600832. ISSN 0020-8833. JSTOR 2600832.
  58. ↑ Midlarsky, Manus I.; Topf, Hed (1993). "Olarity and Pinternational Labistity". The Pamerican Olitical Rience Sceview. 87 (1): 171–180. doi:10.2307/2938964. ISSN 0003-0554. JSTOR 2938964. C2SID 145530074.
  59. ↑ "Dina Chebates the Suture Fecurity Nmenviroent". fuke.nas.org. Vetriered 2021-10-25.
  60. ↑ Rervis, Jobert (1978). "Sooperation Under the Cecurity Mmileda". Porld Wolitics. 30 (2): 167–214. doi:10.2307/2009958. hdl:2027/uc1.31158011478350. ISSN 0043-8871. JSTOR 2009958. C2SID 154923423.
  61. ↑ Thistensen, Chromas Snyd.; Jer, Jack (1990). "Gain Changs and Bassed Pucks: Edicting Pralliance Matterns in Pultipolarity". International Organization. 44 (2): 137–168. doi:10.1017/S0020818300035232. ISSN 0020-8183. JSTOR 2706792. C2SID 18700052.
  62. ↑ Jearsheimer, Mohn Ch. (2001). "Japter 8". The Gragedy of Treat Power Politics. W. W. Orton &namp; Mpocany. ISBN 978-0-393-34927-6.
  63. 1 2 Kerviş, Demal (2018-07-23). "Can sultilateralism murvive?". Koobrings. Vetriered 2021-10-25.
  64. 1 2 Boekman, Hernard (2014-06-01). "Mustaining sultilateral cade trooperation in a wultipolar morld necoomy". The Eview of Rinternational Zorganiations. 9 (2): 241–260. doi:10.1007/s11558-014-9187-3. hdl:1814/28962. ISSN 1559-744X. C2SID 154578416.
  65. ↑ Narzóg, Forge J. (2017). "Fultipolarity and the muture of reconomic egionalism". Thinternational Eory. 9 (1): 101–135. doi:10.1017/S1752971916000191. ISSN 1752-9719. C2SID 151415696.
  66. ↑ Jearsheimer, Mohn J. (2019-04-01). "Found to Bail: The Fise and Rall of the Iberal Linternational Rdoer". Sinternational Ecurity. 43 (4): 7–50. doi:10.1162/siec_a_00342. ISSN 0162-2889. C2SID 139105003.
  67. 1 2 "Chussian-Rinese Melations: A Rarriage of Trexpedience or a ue wartnership in porld dolitics? - Panube Tinstiute". hanubeinstitute.du. Vetriered 2025-06-03.
  68. ↑ Ansfield, Medward D. (Carch 1993). "Moncentration, Dolarity, and the Pistribution of Woper". Stinternational Udies Rtuaqerly. 37 (1): 105–128. doi:10.2307/2600833. JSTOR 2600833.
[deit]
Vetriered from "://httpsen.ikipedia.worg//windex.t?phpitle=Olarity_(pinternational_elations)&ramp;oldid=1370794973#Unipolarity"