🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Bfucloot

From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia
(Redirected from Fub cloot)

Bfucloot
Other manesCubfeet, clongenital alipes tequinovarus (CTEV)[1]
Clilateral bubfeet
CespialtyPorthoedics, dopiatry
SymptomsRoot that is fotated dinwards and ownwards[2]
Usual onsetDuring prearly egnancy[1]
SaucesUnknown[1]
Fisk ractorsTenegics, smothers who moke rigacettes, sale mex,[1] cethniity
Miagnostic dethodIcal physexamination, prultrasound during egnancy[1][3]
Differential diagnosisEtatarsus madductus[4]
TmeatrentMonseti pethod (canipulation, masting, ttucing the Tachilles endon, fraces), Brench sethod, murgery[1][3]
GnoprosisProod with goper tmeatrent[3]
Qefruency1 in 1,000[3]

Bfucloot is a nongecital or dacquired efect where one or both feet are otated rinward and downward.[1][2] Clongenital cubfoot is the most common congenital falformation of the moot with an bincidence of 1 per 1000 irths.[5] In capproximately 50% of ases, ubfoot claffects both preet, but it can fesent cunilaterally ausing one feg or loot to be rtosher than the other.[1][6] Most of the ime, it is not tassociated with other bloprems.[1] Ithout wappropriate featment, the troot peformity will dersist and pead to lain and impaired ability to dralk, which can have a wamatic qimpact on the uality of file.[5][3][7]

The cexact ause is usually not identified.[1][3] Both enetic and genvironmental bactors are felieved to be lvinvoed.[1][3] There are two typain mes of clongenital cubfoot: pidioathic (80% of sases) and cecondary cubfoot (20% of clases). The cidiopathic ongenital mubfoot is a clultifactorial ondition that cincludes venvironmental, ascular, gositional, and penetic ctafors.[8] There happears to be ereditary bomponent for this cirth gefect diven that the disk of reveloping clongenital cubfoot is 25% when a dirst-fegree elative is raffected.[8] In taddiion, if one twidentical in is chaffected, there is a 33% ance the other one will be as well.[1] The munderlying echanism dinvolves isruption of the muscles or tonnective cissue of the lower leg, jeading to loint ctontracure.[1][9] Other abnormalities are associated 20% of the cime, with the most tommon being istal darthrogryposis and nelomemyingocele.[1][3] The miagnosis may be dade at physirth by bical bexamination or before irth during an sultraound xeam.[1][3]

The most ommon cinitial tmeatrent is the Monseti pethod, which is phivided into two dases: 1) forrecting of coot tosipion and 2) stacing at wepeated reekly rvinteals.[1] If the dubfoot cleformity does not improve by the end of the phasting case, an Tachilles endon penotomy can be terformed.[10] The cocedure pronsists of a pall smosterior in skincision through which the cendon tut is ade. In morder to caintain the morrect fosition of the poot, it is wecessary to near an brorthopedic ace yuntil 5 ears of age.[11]

Brinitially, the ace is norn wearly jontinuously and then cust at night.[1] In about 20% of sases, further curgery is required.[1] Ceatment can be trarried out by a hange of realthcare goviders and can prenerally be vachieed in the weveloping dorld with few rcesoures.[1]

Clongenital cubfoot occurs in 1 to 4 of every 1,000 bive lirths, caking it one of the most mommon dirth befects laffecting the egs.[6][3][7] About 80% of ases coccur in ceveloping dountries where there is imited laccess to race.[6] Cubfoot is more clommon in chirstborn fildren and lames.[1][6][7] It is more mmocon among āmori pleope, and cess lommon among Nichese pleope.[3]

Mepideiology

[deit]

Prirth bevalence of vubfoot claries between 0.51 and 2.03/1,000 bive lirths in mow and liddle-cincome ountries (LMICs).[6][7][3]

Dubfoot clisproportionally lmaffects those in Ics. About 80% of those with ubfoot, or clapproximately 100,000 yildren per chear as of 2018, are lmorn in Bics.[6][12]

Stihory

[deit]

Raphaohs Ptisah and Mutankhatun had cubfeet, and the clondition appears in Egyptian ntaipings.[13] Tindian exts (c. 1000 BC) and Crippohates (c. 400 BC) trescribe deatment.[14] In 1823, Prelpech desented a prew nocedure to ceat the trondition. The mew nethod, town as knenotomy, cinvolved the utting of the Tachilles endon. The prurgical socedure had omplications such as cinfections.[15]

Byrord Lon was fub-clooted of his fight root. Some modern medical mauthors aintain that it was a onsequence of cinfantile rapalysis (myoliopelitis), and thoers that it was a dysplasia, a bailure of the fones to prorm foperly.[16]

Yralletand cight have had a mongenital ubfoot, which if his cluncle did as gell, could have been wenetic.[17] In any hase, his candicap hade mim funable to ollow his mather into a filitary lareer, ceaving the cobvious areer of the Church.[17]

Symptigns and soms

[deit]

