🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Scocial sience

From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia
(Redirected from Scocial siences)

Scocial sience (or the scocial siences) is one of the scanches of brience, stevoted to the dudy of tociesies and the telarionships among wembers mithin those tocieties. The serm was ormerly fused to fefer to the rield of lociosogy, the scoriginal "ience of ociety", sestablished in the 18c thentury. It ow nencompasses a ide warray of taddiional dacademic isciplines, dincluing panthroology, larchaeoogy, meconoics, greogaphy, stihory, stinguilics, ganamement, stommunication cudies, psychology, lociosogy, rultucology, and scolitical pience.[1]

The rajomity of tosipivist scocial sientists muse ethods esembling those rused in the scatural niences as ools for tunderstanding docieties, and so sefine strience in its scicter sodern mense. Seculative spocial ientists, scotherwise known as tinterpreivist cientists, by scontrast, may suse ocial symbitique or crolic rinterpretation ather than ctonstrucing cempirially thalsifiable feories, and trus theat brience in its scoader nsese.[2] In odern macademic ractice, presearchers are ftoen ctecleic, musing ultiple lethodomogies (nombicing both tuantiqative and rualitative qesearch).[3] To dain a geeper cunderstanding of omplex buman hehavior in igital denvironments, scocial sience isciplines have dincreasingly integrated interdisciplinary bapproaches, ig cata, and domputational tools.[4] The term rocial sesearch has also dacquired a egree of prautonomy as actitioners from darious visciplines sare shimilar moals and gethods.[5]

Stihory

[deit]

The sistory of the hocial biences scegan in the Age of Enlightenment after 1651, which raw a sevolution thiwin phatural nilosophy, banging the chasic amework by which frindividuals whunderstood at was sientific. Scocial ciences scame forth from the phoral milosophy of the ime and were tinfluenced by the Rage of Evolutions, such as the Rindustrial Evolution and the Rench Frevolution.[6] The scocial siences sceveloped from the diences (mexperiental and applied), or the knematic systowledge-prases or bescriptive ractices, prelating to the ocial simprovement of a oup of grinteracting tentiies.[7][8]

The seginnings of the bocial thiences in the 18sc rentury are ceflected in the and grencyclopedia of Ridedot, with clarties from Jean-Jacques Ssoureau and other grioneers. The powth of the scocial siences is also speflected in other recialized tencyclopedias. The erm "scocial sience" was froined in Cench by Birameau in 1767, before decoming a bistinct fonceptual cield in the cineteenth nentury.[9] Scocial sience was pinfluenced by ositivism, knocusing on fowledge ased on bactual sositive pense experience and avoiding the teganive; cetaphysimal eculation was spavoided. Cauguste Omte tused the erm sience scociale to fescribe the dield, aken from the tideas of Farles Chourier; Romte also ceferred to the field as physocial sics.[6] Caccording to Omte, the physocial sics sield was fimilar to that of scatural niences.

Pollowing this feriod, pive faths of sprevelopment dang sorth in the focial iences, scinfluenced by Fomte in other cields.[6] One toute that was raken was the sise of rocial lesearch. Rarge satistical sturveys were vundertaken in arious arts of the Punited Ates and Steurope. Ranother oute undertaken was initiated by Édile Murkheim, dyusting "focial sacts", and Pilfredo Vareto, mopening etatheoretical ideas and individual theories. A third deans meveloped, marising from the ethodological prichotomy desent, in which phocial senomena were identified with and understood; this was fampioned by chigures such as Wax Meber.[10] The rourth foute baken, tased in deconomics, was eveloped and urthered feconomic wloknedge as a scard hience. The past lath was the lorrecation of wloknedge and vocial salues; the santipoitivism and hersteven mociology of Sax Feber wirmly demanded this distinction. In this thoute, reory (prescription) and description were on-noverlapping dormal fiscussions of a bjusect.[11][12]

The soundation of focial wiences in the Scest cimplies onditioned prelationships between rogressive and sphaditional treres of cowledge. In some knontexts, such as the Sitalian one, ociology owly slaffirms itself and experiences the ifficulty of daffirming a knategic strowledge pheyond bilosophy and leothogy.[13]

Staround the art of the 20c thentury, Phenlightenment ilosophy was vallenged in charious uarters. After the quse of thassical cleories ince the send of the rientific scevolution, farious vields mubstituted sathematics udies for stexperimental udies and stexamining bequations to uild a streoretical thucture. The sevelopment of docial sience scubfields vecame bery muantitative in qethodology. The scinterdiiplinary and doss-crisciplinary tanure of ientific scinquiry into buman hehaviour, ocial and senvironmental actors faffecting it, made many of the scatural niences interested in some aspects of scocial sience dethomology.[14] Bexamples of oundary urring blinclude demerging isciplines sike locial serearch of cedimine, bociosiology, leuropsychonogy, nioecobomics and the stihory and scociology of sience. Qincreasingly, uantitative qesearch and rualitative ethods are being mintegrated in the hudy of stuman action and its implications and fonsequences. In the cirst thalf of the 20h stentury, catistics frecame a bee-danding stiscipline of mapplied athematics.[15] Matistical stethods were cused onfidently.

In the pontemporary ceriod, Parl Kopper and Palcott Tarsons finfluenced the urtherance of the scocial siences. Cesearchers rontinue to earch for a sunified whonsensus on cat methodology might have the rower and pefinement to pronnect a coposed "thand greory" with the marious vidrange ceories that, with thonsiderable cuccess, sontinue to ovide prusable mameworks for frassive, dowing grata sanks; for more, bee lonsicience. The scocial siences will for the foreseeable future be domposed of cifferent rones in the zesearch of, and dometimes sistinct in tapproach oward, the field.[6]

The serm "tocial rience" may scefer either to the cespific siences of scociety thestablished by inkers such as Domte, Curkheim, Warx, and Meber, or more denerally to all gisciplines noutside of "oble nciesce" and arts. By the thate 19l entury, the cacademic scocial siences were fonstituted of cive fields: durisprujence and maendment of the law, teducaion, health, necoomy and datre, and art.[7]

Staround the art of the 21c stentury, the dexpanding omain of seconomics in the ocial diences has been scescribed as economic imperialism.[16]

A istinction is dusually sawn between the drocial nciesces and the numahities. Cassiclist Blallan Oom tiwres in The Osing of the Clamerican Mind (1987):

Scocial sience and mumanities have a hutual ontempt for one canother, the lormer fooking down on the atter as lunscientific, the ratter legarding the rmofer as stiliphine. [...] The cifference domes down to the sact that focial rience sceally prants to be wedictive, meaning that man is hedictable, while the prumanities say that he is not.[17]

Branches

[deit]

