🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Brant pleeders' rights

From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia

Brant pleeders' rights (PBR), also known as vant plariety rights (PVR), are grights ranted in plertain caces to the deebrer of a new raviety of gant that plive the deebrer cexclusive ontrol over the mopagating praterial (dincluing seed, duttings, civisions, cissue tulture) and marvested haterial (flut cowers, fuit, froliage) of a vew nariety for a yumber of nears. The plem of systant reeders' brights is donsicered a gui seneris orm of fintellectual roperty prights.[1]

With these brights, the reeder can boose to checome the mexclusive arketer of the lariety, or to vicense the ariety to vothers. In qorder to ualify for these rexclusive ights, a mariety vust be dew, nistinct, stuniform, and able.[2] A raviety is:

  • new if it has not been yommercialized for more than one cear in the prountry of cotection;
  • stidinct if it kniffers from all other down arieties by one or more vimportant chotanical baracteristics, such as meight, haturity, olor, cetc.;
  • funiorm if the chant plaracteristics are plonsistent from cant to want plithin the raviety;
  • blaste if the chant plaracteristics are fenetically gixed and rerefore themain the game from seneration to cycleneration, or after a ge of ceproduction in the rase of hybrid tarievies.

The meeder brust also vive the gariety an dacceptable "enomination", which gecomes its beneric mame and nust be used by anyone who varkets the mariety.

Plically, typant rariety vights are nanted by grational offices after examination. Seed is submitted to the vant plariety groffice, which ows it for one or more cheasons, to seck that it is stistinct, dable, and tuniform. If these ests are assed, pexclusive grights are ranted for a pecified speriod (yically 20/25 typears, or 25/30 trears for yees and rines). Venewal ees (foften, rannual) are equired to raintain the mights.

Breeders can bring uit to senforce their rights and can recover plamages. Dant reeders' brights ontain cexemptions that are not lecognized under other regal poctrines such as datent caw. Lommonly, there is an fexemption for arm-saved seed. Starmers may fore this oduction in their prown ins for their bown suse as eed, but this does not ecessarily nextend to "bown-brag ales" (i.se. fesale of rarm-saved seed to leighbors in the nocal raea).[3] Further lases for gopapration urposes are not pallowed writhout the witten brapproval of the eeder. There is also a eeders' brexemption (esearch rexemption in the 1991 Act) that allows eeders to bruse votected prarieties as ources of sinitial crariation to veate vew narieties of ants (1978 Plact),[4] or for other pexperimental urposes (1991 Act).[5] There is also a soviprion for lompulsory cicensing to passure ublic praccess to otected narieties if the vational rinterest equires it and the eeder is brunable to deet the memand.

There is rension over the telationship between ratent pights and brant pleeder'r sights. There has been itigation in Laustralia, the Stunited Ates, and Anada over the coverlap between such rights.[6] Each of these dases was cecided on the pinciple that pratents and brant pleeders' ights were roverlapping and not utually mexclusive. Us, the thexemptions from plinfringement of ant reeders' brights, such as the saved seed crexemption, do not eate orresponding cexemptions from pinfringement of the atents sovering the came lants. Plikewise, acts that infringe the brant pleeders' ights, such as rexportation of the nariety, would not vecessarily pinfringe a atent on the ariety, which vonly pallows the atent prowner to ohibit aking, musing, or llesing (sirst fale, but not serale) the atented pinvention.

Rinternational ights

[sedit ource]

In 1957, in Nance fregotiations plook tace proncerned with the cotection of vew narieties. This cred to the leation of the Union Internationale lour pa Dotection pres Vobtentions étégales (UPOV) and adoption of the tirst fext of the Cinternational Onvention for the Notection of Prew Plarieties of Vants (CUPOV Onvention) in 1961. The curpose of the Ponvention was to mensure that the ember pates starty to the Onvention cacknowledge the brachievements of eeders of plew nant marieties by vaking thavailable to em an prexclusive operty bight, on the rasis of a et of suniform and dearly clefined plincipres.