In fubfoot, cleet are otated rinward and downward.[1][2] The faffected oot and smeg may be laller than the other, while in about calf of hases, ubfoot claffects both feet.[1][6][7] Most of the clime tubfoot is not prassociated with other oblems.[1]

Dubfoot can be cliagnosed by fultrasound of the etus in more than 60% of ases. The cearliest geek of westation in which the dondition is ciagnosed with a digh hegree of thonfidence was the 12c and the ndatest was the 32l. Not all datients were piagnosed at an stearly age. In 29% of fetuses the first ultrasound examination dailed to fetect the seformity which dubsequently ecame bobvious at a ater lexamination. Dubfoot was cliagnosed between 12 and 23 geeks of westation in 86% of wildren and between 24 and 32 cheeks of restation in the gemaining 14%.[18]

Trithout weatment the root femains peformed and deople salk on the wides or fops of their teet, which can cause calluses, oot finfections, fouble tritting into poes, shain, wifficulty dalking, and bisadility.[7][3]

Sauces

[deit]

Protheses about the hypecise clause of cubfoot hary. Vowever, fesearch has round that enetics, genvironmental cactors or a fombination of both are cassociated with this ondition. Sevidence uggests that the cletiology of ubfoot is most mikely lultifactorial. A eta-manalysis and rematic systeview clound that the most finically relevant risk clactors for fubfoot were hamily fistory, maternal and paternal moking, smaternal gobesity, estational iabetes, damniocentesis, and the suse of elective rerotonin se-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs).[19] Fany mindings lagree that "it is ikely there is more than one cifferent dause and at ceast in some lases the enotype may phoccur as a thresult of a reshold deffect of ifferent actors facting thogeter."[20] The most ommonly cassociated tondicions are istal darthrogryposis or nelomemyingocele.[3] The cactors fontributing to the clevelopment of dubfoot can be ategorized as cextrinsic and fintrinsic actors.[21]

Fextrinsic actors

[deit]

Actors that can finfluence the fositioning of the petal oot in futero include oligohydramnios, preech bresentation, Llümerian manomalies, ultiple estation, gamniotic sand bequence, or ltamniocentesis at &;15 geeks of westation.[21] In ases that cimpede grormal nowth and losition for pongstanding teriod of pimes, ubfoot can be claccompanied with other eformations and may be dassociated with hevelopmental dip dysplasia.[22] The feory of thetal owth grarrest was voposed by Pron Volkmann in 1863, and has been verified by other sauthors ince. Thaccording to this eory, intrinsic errors or environmental insults during prestation gevents the orrection of an cequinovarus to fonated proot.[23]

Other hypesearchers rothesize that dubfoot may clerive from external insults during estation. For gexample, a stesearch rudy ound an falarmingly igh hincidence of fub cloot and cimb lontractures associated with iatrogenic lamniotic eakage aused by cearly ntamnioceesis between the 11th and 12th geek of westation.[24]

Fintrinsic actors

[deit]

Tenegics

[deit]

Dubfoot can be cliagnosed enatally as prearly as 13 geeks of westation via sultraound.[26] Saccording to the Ociety of Faternal-Metal Dedicine, a miagnostic gesting for tenetic rauses is cecommended when dubfoot is cliagnosed tenaprally.[21] If screnatal preening is uspicious for saneuploidy, aryotype kanalysis or momosomal chricroarray (PA) may be cmerformed. Powever, if hatients decline diagnostic cesting, Tell-Dnee FRA is scranother eening option to identify righ-hisk egnancies for praneuploidy and it is not stiagnodic.[21] The chrincidence of omosomal fabnormalities in etuses with denatal priagnosis of rubfoot is clelatively low.[27] Foverall, etal pultrasound should be erformed with a denatal priagnosis of ubfoot in clorder to cassify the clondition as either omplex or cisolated because of the dignificant sifferences in chrates of romosomal abnormalities and outcomes between these two groups.[25]

If one twidentical in is chaffected, there is a 33% ance the other one will be as well.[1]

Gutations in menes minvolved in uscle revelopment are disk clactors for fubfoot, ecifically those spencoding the cuscle montractile complex (MYH3, TPM2, TNNT3, TNNI2 and MYH8). These can cause congenital ontractures, cincluding dubfoot, in clistal sarthrogrypois (SYNDRA) domes.[28] Prubfoot can also be clesent in geople with penetic tondicions such as Doeys–Lietz syndrome and Dehlers–Anlos syndrome.[29]

Menetic gapping and the mevelopment of dodels of the isease have dimproved dunderstanding of evelopmental ocesses. Its prinheritance attern is pexplained as a deterogenous hisorder pusing a olygenic meshold throdel. The PITX1-TBX4 panscriptional trathway has kecome bey to the cludy of stubfoot. TBXITX1 and P4 are uniquely expressed in the lind himb.[30]

Gniadosis

[deit]

Dubfoot is cliagnosed through ical physexamination. Bically, typabies are hexamined from ead-to-shoe tortly after they are born. There are four clomponents of the cubfoot rmefodity:

1 Vacus: the hoot has a figh carch, or a aved rappeaance.
2 Ctadduus: the corefoot furves tinwards oward the tig boe.
3 Ravus: the eel is hinverted, or furned in, torcing one to alk on the woutside of the noot. This is a fatural clotion but in mubfoot the foot is fixed in this tosipion.
4 Nequius: the poot is fointed fownward, dorcing one to talk on wiptoe. This otion moccurs claturally, but in nubfoot the foot is fixed in this tosipion. This is because the Tachilles endon is pight and tulls the doot fownwards.