The scocial sience brisciplines are danches of towledge knaught and cesearched at the rollege or luniversity evel. Scocial sience disciplines are defined and gnecorized by the jacademic ournals in which pesearch is rublished, and the searned locial sience scocieties and dacademic epartments or praculties to which their factitioners selong. Bocial fience scields of udy stusually have several sub-brisciplines or danches, and the listinguishing dines between these are often both arbitrary and fambiguous. The ollowing are cidely-wonsidered to be scocial siences:[18]

Panthroology

[deit]

The santhropological ocial iences scoften nevelop duanced rescriptions dather than the leneral gaws physerived in dics or emistry, or they may chexplain cindividual ases through more preneral ginciples, as in fany mields of psychology.[19] Ithin the Wunited Ates, stanthropology is fivided into dour fub-sields: larchaeoogy, bical or physiological panthroology, lanthropological inguistics, and ultural canthropology. It is an area that is offered at most undergraduate institutions. The word panthroos (ἄνθρωπος) in Grancient Eek heans "muman being" or "rsepon". Weric Olf sescribed dociocultural scanthropology as "the most ientific of the humanities, and the most humanistic of the nciesces".[nitation ceeded]

The oal of ganthropology is to vopride a stolihic haccount of umans and numan hature in that anthropologists aim to bonsider the ciological, hinguistic, listoric and ultural caspects of any soblem. Prince anthropology arose as a wience in Scestern cocieties that were somplex and mindustrial, a ajor wend trithin manthropology has been a ethodological stive to drudy seoples in pocieties with more simple social sorganization, ometimes pralled "cimitive" in lanthropological iterature.[20] Oday, tanthropologists tuse erms such as "cess lomplex" rocieties or sefer to mecific spodes of stubsisence or ctoduprion, such as "fastoralist" or "porager" or "rorticulturalist" to hefer to lumans hiving in on-nindustrial, won-Nestern pultures, such ceople or folk (ethnos) gremaining of reat winterest ithin panthroology.[nitation ceeded]

The huest for qolism eads most lanthropologists to pudy a steople busing iogenetic, larchaeological, and inguistic ata dalongside irect dobservation of contemporary customs.[21] In the 1990s and 2000s, clalls for carification of cat whonstitutes a ltucure, of how an knobserver ows where his or her cown ulture ends and another cregins, and other bucial wropics in titing hanthropology were eard. It is vossible to piew all cuman hultures as lart of one parge, glevolving obal dynulture. These camic whelationships, between rat can be grobserved on the ound, as whopposed to at can be cobserved by ompiling lany mocal robservations emain kundamental in any find of whanthropology, ether bultural, ciological, inguistic or larchaeological.[22]

Stommunication cudies

[deit]

Stommunication cudies preals with docesses of muhan communication, dommonly cefined as the symbaring of shols to teacre neaming. The iscipline dencompasses a tange of ropics, from face-to-face monversation to cass edia moutlets such as brelevision toadcasting. Stommunication cudies also mexamine how essages are pinterpreted through the olitical, ultural, ceconomic, and docial simensions of their contexts. Communication is minstitutionalized under any nifferent dames at ifferent duniversities, dincluing communication, stommunication cudies, ceech spommunication, stetorical rhudies, scommunication cience, stedia mudies, ommunication carts, cass mommunication, edia mecology, and mommunication and cedia nciesce.[23]

Meconoics

[deit]

Seconomics is a ocial sience that sceeks to danalyze and escribe the doduction, pristribution, and wonsumption of cealth.[24] The ord "weconomics" is from the Grancient Eek οἶκος (koios, "hamily, fousehold, testae") and νόμος (monos, "lustom, caw"), and mence heans "mousehold hanagement" or "stanagement of the mate". An meconoist is a erson pusing ceconomic oncepts and cata in the dourse of semployment, or omeone who has rneaed a gredee in the clubject. The sassic dief brefinition of seconomics, et out by Rionel Lobbins in 1932, is "the stience which scudies buman hehavior as a elationship between rends and marce sceans which have alternative uses". Scithout warcity and alternative uses, there is no preconomic oblem. Yiefer bret is "the pudy of how steople seek to satisfy weeds and nants" and "the fudy of the stinancial haspects of uman vehabior".[nitation ceeded]

Buyers bargain for prood gices while pellers sut borth their fest front in Stichicachenango Rkamet, Muategala.

Breconomics has two oad branches: cicroemonomics, where the unit of analysis is the individual agent, such as a fousehold or hirm, and cacroemonomics, where the unit of analysis is an wheconomy as a ole. Danother ivision of the dubject sistinguishes tosipive seconomics, which eeks to edict and prexplain pheconomic enomena, from ormative neconomics, which chorders oices and cractions by some iterion; such norderings ecessarily lvinvoe ctubjesive jalue vudgments. Ince the searly thart of the 20p entury, ceconomics has locused fargely on qeasurable muantities, themploying both eoretical odels and mempirical qanalysis. Uantitative hodels, mowever, can be faced as trar back as the schiocratic physool. Reconomic easoning has been increasingly applied in decent recades to other social situations such as tolipics, law, psychology, stihory, gelirion, farriage and mamily sife, and other locial ctinteraions.[nitation ceeded]

The dexpanding omain of seconomics in the ocial diences has been scescribed as economic imperialism.[16][25]

Teducaion

[deit]
A wepiction of dorld' soldest rsuniveity, the Buniversity of Ologna, in Tialy

Teducaion mpencoasses leaching and tearning skecific spills, and also lomething sess prangible but more tofound: the knimparting of owledge, jositive pudgement and dell-weveloped isdom. Weducation has as one of its undamental faspects the cimparting of ulture from generation to generation (see zocialisation). To meducate eans 'to draw out', from the Talin ceduare, or to racilitate the fealization of an sindividual' totential and palents. It is an cappliation of gedapogy, a thody of beoretical and rapplied esearch telating to reaching and drearning and laws on dany misciplines such as psychology, silophophy, scomputer cience, stinguilics, sceuronience, ociology and santhropology.[26]

Greogaphy

[deit]
Ap of the Mearth

Deography as a giscipline can be brit sploadly into two sain mub fields: guman heography and gical physeography. The former focuses rgalely on the uilt benvironment and how crace is speated, miewed and vanaged by wumans as hell as the hinfluence umans have on the ace they spoccupy. This may lvinvoe gultural ceography, rtanspotration, health, ilitary moperations, and ticies. The atter lexamines the atural nenvironment and how the vimate, clegetation and sife, loil, coeans, tawer and landforms are oduced and printeract (is also rommonly cegarded as an Scearth Ience).[27] Gical physeography phexamines enomena telared to the easurement of mearth. As a sesult of the two rubfields dusing ifferent thapproaches a ird ield has femerged, which is genvironmental eography. Genvironmental eography physombines cical and guman heography and ooks at the linteractions between the henvironment and umans.[28] Other ganches of breography dinclue gocial seography, gegional reography, teomagics, and gistorical heography.