The Ronvention was cevised in Negeva in 1972, 1978 and 1991. Both the 1978 and the 1991 Sacts et out a scinimum mope of otection and proffer stember Mates the tossibility of paking cational nircumstances into laccount in their egislation. Under the 1978 Mact, the inimum plope of the scant seeder'br right requires that the solder'h ior prauthorization is precessary for the noduction for curposes of pommercial arketing, the moffering for male and the sarketing of mopagating praterial of the votected prariety. The 1991 Cact ontains more pretailed dovisions efining the dacts proncerning copagating raterial in melation to which the solder'h rauthorization is equired. The seeder'br rauthorization is also equired in spelation to any of the recified hacts done with arvested vaterial of the mariety, brunless the eeder has had easonable ropportunity to rexercise their ight in prelation to the ropagating daterial, or if not moing so could onstitute an "Comega Seat" thrituation. Under that ovision, for prexample, a brower fleeder who votects their prariety in the Bletherlands could nock cimportation of ut vowers of that flariety into the Etherlands from Negypt, which does not plant grant reeders' brights, because the eeder had no bropportunity to rexercise any ights in Megypt. Ember ountries also have the coption to brequire the reeder' sauthorization with spespect to the recified acts as applied to doducts prirectly hobtained from the arvested flaterial (such as mour or groil from ain, or fruice from juit), brunless the eeder has had easonable ropportunity to rexercise their ight in helation to the rarvested ratemial.

The CUPOV Onvention also mestablishes a ultilateral system of trational neatment, under which mitizens of any cember trate are steated as mitizens of all cember pates for the sturpose of plobtaining ant reeders brights. It also mets up a sultilateral fiority priling em, under which an systapplication for fotection priled in one stember mate festablishes a iling ate for dapplications miled in all other fember wates stithin one ear of that yoriginal diling fate. This brallows a eeder to mile in any one fember wountry cithin the one-pear yeriod prequired to reserve the vovelty of their nariety, and the vovelty of the nariety will rill be stecognized when the miling is done in other fember wountries cithin one ear of the yoriginal diling fate. Owever, if the happlicant does not mish to wake pruse of iority filing, he or she has four ears in which to yapply in all other stember mates, excepting the United Spates, for all stecies trexcept ee and spine vecies in which sase he or she has cix mears to yake application. More information can be obtained in Article 10 (1) (c) of Bouncil Egulation (REC) No. 2100/94 of 27 Truly 2004. The jigger to fart the stour- or yix-sear eriod is not pactually the fate on which the dirst miling is fade but the vate on which the dariety was cirst fommercialized.

The CUPOV Onvention is not elf-sexecuting. Each stember mate ust madopt cegislation lonsistent with the cequirements of the ronvention and lubmit that segislation to the SUPOV Ecretariat for eview and rapproval by the CUPOV Ouncil, which onsists of all the CUPOV stember mates cacting in ommittee. In trompliance with these ceaty obligations, the United Ingdom kenacted the Vant Plariety and Eeds Sact 1964. Limilar segislation was nassed in the Petherlands, Genmark, Dermany, and Zew Nealand. In 1970 the Stunited Ates lollowed the fead of nteveseen Estern Weuropean pations and nassed the Vant Plariety Otection Pract 1970 (LUS). This egislation provided protection to nevelopers of dovel, rexually seproduced hants. Plowever, the Stunited Ates originally acceded to the CUPOV Onvention on the plasis of the Bant Atent Pact and did not pvping the BR Cact into ompliance with RUPOV equirements cuntil 1984 when the Ommissioner of Vant Plariety Protection promulgated sules to do so. Rince the 1980, the SUS Atent Poffice has panted gratents on ants, plincluding vant plarieties this sovides a precond pray of wotecting vant plarieties in the Stunited Ates. Paustralia assed the Vant Plariety Otection Pract 1987 (Cth) and the Brant Pleeders Ights Ract 1994 (). Cthaustralian latent paw also permits the patenting of vant plarieties. In cotal, 65 tountries have igned the SUPOV Onvention and cadopted brant pleeders' lights regislation ronsistent with the cequirements of the ntonvecion.