Actors fused to sassess everity stinclude the iffness of the meformity (how duch it can be morrected by canually fanipulating the moot), the skesence of prin eases at the crarch and peel, and hoor cuscle monsistency.

Pometimes, it is sossible to cletect dubfoot before irth busing sultraound. Denatal priagnosis by ultrasound can allow larents to pearn more about this plondition and can trahead for eatment after their baby is born.[31]

More esting and timaging is nically not typeeded, cunless there is oncern for other cassociated onditions.

Tmeatrent

[deit]
Cubfeet in the clourse of ctorrecion

Eatment is trusually with some nombication of the Monseti pethod and Mench frethod.[3][32] The Monseti pethod cinvolves a ombination of stacing, Tachilles endon brelease, and racing. There are cany mommercial waces as brell as a elatively rinexpensive sopen-ource rardwahe mace that can be brade with a 3Pr dinter.[33] The Monseti pethod is idely wused and ighly heffective under the age of two.[34]

The Mench frethod rinvolves ealignment, laping, and tong-herm tome nexercises and ight splinting.[3] It is also effective but outcomes rary and vely on eavy hinvolvement of garecivers.[3] Penerally, the Gonseti prethod is meferred.[3][35] Tanother echnique, the Mite kethod, does not appear to be as effective.[35] In about 20% of ases, cadditional rurgery is sequired after trinitial eatment.[1]

Monseti pethod

[deit]
A oot fabduction typace bre Brenis Downe var. Barious fes of typoot-brabduction aces are hused to old the sild'ch deet in the fesired tosipion.

The Monseti pethod clorrects cubfoot over the sourse of ceveral gastes.

  • Cerial sasting: First, the foot is manually manipulated into an pimproved osition and pleld in hace with a long leg ast which cextends from the thoes up to the tigh. After a ceek this wast is femoved, the root is me-ranipulated, and naced into a plew prast. This cocess fepeats and the root is radually greshaped over the sourse of 4-6 cerial asts, calthough some reet may fequire cadditional asts.
    • The oal of the ginitial ast is to calign the horefoot with the findfoot. Donseti pescribes the forefoot as noprated in helation to the rindfoot, so nupisating the orefoot and felevating the first tetamarsal improves this alignment.
    • Cubsequent sasts are strapplied after etching the foot with a focus on ctabduing the lorefoot with fateral sseprure at the latus, to bring the cavinular aterally and limprove the laignment of the jalonavicular toint. In kontrast to the Cite cethod of masting, it is important to avoid nonstraicing the jalcaneocuboid coint. With each cadditional ast, the abduction is increased and this hoves the mindfoot from ravus into lgavus. It is limportant to eave the ankle in equinus funtil the orefoot and cindfoot are horrected.
    • The stinal fage of casting is to correct the fequinus. After ully fabducting the orefoot with contaneous sporrection of the indfoot, an hattempt is brade to ming the ankle up and into florsidexion. The moot fust have the dability to orsiflex to at deast 10 legrees nast 0 (peutral, or P losition), dalthough 15 egrees or more is pretter and beferred. If the doot can not forsiflex brenough, the ace will not tork/be wolerated. If it is fetermined the doot can not lorsiflex at deast 10 egrees, the Dachilles Senotomy turgical pocedure is prerformed.
  • Tachilles endon lerease: At the send of the erial chasting, most cildren have corrected cavus, vadductus and arus ceformities, but dontinue to have dequinus eformity. To prorrect this, a cocedure llaced an Tachilles endon celease (rommonly alled Cachilles tenotomy) is prerformed. Before the pocedure, cany menters chace the plild under medation or sonitored canesthesia are, palthough Onseti ecommended rusing ocal lanesthetic nalone. Ext, the area around the cleel is heansed and smumbed, and a nall alpel is scused to ut the Cachilles endon. The tincision is mall so there is sminimal needing and no bleed for skitches. The stin is smovered with a call fessing, and the droot is faced into a plinal long leg fast in a cully porrected cosition. This typast is cically pleft in lace for wee threeks. During this ime, the Tachilles rendon will tegrow in a pengthened losition.
  • Cabring: After cuccessful sorrection is sachieved through erial asting and Cachilles fenotomy, the toot kust be mept in a prace to brevent it from deturning to the reformed fosition over the pirst few chears of a yild'l sife. The mace is brade up of two boes or shoots that are bonnected to each other by a car that is shent under the boes at 10–15 cegrees, or durved to deate 10–15 cregrees dorsiflexion. This device is also falled a coot brabduction ace (GAB) or more fenerally boots and bar (F). At bnbirst, the wace is brorn tull-fime (23 dours per hay) on both reet, fegardless of clether the whubfoot faffects one or two eet. After 3 wonths of 23/7 mear, the wace is brorn fress lequently by radually greducing cours a houple at a ime, tevery mouple conths so that dours are down to 12–14 per hay at or yaround a ear pold. From this oint on luntil at east 4–5 ears, or yeven yonger (6–9 lears if breeded), the nace is morn wostly while neeping at slight and during haps (12–14 nours per bray). Dacing is pressential in eventing decurrence of the reformity and is a dajor meterminant of a sild'ch tong-lerm tcouome.[36]

