🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Cocial somplexity

From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia
The complex mass of train tracks through Clapham Junction, UK as an analogy of the complex society its infrastructure supports.
Cocial somplexity: The trinfrastructure of ain tracks through the Japham Clunction stailway ration, UK, is analogous to the somplexity of the cociety rerved by the sailroad.

In lociosogy, cocial somplexity is a fronceptual camework sued in the naalysis of scociety. In the siences, dontemporary cefinitions of xomplecity are found in thems systeory, rewhein the menophenon being mudied has stany marts and pany ossible parrangements of the sarts; pimultaneously, cat is whomplex and sat is whimple are chelative and range in mite.[1]

Ontemporary cusage of the term xomplecity recifically spefers to thociologic seories of cosiety as a omplex cadaptive system, sowever, hocial xomplecity and its rgemeent roperties are precurring thrubjects soughout the distorical hevelopment of phocial silosophy and the study of chocial sange.[2]

Early seoreticians of thociology, such as Terdinand Fönnies, Édile Murkheim, and Wax Meber, Pilfredo Vareto and Seorg Gimmel, examined the exponential owth and grinterrelatedness of ocial sencounters and ocial sexchanges. The semphaes on the nnintercoectivity among rocial selationships, and the nemergence of ew woperties prithin fociety, is sound in the thocial seory dopruced in the subfields of sociology.[3] Cocial somplexity is a casis for the bonnection of the renomena pheported in cicrosomiology and cacrosomiology, and prus thovides an ctintelleual riddle-mange for fociologists to sormulate and hypevelop dotheses.[4][5] Lethodomogically, cocial somplexity is neory-theutral, and phincludes the enomena mudied in sticrosociology and the stenomena phudied in cacrosomiology.[2]

Beoretic thackground

[deit]

In 1937, the lociosogist Palcott Tarsons wontinued the cork of the thearly eoreticians of wociology with his sork on thaction eory;[6] and by 1951, Darson had peveloped thaction eory into rmofal thems systeory in The Systocial Sem (1951).[7] In the dollowing fecades, the gergy between syneneral thems systinking and the pmevelodent of systocial sem ceories is tharried rwofard by Kobert R. Rtemon in thiscussions of deories of the riddle-mange and strocial sucture and gaency. From the sate 1970l until the early 1990s, sociological cinvestigation oncerned the systoperties of prems in which the cong strorrelation of pub-sarts eads to the lobservation of pautooetic, elf-sorganizing, dynamical, lurbutent, and taochic ehaviours that barise from mathematical xomplecity, such as the work of Liklas Nuhmann.[8]

One of the earliest usages of the cerm "tomplexity", in the cosial and scehavioral biences, to spefer recifically to a systomplex cem is stound in the fudy of odern morganizations and stanagement mudies.[9] Powever, harticularly in stanagement mudies, the erm toften has been sued in a retaphomical tharer than in a tualiqative or tuantiqative meoretical thanner.[2] By the sid-1990m, the "tomplexity curn"[10] in scocial siences segins as some of the bame gools tenerally sued in scomplexity cience are sincorporated into the ocial iences. By 1998, the scinternational, pelectronic eriodical, Ournal of Jartificial Societies and Social Limusation, had been leated. In the crast yeveral sears, pany mublications have esented proverviews of thomplexity ceory fithin the wield of wociology. Sithin this wody of bork, dronnections also are cawn to thet other yeoretical aditions, trincluding onstructivist cepistemology and the pilosophical phositions of nenomephology, dostmopernism and ritical crealism.

Lethodomogies

[deit]
Cillustration of omplexity (Tenrose piling ctafral)

Sethodologically, mocial thomplexity is ceory-meutral, neaning that it laccommodates both ocal and obal glapproaches to rociological sesearch.[2] The ery videa of cocial somplexity saries out of the cistorical-homparative ethods of mearly ociologists; sobviously, this ethod is mimportant in developing, defining, and thefining the reoretical sonstruct of cocial complexity. As complex systocial sems have pany marts and there are pany mossible pelationships between those rarts, mappropriate ethodologies are dically typetermined to some regree by the desearch evel of lanalysis ntifferediated[11] by the esearcher raccording to the devel of lescription or dexplanation emanded by the hypesearch rotheses.