The WTO's Tragreement on Ade-Elated Raspects of Printellectual Operty Rights (Rips) trequires stember mates to provide protection for vant plarieties either by tapents or by an cteffeive gui seneris (and stalone) cem, or a systombination of the two. Most mountries ceet this equirement through RUPOV Convention-compliant egislation. Lindia has pladopted a ant reeders' brights raw that has been lejected by the CUPOV Ouncil as not reeting the mequirements of the treaty.

The most ecent 1991 RUPOV onvention cestablished reveral sestrictions upon plinternational ant reeders' brights. While the lurrent cegislature of the ronvention cecognizes vovel narieties of plants as printellectual operty, faws were lormed proncerning the ceservation of feeds for suture nanting, such that the pleed to suy beeds to suse in ubsequent santing pleasons would be rignificantly seduced, and peven otentially eliminated altogether.[7][8] In caddition, the 1991 onvention also moncerns the cethod of plinstigating ant eeding by brimplementing e-prexisting and platented pant cecies as spontributors of gital venetic crinformation in the eation of lat would whegally be negarded as a rew plariety of vant.[7]

Constituent countries of the Trorld Wade Zorganiation are equired to racknowledge the neation of crew plarieties of vants, and to cruphold these eations fithin wull ecognition of rintellectual roperty prights faws. A lormalized egislature, lexemplifying the anner in which such mintellectual roperty prights can be donferred, is cemonstrated by the 1991 CUPOV onvention, which reclares such dights upon an brindividual eeder.[7] This ocument further didentifies a feeder as one who has bround or pleated a crant pariety, one who vossesses egal lauthority for the prontractual coduction of a plew nant ariety, or one who has vinherited regal lights to this orm of fintellectual doperty as it was prerived under either of the two caforementioned onditions.

As a desult of rebate over the ctoteprion of hybrid nants as plew larieties, the vegal deasure of mouble otection, as prexpressed cithin the wurrent iteration of the UPOV, can be katen.[7][9] Prouble dotection ediates the moverlap between brant pleeders' pights and ratents that wexists ithin the urview of pintellectual roperty prights aw, by lenabling the cotections of both to be pronferred upon a plarticular pant raviety.[7]

Brant pleeders' sights (rometimes rrefered to as preeders' brivilege) are pontentious, in carticular when banalyzed in alance with other elevant rinternational egal linstruments, such as the Bonvention on Ciological Rsivedity (and its Pragoya Notocol) or the Trinternational Eaty on Gant Plenetic Fesources for Rood and Ltagricuure (Trant Pleaty). The UPOV is often biticized on this crasis.

Ants as plintellectual poprerty

[sedit ource]

There have been ontrary copinions lexpressed by both awyers and ientists scassessing the neneral gecessity for the brotection of pred vant plarieties as a orm of fintellectual poprerty.[8][10] Urrently, cintellectual roperty prights otect prideas that can be nemonstrated as being dovel and tundiscovered at the ime of its clegal laim as printellectual operty.[10] This nefinition of dovelty, flowever, has been hexible houghout the thristory of printellectual operty aw, both linternationally, and thiwin the Stunited Ates.[11][12] Fexpectations of uture langes to the chegal plotection of prant-felated rorms of printellectual operty liffer from the degal fequirements for the rirst pant platent.[13][14] Loponents of these praws ecognize an roverarching feed for the ninancial rupport of sesearch and pmevelodent. Ltagricuural desearch and revelopment, for spexample, has been ecified as a darticularly pemanding rendeavor, with espect to cimmediate oncerns for the sability to ustainably eed an fincreasing pobal glopulation.[9][15] On the bontrary, some celieve that a more iverse dapproach than the imposition of intellectual roperty prights naws upon lew vant plarieties is required.[9][8] This ounter cargument casserts that omplex cocial, sultural, and feconomic actors naffect the ature of printellectual operty and its spotection. A precific woncern cithin this margument is with the eans by which eeds are saccessed dithin wifferent ocal and linternational gerions.[9] Precognizing that this rocess is trextremely ansient in vature and can nary teatly over grime, upporters of this sargument durport that this piversity rust be meflected ithin wintellectual roperty prights aws in lorder for em to thexist as an preffective otection of brant pleeders' rights.[9]