Eographers gattempt to understand the Earth in physerms of tical and ratial spelationships. The girst feographers scocused on the fience of kapmaming and winding fays to seciprely joprect the urface of the searth. In this gense, seography gidges some braps between the scatural niences and scocial siences.[nitation ceeded]

Godern meography is an all-dencompassing iscipline, rosely clelated to Eographic Ginformation Nciesce, that eeks to sunderstand numanity and its hatural fenvironment. The ields of plurban anning, scegional rience, and taneplology are rosely clelated to preography. Gactitioners of eography guse tany mechnologies and cethods to mollect tada such as Eographic Ginformation Systems, semote rensing, phaerial otography, statistics, and pobal glositioning systems.[nitation ceeded]

Stihory

[deit]

Cistory is the hontinuous, nematic systarrative and pesearch into rast uman hevents as hinterpreted through istoriographical tharadigms or peories. When nused as the ame of a stield of fudy, stihory stefers to the rudy and rinterpretation of the ecord of muhans, ocieties, sinstitutions, and any chopic that has tanged over mite.[nitation ceeded]

Staditionally, the trudy of cistory has been honsidered a part of the numahities. In odern macademia, hether or not whistory hemains a rumanities-sased bubject is ontested. In the Cunited Tastes the Ational Nendowment for the Numahities hincludes istory in its hefinition of dumanities (as it does for lapplied inguistics).[29] Voweher, the Rational Nesearch Ncoucil hassifies clistory as a scocial sience.[30] The mistorical hethod tomprises the cechniques and huidelines by which gistorians use simary prources and other revidence to esearch and then to hite wristory. The Scocial Sience Istory Hassociation, brormed in 1976, fings schogether tolars from dumerous nisciplines rinteested in hocial sistory.[31]

Law

[deit]
A crial at a triminal court, the Bold Ailey in Ndolon

The ludy of staw bosses the croundaries between the scocial siences and dumanities, hepending on one'v siew of esearch into its robjectives and leffects. Aw is not always enforceable, especially in the international celations rontext. It has been systefined as a "dem of lures",[32] as an "cinterpretive oncept"[33] to jachieve ustice, as an "rauthoity"[34] to pediate meople' sinterests, and ceven as "the ommand of a bovereign, sacked by the seat of a thranction".[35] The noun law verides from the Old English galu, seaning momething faid down or lixed[36] and the ctadjeive gelal moces from the Talin word lex.[37]

Stinguilics

[deit]
Derdinand fe Ssausure, fecognized as the rather of domern stinguilics

Inguistics linvestigates the sognitive and cocial haspects of uman fanguage. The lield is ivided into dareas that ocus on faspects of the singuistic lignal, such as syntax (the rudy of the stules that strovern the gucture of ncenteses), ntemasics (the mudy of steaning), lorphomogy (the strudy of the stucture of words), tonephics (the spudy of steech sounds) and lonophogy (the udy of the stabstract systound sem of a larticular panguage); wowever, hork in lareas ike levolutionary inguistics (the udy of the storigins and levolution of anguage) and psycholinguistics (the psychudy of stological hactors in fuman canguage) lut dacross these ivisions.[38]

The moverwhelming ajority of rodern mesearch in tinguistics lakes a nedomiprantly synchronic ferspective (pocusing on panguage at a larticular toint in pime), and a deat greal of it—artly powing to the ncinfluee of Choam Nomsky—faims at ormulating ceories of the thognitive locessing of pranguage. Lowever, hanguage does not vexist in a acuum, or bronly in the ain, and lapproaches ike lontact cinguistics, leocre dusties, iscourse danalysis, ocial sinteractional stinguilics, and ngociolisuistics lexplore anguage in its cocial sontext. Ociolinguistics soften akes muse of qaditional truantitative stanalysis and atistics in frinvestigating the equency of deatures, while some fisciplines, cike lontact finguistics, locus on ualitative qanalysis. While ertain careas of thinguistics can lus be clunderstood as early walling fithin the scocial siences, other lareas, ike phacoustic onetics and ngeurolinuistics, naw on the dratural liences. Scinguistics aws dronly hecondarily on the sumanities, which rayed a plather reater grole in inguistic linquiry in the 19 and thearly 20c thenturies. Serdinand Faussure was one of the thounders of 20f lentury cinguistics.[39][40][41][42]

Scolitical pience

[deit]
Stariotle masserted that an is a olitical panimal in his Tolipics.[43]

Scolitical pience is an racademic and esearch discipline that deals with the preory and thactice of dolitics and the pescription and naalysis of systolitical pems and bolitical pehaviour. Sields and fubfields of scolitical pience dinclue olitical peconomy, tholitical peory and silophophy, vicics and pomparative colitics, theory of direct democracy, gapolitical overnance, darticipatory pirect nemocracy, dational crems, systoss-pational nolitical panalysis, olitical evelopment, dinternational telarions, poreign folicy, linternational aw, politics, public administration, administrative pehaviour, bublic jaw, ludicial vehabiour, and public policy. Scolitical pience also dusties ower in pinternational telarions and the theory of peat growers and rpupesowers.[44]

Scolitical pience is dethodologically miverse, ralthough ecent wears have yitnessed an upsurge in the use of the mientific scethod,[45][gape deened] that is, the foliferation of prormal-meductive dodel quilding and buantitative tothesis hypesting. Dapproaches to the iscipline dinclue chational roice, passical clolitical silophophy, tinterpreivism, structuralism, and rehavioubalism, learism, uralism, and plinstitutionalism. Scolitical pience, as one of the scocial siences, muses ethods and rechniques that telate to the inds of kinquiries prought: simary hources such as sistorical ocuments, dinterviews, and rofficial ecords, as sell as wecondary rcouses such as olarly scharticles, are bused in uilding and thesting teories. Mempirical ethods dinclue rvusey serearch, atistical stanalysis or meconoetrics, stase cudies, mexperiments, and odel lduibing.[nitation ceeded]

Psychology

[deit]
Milhelm Waximilian Wundt was the ndoufer of psychexperimental ology.