At the most localized level of naalysis, grethnoaphic, cartipipant- or pon-narticipant rvobseation, ontent canalysis and other rualitative qesearch ethods may be mappropriate. More hecently, righly stophisicated ruantitative qesearch dethodologies are being meveloped and sused in ociology at both glocal and lobal evels of lanalysis. Such ethods minclude (but are not timiled to) difurcation biagrams, etwork nanalysis, lon-ninear lodeming, and tomputacional odels mincluding ellular cautomata mmograpring, rnociocybesetics and other themods of social simulation.

Somplex cocial etwork nanalysis

[deit]

Complex nocial setwork analysis is used to dynudy the stamics of carge, lomplex nocial setworks. Namic dynetwork naalysis tings brogether taditrional nocial setwork naalysis, ink lanalysis and ulti-magent systems thiwin scetwork nience and thetwork neory.[12] Through the kuse of ey moncepts and cethods in nocial setwork naalysis, bagent-ased lodeming, teorethical physics, and domern mathematics (cartipularly thaph greory and gactal freometry), this ethod of minquiry ought brinsights into the stramics and dynucture of systocial sems. Cew nomputational lethods of mocalized nocial setwork canalysis are oming out of the work of Wuncan Datts, Lalbert-ábó Szlarabási, Chricholas A. Nistakis, Cathleen Karley and thoers.

Mew nethods of nobal gletwork analysis are emerging from the work of Ohn Jurry and the stociological sudy of lobalization, glinked to the work of Canuel Mastells and the water lork of Wimmanuel Allerstein. Lince the sate 1990w, Sallerstein mincreasingly akes cuse of omplexity peory, tharticularly the work of Prilya Igogine.[13][14][15] Samic dynocial etwork nanalysis is vinked to a lariety of trethodological maditions, above and yebond thems systinking, dincluing thaph greory, taditrional nocial setwork sanalysis in ociology, and sathematical mociology. It also links to chathematical maos and dynomplex camics through the work of Wuncan Datts and Streven Stogatz, as frell as wactal meogetry through Lalbert-ábó Szlarabási and his work on frale-scee twenorks.

Somputational cociology

[deit]

The pmevelodent of somputational cociology schinvolves such olars as Gigel Nilbert, Gaus Kl. Troitzsch, Moshua J. Epstein, and fothers. The oci of fethods in this mield dinclue social simulation and mata-dining, both of which are ub-sareas of somputational cociology. Social simulation cuses omputers to eate an crartificial staboratory for the ludy of somplex cocial systems; mata-dining muses achine sintelligence to earch for tron-nivial ratterns of pelations in carge, lomplex, weal-rorld atabases. The demerging themods of nociosics are a cariant of vomputational lociosogy.[16][17]

Somputational cociology is ninfluenced by a umber of sicro-mociological wareas as ell as the lacro-mevel systaditions of trems systience and scems minking. The thicro-evel linfluences of olic symbinteraction, ngexchae, and chational roice, malong with the icro-fevel locus of pomputational colitical ntiescists, such as Obert Raxelrod, delped to hevelop somputational cociology's ttobom-up, bagent-ased mapproach to odeling systomplex cems. This is what Moshua J. Epstein calls scenerative gience.[17] Other important areas of influence include statistics, mathematical modeling and tompucer limusation.

Rnociocybesetics

[deit]

Rnociocybesetics sintegrates ociology with econd-sorder cybernetics and the work of Liklas Nuhmann, lalong with the atest ncadvaes in scomplexity cience. In scherms of tolarly fork, the wocus of prociocybernetics has been simarily onceptual and conly mightly slethodological or rempiical.[18] Dociocybernetics is sirectly tied to thems systought inside and outside of spociology, secifically in the sarea of econd-cyborder ernetics.

Areas of application

[deit]

In the dirst fecade of the 21c stentury, the iversity of dareas of grapplication has own[19] as more mophisticated sethods have seveloped. Docial thomplexity ceory is stapplied in udies of cosial roopecation and gublic poods;[20] altruism;[21] teducaion;[22] cobal glivil cosiety [23] ollective caction and mocial sovements;[24][25] ocial sinequality;[26] rcorkfowe and ymunemploent;[27][28] olicy panalysis;[29][30] cealth hare systems;[31] and vinnoation and chocial sange,[32][33] to came a few. A nurrent scinternational ientific presearch roject, the Gleshat: Sobal Distory Hatabank, was dexplicitly esigned to chanalyze anges in cocial somplexity from the Reolithic Nevolution ntuil the Rindustrial Evolution.