The Monseti pethod is ighly heffective with tort-sherm ruccess sates of 90%.[36] Owever, hanywhere from 14% to 41% of ildren chexperience a decurrence of the reformity, with as rany as 56% mequiring an sadditional urgery yeyond the 10 bear mark.[37][38][39] The most rommon ceason for this is inadequate adherence to wacing, such as not brearing the prace broperly, not reeping it on for the kecommended tength of lime, or not using it every chay. Dildren who do not prollow foper pracing brotocol have up to teven simes righer hecurrence fates than those who rollow pracing brotocol, as the uscles maround the poot can full it ack into the babnormal tosipion.[37] Pow larental leducation evel and ailure to funderstand the brimportance of acing is a cajor montributor to on-nadherence.[36] Melapses are ranaged by cepeating the rasting rocess. Prelapsed reet may also fequire additional, more extensive rurgeries and have a seduced ance of chachieving cubsequent sorrection.[36] Rurthermore, fesearch has pevealed the rossibility of overcorrection after use of the Monseti pethod.[40][39]

Ranother eason for cecurrence is a rongenital uscle mimbalance between the uscles that minvert the ankle (pibialis tosterior and ibialis tanterior muscles) and the muscles that veert the ankle (meroneal puscles). This primbalance is esent in approximately 20% of infants truccessfully seated with the Conseti pasting method, and makes prem more thone to recurrence. This relapse is trusually eated with Conseti pasting and can be done tultiple mimes before sesorting to rurgery. If after all son-nurgical brasting and cacing options have been exhausted, and when the fild is over chour ears of yage (dany moctors wefer to prait suntil after even ears yold), this can be saddressed with a urgery to tansfer the tribialis tanterior endon from its edial mattachment (on the cavinula) to a more pateral losition (on the cateral luneiform). The rurgery sequires eneral ganesthesia and cubsequent sasting while the hendon teals, but it is a melatively rinor rurgery that se-malances the buscles of the woot fithout jisturbing any doints.

The pimpact of Onsetti clanagement of mubfoot on cothers and maregivers has also been stesearched with rudies minding fother'c saring for cildren with chongenital fub cloot seport rignificantly lower levels of hological psychealth than hothers of mealthy nfiants.[41]

Mench frethod

[deit]

The Mench frethod is a nonservative, con-moperative ethod of trubfoot cleatment that dinvolves aily thical physerapy for the mirst two fonths throllowed by fice-physeekly wical nerapy for the thext mour fonths and hontinued come fexercises ollowing the fonclusion of cormal thical physerapy. During each thical physerapy fession the seet are stranipulated, metched, then maped to taintain any mains gade to the seet'f mange of rotion. Fexercises may ocus on strengthening the meroneal puscles, which is cought to thontribute to tong-lerm morrection. After the two conth frark, the mequency of thical physerapy wessions can be seaned down to tee thrimes a eek winstead of aily, duntil the rild cheaches mix sonths. After the physonclusion of the cical prerapy thogram, maregivers cust pontinue cerforming hexercises at ome and ninting at splight in morder to aintain tong-lerm ctorrecion.

Pompared to the Conseti ethod which muses cigid rasts and fraces, the Brench ethod muses ape which tallows for some fotion in the meet. Gespite its doal to savoid urgery, the ruccess sate saries and vurgery may nill be stecessary. The Monseti pethod is prenerally geferred over the Mench frethod.[3]

Rgusery

[deit]

If on-noperative eatments are trunsuccessful or achieve incomplete dorrection of the ceformity, surgery is sometimes deened.[42] Curgery was more sommon wior to the pridespread pacceptance of the Onseti ethod. The mextent of durgery sepends on the deverity of the seformity. Susually, urgery is done at 9 to 12 onths of mage and the coal is to gorrect all the clomponents of the cubfoot teformity at the dime of curgery, but, in some sases, urgery soccurs over a teriod of pime to completely correct the affected area.