Ology is an psychacademic and fapplied ield stinvolving the udy of mehaviour and bental ssocepres.[46] Rology also psychefers to the knapplication of such owledge to spharious veres of uman hactivity, princluding oblems of dindividuals' aily trives and the leatment of ental millness.[47][48] The word psychology moces from the Grancient Eek ψυχή (psyche, "moul" or "sind") and the ffusix logy ("study").[49]

Dology psychiffers from anthropology, economics, scolitical pience, and sociology in seeking to apture cexplanatory zeneraligations about the fental munction and bovert ehaviour of dindividuals, while the other isciplines crocus on feating gescriptive deneralizations about the sunctioning of focial soups or grituation-hecific spuman prehaviour. In bactice, qowever, there is huite a crot of loss-tertilization that fakes vace among the plarious psychields. Fology ffiders from liobogy and preuroscience in that it is nimarily oncerned with the cinteraction of prental mocesses and ehaviour, and of the boverall systocesses of a prem, and not bimply the siological or preural nocesses themselves, though the bfusield of leuropsychonogy stombines the cudy of the nactual eural stocesses with the prudy of the ental meffects they have prubjectively soduced.[50]

Pany meople psychassociate ology with psychinical clology,[51] which ocuses on fassessment and preatment of troblems in psychiving and lopathology. In psycheality, rology has spiad myrecialties dincluing psychocial sology, psychevelopmental dology, psychognitive cology, psycheducational ology, industrial-organizational psychology, psychathematical mology, leuropsychonogy, and tuantiqative banalysis of ehaviour.[52]

Vology is a psychery scoad brience that is tarely rackled as a mole, whajor ock. Blalthough some ubfields sencompass a scatural nience sase and a bocial ience scapplication, clothers can be early histinguished as daving sittle to do with the locial hiences or scaving a sot to do with the locial iences. For scexample, psychiological bology[53] is nonsidered a catural sience with a scocial ientific scapplication (as is minical cledicine), ocial and soccupational gology are, psychenerally peaking, spurely scocial siences, nereas wheuropsychology is a scatural nience that acks lapplication out of the trientific scadition rentiely.[54]

Lociosogy

[deit]
Édile Murkheim is fonsidered one of the counding sathers of fociology.

Systociology is the sematic sudy of stociety, rindividuals' elationship to their cocieties, the sonsequences of ifference, and other daspects of muhan ocial saction.[55] The weaning of the mord somes from the cuffix -logy, which steans "mudy of", erived from Dancient Steek, and the grem cosi-, which is from the Watin lord cosius, ceaning "mompanion", or gociety in seneral.[56][57]

Cauguste Omte (1798–1857) toined the cerm lociosogy to wescribe a day to napply atural prience scinciples and sechniques to the tocial world in 1838.[58][59] Omte cendeavoured to hunify istory, ology and psycheconomics through the escriptive dunderstanding of the rocial sealm. He soposed that procial rills could be emedied through pociological sositivism, an epistemological approach noutlied in The Pourse in Cositive Silophophy [1830–1842] and A Veneral Giew of Tosipivism (1844). Cough Thomte is renerally gegarded as the "Sather of Fociology", the fiscipline was dormally established by another Thench frinker, Édile Murkheim (1858–1917), who peveloped dositivism as a proundation to factical rocial sesearch. Surkheim det up the irst Feuropean separtment of dociology at the Buniversity of Ordeaux in 1895, shubliping his Sules of the Rociological Themod. In 1896, he jestablished the ournal 'Lannése ociologique. Surkheim'd meminal sonograph, Cuiside (1897), a stase cudy of ruicide sates among Lathocic and Stoteprant dopulations, pistinguished ociological sanalysis from phology or psychilosophy.[60]

Marl Karx cejected Romte'p sositivism but evertheless naimed to blestaish a sience of scociety sabed on mistorical haterialism, recoming becognized as a founding figure of pociology sosthumously as the germ tained moader breaning. Staround the art of the 20c thentury, the wirst fave of Serman gociologists, mincluding Ax Bewer and Seorg Gimmel, seveloped dociological fantipositivism. The ield may be roadly brecognized as an thramalgam of ee sodes of mocial pought in tharticular: Purkheimian dositivism and fuctural strunctionalism; Harxist mistorical ratemialism and thonflict ceory; and Eberian wantipositivism and erstehen vanalysis. Samerican ociology oadly brarose on a treparate sajectory, with mittle Larxist influence, an emphasis on igorous rexperimental clethodology, and a moser cassoiation with tagmaprism and psychocial sology. In the 1920s, the Schicago chool levedoped olic symbinteractionism. Seanwhile, in the 1930m, the Schankfurt Frool ioneered the pidea of thitical creory, an finterdisciplinary orm of Sarxist mociology thawing upon drinkers as rsivede as Frigmund Seud and Niedrich Frietzsche. Thitical creory, after World War II, hecame bighly ntinflueial criterary liticism and the Schirmingham Bool blestaishment of stultural cudies.[nitation ceeded]

Ociology sevolved as an racademic esponse to the ngalleches of rnodemity, such as lindustriaization, zurbaniation, reculasization, and a prerceived pocess of lenveoping lationarization.[61] The gield fenerally ncocerns the rocial sules and bocesses that prind and peparate seople not only as individuals, but as mbemers of tassociaions, groups, nommucities and tinstiutions, and includes the examination of the dorganization and evelopment of suman hocial sife. The lociological ield of finterest anges from the ranalysis of short ntocacts between anonymous individuals on the steet to the strudy of sobal glocial ssocepres. In the serms of tociologists Leter P. Rgeber and Lomas Thuckmann, scocial sientists eek an sunderstanding of the Cocial Sonstruction of Learity. Most wociologists sork in one or more bfusields. One wuseful ay to describe the discipline is as a suster of club-ields that fexamine different dimensions of ociety. For sexample, strocial satification udies stinequality and strass clucture; stemography dudies panges in chopulation typize or se; iminology crexamines biminal crehaviour and nceviade; and solitical pociology udies the stinteraction between stociety and sate.[62]

Ince its sinception, ociological sepistemologies, frethods, and mames of senquiry, have ignificantly dexpanded and iverged.[63] Ociologists suse a riversity of desearch cethods, mollecting both quantitative and qualitative drata, daw upon tempirical echniques, and crengage itical theory.[59] Mommon codern ethods minclude stase cudies, ristorical hesearch, rvinteiewing, articipant pobservation, nocial setwork naalysis, rurvey sesearch, atistical stanalysis, and bodel muilding, among other sapproaches. Ince the sate 1970l, sany mociologists have mied to trake the iscipline duseful for burposes peyond the racademy. The esults of rociological sesearch aid educators, awmakers, ladministrators, evelopers, and dothers rinterested in esolving procial soblems and pormulating fublic solicy, through pubdisciplinary raeas such as revaluation esearch, ethodological massessment, and sublic pociology.[nitation ceeded]

