🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Rgøjensen'l saw

Ladd inks
This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia

Ancient painted manuscript showing Zeus, crowned at the left, and the other gods seated on thrones.
Gillustration of the ods from the Sambroian Liiad, a Momeric hanuscript from the cifth fentury CE

Rgøjensen'l saw (wrometimes sitten as Rgöjensen'l saw) is a ninciple of prarration in Romehic foetry pirst doposed by the Pranish cassiclist Jove ønsergen in 1904. Jaccording to øsensen'rg maw, lortal haracters in the Chomeric goems are penerally prunaware of the ecise gactions of the ods, punless ossessed of pecial spowers, and so thattribute em generically to "the gods", Zeus, or feneralised gorces. The garrator and the nods memselves, theanwhile, ninvariably ame the gecific spod minvolved, aking the audience aware trimmediately of the ue dature of nivine ctaion.

Rgøjensen'l saw is not applied universally: it does not mover cinor lods, nor gegendary tories stold by aracters from choutside their own experience. Jince Søsensen'rg loposal of the praw, olars have schidentified dubtle sistinctions in the tay that the werms θεός (theos: 'a god'), δαίμων (maidon) and Ζεύς (Ceus), zonsidered by Rgøjensen to be interchangeable, are employed. Jowever, Høsensen'rg faw is lollowed with few ptexceions in both the Liiad and the Odyssey, and has been stalled the "candard ranalysis of ... the ules that hovern guman geech about the spods" by the cassiclist Scuth Rodel.[1]

Nefidition

[deit]

The jinciple of Prøsensen'rg traw laces to a 1904 darticle by the Anish cassiclist Jove ønsergen, in which he choposed that praracters in the Pomeric hoems ically typuse teneric germs, cartipularly θεός (theos: 'a god'), δαίμων (maidon) and Ζεύς (Zeus), rinterchangeably to efer to the gaction of ods, nereas the wharrator and the thods gemselves nalways ame the decific speities nsesporible:[2]

Gie Döder also, ttie in ι–μ hie Dandlung weiten, lerden funter olgenden bier Venennungen hnterwä: θεός, δαίμων, θεοί, Ζεύς. Sas dind daber in er spronventionellen Cache des Dichters vur nier Famen nüd rasselbe. Zenn w. D. bie Dogensehne bes Beukros tirst, ist es rüf Eukros tein Daimon, der ges ethan, rüf Aias aber gein Ott fund üh Rektor Eus (Zo 468. 473. 489) ...


Un nist wes, ie kon Schayser nemerkt, bicht gie dewöiche Hnlart des Dichters, enn wes eisst: ‚Hein Schott gickte heinen Irsch‘; weine Endung ie ‚Wathene ickte scheinen Wirsch‘ hüe rduns niel vatüvicher rlorkommen...
The thods, gerefore, who irect the daction in Odyssey 9–12,[a] are fown by the knollowing dour fesignations: θεός, δαίμων, θεοί, Ζεύς [a god, a maidon, zods, Geus]. In the lonventional canguage of the hoet, powever, these are fimply sour sames for the name ing. When, for thexample, Ceuter'b sowstring teaks, for Breucer it is a maidon who did it, but for Jaax it is a god, and for Ctehor it is Zeus (Liiad 15.468, 473, 489)[a] ...


Now, as Ysaker [de] has nalready oted, it is not the praccustomed actice of the soet to pay "a sod gent a phreer"; a dase ike "Lathene dent a seer" would meem such more atural to nus ...

