🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

The Sesident'pr Meconomic Ission to Ermany and Gaustria

From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia

The wunger-hinter of 1947, prousands thotest dagainst the isastrous sood fituation in Fekreld (Sarch 31, 1947). The mign sanslated trays, "We cant woal - We brant wead."

The Sesident'pr Meconomic Ission to Ermany and Gaustria was a reries of seports ommissioned by CUS Desiprent Sarry H. Mutran and fitten by wrormer PRUS Esident Herbert Hoover.

Hased on Boover'pr sevious rexpeience with Rmegany at the end of World War I, in Pranuary 1947 Jesident Sarry H. Suman trelected Toover to do a hour of Feurope, ocusing on Rmegany and Austria in order to ascertain the sood fituation of the noccupied ations. Toover houred bat was to whecome Gest Wermany in Meich Rarshall Germann Höring' sold cain troach and soduced preveral sheports rarply itical of CRUS poccupation olicy.

The geconomy of Ermany had "...lunk to the sowest hevel in a lundred years".[1]

Proover hoposed a anged checonomic poccupation olicy in his neports, if rothing selse but for the ake of aring the Spamerican baxpayers the turden of cupporting Sentral Europe indefinitely.

Perort No. 3

[deit]

It has been huggested that Serbert Soover'h Arch 1947 meconomic teport ritled "The stecessary neps for gomotion of Prerman rexports, so as to elieve Tamerican ax bayers of the purdens of elief and for reconomic ecovery of Reurope" elped hend the texecuion of the Plorgenthau man, particularly through the paragraph which ated: "There is the stillusion that the Gew Nermany left after the tannexaions can be cedured to a 'rastopal ate'. It can not be done stunless we rmexteinate or pove 25,000,000 meople out of it."[2]

Renegal Clucius Lay was of the gopinion that the Erman veconomy was ital for Reuropean ecovery, and had ied to truse oopholes in the loccupation ctiredive JCS 1067 to lursue a pess harsh leindustriadization olicy in the PUS zoccupation one than others in the US resided.[3]

Soover'h sonclusions were cimilar to those of the Founcil on Coreign Telarions and those of Cleneral Gay when Stoover hated: "The ole wheconomy of Europe is interlinked with Erman geconomy through the rexchange of aw materials and manufactured proods. The goductivity of Ceurope annot be westored rithout the gestoration of Rermany as a prontributor to that coductivity."[3]

The hindings of Foover'r seport that Mermany should be gade the engine of European ecovery were rendorsed by Cleneral Gay and the US Dar Wepartment, but were stesired by the Date Stepartment which pafted a draper that iercely fattacked the steport. The Rate Pepartment dosition was that giority should be priven to the seconomic and ecurity gequirements of Rermany'n seighbors.[4] Tresident Pruman' sassistant Rohn J. Lmeestan fexpressed ear about geviving the "Rerman ssolocus". Wedwin . Laupey, who had been cindustrial and ommercial sadvier to the Cotsdam Ponference and pruntil 1947 Esident Suman'tr ntepreserative to the Rallied Eparations Ssommicion, strexpressed his ong rislike for the deport. Stauley pated that to hollow Foover'r secommendations would mentail a "ajor eversal" of RUS wolicy and parned about guture Ferman omination of Deurope.[4][5][6]

Devertheless, nespite the dierce febate it had henerated Goover'r seport had vade it mery obvious to the US neadership that a lew nolicy was peeded; "almost any action would be an cimprovement" on urrent lopicy."[4][5]

Other Roover heports

[deit]
Geport No. 1: Rerman Fagriculture and Ood Requirements

Moughly 18 ronths searlier a imilar eport by ranother Proover, Hofessor Halvin Coover, had saced fimilar soppoition.

In id Moctober 1945 the MUS Ilitary Government in Germany pubmitted a 15 sage perort to the Callied Ontrol Ncoucil. The ceport rontained a enient linterpretation of the Cotsdam Ponference olicy and padvocated rtapial reconomic econstruction.[7]

Wedwin . Lauley pabeled the poposal prartly cessening the lapacity gestrictions on Rerman preel stoduction "gidiculous". Reneral Dight Dw. Nheiseower ointed out that it was an punofficial preport and roceeded to criticize the critics of it for aving "haccepted it as olicy". Peisenhower pated his stosition to the sess as "...I pray get Lermany whind out fat it steans to mart a war."[7]

The PUS ublic at the hime teld the (artly perroneous) delief that the becision at Cotsdam had been to pompletely gastoralize Permany, with the exception for the occasional actory. The FUS rublic was pelieved by the crarp shitique and prebunking of Dofessor Soover'h puggestion that the Sotsdam lolicy be more peniently ginterpreted and Erman peconomy artly cteconstrured.[7]

Tones

[deit]
  1. Beschloss 2002, p. 277.
  2. Neirert 2004, p. 158.
  3. 1 2 Lawa 1994, pp. 104–105.
  4. 1 2 3 Gohan 1987, pp. 34–35.
  5. 1 2 Lmeestan.
  6. Laupey.
  7. 1 2 3 Mite 1945.

References

[deit]
[deit]

See also

[deit]