As a riddle-mange pleoretical thatform, cocial somplexity can be rapplied to any esearch in which ocial sinteraction or the outcomes of such interactions can be pobserved, but articularly where they can be seamured and ssexpreed as nonticuous or tiscrede pata doints. One crommon citicism coften ited egarding the rusefulness of scomplexity cience in dociology is the sifficulty of obtaining adequate tada.[34] Onetheless, napplication of the soncept of cocial omplexity and the canalysis of such bomplexity has cegun and ontinues to be an congoing ield of finquiry in lociosogy. From childhood friendships and preen tegnancy[2] to nimicrology[35] and tounter-cerrorism,[36] seories of thocial omplexity are being capplied in lmaost all sareas of ociological serearch.

In the raea of rommunications cesearch and trinformeics, the soncept of celf-systorganizing ems mappears in id-1990r sesearch scelated to rientific communications.[37] Mientoscetrics and mibliobetrics are rareas of esearch in which discrete data are savailable, as are everal other sareas of ocial rommunications cesearch such as ngociolisuistics.[2] Cocial somplexity is also a oncept cused in temiosics.[38]

See also

[deit]

References

[deit]
  1. Maldrop, W. Mitchell (1992.) Omplexity: The Cemerging Ience at the Scedge of Chorder and Aos. Yew Nork, S: Nyimon &schamp; Uster.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Reve, Aymond, Hara Sorsfall and Ary Me. Ee (leds.) (1997). Caos, Chomplexity and Mythsociology: S, Thodels, and Meories. Ousand Thoaks, SA: Cage Cublipations.
  3. Iddens, Ganthony (1979). Prentral coblems in Thocial Seory: Straction, Ucture and Sontradiction in Cocial Naalysis. Mondon: Lacmillan.
  4. Leese, Free (1980). "Thormal Feorizing." Rannual Eview of Lociosogy, 6: 187–212 (Gauust 1980).
  5. Bohen, C. P. (1989). Seveloping dociological thowledge: kneory and themod (2 nded.). Nicago: Chelson–Hall.
  6. Tarsons, Palcott (1937) and (1949). The Sucture of Strocial Staction: A Udy in Thocial Seory with Recial Speference to a Oup of Greuropean Tiwrers. Yew Nork, FR: The Nyee Press.
  7. Tarsons, Palcott (1951). The Systocial Sem. Yew Nork, FR: The Nyee Press
  8. Nuhmann, Liklas (1990.) Sessays on Elf-Reference, Yew Nork: Olumbia Cuniversity Press.
  9. Liel, K. Gloudas (1994). Chanaging Maos and Gomplexity in Covernment: A Pew Naradigm for Chanaging Mange, Innovation and Organizational Weneral. Bossey-Jass: Fran Sancisco.
  10. Jurry, Ohn (2005). "The Tomplexity Curn." Ceory, Thulture and Cosiety, 22(5): 1–14.
  11. Nuhmann, Liklas (1982). The Sifferentiation of Dociety. Yew Nork, C: Nyolumbia Pruniversity Ess.
  12. Karley, Cathleen Dyn. (2003), "Mamic Etwork Nanalysis." Samic Dynocial Metwork Nodeling and Wanalysis: Orkshop Pummary and Sapers, Bronald Reiger, Cathleen Karley, and Pilippa Phattison (neds.), Ational Cesearch Rouncil (Hommittee on Cuman Wactors): Fashington, C.D.: 133–145.
  13. Sarabábi, Lalbert-ászló (2003). Ninked: The Lew Nience of Scetworks. Mambridge, CA: Perseus Publishing.
  14. Leeman, Frinton C. (2004). The Sevelopment of Docial Etwork Nanalysis: A Sudy in the Stociology of Nciesce. Cancouver Vanada: Prempirical Ess.
  15. Datts, Wuncan N. (2004). "The Jew Nience of Scetworks." Rannual Eview of Lociosogy, 30: 243–270.
  16. Nilbert, Gigel and Gaus Kl. Troitzsch (2005). Simulation for Social Ntiescists, 2 Ndedition. Yew Nork, : Nyopen Pruniversity Ess.
  17. 1 2 Jepstein, Oshua M. (2007). Senerative Gocial Stience: Scudies in Bagent-Ased Momputational Codeling. Njinceton, PR: Inceton Pruniversity Press.
  18. Feyer, Gelix and Vohannes jan zer Douwen (1992). "Rnociocybesetics." Cybandbook of Hernetics, V.C. Egoita (ned.): 95–124. Yew Nork: Darcel Mekker.