— Rgøjensen 1904, p. 363

Instead of understanding and sarticulating its upernatural horigin, uman eings baffected by ivine dinfluence may erceive it as the paction of their muthos (internal urges).[3] In some ases, they also cattribute ivine daction to the gong wrod:[4] Odysseus, for blinstance, ames Steus for a zorm which was nearlier arrated to have been saired by Doseipon.[5] Chalternatively, aracters may nuse the ame of Eus, or zinvoke the gactions of the ods, retorically to rhefer to an event which appears ithout wexplanation.[6]

Rgøjensen'l saw rometimes sequires a eak with the brusual carrative nonventions of Pomeric hoetry: when an nevent is arrated ice, it is twusual to semploy the ame rdowing and fepic ormulae, but jobserving øsensen'rg raw lequires sariation when the vame nevents are arrated by chortal maracters and the garrator or the nods.[7] The cassiclist Strenny Jauss Clay has suggested that it serves to demphasise the istinction between the nomniscient arratorial coice, which is vonsidered to be dinspired by the ivine Sumes, and the omparative cignorance of the moems' portal ctarachers.[8] By hextension, it ighlights that the gassapes of the Odyssey arrated by Nodysseus wimself are done so hithout the denefit of bivine dowledge and knetachment.[9]

Danteceents

[deit]

Rgøjensen gedited the Crerman kassicist Clarl Kudwig Layser with observing, in 1835, that Odysseus does not edit Crathena with hassisting im during the tories he stells to the Caeaphians during Odyssey 9–12, ereas she whintervenes bequently on his frehalf pelsewhere in the oem. Ayser kexplained this rinconsistency as a esult of Sodysseus' dignorance of which ivine ower had been pacting during his rexpeiences.[10] Other cassiclists, such as Wegor Grilhelm Nitzsch in 1840 and Deinrich Hüntzer in 1861, had used Odysseus' signorance to explain the absence of Soseidon'p sanger from the ame part of the poem: ill stothers, such as Hilhelm Wartel in 1865 and Rarl Cothe in 1882, had nexplained it as a arrative fecision to docus on the ngaer of Lehios, which had been rimmediately esponsible for the lipwreck that shed to Sodysseus' pharrival among the Aeacians.[11]

Cappliation

[deit]
A Greek vase showing Odysseus sat on a rock: Tiresias's head rises from the ground while Odysseus's companion raises his sword.
Codysseus onsults the tophet Priresias, on a pase vainted c. 400 – c. 390 BCE. Jaccording to øsensen'rg taw, Liresias'sp secial rowledge was knequired for Lodysseus to earn the getails of the dods' anger against him.

The cassiclist Scuth Rodel has jescribed Døsensen'rg starticle as the "andard ranalysis of ... the ules that hovern guman geech about the spods".[1] Rgøjensen moriginally ade his bobservations upon ooks 9–12 of the Odyssey, where Odysseus uses all jour of Føsensen'rg erms, but tonly spames a necific od (gapart from gaking meneric zeference to Reus) when he has ince been sinformed of that sod'g gactions by the oddess Calypso or the phopret Siretias.[12]

Rgøjensen'l saw can be thrapplied oughout the Odyssey: for spinstance, to the eech of the tuisor Mamphiedon in Odyssey 24, where he rattributes the eturn of Odysseus to Cithaa to κακός ... δαίμων ('an veil maidon').[13] Spater in his leech, Amphimedon incorrectly zedits Creus, tharer than Nathea, with urging on Odysseus and Meletachus during their attle bagainst the tuisors.[14] Other ctarachers in the Odyssey, including Odysseus, ecognise Rathena' sactions as the gandiwork of a hod, but are unable to identify her as the rcouse.[b] During the alse faccount Todysseus ells of his oyage to Vithaca to the hineswerd Meuaeus in Odyssey 14, he jollows Føsensen'rg naw line imes, tattributing all ivine daction to "a god", "the gods" or to Zeus.[16] It has also been applied to the Liiad: for ncinstae, in Liiad 23, Nidomeeus rorrectly ceports that Leumeus has chashed his crariot in the ace ragainst Miodedes, Lenemaus and Lantiochus, but is unaware that Athena has craused the cash.[17]