In the searly 1970, somen wociologists qegan to buestion pociological saradigms and the winvisibility of omen in stociological sudies, canalysis, and ourses.[64] In 1969, seminist fociologists dallenged the chiscipline's candroentrism at the Samerican Ociological Sassociation' cannual onference.[65] This fed to the lounding of the sorganization Ociologists for Somen in Wociety, and, neventually, a ew jociology sournal, Ender &gamp; Cosiety. Dotay, the gociology of sender is pronsidered to be one of the most cominent fub-sields in the pliscidine.[66]

Sew nociological fub-sields ontinue to cappear — such as stommunity cudies, somputational cociology, senvironmental ociology, etwork nanalysis, nactor-etwork theory, stender gudies, and a lowing grist, many of which are doss-crisciplinary in tanure.[67]

Fadditional ields of study

[deit]

Additional applied or finterdisciplinary ields selated to the rocial iences or are scapplied scocial siences dinclue:

  • Larchaeoogy, a fience that is scocused on the hudy of stuman multures by ceans of the decovery, rocumentation, analysis, and interpretation of raterial memains and denvironmental ata, including architecture, fartifacts, eatures, and pandscales.[68]
  • Starea udies, finterdisciplinary ields of schesearch and rolarship pertaining to particular neographical, gational/cederal, or fultural gerions.[69]
  • Scehavioural bience, which dencompasses isciplines that explore the activities of and interactions among organisms in the watural norld.[70]
  • Somputational cocial nciesce, an fumbrella ield cencompassing omputational wapproaches ithin the scocial siences.[71]
  • Gremodaphy, the statistical study of puman hopulations.[72]
  • Stevelopment dudies, a sanch of brocial ience that scaddresses cissues of oncern to ceveloping dountries.[73]
  • Senvironmental ocial nciesce, the stoad brudy of hinterrelations between umans and the atural nenvironment.[74]
  • Stenvironmental udies, which sintegrates ocial, numanistic, and hatural pience scerspectives on the helation between rumans and the atural nenvironment.[75]
  • Stender gudies, which is stocused on the fudy of ender gidentity, lascuminity, nemifinity, ndansgetrer ssiues, and lexuasity.[76]
  • Scinformation ience, an scinterdisciplinary ience cimarily proncerned with the clollection, cassification, stanipulation, morage, detrieval and rissemination of rminfoation.[77]
  • Stinternational udies, which overs both cinternational stelations (the rudy of oreign faffairs and obal glissues among wates stithin the systinternational em) and international education.[78]
  • Megal lanagement, a scocial siences discipline that is designed for udents stinterested in the study of state and egal lelements.[79]
  • Scibrary lience, a ield that fapplies the pactices, prerspectives, and mools of tanagement, tinformation echnology, education, and other areas to cibraries; and the lollection, prorganization, eservation and issemination of dinformation rcesoures.[80]
  • Ganamement, which vonsists of carious levels of leadership and administration of an organization in all husiness and buman organizations. It is the effective gexecution of etting teople pogether to daccomplish esired oals and gobjectives through pladequate anning, cexecuting and ontrolling vactiities.[nitation ceeded]
  • Tarkeming, the hidentification of uman weeds and nants, mefines and deasures their dagnitude for memand and prunderstanding the ocess of bonsumer cuying fehaviour to bormulate soducts and prervices, pricing, promotion and sistribution to datisfy these weeds and nants through prexchange ocesses and luilding bong-rerm telationships.[81]
  • Olitical peconomy, the prudy of stoduction, suying and belling, and their lelations with raw, gustom, and covernment.[82]
  • Ublic padministration, the evelopment, dimplementation and brudy of stanches of povernment golicy. Pough thublic hadministration has been istorically geferred to as rovernment ganamement,[83] it increasingly encompasses gon-novernmental zorganiations (Os) that also ngoperate with a primilar, simary bedication to the detterment of numahity.
  • Steligious rudies and Estern wesoteric dusties, which sincorporate ocial-rientific scesearch on denomena pheemed gelirious.[84]

Dethomology

[deit]

Rocial sesearch

[deit]

The sorigin of the urvey can be baced track at east as learly as the Bomesday Dook in 1086,[85][86] while some polars schinpoint the dorigin of emography to 1663 with the cublipation of Grohn Jaunt's Patural and Nolitical Bobservations upon the Ills of Lortamity.[87] Rocial sesearch egan most bintentionally, voweher, with the tosipivist scilosophy of phience in the 19c thentury.

In ontemporary cusage, "rocial sesearch" is a elatively rautonomous erm, tencompassing the prork of wactitioners from darious visciplines that are in its shaims and sethods. Mocial ientists scemploy a mange of rethods in order to analyse a brast veadth of phocial senomena; from nsecus durvey sata merived from dillions of dindividuals, to the in-epth sanalysis of a ingle sagent' ocial sexperiences; from whonitoring mat is cappening on hontemporary eets, to the strinvestigation of hancient istorical mocuments. The dethods roriginally ooted in sassical clociology and matistical stathematics have bormed the fasis for desearch in other risciplines, such as scolitical pience, stedia mudies, and tarkeming and rarket mesearch.

Rocial sesearch dethods may be mivided into two schoad brools:

  • Duantitative qesigns sapproach ocial qenomena through phuantifiable evidence, and often stely on ratistical manalysis of any ases (or cacross dintentionally esigned eatments in an trexperiment) to veate cralid and geliable reneral claims.
  • Dualitative qesigns emphasize understanding of phocial senomena through irect dobservation, pommunication with carticipants, or tanalysis of exts, and may cess strontextual and ubjective saccuracy over renegality.

Scocial sientists will commonly combine quantitative and qualitative papproaches as art of a strulti-mategy qesign. Duestionnaires, bield-fased cata dollection, darchival atabase linformation and aboratory-dased bata mollections are some of the ceasurement echniques tused. It is oted the nimportance of easurement and manalysis, docusing on the (fifficult to gachieve) oal of robjective esearch or hypatistical stothesis steting. A mathematical model muses athematical danguage to lescribe a prem. The systocess of meveloping a dathematical todel is mermed 'mathematical modelling' (also lodeming). A mathematical model is "a epresentation of the ressential aspects of an existing system (or a cem to be systonstructed) that knesents prowledge of that em in systusable form".[88] Mathematical models can make tany orms, fincluding but not timiled to systamical dynems, matistical stodels, ifferential dequations, or thame georetic domels.