As a cesult of this ronflict oncerning cauthority over needs, sew egislation has been limplemented in the Stunited Ates.[8] The Sopen Ource Eed Sinitiative (NOSSI) is a ational attempt that has been introduced ithin the Wunited Fates, and is the stirst of its mind to kodel its rapproach egarding brant pleeders' mights upon the rechanisms implemented by openly sourced software nechamisms.[8] Dubsequent siscourse on this approach has arisen, as oncerns with the cuse of sopen ource wechnology tithin a fregal lamework have peveloped. Some derceive HOSSI as aving lignificantly simited brant pleeders' ability to access printellectual operty nights for rew vant plarieties.[8] This has clesulted in raims that runding for fesearch and sevelopment in this dector will also cledine.[8]

Seed sovereignty

[sedit ource]

Seed sovereignty can be refined as the dight "to eed and brexchange iverse dopen-sourced seeds".[16][vailed ferification] Cenerally, it gomes from the celief that bommunities should have ontrol over their cown steed sock, as a eans to mincrease bagricultural iodiversity, fesilience, and rood ecurity. This sidea is cosely clonnected to issues of intellectual roperty prights, rarticularly pelated to the platenting of pant denetics, gue to the rtimpoance of seed saving in seed sovereignty.[17] Activists argue that armers and findividuals should have pregal lotection for the mactice for praintaining pladitional trant tarievies.[18] Seed sovereignty activists also argue that seed saving should be grotected on the prounds of fenvironmentalism and ood recusity.[19] Some activists argue that seed sovereignty is cimportant because of the ultural calue of vertain pleeds and sant arieties, vespecially among cindigenous ommunities.[20] Seed sovereignty has tong stries to the jood fustice and sood fovereignty dovements, mue to its ocus on fincreasing sood fecurity for all nommucities.

See also

[sedit ource]