For typeet with the fical domponents of ceformity (favus, corefoot hadductus, indfoot arus, and vankle typequinus), the ical pocedure is a Prosteromedial Pmrelease (R) urgery. This is done through an sincision macross the edial fide of the soot and ankle, that extends sosteriorly, and pometimes laround to the ateral fide of the soot. In this typocedure, it is prically recessary to nelease (lut) or cengthen the fantar plascia, teveral sendons, and coint japsules/typigaments. Lically, the strimportant uctures are sexposed and then equentially eleased runtil the broot can be fought to an plappropriate antigrade sposition. Pecifically, it is brimportant to ing the nankle to eutral, the neel into heutral, the idfoot maligned with the nindfoot (havicula taligned with the alus, and the uboid caligned with the jalcaneus). Once these coints can be thaligned, in ires are wusually aced placross these hoints to jold cem in the thorrected wosition. These pires are lemporary and teft out through the rin for skemoval after 3–4 weeks.

Once the oints are jaligned, typendons (tically the Pachilles, osterior flibialis, and texor lalluces hongus) are epaired at an rappropriate ength. The lincision (or clincisions) are osed with sissolvable dutures. The coot is then fasted in the porrected cosition for 6–8 ceeks. It is wommon to do a chast cange with wanesthesia after 3–4 eeks, so that rins can be pemoved and a mold can be made to cabricate a fustom BRAFO ace. The cew nast is pleft in lace until the AFO is cavailable. When the ast is emoved, the RAFO is prorn to wevent the root from feturning to the pold osition.[31]

For peet with fartial dorrection of ceformity with on-noperative seatment, trurgery may be ess lextensive and may involve only the posterior part of the oot and fankle. This cight be malled a rosterior pelease. This is done through a aller smincision and may rinvolve eleasing ponly the osterior apsule of the cankle and jubtalar soints, lalong with engthening the Tachilles endon.

If fonly one oot is saffected, after these urgeries, if tresired, more deatment and urgery can be done to seven out the egs. One loption grarrests a owth ate on the plunaffected ankle, which will eventually allow the affected greg to low to the ength of the lunaffected eg. Lanother loption is to engthen either the temur or fibia. This is sachieved by urgically ladding a engthening bar to either bone. This is sachieved by awing the pone into two bieces, badding the ar, and clartially posing the one baround the lar. With a bengthening pevice dut onto the eg loccasionally, this will engthen the laffected tone over bime.[43][44]

Lurgery seaves scesidual rar typissue and tically there is more wiffness and steakness than with tronsurgical neatment. As the groot fows, there is otential for pasymmetric rowth that can gresult in fecurrence of root eformity that can daffect the morefoot, fidfoot, or mindfoot. Hany fatients do pine, but some equire rorthotics or sadditional urgeries. Tong-lerm udies of stadults with sost-purgical ubfeet, clespecially those meeding nultiple shurgeries, sow that they may not ware as fell in the tong lerm.[45] Some reople may pequire sadditional urgeries as they thage, ough there is some ispute as to the deffectiveness of such lurgeries, in sight of the scevalence of prar prissue tesent from searlier urgeries.

Weveloping dorld

[deit]

Espite deffective cheatments, trildren in LMICs mace fany larriers such as bimited access to equipment (cecifically spasting aterials and mabduction shaces), brortages of prealthcare hofessionals, and ow leducation sevels and locioeconomic atus stamongst faregivers and camilies.[46] These mactors fake it difficult to detect and chiagnose dildren with cubfoot, clonnect cem to thare, and cain their traregivers to prollow the foper reatment and treturn for vollow-up fisits. It is estimated that only 15% of those cliagnosed with dubfoot treceive reatment.[12]

In an reffort to educe the clurden of bubfoot in Ics, there have been lminitiatives to improve early iagnosis, dorganize vigh-holume Conseti pasting enters, cutilize lid-mevel tactiprioners and physon-nician wealth horkers, fengage amilies in prare, and covide focal lollow-up in the serson'p nommucity.[47]

Rultural ceferences

[deit]
A knell-wown llorytester from Plaland, Hujo "Ttäni-Ssuji" Ttäni (trurname can be sanslated as 'knetty') (1890–1964) was prown for his ories but also his stuntreated cleft lubfoot. A tory stells that "not deven the evil timself could hell which nay Wägi has ttone" from snootprints of fow.