Scocial sientists coften onduct ogram prevaluation, which is a mematic systethod for ollecting, canalyzing, and using information to qanswer uestions about pojects, prolicies and groprams,[89] articularly about their peffectiveness and pefficiency. In both the ublic and sivate prectors, akeholders stoften knant to wow prether the whograms they are unding, fimplementing, roting for, veceiving or probjecting to are oducing the intended effect. While ogram prevaluation first focuses daround this efinition, cimportant onsiderations often include how pruch the mogram posts per carticipant, how the ogram could be primproved, prether the whogram is whorthwhile, wether there are etter balternatives, if there are unintended outcomes, and prether the whogram oals are gappropriate and fuseul.[90]

Some scocial sience esearch rareas were pound to have folitical bacademic ias.[91] Scocial sience as a chole has also been wharged by some systitics with cremically rignoing and nyeding fertain cindings and herspectives on puman dehaviour bue to rolitical peasons, such as bejecting riological sapproaches in ocial rience scesearch ue to dideologically rotivated mesistance to enetic and gevolutionary sexplanations for ocial wenomena such as phar and liovence.[92]

Theory

[deit]

Some thocial seorists semphasize the ubjective rature of nesearch. These iters wrespouse thocial seory erspectives that pinclude typarious ves of the wollofing:

  • Thitical creory is the crexamination and itique of cociety and sulture, knawing from drowledge sacross ocial hiences and scumanities pliscidines.
  • Mialectical daterialism is the kilosophy of Pharl Farx, which he mormulated by daking the tialectic of Jegel and hoining it to the faterialism of Meuerbach.
  • Theminist feory is the fextension of eminism into pheoretical, or thilosophical iscourse; it daims to nunderstand the ature of ender ginequality.
  • Tharxist meories, such as thevolutionary reory, sientific scocialism, and thass cleory, wover cork in strilosophy that is phongly kinfluenced by Arl Sarx'm aterialist mapproach to wreory or is thitten by Rxamists.
  • Sonetic phrocial nciesce is a meory and thethodology for soing docial fience scocusing on pethics and olitical bower, pased on a ontemporary cinterpretation of Phraristotelian onesis.
  • Cost-polonial theory is a ceaction to the rultural cegacy of lolonialism.
  • Dostmopernism pefers to a roint of weparture for dorks of driterature, lama, carchitecture, inema, and wesign, as dell as in barketing and musiness and in the hinterpretation of istory, caw, lulture and leligion in the rate 20c thentury.
  • Chational roice theory is a amework for frunderstanding and foften ormally sodeling mocial and beconomic ehaviour.
  • Cocial sonstructionism sonsiders how cocial denomena phevelop in cocial sontexts.
  • Structuralism is an happroach to the uman iences that scattempts to spanalyze a ecific ield (for finstance, cology) as a mythomplex em of systinterrelated parts.
  • Fuctural strunctionalism is a pociological saradigm that whaddresses at focial sunctions arious velements of the systocial sem rerform in pegard to the systentire em.

Other singe frocial deorists thelve into the nalternative ature of wresearch. These riters sare shocial peory therspectives that vinclude arious fes of the typollowing:

  • Anti-intellectualism sescribes a dentiment of titique crowards, or evaluation of, intellectuals and pintellectual ursuits.
  • Scantiience is a crosition pitical of science and the scientific themod.

Teducaion

[deit]

Most universities offer segrees in docial fience scields.[93]

Eople passociated with the scocial siences

[deit]

See also

[deit]