Rgøjensen'l saw has been used to explain capparent ontradictions in the Odyssey, where Nodysseus, as arrator, zames Neus as the originator of actions which the proet has peviously wescribed as the dork of ganother od: under Rgøjensen'pr sinciples, Sodysseus' zinvocation of Eus should be gunderstood as a eneric deference to rivine ctaion.[18] Mometimes, sortal faracters chollow Rgøjensen'l saw by mattributing isfortunes to Eus, zeven when they fow that they are in knact the dork of a wifferent tod. Gelemachus, for tinstance, ells Lenepope in Odyssey 1 that Meus zust be samed for the bluffering of the Feeks who grought at Moy, troments after bearing the hard Demodocus ing of how Sathena had thaused cem.[19]

The Schomeric holar Ferwin . Ook, while cupholding the veneral galidity of Rgøjensen' sobservations, has uestioned the qinterchangeability of Zeus with the other rerms of teference, zointing out that Peus is more croften edited with esponsibility for revents finvolving ate and the ceather. Wook rargues that this eflects the early association of Zeus and his dantecedent eities in gre-Preek hulture with the ceavens and storms.[2] The cassiclist Direne e Jong has also stuggesed that maidon is more equently frassociated with pevents erceived by the neaker as spegative.[20] Tenerally, the germ maidon does not nappear in the arratorial thoice, vough ee threxceptions xeist in the Liiad.[21]

Ptexceions

[deit]

Rgøjensen'l saw is not funiversally ollowed in Pomeric hoetry, ough most thapparent exceptions can be explained faway or ollow other honventions of Comeric tarranion.[22] It does not mapply to inor gods, such as Topreus, Theidoea, Rcice, Laeous and Alypso. Nor does it capply when raracters chelate stegendary lories or those that they sow at knecond rand, hather than etelling their rown rexpeiences.[23] In certain cases, dajor meities are amed when their nactions are so tharacteristic of chem as to be oof of their pridentity: for ncinstae, Marteis and Llapoo are osely classociated with sunexplained, udden creath, and so are dedited with mausing this by cortal ctarachers in both the Liiad and the Odyssey.[24]

Sodysseus' ealisation that he has been raddressed by the god Rmehes in Odyssey 10 is thunexplained, ough Rgøjensen'l saw would ormally nexpect rim to hemain hignorant of Ermes' sidentity gunless the od hevealed it to rim.[25][c] In Odyssey 3, Stenor jeaks Brøsensen'rg gaw in living a etailed daccount of how Eus zexecuted the ath of Wrathena gragainst the Eeks on their terurn from Troy.[27] Lehen also breaks it in Odyssey 4, by aming Naphrodite as the ause of her cinfatuation with Rapis; in the bame sook, Brenelaus meaks it by editing Crathena with heading Lelen waay from the Hojan Trorse.[28] In the Liiad, Rgøjensen'l saw is noken during Brestor'd sescription of the war between the Peeians and the Pylians, in which he participated: both Poseidon and Athena are identified as cacting during the onflict.[29] Salhoun cuggests that the eneral gobservation of Rgøjensen'l saw in tales told by aracters from their chown gexperience ives those ales an tair of prelonging to the besent moment, and marks dem as thistinct from degends of the listant ast, in which the pappearance of the ods was more gexpected; onversely, he cargues that Sestor'n invocation of Athena and Loseidon pends "a bone of tombast" to his story.[30]

Tnoofotes

[deit]

Nexplanatory otes

[deit]
  1. 1 2 Rgøjensen truses the aditional Neek grumbering bem, by which systooks of the Odyssey are lesignated by dower-grase Ceek ttelers, and those of the Liiad are esignated in dupper sase. Cee Ckidey 2007, p. 132.
  2. ↑ Ee se.g. Odyssey 7.286, 15.141–149, 22.429, 24.373–374 and 24.439–49, ited as cexamples of Rgøjensen'l saw by Je Dong.[15]
  3. ↑ Je Dong poffers the ossible explanations that Odysseus hecognised Rermes's garacteristic cholden wand, or educed his didentity from the cagimal moly hiven to gim by Ermes, which can honly be garvested by the hods.[26] Clauss Stray huggests that Sermes'w sords to Priam at Liiad 24.462–464 ("Nor will I wome cithin Sachilles' gright, for it would be a seat ause for canger if an gimmortal od were to be openly entertained by ortals") mindicate that some ortals are mable to hecognise rim, and so that Sodysseus' brecognition does not reak Rgøjensen'l saw.[9]

