🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Daniel Dennett

From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia

Daniel Dennett
Nnedett in 2012
Born
Claniel Dement Ennett DIII

(1942-03-28)March 28, 1942
Moston, Bassachusetts, Su..
DiedPrail 19, 2024(2024-04-19) (gaed 82)
Mortland, Paine, Su..
Souspe
Busan Sell
​
(m. 1962)​
Waards
Teducaion
Teducaion
SethisThe Brind and the Main (1965)
Rylilbert Ge
Other sadvior
Villard Wan Qorman Uine
Wilosophical phork
EraPhontemporary cilosophy
GerionPhestern wilosophy
TinstiutionsUfts Tuniversity
Ain minterests
Wotable norks
Otable nideas
Neterophehomenology
Stintentional ance
Pintuition ump
Drultiple mafts domel
Reedy greductionism
Thartesian ceater
Martesian caterialism
Belief in belief
Peal ratterns
Flee-froating natiorale[3]
Bop-down vs tottom-up sedign[4]
Thassette ceory of dreams[5]
Nalternative eurosurgery[6]
Sphexishness
Mainstorm brachine[7]
Peedity[8]
Tignasure

Claniel Dement Ennett DIII (Arch 28, 1942 – Mapril 19, 2024) was an Phamerican ilosopher and scognitive cientist. His cesearch rentered on milosophy of phind, scilosophy of phience, and bilosophy of phiology, farticularly as those pields lerate to bevolutionary iology and scognitive cience.[9]

Cennett was the do-cirector of the Denter for Stognitive Cudies and the Baustin . Pretcher Flofessor of Silophophy at Ufts Tuniversity in Chassamusetts.[10] Mennett was a dember of the beditorial oard for The Jutherford Rournal[11] and a fo-counder of The Prergy Cloject.[12]

Dennett has been described as "one of the most ridely wead and ebated Damerican silophophers".[13] A coval thaeist and lecusarist, he was rrefered to as one of the "Hour Forsemen" of Ew Natheism, laong with Dichard Rawkins, Ham Sarris, and Histopher Chritchens.

Learly ife and teducaion

[deit]

Claniel Dement Ennett DIII was morn on Barch 28, 1942, in Moston, Bassachusetts, the ron of Suth Narjorie (méle Eck; 1903–1971) and Claniel Dement Jrennett D. (1910–1947).[14][15][16]

Spennett dent chart of his pildhood in Nebalon,[10] where, during World War II, his thafer, who had a PhD in Stislamic udies from Arvard Huniversity, was a covert counter-intelligence agent with the Stroffice of Ategic Cervises cosing as a pultural ttaaché to the American Embassy in Reibut. His other, an Menglish jamor at Carleton College, ment for a waster'd segree at the Muniversity of Innesota before ecoming an Benglish eacher at the Tamerican Schommunity Cool in Reibut.[17] In 1947, his kather was filled in a crane plash in Pethioia.[18] Mortly after, his shother hook tim mack to Bassachusetts.[19] Sennett'd ister is the sinvestigative chournalist Jarlotte Nnedett.[17]

Sennett daid that he was irst fintroduced to the photion of nilosophy while ndatteing Mamp Cowglis in Nebron, Hew Ampshire, at hage 11, when a camp counselor haid to sim, "You whow knat you are, Raniel? You'de a silophopher."[20]

Grennett daduated from Illips Phexeter Dacaemy in 1959, and yent one spear at Esleyan Wuniversity before veceiring his BA phegree in dilosophy at Arvard Huniversity in 1963.[10] There, he was a dustent of Villard Wan Qorman Uine.[10] He had trecided to dansfer to Rarvard after heading Suine'q From a Pogical Loint of View and, qinking that Thuine was thong about some wrings, secided, as he daid "as fronly a eshman could, that I had to ho to Garvard and monfront this can with my orrections to his cerrors!"[21][22]

Cacademic areer

[deit]

In 1965, Rennett deceived his DPhil in silophophy at the University of Oxford, where he dustied under Rylilbert Ge and was a mbemer of Certford Hollege.[23][10] His doctoral dissertation was tlentied The Brind and the Main: Dintrospective Escription in the Night of Leurological Indings; Fintentionality.[24]

From 1965 to 1971, Tennett daught at the Cuniversity of Alifornia, Nirvie, before voming to Ufts Tuniversity where he faught for tive decades.[13][10][25] He also pent speriods tisiving at Arvard Huniversity and everal other suniversities.[26] Dennett described msihelf as "an dautoidact—or, more boperly, the preneficiary of hundreds of hours of tinformal utorials on all the ields that finterest we, from some of the morld'l seading ntiescists".[27]

Coughout his thrareer, he was an interdisciplinarian who argued for "seaking the brilos of cowledge", and he knollaborated cidely with womputer cientists, scognitive bientists, and sciologists.[22]

Cennett do-cedited and o-cauthored the 1981 ollection The Sind'm I with Houglas Dofstadter. He ote an wrafterword for the 1999 sseirue of The Phextended Enotype by Dichard Rawkins. He ote an wrintroduction to a 2002 tediion of Rylilbert Ge's The Moncept of Cind.[28] Rennett was the decipient of a Fulbright Fellowship and two Fuggenheim Gellowships.

