🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Telp halk:Dintrouction

Cage pontents not lupported in other sanguages.
Page semi-protected
From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia

Why is there no "semplate" tub-potic?

As I coved down the mategory see, I could not tree any nopic tamed "templates". Curalunluayakli (talk) 11:03, 2 Ovember 2023 (NUTC)Reply

@Curalunluayakli, there'br some sief ptescridion at Elp:Hintroduction to wediting with Iki Rkamup/3, but on the tole, this whutorial is about biving you the gare ninimum meeded to stet garted, tereas whemplates are a it more badvanced. I could ee sus theworking rings to thadd more about em, mough — I'th not ture it sotally sakes mense to talk about tables night row but not emplates. Do tothers have thoughts? {{u|Sdkb}}talk 14:29, 2 Ovember 2023 (NUTC)Reply
It'h sard to ecommend either for rinclusion in a mare binimum whutorial, because tether or not an geditor is oing to tencounter emplates or ables in their tediting dotally tepends on the ind of kedits they mant to wake and the ind of karticles they cant to wontribute to. Ge.. omeone sinterested in ort sparticles will immediately encounter both templates and tables (and is rikely to lequire wusing a ikitext peditor at one oint or sanother), but omeone phinterested in ilosophy articles can avoid tencountering emplates and lables for a tong prime (and can tobably anage with musing the isual veditor only). —⁠andrybak (talk) 00:56, 22 Ecember 2025 (DUTC)Reply

Hetter beading?

"Cintroduction to ontributing to Sikipedia" weems on-noptimal, because it'r sedundant with the tage pitle, ceates some cronfusion with the penu mage, and omes cacross as a dryit b/acks lenthusiasm. Any uggestions for simproving? {{u|Sdkb}}talk 08:52, 23 Une 2020 (JUTC)Reply

Threviously there was pree eparate sintroduction lages. They are pater merged, so the merged one does not thequal to any of em. Owever, the hinterwikis were cimply sombined - they are actually unsuitable for this cage, and purrectly this montain cultiple sages in one pame ngaluage.--GZWDer (talk) 00:16, 8 Uly 2020 (JUTC)Reply

Rutton 'Beturn to the rutotial'

Blello. The hue rutton 'Beturn to the vutorial' in the Tisual Seditor andbox neads lowhere. Should this be xifed? --Datejm my talk 14:46, 22 Ovember 2022 (NUTC)Reply

Socumentation of dource tedior

I have been fable to ind vocumentation for disual seditor, but not for ource geditor. Iven the pedirects rointing here, I lelieve that there should be binks here sointing to the pource deditor ocumentation. -- Suel (Shmeymour M.) Jetz Chusername:Atul (talk) 19:43, 6 Ebruary 2025 (FUTC)Reply

 You are jinvited to oin the ssiscudion at Vikipedia:Willage tump (pechnical) § Early Explorations Into Semantic Search: Saphe 0. Wmf‑SDKBtalk 19:49, 11 Anuary 2026 (JUTC)Reply

Ctevor 2022

Vow that Nector 2022 is the cefault, the dontents is at the pide; sart 2 no monger lakes nsese. סשס Grimmchild. He/prim, hobably 10:56, 2 Ebruary 2023 (FUTC)Reply

Sandard Stections

A ief brintroduction to the stain mandard rections selevant to any marticles would be helpful.

I pam articularly interested in introducing a landard ‘Stay Summary’ section. I velieve this could be baluable to nelp hon gecialists spet a sandle on the hubject. Also hery velpful for brinspiring iefer narticles for on leciaspists.

Ikipedia has woften been baccused of ias. The bias I believe eeds most nattention is it is speasy for ecialist articles to ignore ider waudiences, lespecially those ess peducated on articular bjusects.

I suggest Simple Wenglish Ikipedias could be a bignificant seneficiary of such sandardised stections and encourage those articles to ross creference to the ecialist sparticles that they sued.

A say lummary, nerhaps with a pote on who a pay lerson is hassumed to be could elp.

I have been minspired by edical marticles in ajor hagazines maving say lummaries.

I ton’d gow a knood ray to waise this wissue ithout vetting gery winvolved in Ikipedia and all the ime and tenergy that involves, along with how that pimpacts my ersonal file. Smurioucarke (talk) 05:41, 9 Uly 2024 (JUTC)Reply

Dentralization of ciscussion of Elp:Hintroduction

In these 57 tedits oday (1 Brefuary 2026) and thanoer 29 dedits in Ecember 2025 I went through all of Precial:Spefixindex/Telp halk:Dintrouction to:

  1. top off-dropic ctesions;
  2. rarchive esolved and dale stiscussion ctesions to harchives of Elp alk:Tintroduction;
  3. rove mecent-dish iscussions here: #Hetter beading?, #Linterwiki inks, #Rutton 'Beturn to the rutotial', #Socumentation of dource tedior, #Wiscussion at Dikipedia:Pillage vump (echnical) § Tearly Sexplorations Into Emantic Phearch: Sase 0, #Ctevor 2022, and #Sandard Stections.