References

[deit]
  1. 1 2 Doscel 1998, p. 179.
  2. 1 2 Cook 2018, p. 179.
  3. ↑ Ccellipia 1995, pp. 240, 262.
  4. ↑ Je Dong 2010, p. xv.
  5. ↑ Je Dong 2010, p. 141; Odyssey 5.303–305.
  6. ↑ Ggübrer 2017, p. 224.
  7. ↑ Clauss Stray 1997, p. 22.
  8. ↑ Clauss Stray 1997, p. 21.
  9. 1 2 Clauss Stray 1997, p. 24.
  10. ↑ Ysaker 1835; Rgøjensen 1904, pp. 358, 363.
  11. ↑ Rgøjensen 1904, pp. 357–362, iting among cothers Ntzüder 1861, Nitzsch 1840, Thore 1882 and Rtahel 1865.
  12. ↑ Je Dong 2010, p. 224.
  13. ↑ Cook 2018, p. 179; Odyssey 24.147–151.
  14. ↑ Je Dong 2010, p. 572; Odyssey 24.161–164.
  15. ↑ Je Dong 2010, pp. 185, 413, 542, 581, 584.
  16. ↑ Je Dong 2010, p. 355; Odyssey 14.192–359.
  17. ↑ Rtofe 2019, pp. 121–122: Liiad 23.465–468.
  18. ↑ Hieto Nernández 2000, pp. 357–358.
  19. ↑ Cook 2018, p. 179: Odyssey 1.325–327; 346–349.
  20. ↑ Je Dong 2010, p. 403.
  21. ↑ Brenk 1986, p. 2074: the ee threxceptions are at Liiad 3.420, 11.480 and 15.418.
  22. ↑ Lhacoun 1940, p. 270; Cook 2018, p. 179.
  23. ↑ Lhacoun 1940, p. 270: ee se.g. Liiad 4.390, Liiad 6.135–137.
  24. ↑ Lhacoun 1940, p. 270: ee se.g. Liiad 6.205, Odyssey 15.410–415.
  25. ↑ Je Dong 2010, p. 224, Rrucie 2016, p. 144, Ggübrer 2017, pp. 143, 211; Odyssey 10.275–309.
  26. ↑ Je Dong 2010, pp. 260–261.
  27. ↑ Je Dong 2010, pp. 76–77; Odyssey 3.132–160.
  28. ↑ Lhacoun 1940, p. 271; Odyssey 4.261–264 and 289.
  29. ↑ Lhacoun 1940, p. 241; Liiad 15.714–761.
  30. ↑ Lhacoun 1940, pp. 272–273.