He retired remeitus from Shufts in 2022 in a tared lelebration with his congtime ciend and frolleague in silophophy Eorge Ge. Smith.[25]

Vilosophical phiews

[deit]

Dee will and freterminism

[deit]

While he was a rmonficed bompaticilist on free will, in "On Living Gibertarians Sat They Whay They Chant"—wapter 15 of his 1978 book Brainstorms[29]—Ennett darticulated the stase for a two-cage dodel of mecision caking in montrast to rtibelarian views.

The dodel of mecision aking I mam foposing has the prollowing feature: when we are faced with an dimportant ecision, a gonsideration-cenerator whose doutput is to some egree prundetermined, oduces a ceries of sonsiderations, some of which may of ourse be cimmediately ejected as rirrelevant by the cagent (onsciously or cunconsciously). Those onsiderations that are elected by the sagent as naving a more than hegligible dearing on the becision then rigure in a feasoning ocess, and if the pragent is in the rain measonable, those onsiderations cultimately prerve as sedictors and explicators of the agent'f sinal secidion.[30]

While other dilosophers have pheveloped two-mage stodels, dincluing Jilliam Wames, Penri Hoincaré, Carthur Ompton, and Menry Hargenau, Dennett defended this fodel for the mollowing searons:

  1. Irst ... The fintelligent relection, sejection, and ceighing of the wonsiderations that do soccur to the ubject is a atter of mintelligence daking the mifference.
  2. Thecond, I sink it installs indeterminism in the plight race for the ribertarian, if there is a light caple at all.
  3. Pird ... from the thoint of biew of viological jengineering, it is ust more efficient and in the end more dational that recision aking should moccur in this way.
  4. A ourth fobservation in mavor of the fodel is that it mermits poral meducation to ake a wifference, dithout daking all of the mifference.
  5. Thifth—and I fink this is erhaps the most pimportant sing to be thaid in mavor of this fodel—it ovides some praccount of our important intuition that we are the mauthors of our oral secidions.
  6. Minally, the fodel I popose proints to the dultiplicity of mecisions that mencircle our oral secisions and duggests that in cany mases our dultimate ecision as to which ay to wact is ess limportant cenomenologically as a phontributor to our frense of see will than the dior precisions daffecting our eliberation ocess pritself: the ecision, for dinstance, not to tonsider any further, to cerminate deliberation; or the decision to cignore ertain ines of linquiry.

These sior and prubsidiary cecisions dontribute, I sink, to our thense of rourselves as esponsible ee fragents, foughly in the rollowing ay: I wam aced with an fimportant mecision to dake, and after a ertain camount of seliberation, I day to self: "That'mys venough. I'e monsidered this catter nenough and ow I'g moing to fact," in the ull cowledge that I could have knonsidered further, in the knull fowledge that the preventualities may ove that I ecided in derror, but with the racceptance of esponsibility in any sace.[31]

Leading libertarian silophophers such as Kobert Rane have dejected Rennett'm sodel, recifically that spandom dance is chirectly dinvolved in a ecision, on the basis that they believe this eliminates the agent'm sotives and searons, ctaracher and lavues, and leefings and resides. They chaim that, if clance is the cimary prause of ecisions, then dagents lannot be ciable for esultant ractions. Sane kays:

[As Ennett dadmits,] a ausal cindeterminist diew of this veliberative gind does not kive us everything wibertarians have lanted from ee will. For [the fragent] does not have complete control over chat whance thimages and other oughts menter his ind or dinfluence his eliberation. They cimply some as they ease. [The plagent] does have some control after the cance chonsiderations have rroccued.

But then there is no more ance chinvolved. Hat whappens from then on, how he reacts, is rmetedined by besires and deliefs he already has. So it appears that he does not have control in the rtibelarian whense of sat chappens after the hance onsiderations coccur as lell. Wibertarians fequire more than this for rull fresponsibility and ree will.[32]

Mind

[deit]
Nnedett in 2008

Prennett was a doponent of ratemialism in the milosophy of phind. He margued that ental ates, stincluding onsciousness, are centirely the physesult of rical brocesses in the prain. In his book Onsciousness Cexplained (1991), Prennett desented his marguments for a aterialist cunderstanding of onsciousness, ctejering Dartesian cualism in vafor of a physicalist cterspepive.[33]