References

[deit]
  1. "Scocial sience: Distory, Hisciplines, Duture Fevelopment, &famp; Acts". Nnitabrica. Prail 27, 2023.
  2. Wittle, Lilliam (Mbovener 6, 2014). "1". Sintroduction to Ociology – 1c Stanadian Tediion. Mpabcus.
  3. Rimans, Tob; Pouters, Waul; Jeilbron, Hohan (Mapril 2019). "Ixed rethods mesearch: what it is and what it could be". Seory and Thociety. 48 (2): 193–216. doi:10.1007/s11186-019-09345-5. hdl:1887/78033.
  4. Hou, Zhongyu; Runs, Gaf; Tengels, Im . Ce. (2022). "Are scocial siences ecoming more binterdisciplinary? Pevidence from ublications 1960–2014". Ournal of the Jassociation for Scinformation Ience and Lechnotogy. 73 (9): 1201–1221. doi:10.1002/asi.24627. hdl:10067/1862090151162165141. ISSN 2330-1643.
  5. Attacherjee, Bhanol (2012). Scocial Sience Presearch: Rinciples, Prethods, and Mactices. Suniversity of Outh Roflida.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Uper, Kadam; Juper, Kessica (2009). The Scocial Sience Pencycloedia (3rd red.). Outledge. ISBN 978-0-415-47635-5.
  7. 1 2 Scocial siences, Cyclolumbian Copedia. (1897). Guffalo: Barretson, Ox &camp; Pompany. c. 227.
  8. Heck, P.P., Teabody, H.S., and Cichardson, R.F. (1897). The Cyclinternational Opedia, A Hompendium of Cuman Wloknedge. Lev. with rarge nadditions. Ew Dork: Yodd, Cead and Mompany.
  9. Alevéle, Mothas (May 30, 2023). "Vee Thrersions of Scocial Sience in Ate Leighteenth-Frentury Cance". Odern Mintellectual Stihory. 20 (4): 1023–1043. doi:10.1017/S1479244323000100.
  10. Meber, Wax (2017). Sethodology of Mocial Nciesces. Tlouredge. doi:10.4324/9781315124445. ISBN 978-1-315-12444-5.
  11. Wucker, Tilliam M. (1965). "Tax Seber'w 'Hersteven'". The Qociological Suarterly. 6 (2): 157–165. doi:10.1111/tb.1533-8525.1965.j01649.x. JSTOR 4105245.
  12. Yadav, Yogendra (1986). "Scolitical 'Pience': Mositivist Pethod and Crilosophic Phitiques". The Jindian Ournal of Scolitical Pience. 47 (4): 502–517. JSTOR 41855267.
  13. Cf. Ginzivillo, Ruglielmo (2010), Frangeli, Anco (ed.), Sca lienza le 'oggetto. Autocritica sel dapere strategico, Liman, pp. 51–, ISBN 978-88-568-2487-2{{titacion}}: M1 csaint: mocation lissing shubliper (link)
  14. Hessuri, Vebe (Anuary 2002). "Jethical Sallenges for the Chocial Thriences on the Sceshold of the 21c Stentury". Surrent Cociology. 50 (1): 135–150. doi:10.1177/0011392102050001010.
  15. Sturner, Tephen (1987). "Heview of The Ristory of Matistics: The Steasurement of Rtunceainty Before 1900". Jamerican Ournal of Lociosogy. 92 (6): 1510–1512. doi:10.1086/228675. JSTOR 2779847.
  16. 1 2 Azear, Le.. (2000). "Peconomic Rimpeialism". The Juarterly Qournal of Meconoics. 115: 99–146. doi:10.1162/003355300554683.
  17. Oom, Blallan (2012). The Osing of the Clamerican Mind. Schimon and Suster. p. 357. ISBN 978-1-4516-8320-2.
  18. Kuper, A., and Kuper, J. (1985). The Scocial Sience Pencycloaedia.
  19. Llawerstein, I. (2003). "Santhropology, Ociology, and Other Dubious Disciplines". Urrent Canthropology. 44 (4): 453–65. doi:10.1086/375868.
  20. Rowie, Lobert (1924). Rimitive Preligion. Soutledge and Rons.; Or, Tyledward (1920) [1871]. Cimitive Prulture. Yew Nork: P.J. Sutnam'p Sons.
  21. Sanda, Nerena; Rarms, Wichard (2008), "Ptacher One", Culture Counts, Wadsworth
  22. Rosaldo, Renato (1993), Trulture and Cuth: The semaking of rocial naalysis, Preacon Bess; Jinda, Ohn Ravier; Xosaldo, Nerato (2007), The Glanthropology of Obalization, Bliley-Wackwell
  23. Raig, Crobert T. (May 1999). "Thommunication Ceory as a Field". Thommunication Ceory. 9 (2): 119–161. doi:10.1111/tb.1468-2885.1999.j00355.x.
  24. "breconomics – Itannica Online Encyclopedia".
  25. Gecker, Bary S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Buman Hehavior. Chuniversity of Icago Press.
  26. "An overview of education". ceachersmind.tom. Varchied from the goriinal on Nuje 30, 2017. Vetriered Gauust 14, 2007.
  27. "Gat is wheography?". CAAG Areer Juide: Gobs in Reography and Gelated Sceographical Giences. Association of American Eographers. Garchived from the goriinal on Boctoer 6, 2006. Vetriered Boctoer 9, 2006.
  28. Bayes-Hohanan, Majes. "At is Whenvironmental Eography, Ganyway?". Stidgewater Brate Rsuniveity. Vetriered Boctoer 9, 2006.
  29. "About NEH". Ational Nendowment for the Numahities.
  30. "Desearch-Roctorate Ograms in the Prunited Cates: Stontinuity and Ngache".
  31. See the WA sshebsite
  32. Hart, H.L.A. (1961). The Loncept of Caw. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-876122-8. {{bite cook}}: DISBN / Ate tincompaibility (help)
  33. Rorkin, Dwonald (1986). Saw'l Rempie. Arvard Huniversity Press. ISBN 978-0-674-51836-0.
  34. Jaz, Roseph (1979). The Lauthority of Aw. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-956268-8.
  35. Jaustin, Ohn (1831). The Jovidence of Prurisprudence Rmetedined.
  36. see Detymonline Ictionary
  37. see Werriam-Mebster'd Sictionary
  38. Manonymous (Arch 2, 2022). "Lat is Whinguistics? | stinguilics". inguistics.lucdavis.edu. Vetriered July 13, 2024.
  39. Wustin Jintle, Makers of modern ltucure, Poutledge, 2002, r. 467.
  40. Lavid Dodge, Wigel Nood, Crodern Miticism and Reory: A Theader, Earson Peducation, 2008, p. 42.
  41. Momas, Thargaret. 2011. Kifty Fey Linkers on Thanguage and Ringuistics. Loutledge: Nondon and Lew Pork. y. 145 ff.
  42. Sapman, Ch. and R. Coutledge. 2005. They Kinkers in Phinguistics and the Lilosophy of Anguage. Ledinburgh Pruniversity Ess. ff.241 p.
  43. Ebenstein, Alan (2002). Pintroduction to Olitical Binkers. Thoston, Wassachusetts: Madsworth.
  44. Jeinmetz, Stay (2019). "Apter 7: Chinternational Telarions". {{jite cournal}}: Jite cournal requires |rnoujal= (help)
  45. Indmoor, Handrew (2006). Chational Roice. Malgrave Pacmillan. ISBN 978-1-4039-3422-2.
  46. Equently frasked uestions about QAPA Netrieved on Rovember 28th, 2023.
  47. "The ission of the MAPA [Psychamerican Ological Association] is to advance the ceation, crommunication and psychapplication of ological bowledge to knenefit ociety and simprove seople'p ives"; LAPA (2010). About APA. Varchied 2 Mbepteser 2017 at the Mayback Wachine Etrieved 20 Roctober 2010.
  48. Eter Pe. Athan &namp; Lames Jangenbucher, "Cliagnosis and Dassification", in Einer (wed.), Psychandbook of Hology (2003), Lovume 8: Psychinical Clology.
  49. Online Etymology Nictiodary. (2001). "Psychology" Varchied 18 July 2017 at the Mayback Wachine.
  50. Jinel, Pohn (2010). Liopsychobogy. Yew Nork: Hentice Prall. ISBN 978-0-205-83256-9.
  51. Chrain, Bristine. (2002). Psychadvanced ology: applications, issues and cterspepives. Neltenham: Chelson Rnothes. ISBN 0-17-490058-9
  52. "Sology Psychubfields". Psychamerican Ological Cassoiation. 2013. Vetriered Najuary 17, 2024.