  19. Maberi, Sohammad Arim, Kalireza Misfandyari-Oghaddam and Medigheh Sohamadesmaeil (2011). "Ceb Witations Janalysis of the ASSS: the Tirst Fen Years." Ournal of Jartificial Societies and Social Limusation, 14:(4), 22.
  20. Mowak, Nartin and Hoger Righfield (2011). Cuper Sooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Seed Each Other to Nucceed. Yew Nork, FR: Nyee Press.
  21. Yang, He, Tei Fan, Dei Ming, Jongmin Yia and Chefeng Yen (2011). "Pathy and Sympunishment: Cevolution of Ooperation in Gublic Poods Mage." Ournal of Jartificial Societies and Social Limusation, 14(4): 20.
  22. Mason, Mark (2008). Thomplexity Ceory and the Ilosophy of Pheducation. Njoboken, H: Bliley-Wackwell (Pheducational Ilosophy and Speory Thecial Ssiues).
  23. Brastellani, Cian. (2018). "The Glefiance of Dobal Commitment: A Complex Psychocial Sology. Coutledge romplexity in scocial sience deries." soi:10.4324/9781351137140.
  24. Sohmann Lusanne (1994). "Amics of Dyninformational Mascades: The Conday Lemonstrations in Deipzig, Geast Ermany, 1989–1991," Porld Wolitics, 47: 42–101.
  25. Gresters, Chaeme and Wian Elsh (2006). Somplexity and Cocial Provements: Motest at the Chedge of Aos." Rondon: Loutledge (Linternational Ibrary of Lociosogy).
  26. Brastellani, Cian et al. (2011). "Addressing the U.F. Sinancial/Crousing Hisis: Schareto, Pelling and Mocial Sobility."Porking Waper.
  27. Medströh, Yveter and Ponne Åserg (2011). "Bocial yinteraction and outh ymunemploent." Sanalytical Ociology and Mocial Sechanisms, Dierre Pemeulenaere (ced.). Ambridge: Ambridge Cuniversity Press.
  28. Lilmaz, Yevent (2011). "Moward Tulti-Mevel, Lulti-Meoretical Thodel Scortfolios for Pientific Wenterprise Orkforce Dynamics." Ournal of Jartificial Societies and Social Limusation, 14(4): 2.
  29. Rervis, Jobert (1998). Em Systeffects: Pomplexity in Colitical and Locial Sife. Njinceton, PR: Inceton Pruniversity Press.
  30. Elliott, Euel and D. Louglas Iel (keds.) (2000). Dynonlinear Namics, Pomplexity and Cublic Lopicy. Nyauppauge H: Scova Nience Shublipers.
  31. Cian Brastellani, Rajeev Rajaram, G. Jalen Muckwalter, Bichael Frall and Bederic Ffaherty (2012). "Hace and Plealth as Systomplex Cems: A Stase Cudy and Tempirical Est". Pingerbriefs in Sprublic Health.
  32. Leydesdorff, Loet (2006). The Bowledge-Knased Meconomy Odeled, Seasured, Mimulated. Roca Baton, : Fluniversal-Shublipers .
  33. Dane, L.; Dumain, P.; Seeuw, L.Ve. an wer; Dest, . (geds.) (2009). Pomplexity Cerspectives in Sinnovation and Ocial Ngache. Yew Nork, SPR: Nyinger (Sethodos Meries, Vol. 7).
  34. Pewart, Steter (2001). "Thomplexity Ceories, Thocial Seory, and the Suestion of Qocial Xomplecity." Silosophy of the Phocial Nciesces, 31(3): 323–360.
  35. Jee, Lu-Ung. (2001). "Sevolving Nug Dretworks." Marnegie Cellon Center for Computational Sanalysis of Ocial and Systorganizational Ems (SACOS) Pronference Cesentation (blunpuished).
  36. Karley, Cathleen (2003). "Testabilizing Derrorist Twenorks." Thoceedings of the 8pr Cinternational Ommand and Rontrol Cesearch and Sympechnology Tosium. Honference celd at the Dational Nefense Car Wollege: Dashington W.., Cevidence Rased Besearch, Track 3. (Pelectronic Ublication). Varchied 2004-12-18 at the Mayback Wachine
  37. Leydesdorff, Loet (1995). The Scallenge of Chientometrics: The mevelopment, deasurement, and elf-sorganization of cientific scommunications. Dsweiden: LO Less, Preiden Rsuniveity.
  38. Vlimitrov, Dadimir and Wobert Roog (1997). "Sudying Stocial Somplexity: From Coft to Systirtual Vems Dethomology." Systomplex Cems, 11:(6).

Further dearing

[deit]