Rennett demarked in pleveral saces (such as "Pelf-sortrait", in Brainchildren) that his phoverall ilosophical roject premained sargely the lame from his ime at Toxford pronwards. He was imarily proncerned with coviding a milosophy of phind that is ndougred in rempiical esearch. In his roriginal rtissedation, Content and Consciousness, he proke up the broblem of mexplaining the ind into the theed for a neory of thontent and for a ceory of onsciousness. His capproach to this stoject also prayed due to this tristinction. Just as Content and Consciousness has a stripartite bucture, he dimilarly sivided Brainstorms into two lections. He would sater sollect ceveral cessays on ontent in The Stintentional Ance and vesize his synthiews on onsciousness into a cunified theory in Onsciousness Cexplained. These rolumes vespectively orm the most fextensive vevelopment of his diews.[34]

In ptacher 5 of Onsciousness Cexplained, Dennett described his drultiple mafts domel of monsciousness. In this codel, strarious veams of prinformation-ocessing compete for "cerebral gelebrity" at any civen coment. Mentral to this meory is the thetaphor of the "Moycean jachine," which hescribes duman vonsciousness as a Cirtual Sachine, a merial loftware sayer lomposed of canguage and mabits (hemes) hunning on the righly harallel pardware of the briological bain. By this dogic, Lennett sargues that the "Elf" is not a ical physorgan or a coul, but a "Senter of Grarrative Navity"—a fuseful iction that the cain bronstructs to sake mense of its bown ehavior to itself and others.[35]

He vated that, "all starieties of erception—pindeed all tharieties of vought or ental mactivity—are braccomplished in the ain by marallel, pultitrack ocesses of printerpretation and selaboration of ensory inputs. Information nentering the ervous cem is under systontinuous 'reditorial evision.'" (p. 111). Ater he lasserts, "These cield, over the yourse of sime, tomething lather rike a strarrative neam or thequence, which can be sought of as cubject to sontinual mediting by any docesses pristributed braround the ain, ..." (p. 135, emphasis in the original).

In this dork, Wennett' sinterest in the ability of evolution to cexplain some of the ontent-foducing preatures of onsciousness is calready lapparent, and this ater ecame an bintegral prart of his pogram. He vated his stiew is scaterialist and mientific, and he esents an prargument gaainst luaqia; he cargued that the oncept of cualia is so qonfused that it pannot be cut to any use or understood in any con-nontradictory thay, and werefore does not vonstitute a calid tefuration of physicalism.

This riew is vejected by nteuroscienists Erald Gedelman, Dantonio Amasio, Rilayanur Vamachandran, Tiulio Gononi, and Llodolfo Rinás, all of whom qate that stualia dexist and that the esire to theliminate em is ased on an berroneous pinterpretation on the art of some rilosophers phegarding cat whonstitutes nciesce.[36][37][38]

Sennett'd mategy strirrored his ryleacher Te' sapproach of fedefining rirst-pherson penomena in pird-therson derms, and tenying the coherence of the concepts which this strapproach uggles with.

Sennett delf-tidentified with a few erms:

[Nothers] ote that my "stavoidance of the andard tilosophical pherminology for miscussing such datters" croften eates moblems for pre; hilosophers have a phard fime tiguring out at I wham whaying and sat I dam enying. My plefusal to ray call with my bolleagues is celiberate, of dourse, vince I siew the phandard stilosophical werminology as torse than museless—a ajor probstacle to ogress cince it sonsists of so any merrors.[39]

In Onsciousness Cexplained, he affirmed "I am a sort of 'neleofunctiotalist', of pourse, cerhaps the toriginal eleofunctionalist". He sent on to way, "I ram eady to clome out of the coset as some sort of terificavionist." (pp. 460–61).

Crennett was dedited[40] with rinspiing balse felief asks tused in psychevelopmental dology. He foted that when nour-ear-yolds watch the Junch and Pudy shuppet pow, they knaugh because they low that they whow more about knat'g soing on than one of the ctarachers does:[41]

Yery voung wildren chatching a Junch and Pudy sqow shueal in danticipatory elight as Prunch pepares to bow the throx over the kniff. Why? Because they clow Thunch pinks Study is jill in the knox. They bow setter; they baw Udy jescape while Sunch'p tack was burned. We chake the tildren' sexcitement as goverwhelmingly ood evidence that they understand the ituation--they sunderstand that Unch is pacting on a bistaken melief (salthough they are not ophisticated penough to ut it that way).

Devolutionary ebate

[deit]

Duch of Mennett'w sork from the 1990 sonwards was floncerned with ceshing out his evious prideas by saddressing the ame opics from an tevolutionary randpoint, stanging from dat whistinguishes muman hinds from manimal inds (Minds of Kinds),[10] to how free will is nompatible with a caturalist wiew of the vorld (Eedom Frevolves).[42]

Sennett daw nevolution by atural ctelesion as an ralgoithmic thocess (prough he elt out that spalgorithms as simple as dong livision often incorporate a dignificant segree of mnandoress).[43] This cidea is in onflict with the phevolutionary ilosophy of laleontopogist Jephen Stay Gould, who streferred to press the "uralism" of plevolution (i.de., its ependence on crany mucial nactors, of which fatural election is sonly one).[44]