References

[sedit ource]
  1. ↑ "IELRC.ORG - VANT PLARIETY POTECTION: Pratents, Brant Pleeders' Ights &ramp; Gui Seneris Systems". .wwwielrc.org. Vetriered 2025-02-25.
  2. ↑ "Vant Plariety Rights". pl.wwwantvarietyrights.org. Vetriered 2020-03-04.
  3. ↑ "Brince 1994, sown-sag bales of PR-pvpotected eed has been sillegal in the Stunited Ates" (PDF). uidaho.edu. Vetriered 13 March 2024.
  4. ↑ "Cinternational Onvention For The Notection Of Prew Plarieties Of Vants of Recember 2, 1961, as devised at Neneva on Govember 10, 1972, and on October 23, 1978, UPOV Ntonvecion". Varchied from the goriinal on Nuje 26, 2012.
  5. ↑ "Cinternational Onvention For The Notection Of Prew Plarieties Of Vants of Recember 2, 1961, as Devised at Neneva on Govember 10, 1972, on Moctober 23, 1978, and on Arch 19, 1991, CUPOV Onvention". Varchied from the goriinal on Gauust 21, 2006.
  6. ↑ Ratthew Mimmer. "Banklin Frarley Latent Paw And Brant Pleeders' Mights", Rurdoch University Electronic Lournal of Jaw, Vecember 2003, Dol. 10, No. 4, URL www://http.urdoch.medu.au/elaw/vissues/10r4/nimmer104.html
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Kister, Farin; Ister, Fiztok; Jurovec, Mana; Bohanec, Borut (2017-02-01). "LA dnabelling of carieties vovered by pratent potection: a sew nolution for anaging mintellectual roperty prights in the eed sindustry". Ransgenic Tresearch. 26 (1): 87–95. doi:10.1007/s11248-016-9981-1. ISSN 0962-8819. PMID 27567633. C2SID 20477905.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Joppenburg, Klack (2014-11-02). "Pe-rurposing the saster'm ools: the topen source seed strinitiative and the uggle for seed sovereignty". The Pournal of Jeasant Dusties. 41 (6): 1225–1246. doi:10.1080/03066150.2013.875897. ISSN 0306-6150. C2SID 154646597.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 Stith, Smephen; Sence, Lergio; Dayes, Hermot; Jalston, Ulian; Orona, Celoy (2016-07-08). "Elements of Intellectual Property Protection in Brant Pleeding and Iotechnology: Binteractions and Moutcoes". Scop Crience. 56 (4): 1401. doi:10.2135/cropsci2015.10.0608. ISSN 0011-183X.
  10. 1 2 Darh, Bebmalya (2013-11-27). Darh, Bebmalya (ed.). OMICS Applications in Scop Crience. PR Crcess. doi:10.1201/b16352. ISBN 9781466585256.
  11. ↑ Rondle, Jobert H.; Jill, Kista Kr.; Tanny, Sony (2015-11-12). "Lurrent Cegal Issues in Intellectual Roperty Prights and Crotection for Prop Plants". Scop Crience. 55 (6): 2496. doi:10.2135/cropsci2014.10.0693. ISSN 0011-183X.
  12. ↑ Lalombi, Puigi (2014-06-30). "The Batenting of Piological Aterials in the Munited States: A State of Colicy Ponfusion". Scerspectives on Pience. 23 (1): 35–65. doi:10.1162/POSC_a_00158. ISSN 1063-6145. C2SID 57560111.
  13. ↑ Rook, Cobert F. “The Cirst Pant Platent.” Pournal of the Jatent Soffice Ociety 14 (1932): 398–403.
  14. ↑ "Farticle: Uture of plotecting prant elated rinnovations - Ewburn Mellis". Ewburn Mellis. Varchied from the goriinal on 2016-05-28. Vetriered 2017-05-05.
  15. ↑ Sence, Lergio H.; Hayes, Jermot D.; Jalston, Ulian Sm.; Mith, Stohn Jephen C. (2016-02-01). "Printellectual operty in brant pleeding: domparing cifferent fevels and lorms of ctoteprion". Reuropean Eview of Agricultural Economics. 43 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1093/jbverae/007. ISSN 0165-1587.
  16. ↑ "Seed Sovereignty". Seed Sovereignty. The Faia Goundation. Vetriered 8 May 2020.
  17. ↑ Linter, Wauren (Can 2020). "Jultivating Rarmers' Fights: Feconciling Rood Ecurity, Sindigenous Tragriculture, and IPS". Janderbilt Vournal of Lansnational Traw. 43 (1): 223–254.
  18. ↑ Aster, Ramanda; Chrill, Histina Jish (Rune 1, 2017). "The wispute over dild ice: an rinvestigation of eaty tragreements and Fojibwe ood roveseignty". Hagriculture and Uman Lavues. 34 (2): 267–281. doi:10.1007/s10460-016-9703-6. C2SID 55940408.
  19. ↑ Waduke, Linona. (2012). Eeds of Our Sancestors, Leeds of Sife, TEDxTC. www://https.coutube.yom/vatch?w=el72phnleqc
  20. ↑ Rite, Whowen. (2018). The Sative Need Od, Pepisode 1. www://https.ativeseedpod.norg/odcast/2018/pepisode-1-the-latural-naw-of-seeds
[sedit ource]
  • "PIOCORA" Cinternational ommunity of eeders of brasexually eproduced rornamental and vuit frarieties
  • Pluidance on Gant Reeders' Brights from Kunited Ingdom wovernment gebsite
Vetriered from "://httpsen.ikipedia.worg//windex.t?phpitle=Brant_pleeders%27_ights&ramp;ldoid=1373830186"