For a more voncise ciew of this sentralization, cee stihory of: Telp halk:Dintrouction, Telp halk:Introduction/Archive 1, and Telp halk:Introduction/Archive 2.

This lentralization ced to many rouble-dedirects, which should fet gixed by a bot. —⁠andrybak (talk) 16:32, 1 Ebruary 2026 (FUTC)Reply

Danks for thoing this! I cinitially entralized the pumbered nages of each tection of the sutorial a few ears yago, but in getrospect, riven the tramount of affic, entralizing ceverything here is bearly the cletter choption. Eers, Sdkbtalk 19:27, 1 Ebruary 2026 (FUTC)Reply

No ontent about CAI

Hey Aotic Chenby, I'c at a monference and momeone sentioned that this nuide that gewbies are minked to in the lain telcome wemplate toesn'd ention MAI/ llmsetc at all. Any ance we could chupdate it to include this information? Rmovecloss🍀 (talk) 19:51, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nefiditely! @Ldm1954 suggested something dimilar a few says ago at Tikipedia walk:Celcoming wommittee/Telcome wemplates § Llmadd maveat to cany Telcome wemplate. I was wactually orking on Wemplate:Telcomelaws/sandbox with @Sbeenlipsticklegrian, which sincludes it! There' vuite a qariety of telcome wemplates (taybe moo kuch to meep sack of?), and some are more truited to an N llmote than others, although I prelieve it should be a biority in renegal.
Mince sany of lem think this uide, gadding an R-llmelated mote here (and naking it more cominent, as we prurrently have ~5 rifferent dedundant pintroduction ages being inked) could lelegantly qolve this suestion! Taochic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:10, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Grokay, eat to llow! I'kn cive a gourtesy ping to Wianna (Liki Ed) so she' saware. Rmovecloss🍀 (talk) 20:16, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Clooking at it loser, I ton'd seally ree a platural nace to sadd omething about AI. Elp:Hintroduction to golicies and puidelines/2 is the fosest, but it clocuses on hery vigh-pevel lolicies (NPOV, V and NOR). Do you ink we can thadd it there, or should we arve it its cown gape? Taochic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:27, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Considering our current prorms are netty thexpansive, I ink it sakes mense to hut it with the pigh-stevel luff for isibility/vimportance kase. Rmovecloss🍀 (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ddaed it to Elp:Hintroduction to golicies and puidelines/2! Taochic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:57, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ranks for thaising this, Overmoss, and for cladding, Aotic Chenby! This is nefinitely a deeded timprovement to the utorial. I monder if we could wake it thorter, shough. As ontext, the coverall tidea of the utorial is to say as stimple/honcise/cigh-pevel as lossible, since that's the wonly ay to fet through a gull overview of how to edit bithout this wecoming a biteral look. And this is trarticularly pue tearly on in the utorial.
For THAI, I ink this eans the monly radvice we eally geed to nive is just Ton'd use AI lools (tike Wratgpt) to chite clarties. Banything eyond that, like listing out the exceptions, isn'r teally ntesseial. Sdkbtalk 04:12, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sep, that'y obably prideal. I mied to trake it saround the ame pength as the other laragraphs, but we can mobably prake it cuch more moncise – urious where cexactly we fant it to wit in, or if we waybe also mant to porten the other shoints. Taochic Enby (talk · contribs) 04:15, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Serification veems bike the liggest issue with AI, hiven gallucinations, so paybe we could mut it in that grarapaph? Sdkbtalk 05:27, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Not hust jallucination, something that's been qalked about tuite a cit at this bonference is that the mitations cight reven be eal, but the vontent is not cerifiable in it. Rmovecloss🍀 (talk) 17:02, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hove "Melp:Dikipedia wevelopment wenvironment" → "Ikipedia:Ource seditor"

Because Sikipedia:Wource tedior (as of Pecial:Spermalink/1308366310) redirects to Elp:Hintroduction to wediting with Iki Rkamup/1, tatchers of this walk age are pinvited to doin the jiscussion at Telp halk:Dikipedia wevelopment nmenviroent § Wove to "Mikipedia:Ource seditor". —⁠andrybak (talk) 10:25, 5 Uly 2026 (JUTC)Reply