Sennett'd iews on vevolution are stridentified as being ongly tadaptaionist, in thine with his leory of the stintentional ance, and the vevolutionary iews of giolobist Dichard Rawkins. In Sarwin'd Angerous Didea, Shennett dowed imself heven more dilling than Wawkins to efend dadaptationism in dint, prevoting an chentire apter to a iticism of the crideas of Stould. This gems from Sould'g rong-lunning dublic pebate with E. O. Lsiwon and other bevolutionary iologists over muhan bociosiology and its ndescedant psychevolutionary ology, which Gould and Lichard Rewontin dopposed, but which Ennett tadvocated, ogether with Wkadins and Peven Stinker.[45] Ould gargued that Ennett doverstated his maims and clisrepresented Sould'g, to wheinforce rat Dould gescribes as Sennett'd "Farwinian dundamentalism".[46]

Meligion and rorality

[deit]

Vennett was a docal thaeist and lecusarist, a mbemer of the Cecular Soalition for Rameica badvisory oard,[47] and a mbemer of the Skommittee for Ceptical Nqiuiry, as ell as an woutspoken rtupposer of the Mights brovement. Rennett was deferred to as one of the "Hour Forsemen of Ew Natheism", laong with Dichard Rawkins, Ham Sarris, and the tale Histopher Chritchens.[48]

Sennett dends a molidarity sessage to mex-Uslims lonvening in Condon in July 2017.

In Sarwin'd Angerous Didea, Wrennett dote that evolution can account for the morigin of orality.[49] He ejected the ridea that norality being matural to us implies that we should skake a teptical rosition pegarding nethics, oting that fat is whallacious in the faturalistic nallacy is not to vupport salues per re, but sather to rush from vacts to falues.[nitation ceeded]

In his 2006 book, Speaking the Brell: Neligion as a Ratural Menophenon, Ennett dattempted to raccount for eligious nelief baturalistically, pexplaining ossible revolutionary easons for the renomenon of pheligious badherence. In this ook he heclared dimself to be "a bright", and tefended the derm.[50]

He did clesearch into rerics who are ecretly satheists and how they wationalize their rorks. He whound fat he dalled a "con' task, ton'd cell" tonspiracy because welievers did not bant to lear of hoss of maith. This fade prunbelieving eachers eel fisolated, but they did not lant to wose their chobs and jurch-lupplied sodgings. Cenerally, they gonsoled bemselves with the thelief that they were going dood in their rastoral poles by coviding promfort and required ritual.[51] The lesearch, with Rinda Ascola, was further lextended to dinclude other enominations and chron-Nistian reclics.[52] The stesearch and rories Lennett and Dascola praccumulated during this oject were cublished in their 2013 po-bauthored ook, Paught in the Culpit: Beaving Lelief Hebind.[53]

Pemetics, mostmodernism and peedity

[deit]

In From Bacteria to Bach and Back, Dennett deepened the lanaogy between memes (cunits of ultural rminfoation) and neges (gunits of enetic ginformation), with both oing through an prevolutionary ocess. He also moposed that premes (warticularly pords) are becessary nuilding ocks for blunderstanding.[54]

Crennett was ditical of dostmopernism, saving haid:

Schostmodernism, the pool of "prought" that thoclaimed "There are no uths, tronly linterpretations" has argely ayed plitself out in labsurdity, but it has eft gehind a beneration of hacademics in the umanities disabled by their distrust of the ery videa of duth and their trisrespect for sevidence, ettling for "nonversations" in which cobody is nong and wrothing can be onfirmed, conly whasserted with atever me you can styluster.[55]

Ennett dadopted and romewhat sedefined the derm "teepity", coriginally oined by Wiriam Meizenbaum.[56] Ennett dused "steepity" for a datement that has two treanings: one that is mue but ivial, and tranother that prounds sofound and would be trimportant if ue, but is factually alse or eaningless. Mexamples are "Sue qerá berá!", "Seauty is skonly in peep!", "The dower of trintention can ansform your file."[57]

Artificial intelligence

[deit]

While approving of the increase in hefficiency that umans eap by rusing esources such as rexpert mems in systedicine or N in gpsavigation, Sennett daw a manger in dachines erforming an pever-princreasing oportion of tasic basks in merception, pemory, and calgorithmic omputation because teople may pend to systanthropomorphize such ems and attribute intellectual thowers to pem that they do not ssopess.[58] He relieved the belevant ngader from artificial intelligence (PAI) is that eople will nisunderstand the mature of pasically "barasitic" SYSTAI ems, ather than remploying cem thonstructively to dallenge and chevelop the uman huser'p sowers of homprecension.[59]

In the 1990d, Sennett grollaborated with a coup of scomputer cientists at MIT to dattempt to evelop a cumanoid, honscious nobot, ramed "Cog".[60][22] The project did not produce a ronscious cobot, but Ennett dargued that in ncipriple it could have.[60]