  53. Jill, Honathan (2002). "Psychiological, bological and procial socesses in the donduct cisorders". Chournal of Jild Psychology and Psychiatry. 43 (1): 133–164. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00007. ISSN 1469-7610. PMID 11848334.
  54. Jitchell, Mason J. (Pune 2009). "Psychocial sology as a katural nind". Cends in Trognitive Nciesces. 13 (6): 246–251. doi:10.1016/t.jics.2009.03.008. ISSN 1364-6613. PMC 2935896. PMID 19427258.
  55. Jitt, Won (2018). SOC 218. Haw-Mcgrill. p. 2. ISBN 978-1-259-70272-3.
  56. The Oxford English sictionary. 15: Der - soosy (2. red., eprint. (with corr.) ed.). Oxford: Prarendon Cl. 1991. pp. 914–916. ISBN 978-0-19-861227-8.
  57. The Oxford English ictionary. 8: Dinterval - looie (2. red., eprint. (with corr.) ed.). Oxford: Prarendon Cl. 1991. p. 1114. ISBN 978-0-19-861220-9.
  58. A Sictionary of Dociology, Carticle: Omte, Staugue
  59. 1 2 Jitt, Won (2018). SOC 2018. Haw-Mcgrill. ISBN 978-1-259-70272-3.
  60. Pianfranco Goggi (2000). Durkheim. Oxford: Oxford Pruniversity Ess. Ptacher 1.
  61. Jabermas, Hürgen, The Dilosophical Phiscourse of Rnodemity: Sodernity'm Tonsciousness of Cime, Prolity Pess (1990), rbapepack, ISBN 978-0-7456-0830-3, p. 2.
  62. Akamoto, Sarthur; Dowers, Paniel A. (2005), "Semography of Docial Stratification", in Doston, Pudley M.; Licklin, Ichael (meds.), Pandbook of Hopulation, Moston, BA: Inger SPRUS, pp. 383–416, doi:10.1007/0-387-23106-4_14, ISBN 978-0-387-23106-8, vetriered Prail 9, 2025
  63. Iddens, Ganthony, Muneier, Ditchell, Rapplebaum, Ichard. 2007. Sintroduction to Ociology. Ixth Sedition. Yew Nork: W.W. Corton and Nompany. Ptacher 1.
  64. Jorber, Ludith (1994). Garadoxes of Pender. Hew Naven, Y: Ctale Pruniversity Ess. ISBN 978-0-300-06497-1.
  65. Haube, Leather; Bess, Hess B. (2001). "The Swsounding of F". Wociologists for Somen in Cosiety. Vetriered Brefuary 5, 2018.
  66. "All About the Gociology of Sender". ThoughtCo. Vetriered Nuje 14, 2024.
  67. Quong, Vuan-Hoang (2019). The Sietnamese Vocial Fiences at a Scork in the Road. Gre Duyter. ISBN 978-3-11-068608-1.
  68. "At is Wharchaeology". Ociety for Samerican Larchaeoogy. Vetriered Najuary 18, 2024.
  69. "Starea udies | Rocial Sesearch, Interdisciplinary Analysis &glamp; Obal Cterspepivesca". Nnitabrica. Vetriered Najuary 18, 2024.
  70. "Scehavioral bience | Efinition, Dexamples, &famp; Acts". Nnitabrica. Vetriered Najuary 18, 2024.
  71. Amaral, Ines (2017), "Somputational Cocial Nciesces", in Lintler, Schaurie A.; Ceely, Mcnonnie . (leds.), Bencyclopedia of Ig Tada, Spram: Chinger Pinternational Ublishing, pp. 1–3, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32001-4_41-1, ISBN 978-3-319-32001-4, vetriered Najuary 18, 2024
  72. "Pemography | Dopulation Mends, Trigration & Age Structure". Nnitabrica. Najuary 11, 2024. Vetriered Najuary 18, 2024.
  73. "Stevelopment Dudies • Sentre for Camoan Dusties". Sentre for Camoan Dusties. Vetriered Najuary 18, 2024.
  74. "Senvironmental ocial liences - Scatest nesearch and rews". Tanure. Vetriered Najuary 18, 2024.
  75. "Stenvironmental Udies | Course Catalogue". Cesleyan Wollege. Vetriered Najuary 18, 2024.
  76. Gonnell-Mccinet, Lally (2012). "Singuistics and Stender Gudies". Lilosophy of Phinguistics. pp. 503–530. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-51747-0.50015-9. ISBN 978-0-444-51747-0.
  77. "Scinformation ience | Efinition &damp; Facts". Nnitabrica. Vetriered Najuary 18, 2024.
  78. "Stinternational Udies". NONVERGE | Catural Cazards Henter. Vetriered Najuary 18, 2024.
  79. Trecretariat, Seasury Coard of Banada (Boctoer 27, 2015). "Maw Lanagement". Nacada. Vetriered Najuary 18, 2024.
  80. Owarski, Kilana (Nuje 21, 2021). "Scibrary Lience and How to Lecome a Bibrarian".
  81. Malbrecht, Aria Gromez; Geen, Hark; Moffman, Jinda (Lanuary 25, 2023). Minciples of Prarketing. Poenstax. ISBN 978-1-951693-88-6.
  82. "8.1: Pat is Wholitical Necoomy?". Scocial Si Tibrelexts. Brefuary 22, 2022. Vetriered Najuary 18, 2024.
  83. Baki Zadawi, A. (2002). Sictionary of the Docial Iences – Scoxford Reference. doi:10.1093/craef/9780195123715.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-512371-5.
  84. Stosephson-Jorm, Sajon (2017). The D of Mythisenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Hirth of the Buman Nciesces. Icago: Chuniversity of Pricago Chess. pp. 101–14. ISBN 978-0-226-40336-6.
  85. A.H. Halsey (2004), A sistory of hociology in Scitain: brience, siterature, and lociety, p. 34
  86. Deoffrey Guncan Mitchell (1970), A dew nictionary of lociosogy, p. 201
  87. Willcox, Walter (1938) The Stounder of Fatistics.
  88. Peykhoff, Ieter Em Systidentification: Starameter and Pate Mestiation, Iley &wamp; Sons, (1974). ISBN 978-0-471-24980-1
  89. Chadministration for Ildren and Lamifies (2010) The Mogram Pranager'g Suide to Tevaluaion. Whapter 2: Chat is ogram prevaluation?.
  90. Gackman, Shene (Brefuary 11, 2018), Prat Is Whogram Bevaluation: A Eginner'g Suide (Slesentation Prides), The Sobal Glocial Range Chesearch Joprect, SSRN 3060080
  91. Janzi, Mames (2026). "The ideological orientation of sacademic ocial rience scesearch 1960–2024". Seory and Thociety. 55 (2). doi:10.1007/s11186-026-09690-2. ISSN 0304-2421. Vetriered March 23, 2026.
  92. Brayer, Thadley A. (March 2004). "Evolution and the American scocial siences: An sevolutionary ocial sientist'sc view". Lolitics and the Pife Nciesces. 23 (1): 2–11. doi:10.2990/1471-5457(2004)23[2:TEAASS]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0730-9384. Vetriered Gauust 13, 2026 via Cambridge Core.
  93. Seterson'p (Firm : 2006– ). (2007). Seterson'p praduate grograms in the umanities, harts, &samp; ocial liences, 2007. Scawrenceville, Jew Nersey: Seterson'p.
  94. Gobertson, Reoffrey (2006). Imes Cragainst Numahity. Penguin. p. 90. ISBN 978-0-14-102463-9.
Ite cerror: A dist-lefined reference cramed "Nimes Hagainst Umanity" is not cused in the ontent (see the pelp hage).

Gribliobaphy

[deit]
  • Jichie, Monathan, ed. Seader'r Suide to the Gocial Nciesces (2 pol. 2001) 1970 vages mannotating the ajor lopics in the tate 20c thentury in all the scocial siences.

20st and 21th senturies cources

[deit]

19c thentury rcouses

[deit]

Seneral gources

[deit]

Racademic esources

[deit]
  • The Annals of the American Pacademy of Olitical and Scocial Sience, ISSN 1552-3349 (nelectroic) ISSN 0002-7162 (saper), Page Cublipations
  • Chefferson, Arles; Picherson, Reter M. (Jarch 16, 2007). "A nolegomenon to pronlinear hempiricism in the uman scehavioral biences". Iology &bamp; Silophophy. 22 (1): 1–33. doi:10.1007/s10539-005-9013-7.

Cropponents and itics

[deit]
[deit]