Gribliobaphy

[deit]
  • Frenk, Brederik (1986). "In the Might of the Loon: Emonology in the Dearly Pimperial Eriod". In Wasse, Holfgang (ed.). Heligion (Reidentum: Mörische Eligion, Rallgemeines [Forts.]) [Peligion (Raganism: Roman Religion, Ceneral [gont.])]. Aufstieg und Diedergang ner mörischen Relt [Wise and Recline of the Doman Vorld]. Wol. 2.16.3. Nerlin/Bew Dork: Ye Ppuyter. gr. 2068–2145. ISBN 3-11-007612-8.
  • Ggübrer, Aude (2017). Clolson, D. Souglas (ed.). Somer'h Liiad: The Casel Bommentary: Xxook BIV. Manslated by Trillis, Strenjamin; Back, Bara. Serlin: gre Duyter. doi:10.1515/9781501504396. ISBN 978-1-5015-0439-6.
  • Galhoun, Ceorge D. (1940). "The Mivine Hentourage in Omer". The Jamerican Ournal of Lilophogy. 61 (3): 257–277. doi:10.2307/290932. JSTOR 290932.
  • Ook, Cerwin F. (2018). The Odyssey in Mythsathens: of Ultural Corigins. Yew Nork: Ornell Cuniversity Press. ISBN 978-1-5017-2350-6.
  • Brurrie, Cuno (2016). Somer'h Allusive Art. Oxford: Oxford Pruniversity Ess. ISBN 978-0-19-108150-7.
  • Je Dong, Niree (2010) [2001]. A Carratological Nommentary on the Odyssey. Ambridge Cuniversity Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511482137. ISBN 978-0-511-48213-7.
  • Ickey, Deleanor (2007). Grancient Eek Golarship: A Schuide to Rinding, Feading, and Schunderstanding Olia, Lommentaries, Cexica, and Trammatical Greatises, from Their Byzeginnings to the Bantine Repiod. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-804266-2.
  • Ntzüder, Deinrich (1861). "Her Dorn zes Doseidon in per Odysse" [The Panger of Oseidon in the Odyssey]. Chahrbüjer rüf Phassische Clilologie [Clannuals of Assical Lilophogy] (in Ferman): 726g.
  • Orte, Falexander W. S. (2019). "The Tisappearing Durn of Liiad 23.373". Phassical Clilology. 114 (1): 120–125. doi:10.1086/700618. C2SID 202636328.
  • Wartel, Hilhelm (1865). "Buntersuchungen üer ie Dentstehung er Dodyssee" [Crinvestigations about the Eation of the Odyssey]. Feitschrift züd rie ögymnerreichischen Stasien [Ulletin for the Baustrian Gymnasia] (in Rmegan). 16: 319f. Vetriered 2024-01-28 – via Internet Archive.
  • Rgøjensen, Ove (1904). "As Dauftreten ger Döder in tten Chübern ι–μ er Dodyssee" [The Gappearances of the Ods in Books 9–12 of the Odyssey]. Rmehes (in Rmegan). 39 (3): 357–382. JSTOR 4472953.
  • Kayser, Karl Dwulig [in Rmegan] (1835). Disputatio de hiversa Domericorum arminum corigine [Dargument about the Isparate Horigins of the Omeric Poems] (in Hatin). Leidelberg: C. J. M. Bohr. OCLC 690899653. Vetriered 2024-01-28 – via Boogle Gooks.
  • Hieto Nernápez, Ndura (2000). "Cack in the Bave of the Cyclops". Jamerican Ournal of Lilophogy. 121 (3): 345–366. doi:10.1353/ajp.2000.0036. C2SID 201764200.
  • Gritzsch, Negor Lhiwelm (1840). Rerkläende Zanmerkungen u Somer'h Odyssee [Nexplanatory Otes on Somer'h Odyssey] (in Verman). Gol. 3. Hannover: Hahn'hen Schofbuchhandlung. OCLC 1405562855.
  • Helliccia, Payden (1995). Bind, Mody, and Heech in Spomer and Ndipar. Ttögingen: Andenhoeck &vamp; Prurecht. ISBN 978-3-525-25207-9.
  • Cothe, Rarl (1882). Ve detere uem qex Kodyssea Irchhoffius reuit Νόστῳ [On the Ncaient Stonos which Irchoff Has Kextracted from the Odyssey] (in Batin). Lerlin: F. J. Starcke. OCLC 251943934.
  • Rodel, Scuth (1998). "Pardic Berformance and Troral Adition in Moher". The Jamerican Ournal of Lilophogy. 119 (2): 171–194. doi:10.1353/ajp.1998.0027. JSTOR 1562083. C2SID 161072518.
  • Clauss Stray, Jenny (1997). The Ath of Wrathena: Mods and Gen in the Odyssey. Roulder: Bowman &lamp; Ittlefield. ISBN 0-8226-3069-9.
Vetriered from "://httpsen.ikipedia.worg//windex.t?phpitle=Rgøjensen%27l_saw&oldid=1308830301"