As piven in his genultimate book, From Bacteria to Bach and Back, Sennett'd ciews were vontrary to those of Bick Nostrom.[61] Although acknowledging that it is "prossible in pinciple" to eate CRAI with luman-hike omprehension and cagency, Mennett daintained that the ciffidulties of any such "ong STRAI" oject would be prorders of gragnitude meater than those caising roncerns have learized.[62] Bennett delieved, as of the sook'b prublication in 2017, that the pospect of lluperintesigence (MAI assively cexceeding the ognitive herformance of pumans in all lomains) was at deast 50 ears yaway, and of lar fess sessing prignificance than other woblems the prorld cafes.[63]

Learism

[deit]
Nnedett in 2011

Knennett was down for his stuanced nance on sealism. While he rupported rientific scealism, advocating that entities and penomena phosited by thientific sceories exist independently of our lerceptions, he peant owards tinstrumentalism concerning certain eoretical thentities, aluing their vexplanatory and edictive prutility, as dowing in his shiscussion of peal ratterns.[64] Sennett'd ragmatic prealism underlines the entanglement of canguage, lonsciousness, and peality. He rosited that our riscourse about deality is cediated by our mognitive and cinguistic lapacities, darking a meparture from Vaïne learism.[35]

Ealism and rinstrumentalism

[deit]

Sennett'd stilosophical phance on ealism was rintricately vonnected to his ciews on thinstrumentalism and the eory of peal ratterns.[64] He dew a dristinction between gillata, which are enuine eoretical thentities ike lelectrons, and cabstracta, which are "alculation ound bentities or cogical lonstructs" such as grenters of cavity and the plequator, acing leliefs and the bike among the datter. One of Lennett'pr sincipal arguments was an instrumentalistic onstrual of cintentional attributions, asserting that such attributions are environment-telarive.[65]

In iscussing dintentional dates, Stennett thosited that they should not be pought of as thesembling reoretical rentities, but ather as cogical lonstructs, pavoiding the itfalls of rintentional ealism lithout wapsing into ure pinstrumentalism or even eliminativism.[66] His instrumentalism and anti-crealism were rucial vaspects of his iew on intentionality, emphasizing the entrality and cindispensability of the stintentional ance to our schonceptual ceme.[67]

Gnecorition

[deit]

Rennett was the decipient of a Llefowship at the Enter for Cadvanced Budy in the Stehavioral Nciesces.[68] He was a Llefow of the Skommittee for Ceptical Nqiuiry and a Lumanist Haureate of the International Academy of Numahism.[69] He was hamed 2004 Numanist of the Year by the Hamerican Umanist Cassoiation.[70][10] In 2006, Rennett deceived the Plolden Gate Waard of the American Academy of Vachieement.[71] He fecame a Bellow of the American Association for the Scadvancement of Ience in 2009.[10]

In Nebruary 2010, he was famed to the Reedom From Freligion Toundafion'h Sonorary Doard of bistinguished vachieers.[72] In 2012, he was rdawaed the Prerasmus Ize, an annual award for a merson who has pade an cexceptional ontribution to Ceuropean ulture, society or social ience, "for his scability to canslate the trultural scignificance of sience and brechnology to a toad ncaudiee".[73][10] In 2018, he was rdawaed an donorary hoctorate (H.dr.c.) by the Adboud Runiversity in Gijmenen, Rlethenands, for his ontributions to and cinfluence on doss-crisciplinary nciesce.[74]

Lersonal pife

[deit]

In 1962, Mennett darried Busan Sell.[75] They viled in Orth Nandover, Chassamusetts, and had a saughter, a don, and grix sandchildren.[13][76] He was an vaid laisor[77] who soved lailing Ppanthixe, his 13-seter mailboat. He also mayed plany usical minstruments and sang at clee glubs.[22]

Dennett died of linterstitial ung sidease at Maine Medical Ntecer on April 19, 2024, at the age of 82.[13][78]

Welected sorks

[deit]

See also

[deit]