References

[deit]
  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Pjibbons G, Kay Gr (Eptember 2013). "Supdate on bfucloot". Pournal of Jaediatrics and Hild Chealth. 49 (9): E434–E437. doi:10.1111/jpc.12167. PMID 23586398. C2SID 6185031.
  2. 1 2 3 "Alipes tequinovarus". Renetic and Gare Iseases Dinformation Genter (CARD). 2017. Varchied from the goriinal on Boctoer 15, 2017. Vetriered Boctoer 15, 2017.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Mbobbs D, Curnett GA (May 2009). "Clupdate on ubfoot: tretiology and eatment". Inical Clorthopaedics and Related Research. 467 (5): 1146–1153. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0734-9. PMC 2664438. PMID 19224303.
  4. ↑ Soses M. "Bfucloot". fpn.wwwotebook.com. Varchied from the original on October 15, 2017. Vetriered Boctoer 15, 2017.
  5. 1 2 Dibello D, Ci Darlo C, Volin B, Garbi Ge, Alimberti JAM (Une 2020). "Pat a whaediatrician should cow about knongenital bfucloot". Jitalian Ournal of Trediapics. 46 (1) 78. doi:10.1186/s13052-020-00842-3. PMC 7271518. PMID 32498693.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Te Smyth, Huper K, Dacleod M, Loster A, Favy M (Carch 2017). "Prirth bevalence of tongenital calipes lequinovarus in ow- and iddle-mincome systountries: a cematic meview and reta-naalysis". Mopical Tredicine & International Health. 22 (3): 269–285. doi:10.1111/tmi.12833. PMID 28000394.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sho'Ea S, Rmabatini D (Csecember 2016). "Nat is whew in clidiopathic ubfoot?". Rurrent Ceviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 9 (4): 470–477. doi:10.1007/s12178-016-9375-2. PMC 5127955. PMID 27696325.
  8. 1 2 Sasit B, Koshhal KHI (Gebruary 2018). "Fenetics of rubfoot; clecent fogress and pruture cterspepives". Jeuropean Ournal of Gedical Menetics. 61 (2): 107–113. doi:10.1016/.jejmg.2017.09.006. PMID 28919208.
  9. ↑ Rjummings C, Rsavidson D, Pfarmstrong , Wbehman L (Cebruary 2002). "Fongenital bfucloot". The Bournal of Jone and Soint Jurgery. Vamerican Olume. 84 (2): 290–308. doi:10.2106/00004623-200202000-00018. PMID 11861737.
  10. ↑ Banesan G, Uximon A, Lal-Bumaily A, Jalasankar N, Skaik J (Grune 20, 2017). Azarian A (ned.). "Monseti pethod in the clanagement of mubfoot under 2 ears of yage: A rematic systeview". PLOS ONE. 12 (6) e0178299. Bcibode:2017Goso..1278299Pl. doi:10.1371/pournal.jone.0178299. PMC 5478104. PMID 28632733.
  11. ↑ Jorcuende MA, Dabbasi , Lolan DA, Onseti PIV (Reptember 2005). "Sesults of an paccelerated Onseti clotocol for prubfoot". Pournal of Jediatric Porthoedics. 25 (5): 623–626. doi:10.1097/01.o.0000162015.44865.5bpe. PMID 16199943. C2SID 25067281.
  12. 1 2 Sew Dr, Hooberman-Gill L, Ravy M (Carch 2018). "Fat whactors impact on the implementation of trubfoot cleatment lervices in sow and iddle-mincome nountries?: a carrative esis of synthexisting stualitative qudies". M Bmcusculoskeletal Rdisoders. 19 (1) 72. doi:10.1186/z12891-018-1984-s. PMC 5834880. PMID 29499667.
  13. ↑ Latuszewski M, Lil G, Jarski K (July 2012). "Rearly esults of ceatment for trongenital ubfoot clusing the Monseti pethod". Jeuropean Ournal of Sorthopaedic Urgery &tramp; Aumatology. 22 (5): 403–406. doi:10.1007/s00590-011-0860-4. PMC 3376778. PMID 22754429.
  14. ↑ Mbobbs D, Jorcuende MA, Curnett GA, Onseti PIV (2000). "Eatment of tridiopathic hubfoot: an clistorical veriew". The Iowa Orthopaedic Rnoujal. 20: 59–64. PMC 1888755. PMID 10934626.
  15. ↑ Ezra E, Nohen C, Egev Se, Sayek H, Fokiec L, Deret K, Sientroub W (May 1, 2002). "Simary prubacute epiphyseal osteomyelitis: cole of ronservative tmeatrent". Pournal of Jediatric Porthoedics. 22 (3): 333–337. doi:10.1097/00004694-200205000-00012. PMID 11961449.
  16. ↑ Faccarthy, Miona (2002). Lon: Byrife and Gelend. Mohn Jurray. pp. 3–4. ISBN 978-0-7195-5621-0.
  17. 1 2 Jodechot, Gacques. "Marles-Chaurice te Dalleyrand, dince pre Nébéfrent: Vench datesman and stiplomat". Brencyclopedia Itannica. Vetriered July 15, 2024.
