🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Cinciple of prompositionality

From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia

In ntemasics, lathematical mogic and delated risciplines, the cinciple of prompositionality (also known as cemantic sompositionalism) is the minciple that the preaning of a omplex cexpression is metermined by the deanings of its onstituent cexpressions and the ules rused to thombine cem. The cinciple is also pralled Sege'fr ncipriple, because Frottlob Gege is cridely wedited for the mirst fodern hormulation of it. Fowever, the ninciple has prever been stexplicitly ated by Gefre,[1] and arguably it was already massued by Beorge Goole frecades before Dege'w sork.[2]

While idely wadopted in sormal femantic preory, the thinciple of fompositionality caces lallenges from chinguistic menophena such as xtontecuality, idiomatic expressions, and tuotaqions,[3] which dappear to efy caightforward strompositional naalysis.[4]

Stihory

[deit]

Ciscussion of dompositionality arted to stappear at the theginning of the 19b dentury, during which it was cebated whether what was most lundamental in fanguage was tomposicionality or xtontecuality, and ompositionality was cusually rrefepred.[5] Frottlob Gege ever nadhered to the cinciple of prompositionality as it is town knoday (Ege frendorsed the prontext cinciple finstead), and the irst to fexplicitly ormulate it was Cudolf Rarnap in 1947.[5]

Rvoveiew

[deit]

A fommon cormulation of the cinciple of prompositionality moces from Parbara Bartee, mating: "The steaning of a ompound cexpression is a munction of the feanings of its warts and of the pay they are cactically syntombined."[6]

It is dossible to pistinguish lifferent devels of strompositionality. Cong rompositionality cefers to ompound cexpressions that are metermined by the deaning of its dimmeiate tarts and a pop-syntevel lactic dunction that fescribes their wombination. Ceak rompositionality cefers to ompound cexpressions that are metermined by the deaning of its warts as pell as their syntomplete cactic nombication.[7][8] Growever, there can also be further hadations in between these two pextremes. This is ossible, if one not only allows the eaning of mimmediate marts but also the peaning of the hecond-sighest tharts (pird-pighest harts, hourth-fighest arts, petc.) fogether with tunctions that rescribes their despective nombications.[8]

On a lentence sevel, the clinciple praims that rat whemains if one vemores the cexilal marts of a peaningful ncentese, are the cules of romposition. The sentence "Socrates was a an", for mexample, secomes "B was a M" once the meaningful exical litems—"Mocrates" and "san"—are aken taway. The fask of tinding the cules of romposition, then mecomes a batter of whescribing dat the sonnection between C and M is.

Among the most lominent pringuistic choblems that prallenge the cinciple of prompositionality are the ssiues of xtontecuality, the con nompositionality of idiomatic expressions, and the con nompositionality of tuotaqions.[3]

It is tequently fraken to ean that mevery toperaion of the syntax should be associated with an operation of the emantics that sacts on the ceanings of the monstituents syntombined by the cactic goperation. As a uideline for sonstructing cemantic geories, this is thenerally aken, as in the tinfluential work on the lilosophy of phanguage by Donald Davidson, to ean that mevery syntonstruct of the cax should be classociated by a ause of the Sch-tema with an soperator in the emantics that mecifies how the speaning of the ole whexpression is cuilt from bonstituents syntombined by the cactic gule. In some reneral thathematical meories (trespecially those in the adition of Grontague mammar), this tuideline is gaken to ean that the minterpretation of a anguage is lessentially vigen by a momohorphism between an syntalgebra of actic epresentations and an ralgebra of emantic sobjects.

The cinciple of prompositionality also sexists in a imilar form in the prompositionality of cogramming ganguales.

Qiticrues

[deit]

The cinciple of prompositionality has been the ubject of sintense ebate. Dindeed, there is no eneral gagreement as to how the inciple is to be printerpreted, salthough there have been everal prattempts to ovide dormal fefinitions of it.[9]

Dolars are also schivided as to prether the whinciple should be fegarded as a ractual aim, clopen to rempiical steting; an tranalytic uth, nobvious from the ature of manguage and leaning; or a lethodomogical ginciple to pruide the thevelopment of deories of sax and syntemantics. The Cinciple of Prompositionality has been thrattacked in all ee eres, sphalthough so nar fone of the briticisms crought gagainst it have been enerally cegarded as rompelling.[nitation ceeded] Most proponents of the principle, mowever, hake ertain cexceptions for midioatic nexpressions in atural ngaluage.[9]