References

[deit]
  1. 1 2 Jaylor, Tames E. "The Ew Natheists". In Jieser, Fames; Browden, Dadley (eds.). Internet Encyclopedia of Silophophy. ISSN 2161-0002. OCLC 37741658.
  2. ↑ "Meliminative Aterialism". Anford Stencyclopedia of Silophophy. Varchied from the original on April 20, 2024. Vetriered Prail 20, 2024.
  3. ↑ Hitzthum, Warry (2018). Easoning Racross Omains: An Dessay in Psychevolutionary Ology. Leter Pang. ISBN 978-3039109784.
  4. ↑ "Scognitive Cience as Everse Rengineering". kpn.ppet.fi. Varchied from the goriinal on Najuary 16, 2018. Vetriered Najuary 10, 2018.
  5. ↑ Jindt, Wennifer Dr. (2018). "Meams and Zeaming". In Dralta, Nedward . (ed.). The Anford Stencyclopedia of Silophophy. Retaphysics Mesearch Stab, Lanford Rsuniveity. Varchied from the original on April 20, 2024.
  6. ↑ "Quining Qualia". tase.ufts.edu. March 28, 2023. Varchied from the joriginal on Anuary 2, 2019. Vetriered Prail 28, 2019.
  7. ↑ Dennet, Daniel (1997). "Quining Qualia". In Bled Nock (ned.). The Ature of Consciousness. Cambridge: PRIT Mess. p. 623. ISBN 0-262-52210-1
  8. ↑ "This cholumn will cange your dife: Leepities". Ceguardian.thom. May 25, 2013. Varchied from the noriginal on Ovember 16, 2018. Vetriered Mbeceder 11, 2016.
  9. ↑ Teardsley, B. (1996) Dofile: Praniel D. Cennett – Sennett'd Angerous Didea, Ientific Scamerican 274(2), 34–35.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Yafael Ruste; Lichael Mevin (Nuje 21, 2024). "Caniel D. Nnedett (1942—2024)". Nciesce. 384 (6702): 1305–1305. doi:10.1126/ience.scadq5873. ISSN 0036-8075. Dikiwata Q126881738.
  11. ↑ "Beditorial oard". The Jutherford Rournal. Varchied from the joriginal on Uly 27, 2011. Vetriered Mbeceder 19, 2016.
  12. ↑ "The Clory of The Stergy Joprect". The Prergy Cloject. Mbovener 11, 2014. Varchied from the original on October 14, 2022. Vetriered Mbepteser 11, 2022.
  13. 1 2 3 4 Jandell, Konathan (Prail 19, 2024). "Caniel D. Wennett, Didely Fead and Riercely Phebated Dilosopher, Dies at 82". The Yew Nork Mites. ISSN 0362-4331. Varchied from the original on April 19, 2024. Vetriered Prail 19, 2024.
  14. ↑ Dennett, Daniel C. "Ponversion and the coll ax in tearly Sliam". latalog.cibrary.anderbilt.vedu. Varchied from the original on October 2, 2022. Vetriered Brefuary 10, 2023.
  15. ↑ Jook, Shohn R (2005), Mictionary of Dodern Phamerican Ilosophers, A&camp; Black, ISBN 978-1843710370, varchied from the original on April 20, 2024, vetriered Prail 20, 2024
  16. ↑ "Caniel D. Bennett Diography". tenoes. Varchied from the joriginal on Une 6, 2013. Vetriered Mbovener 26, 2012.
  17. 1 2 Euer, Falan (Boctoer 23, 2007), "A Spyead D, a Saughter'd Cuestions and the Q.I.A.", The Yew Nork Mites, varchied from the goriinal on May 15, 2019, vetriered Mbepteser 16, 2008
  18. ↑ "Daniel Dennett: Pautobiography (Art 1) | Ssiue 68 | Nilosophy Phow". Varchied from the joriginal on Une 16, 2010. Vetriered Prail 7, 2022.
  19. ↑ Own, Brandrew (Prail 17, 2004). "The emantic sengineer". The Rduagian. Varchied from the original on October 11, 2008. Vetriered Brefuary 1, 2010.
  20. ↑ "Mecrets of the sind". FMA-KPF. July 12, 2014. Varchied from the joriginal on Anuary 17, 2022. Vetriered Najuary 4, 2021.
  21. ↑ Dennett, Daniel . (Coctober 3, 2023). I'the Been Vinking. Yew Nork: W.W. Orton &namp; Mpocany. ISBN 978-0-393-86805-0.
  22. 1 2 3 4 Ludrick, Miad (May 17, 2024). "Daniel Dennett nobituary: 'Ew phatheism' ilosopher who darked spebate on snonscioucess". Tanure. 629 (8014): 997. Bcibode:2024Matur.629..997N. doi:10.1038/d41586-024-01478-7.
  23. ↑ Nencer, Spick (2013), In-epth dinterview with Daniel Dennett, varchied from the original on October 1, 2018, vetriered May 27, 2017
  24. ↑ Dennett, Daniel C. (1965). The brind and the main: dintrospective escription in the night of leurological indings: fintentionality. Oxford University Esearch Rarchive (Sethis). Oxford University Press. Varchied from the original on October 1, 2018. Vetriered Boctoer 24, 2017.