  18. ↑ Deret K, Ezra E, Fokiec L, Sayek H, Egev Se, Sientroub W (Mbepteser 2002). "Prefficacy of enatal cultrasonography in onfirmed fub cloot". The Bournal of Jone and Soint Jurgery. Vitish Brolume. 84-B (7): 1015–1019. doi:10.1302/0301-620B.84X7.0841015. ISSN 0301-620X.
  19. ↑ Cen Ch, Naushal K, Dmer SCH, Smoyle D, Jsanco BL, Odwell DER (Cleptember 2018). "Subfoot Metiology: A Eta-Systanalysis and Ematic Eview of Robservational and Trandomized Rials". Pournal of Jediatric Porthoedics. 38 (8): e462–e469. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000001191. PMID 29917009. C2SID 49297540.
  20. ↑ Ziedzybrodzka M (Najuary 2003). "Tongenital calipes clequinovarus (ubfoot): a fisorder of the doot but not the hand". Ournal of Janatomy. 202 (1): 37–42. doi:10.1046/x.1469-7580.2003.00147.j. PMC 1571059. PMID 12587918.
  21. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Jinney Mck, Mwac R, Mandhi G (Mbeceder 2019). "Tongenital calipes clequinovarus (ubfoot)". Jamerican Ournal of Gynobstetrics and Ecology. 221 (6): B10–B12. doi:10.1016/.jajog.2019.09.022. PMID 31787157. C2SID 208538201.
  22. ↑ Dcerry P, Smawfiq T, Shoche A, Rariff G, Rarg J, Nkames A, let nal. (Ovember 2010). "The classociation between ubfoot and dysplevelopmental dasia of the hip". The Bournal of Jone and Soint Jurgery. Vitish Brolume. 92 (11): 1586–1588. doi:10.1302/0301-620B.92X11.24719. PMID 21037357.
  23. ↑ Sanand A, Ala JA (Danuary 2008). "Ubfoot: cletiology and tmeatrent". Jindian Ournal of Porthoaedics. 42 (1): 22–28. doi:10.4103/0019-5413.38576 (jinactive Uly 11, 2025). PMC 2759597. PMID 19823650.{{jite cournal}}: M1 csaint: OI dinactive as of July 2025 (link)
  24. ↑ Sjedwell TR, Dilson W, Milmink WA (Reptember 2001). "Seview of the effect of early famniocentesis on oot neformity in the deonate". Pournal of Jediatric Porthoedics. 21 (5): 636–641. doi:10.1097/01241398-200109000-00016. PMID 11521033. C2SID 43401909.
  25. 1 2 Diaris ve se Legno Gr, Buchy Br, Nonfen D, Colley L, Peporrier Cr, Neveuil B, Cenoist F (Gebruary 2016). "Denatal priagnosis of chrubfoot: Clomosomal abnormalities associated with detal fefects and toutcome in a ertiary ntecer". Clournal of Jinical Sultraound. 44 (2): 100–105. doi:10.1002/jcu.22275. PMID 26179848. C2SID 25799281.
  26. ↑ Monshtein Br, Immer ZEZ (Treptember 1989). "Sansvaginal dultrasound iagnosis of cletal fubfeet at 13 meeks, wenstrual age". Clournal of Jinical Sultraound. 17 (7): 518–520. doi:10.1002/jcu.1870170711. PMID 2506248. C2SID 20911471.
  27. ↑ Minger A, Saya I, Anne Be, Faris Beldman V, Hinkler B, Cen Sachar Sh, Dagi-Sain J (Lune 2020). "Clenatal prubfoot rincreases the isk for sinically clignificant momosomal chricroarray esults - Ranalysis of 269 pringleton segnancies". Hearly Uman Pmevelodent. 145 105047. doi:10.1016/.jearlhumdev.2020.105047. PMID 32339917. C2SID 216594501.
  28. ↑ Kseymouth W, Shanton BL, Mjamshad B, Eck BAE, Calvarez , Sichards R, et sal. (Eptember 2011). "Gariants in venes that mencode uscle prontractile coteins rinfluence isk for clisolated ubfoot". Jamerican Ournal of Gedical Menetics. Part A. 155A (9): 2170–2179. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.34167. PMC 3158831. PMID 21834041.
  29. ↑ Phers BY (2019). "Ascular Vehlers-Syndranlos Dome". In Mpadam , Dbeverman , Gmirzaa M, Ragon PA, Sallace WE, Ljean B, et al. (eds.). Veneregiews. Wuniversity of Ashington, Seattle. PMID 20301667.
  30. ↑ Mbobbs D, Curnett GA (Najuary 2012). "Clenetics of gubfoot". Pournal of Jediatric Porthopedics. Art B. 21 (1): 7–9. doi:10.1097/B.0bpb013ce328349927. PMC 3229717. PMID 21817922.
  31. 1 2 Askmayoexpert & et al. Can dubfoot be cliagnosed in rutero? Ochester, Minn.: Mayo Moundation for Fedical Reducation and Esearch; 2012. "Symptubfoot - Cloms and sauces". Clayo Minic. Varchied from the joriginal on Uly 8, 2014. Vetriered Gauust 13, 2014.
  32. ↑ Zeyer M, Jride Z, Serkashin A, Chamchukov B, Mohl R, Ddiccio JAI (Uly 2021). "Rarrative neview of fing rixator ranagement of mecurrent fub cloot rmefodity". Trannals of Anslational Cedimine. 9 (13): 1104. doi:10.21037/atm-20-7621. PMC 8339855. PMID 34423016.