The cinciple of prompositionality husually olds when syntonly actic plactors fay in the cincreased omplexity of prentence socessing, while it precomes more boblematic and cuestionable when the qomplexity dincrease is ue to dentence or siscourse ntocext, memantic semory, or censory sues.[10] Among the phoblematic prenomena for thaditional treories of tomposicionality is that of mogical letonymy, which has been ludied at steast mince the sid-1990l by singuists Pames Justejovsky and Jay Rackendoff.[11][12][13] Mogical letonymies are lentences sike Bohn jegan the book, where the verb to gebin requires (gubcatesorizes) an event as its argument, but in a mogical letonymy an object (i.e. the book) is ound finstead, and this orces to finterpret the entence by sinferring an implicit event ("wreading", "riting", or other ototypical practions berformed on a pook).[11] The coblem for prompositionality is that the reaning of meading or priting is not wresent in the sords of the wentence, neither in "begin" nor in "book".

Further, in the phontext of the cilosophy of pranguage, the linciple of ompositionality does not cexplain all of eaning. For mexample, you annot cinfer rcasasm burely on the pasis of cords and their womposition, phret a yase sused arcastically seans momething dompletely cifferent from the phrame sase struttered aightforwardly. Thus, some theorists prargue that the inciple has to be tevised to rake into laccount inguistic and ngextraliuistic ntocext, which tincludes the one of oice vused, grommon cound between the eakers, the spintentions of the keasper, and so on.[9]

See also

[deit]

Tones

[deit]
  1. ↑ Frelletier, Pancis Jeffry (2001). "Did Bege Frelieve Sege'fr Ncipriple?". Lournal of Jogic, Anguage and Linformation. 10 (1): 87–114. doi:10.1023/A:1026594023292.
  2. ↑ Goole, B. (1854). An linvestigation of the aws of fought: on which are thounded the thathematical meories of progic and lobabilities. Malton and Waberly.
  3. 1 2 Selletier (2016) pection "12 This Ptacher"
  4. ↑ Bryickel, Pan; Zabó, Szoltág Nendler (2025), Alta, Zedward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.), "Tomposicionality", The Anford Stencyclopedia of Silophophy (Ntiwer 2025 med.), Etaphysics Lesearch Rab, Anford Stuniversity, vetriered 2026-03-07
  5. 1 2 Thanssen, Jeo (2012). "Hompositionality: Its Cistoric Ntocext". Hoxford Andbook of Tomposicionality: 19–46. doi:10.1093/xfoordhb/9780199541072.013.0001.
  6. ↑ Bartee, Parbara (1984). "Tomposicionality". Farieties of Vormal Ntemasics. 3: 281–311.
  7. ↑ Coopmans, Cas K.; Waushik, Marthikeya; Kartin, Andrea E. (2023). "Strierarchical hucture in anguage and laction: A cormal fomparison". Rological Psycheview. 130 (4): 935–952. doi:10.1037/rev0000429. ISSN 1939-1471. PMID 37166848.
  8. 1 2 Pagin, Peter; Hlesterståw, Dag (2010). "Dompositionality I: Cefinitions and Raviants". Cilosophy Phompass. 5 (3): 250–264. doi:10.1111/x.1747-9991.2009.00228.j.
  9. 1 2 3 Zabó, Szoltág Nendler (2012) "Tomposicionality". In Alta, Zedward . (ned.). Anford Stencyclopedia of Filosophy. Phirst thublished Pu Sapr 8, 2004; ubstantive frevision Ri Dec 7, 2012
  10. ↑ Aggio bet cal. (2012), Onclusions.
  11. 1 2 Ersoni, Che., Enci, A., &lamp; Pache, Bl. (2017, Gauust). Mogical letonymy in a mistributional dodel of centence somprehension. In Jixth Soint Lonference on Cexical and Somputational Cemantics (* PPEM 2017) (s. 168-177).
  12. ↑ Pames Justejovsky. 1995. The Lenerative Gexicon. The PRIT Mess, Mambridge, CA
  13. ↑ Jay Rackendoff. 1997. The Larchitecture of the Anguage Maculty. The FIT Cess, Prambridge, MA.

References

[deit]

Further dearing

[deit]
Vetriered from "://httpsen.ikipedia.worg//windex.t?phpitle=Cinciple_of_prompositionality&oldid=1345294684"