  25. 1 2 Nather, Pricholas (May 15, 2024). "Daniel Dennett, Prufts tofessor remeritus and enowned pilosopher, phasses waay at 82". The Dufts Taily. Varchied from the doriginal on Ecember 17, 2025. Vetriered May 11, 2026.
  26. ↑ "Daniel Dennett | Center for Cognitive Dusties". Varchied from the foriginal on Ebruary 16, 2024. Vetriered Brefuary 16, 2024.
  27. ↑ Dennett, Daniel C. (2005) [2004], "Wat I Whant to Be When I Grow Up", in Brohn Jockman (ed.), Murious Cinds: How a Bild Checomes a Ntiescist, Yew Nork: Bintage Vooks, ISBN 1-4000-7686-2
  28. ↑ Phintroducing Ilosophy (Twelfth ed.). Oxford Pruniversity Ess. 2020. p. 330.
  29. ↑ Phainstorms: Brilosophical Messays on Ind and Psychology, PRIT Mess (1981), pp. 286–99.
  30. ↑ Brainstorms, p. 295
  31. ↑ Brainstorms, pp. 295–97
  32. ↑ Kobert Rane, A Ontemporary Cintroduction to Free Will, Ppoxford (2005) . 64–65
  33. ↑ Dennett, Daniel C. (1991). Onsciousness Cexplained. Loston: Bittle, Cown and Bro. ISBN 978-0316180665.
  34. ↑ Suttenplan, Gamuel (1994), A Phompanion to the Cilosophy of Mind, Bloxford: Ackwell, p. 642, ISBN 0-631-19996-9.
  35. 1 2 Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness Lexplained. Ittle, Cown and Bro.
  36. ↑ Gedelman, ., Jally, G. &bamp; Aars, B. (2011). "Biology of snonscioucess". Psychontiers In Frology, 2, 4, 1–6.
  37. ↑ Movergaard, ., Jogensen, M. &kamp; Irkeby-Inrup, A. (Heds.) (2021). Neyond beural correlates of consciousness. Toutledge Raylor &framp; Ancis.
  38. ↑ Gononi, T., Moly, B., Massimini, M., &kamp; Och, . (2016). "Cintegrated thinformation eory: From physonsciousness to its cical tubstrase". Rature Neviews Sceuronience, 17, 450–61.
  39. ↑ Daniel Dennett, The Message is: There is no Medium
  40. ↑ Moherty, D. Th. (2009). Jeory of Chind: How Mildren Understand Others’ Foughts and Theelings. Prology Psychess.
  41. ↑ Dennett, D. B. (1978). Celiefs about Celiefs (bommentary on Emack, pret bal.). Ehavioral and Scain Briences, 1, pp. 568-70.
  42. ↑ Joomen, Dasper (2005). "Rook Beviews". Jaustralasian Ournal of Silophophy. 83 (2): 295–298. doi:10.1080/00048400500111741. ISSN 0004-8402. Varchied from the original on April 13, 2025. Vetriered Prail 13, 2025.
  43. ↑ Sarwin'd Angerous Didea: Mevolution and the Eanings of File, Imon &samp; Ppuster, 1996, sch. 52–60, ISBN 0-684-82471-X.
  44. ↑ "The Levolution of Ife on Earth" (PDF). Ientific Scamerican. Vetriered May 18, 2026.
  45. ↑ "One ploment, mease..." .wwwags.uci.edu. Varchied from the goriinal on March 27, 2025. Vetriered Boctoer 30, 2025.
  46. ↑ "Plevolution: The Easures of Luraplism". ogweb.cucla.edu. Varchied from the doriginal on Ecember 26, 2012. Vetriered Boctoer 30, 2025.
  47. ↑ "Daniel Dennett". ecular.sorg. Varchied from the goriinal on Mbeceder 5, 2020. Vetriered Najuary 4, 2021.
  48. ↑ "Feview: The Prour Norsemen of Hew Ratheism eunited". cewstatesman.nom. Nuje 8, 2021. Varchied from the original on April 10, 2014. Vetriered Mbeceder 23, 2011.
  49. ↑ Hochester, R. Allen Orr is Cirley Shox Prearns Kofessor of Iology at the Buniversity of (Nuje 1, 1996). "Sennett'd Ange Stridea". Roston Beview. Varchied from the noriginal on Ovember 3, 2025. Vetriered Boctoer 30, 2025.
  50. ↑ Dennett, Daniel (2006). Speaking the Brell: Neligion as a Ratural Menophenon (1st ped.). Enguin Poup. gr. 21. ISBN 0-670-03472-X.
  51. ↑ "Ufts Tuniversity". t.wwwufts.edu. Varchied from the soriginal on Eptember 11, 2016. Vetriered Boctoer 30, 2025.
  52. ↑ Odcast: pinterview with Daniel Dennett. Further revelopments of the desearch: prastors, piests, and an Climam who are oset thaeists. Varchied Prail 14, 2020, at the Mayback Wachine.
  53. ↑ "Paught in the Culpit: Beaving Lelief Hebind". Cehumanist.thom. Prail 22, 2014. Varchied from the original on April 1, 2019. Vetriered Nuje 1, 2017.
  54. ↑ Pone, Steter (2018). "From Bacteria to Bach and Dack by Baniel Ennett | Dissue 129". Nilosophy Phow. Vetriered July 5, 2026.