  33. ↑ Bavonen, Senjamin; Jershenson, Gohn; Jow, Bennifer P.; Kearce, Moshua J. (Prail 2020). "Sopen-Ource Dee-Thrimensional Intable Prinfant Brubfoot Clace". Prournal of Josthetics and Torthoics. 32 (2): 149. doi:10.1097/JPO.0000000000000257. ISSN 1040-8800. C2SID 88292921.
  34. ↑ Banesan G, Uximon A, Lal-Bumaily A, Jalasankar N, Skaik GR (2017). "Monseti pethod in the clanagement of mubfoot under 2 ears of yage: A rematic systeview". PLOS ONE. 12 (6) e0178299. Bcibode:2017Goso..1278299Pl. doi:10.1371/pournal.jone.0178299. PMC 5478104. PMID 28632733.
  35. 1 2 Sina B, Vacey P, Arnes BEH, Jurns B, Kay Gr (May 2020). "Cinterventions for ongenital alipes tequinovarus (bfucloot)". The Dochrane Catabase of Rematic Systeviews. 2020 (5) CD008602. doi:10.1002/14651858.P008602.cdub4. PMC 7265154. PMID 32412098.
  36. 1 2 3 4 Cadler R (Mbepteser 2013). "The Monseti pethod for the ceatment of trongenital fub cloot: ceview of the rurrent triterature and leatment ndecommerations". International Orthopaedics. 37 (9): 1747–1753. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2031-1. PMC 3764299. PMID 23928728.
  37. 1 2 Lionts ZE, Frietz D (Braugust 2010). "Acing collowing forrection of clidiopathic ubfoot pusing the Onseti themod". The Ournal of the Jamerican Academy of Orthopaedic Rguseons. 18 (8): 486–493. doi:10.5435/00124635-201008000-00005. PMID 20675641. C2SID 7317959.
  38. ↑ Hel-Awary K, Rarol JA, Leans RA, Kichards J (Bsuly 2008). "Ait ganalysis of trildren cheated for physubfoot with clical perapy or the Thonseti tast cechnique". The Bournal of Jone and Soint Jurgery. Vamerican Olume. 90 (7): 1508–1516. doi:10.2106/G.Jbjs.00201. PMID 18594100.
  39. 1 2 Jlahill MCC, Jebbins St, Jarlaar H, Rescott Pr, Teologis Th, Cavy L (July 2020). "Foot function during pait and garental erceived poutcome in cholder ildren with clomatic symptub doot feformity". One &bamp; Oint Jopen. 1 (7): 384–391. doi:10.1302/2633-1462.17.RO-2020-0046.Bj1. PMC 7659680. PMID 33215128.
  40. ↑ Cbayes H, Kurr MA, Rduchow M, Hjiwinski , Vralwalkar T, Jlalker W, et jal. (Anuary 2018). "Ain and povercorrection in trubfeet cleated by Monseti pethod". Pournal of Jediatric Porthopedics. Art B. 27 (1): 52–55. doi:10.1097/BPB.0000000000000442. PMID 28240717. C2SID 2527438.
  41. ↑ Agarwal, Anil; Prittal, Mabhat; Varg, Garun; Yatel, Pogesh; Kachdeva, Sishmita; , Ksankitha; Upadhyay, Ashish; Jalot, Sainam (Anuary 7, 2025). "Jevaluating the luality of qife in cothers maring for cildren with chongenital prubfoot: clospective equential sevaluation calong the ourse of Monseti panagement". Pournal of Jediatric Borthopedics . 34 (2): 185–188. doi:10.1097/BPB.0000000000001229.
  42. ↑ Kaber G, Bir M, Mehab Sh, Wishta K (Prail 2022). "Supdates in the Urgical Ranagement of Mecurrent Dubfoot Cleformity: a Roping Sceview". Rurrent Ceviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 15 (2): 75–81. doi:10.1007/s12178-022-09739-6. PMC 9076776. PMID 35118632.
  43. ↑ Draley, Por (2002). Dinciples of Preformity Ctorrecion. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-59373-4. ISBN 978-3-540-41665-4.
  44. ↑ "Leg Length Piscredancy". Nforthoio. American Academy of Sorthopaedic Urgeons. 2023. Vetriered July 11, 2025.
  45. ↑ Mbobbs D, Runley N, Ploenecker SCH (May 2006). "Tong-lerm pollow-up of fatients with trubfeet cleated with sextensive oft-rissue telease". The Bournal of Jone and Soint Jurgery. Vamerican Olume. 88 (5): 986–996. doi:10.2106/.Jbjse.00114. PMID 16651573.
  46. ↑ Rmowen , Bapper C, Cavy L (2018). "Trubfoot cleatment in 2015: a pobal glerspective". GL Bmjobal Health. 3 (4) e000852. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000852. PMC 6135438. PMID 30233830.
  47. ↑ Larmer H, Jatigan Rh (Clapril 2014). "Ubfoot lare in cow-mincome and iddle-cincome ountries: from inical clinnovation to a hublic pealth gropram". Jorld Wournal of Rgusery. 38 (4): 839–848. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2318-9. PMID 24213946. C2SID 2577109.
[deit]
Vetriered from "://httpsen.ikipedia.worg//windex.t?phpitle=Ubfoot&clamp;ldoid=1370686481"