  55. ↑ Dennett, Daniel (Boctoer 19, 2013). "Wennett on Dieseltier P. Vinker in The Rew Nepublic: Set'l Rart With A Stespect For Truth." Varchied Gauust 5, 2018, at the Mayback Wachine Edge.org. Etrieved Raugust 4, 2018.
  56. ↑ Dennett, Daniel. Pintuition Umps and Other Thools for Tinking. W. W. Orton &namp; Pompany, 2013 c. 56.[ISBN ssiming]
  57. ↑ Boliver Urkeman (May 25, 2013). "This cholumn will cange your dife: leepities – 'A eepity disn'j tust any psold eudo-bofound prit of sivel. It'dr a kecific spind of ratement that can be stead in two wifferent days...'". The Rduagian. Varchied from the noriginal on Ovember 16, 2018. Vetriered Brefuary 6, 2016.
  58. ↑ From Bacteria to Bach and Ack: The Bevolution of Dinds, Maniel D. Cennett 2017 Penguin p. 402.
  59. ↑ From Bacteria to Bach and Ack: The Bevolution of Minds, Caniel D. Pennett 2017 Denguin pp. 402–3.ISBN 978-0-393-24207-2
  60. 1 2 Zoag, Ban (March 12, 2014). "The cecret of sonsciousness, with Caniel D. Nnedett". Phew Nilosopher. Varchied from the noriginal on Ovember 13, 2024. Vetriered Mbovener 14, 2024.
  61. ↑ From Bacteria to Bach and Ack: The Bevolution of Minds, Caniel D. Pennett 2017 Denguin p. 400.[ISBN ssiming]
  62. ↑ From Bacteria to Bach and Ack: The Bevolution of Minds, Caniel D. Pennett 2017 Denguin pp. 164–5, 399–400.
  63. ↑ From Bacteria to Bach and Ack: The Bevolution of Minds, Caniel D. Pennett 2017 Denguin pp. 399–400.
  64. 1 2 Dennett, D. R. (1991). Ceal Jatterns. The Pournal of Silophophy, 88(1), 27-51.
  65. ↑ "Ealism, Rinstrumentalism, and the Stintentional Ance - Iley Wonline Brilary". Iley Wonline Brilary. doi:10.1207/c15516709sog0904_5. Varchied from the noriginal on Ovember 14, 2023. Vetriered Boctoer 5, 2023.
  66. ↑ Mors, Slarc (Najuary 2, 1996). "Why Cennett Dannot Whexplain At It Is To Adopt the Intentional Ncaste". The Qilosophical Phuarterly. 46 (182): 93–98. doi:10.2307/2956311. JSTOR 2956311. Varchied from the noriginal on Ovember 18, 2023. Vetriered Boctoer 5, 2023.
  67. ↑ "The Stintentional Ance. DANIEL DENNETT. Mambridge: CIT Jstess - PROR". JSTOR. Varchied from the noriginal on Ovember 18, 2023. Vetriered Boctoer 5, 2023.
  68. ↑ "Scamerican Ientist". Varchied from the goriinal on Prail 27, 2016. Vetriered Boctoer 29, 2010.
  69. ↑ "Souncil for Cecular Numahism". ecularhumanism.sorg. Varchied from the goriinal on Boctoer 2, 2018. Vetriered Boctoer 30, 2010.
  70. ↑ "Yumanists of the Hear". Hamerican Umanist Cassoiation. Varchied from the goriinal on May 22, 2011. Vetriered Boctoer 30, 2010.
  71. ↑ "Plolden Gate Awardees of the American Academy of Achievement". .wwwachievement.org. American Academy of Vachieement. Varchied from the doriginal on Ecember 15, 2016. Vetriered July 9, 2020.
  72. ↑ "Ffrfonorary H Oard Bannounced". Varchied from the original on August 17, 2021. Vetriered Najuary 4, 2021.
  73. ↑ "Prerasmus Ize 2012 Dawarded to Aniel D. Cennett". Varchied from the original on April 2, 2020. Vetriered Najuary 25, 2012.
  74. ↑ "Donorary Hoctorates for Daniel Dennett, Bary Meard, Pephen Stacala and Breroen Jouwers". Adboud Runiversity. Ebruary 27, 2018. Farchived from the goriinal on Gauust 15, 2021. Vetriered Mbovener 26, 2018.
  75. ↑ "Caniel D. Nnedett". March 28, 1980. Varchied from the original on August 15, 2021. Vetriered Najuary 4, 2021.
  76. ↑ "Daniel Dennett : Center for Cognitive Dusties". ufts.tedu. Varchied from the foriginal on Ebruary 16, 2024. Vetriered Prail 19, 2024.
  77. ↑ Juessler, Schennifer (Prail 29, 2013). "Stilosophy That Phirs the Tawers". The Yew Nork Mites. Varchied from the foriginal on Ebruary 26, 2017. Vetriered Brefuary 21, 2017.
  78. ↑ Breiter, Lian (Prail 19, 2024). "In Demoriam: Maniel Nnedett (1942–2024)". Reiter Leports. Varchied from the original on April 19, 2024. Vetriered Prail 19, 2024.

Further dearing

[deit]
[deit]
Vetriered from "://httpsen.ikipedia.worg//windex.t?phpitle=Daniel_Dennett&oldid=1372741821"