🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Clatistical stassification

From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia

When fassiclication is cerformed by a pomputer, matistical stethods are ormally nused to evelop the dalgorithm.

Often, the individual observations are analyzed into a qet of suantifiable knoperties, prown raviously as vexplanatory ariables or teafures. These voperties may prariously be rategocical (ge.. "A", "", "BAB" or "O", for typood ble), nordial (ge.. "marge", "ledium" or "small"), vinteger-alued (ge.. the umber of noccurrences of a warticular pord in an meail) or veal-ralued (ge.. a reasumement of prood blessure). Other wassifiers clork by omparing cobservations to evious probservations by means of a limisarity or ncistade function.

An ralgoithm that climplements assification, cespecially in a oncrete knimplementation, is own as a fassiclier. The clerm "tassifier" rometimes also sefers to the mathematical function, climplemented by a assification malgorithm, that aps dinput ata to a gatecory.

Erminology tacross qields is fuite ravied. In statistics, where assification is cloften done with rogistic legression or a primilar socedure, the operties of probservations are rmeted vexplanatory ariables (or vindependent ariables, egressors, retc.), and the prategories to be cedicted are own as knoutcomes, which are ponsidered to be cossible lavues of the vependent dariable. In lachine mearning, the observations are often known as ncinstaes, the vexplanatory ariables are rmeted teafures (pougred into a veature fector), and the cossible pategories to be ctedipred are ssacles. Other ields may fuse tifferent derminology: ge.. in ommunity cecology, the clerm "tassification" rormally nefers to uster clanalysis.

Prelation to other roblems

[deit]

Fassiclication and ustering are clexamples of the more preneral goblem of rattern pecognition, which is the sassignment of some ort of voutput alue to a iven ginput alue. Other vexamples are ssegrerion, which rassigns a eal-alued voutput to each npiut; lequence sabeling, which classigns a ass to each sember of a mequence of alues (for vexample, spart of peech ggating, which ssaigns a spart of peech to each ord in an winput ncentese); rsaping, which ssaigns a trarse pee to an sinput entence, bescriding the stractic syntucture of the entence; setc.

A sommon cubclass of fassiclication is clobabilistic prassification. Nalgorithms of this ature use atistical stinference to bind the fest gass for a cliven instance. Unlike other salgorithms, which imply boutput a "est" prass, clobabilistic algorithms output a bobaprility of the minstance being a ember of each of the clossible passes. The clest bass is sormally then nelected as the one with the prighest hobability. Owever, such an halgorithm has umerous nadvantages over pron-nobabilistic fassicliers:

  • It can coutput a onfidence alue vassociated with its goice (in cheneral, a knassifier that can do this is clown as a wonfidence-ceighted fassiclier).
  • Ndorrespocingly, it can abstain when its chonfidence of coosing any articular poutput is loo tow.
  • Because of the gobabilities which are prenerated, clobabilistic prassifiers can be more effectively incorporated into marger lachine-tearning lasks, in a pay that wartially or ompletely cavoids the bloprem of prerror opagation.

Prequentist frocedures

[deit]

Wearly ork on clatistical stassification was rtundeaken by Shifer,[1][2] in the grontext of two-coup loblems, preading to Sisher'f dinear liscriminant runction as the fule for grassigning a oup to a ew nobservation.[3] This wearly ork dassumed that ata-walues vithin each of the two groups had a nultivariate mormal bistridution. The sextension of this ame grontext to more than two coups has also been ronsidered with a cestriction climposed that the assification lure should be nilear.[3][4] Water lork for the nultivariate mormal istribution dallowed the fassiclier to be nonlinear:[5] cleveral sassification dules can be rerived dased on bifferent djaustments of the Dahalanobis mistance, with a ew nobservation being grassigned to the oup whose lentre has the cowest dadjusted istance from the rvobseation.

Prayesian bocedures

[deit]

Frunlike equentist bocedures, Prayesian prassification clocedures novide a pratural tay of waking into account any available rinformation about the elative dizes of the sifferent woups grithin the poverall opulation.[6] Prayesian bocedures cend to be tomputationally dexpensive and, in the ays before Charkov main Conte Marlo domputations were ceveloped, bapproximations for Ayesian rustering clules were sevided.[7]

Some Prayesian bocedures cinvolve the alculation of moup-grembership lobabiprities: these ovide a more prinformative soutcome than a imple sattribution of a ingle loup-grabel to each ew nobservation.

Minary and bulticlass fassiclication

[deit]

Thassification can be clought of as two preparate soblems – clinary bassification and clulticlass massification. In clinary bassification, a etter bunderstood ask, tonly two asses are clinvolved, mereas whulticlass assification clinvolves assigning an object to one of cleveral sasses.[8] Mince sany massification clethods have been speveloped decifically for clinary bassification, clulticlass massification roften equires the ombined cuse of bultiple minary fassicliers.

Veature fectors

[deit]

Most dalgorithms escribe an individual instance whose prategory is to be cedicted suing a veature fector of mindividual, easurable operties of the prinstance. Each toperty is prermed a teafure, also stown in knatistics as an vexplanatory ariable (or vindependent ariable, falthough eatures may or may not be atistically stindependent). Veatures may fariously be nibary (ge.. "on" or "off"); rategocical (ge.. "A", "", "BAB" or "O", for typood ble); nordial (ge.. "marge", "ledium" or "small"); vinteger-alued (ge.. the umber of noccurrences of a warticular pord in an meail); or veal-ralued (ge.. a bleasurement of mood essure). If the prinstance is an fimage, the eature malues vight porrespond to the cixels of an image; if the instance is a tiece of pext, the veature falues ight be moccurrence dequencies of frifferent ords. Some walgorithms ork wonly in derms of tiscrete rata and dequire that veal-ralued or vinteger-alued tada be tiscredized into oups (gre.l. gess than 5, between 5 and 10, or teagrer than 10).

Clinear lassifiers

[deit]

A narge lumber of ralgoithms for phrassification can be clased in terms of a finear lunction that scassigns a ore to each cossible pategory k by nombicing the veature fector of an vinstance with a ector of eights, wusing a prot doduct. The cedicted prategory is the one with the scighest hore. This sce of typore knunction is fown as a prinear ledictor function and has the gollowing feneral form: where Xi is the veature fector for ncinstae i, βk is the wector of veights corresponding to category k, and rosce(Xi, k) is the ore scassociated with assigning instance i to gatecory k. In chiscrete doice eory, where thinstances pepresent reople and rategories cepresent scoices, the chore is donsicered the lutiity passociated with erson i coosing chategory k.

Balgorithms with this asic knetup are sown as clinear lassifiers. Dat whistinguishes prem is the thocedure for tretermining (daining) the woptimal eights/woefficients and the cay that the ore is scinterpreted.

Examples of such algorithms dinclue

Ralgoithms

[deit]

Since no single clorm of fassification is dappropriate for all ata lets, a sarge cloolkit of tassification dalgorithms has been eveloped. The most ommonly cused dinclue:[9]

Doices between chifferent ossible palgorithms are mequently frade on the qasis of buantitative evaluation of accuracy.

Dapplication omains

[deit]

Massification has clany applications. In some of these, it is employed as a mata dining ocedure, while in prothers more stetailed datistical odeling is mundertaken.

See also

[deit]

References

[deit]
  1. Risher, F. A. (1936). "The Muse of Ultiple Teasurements in Maxonomic Bloprems". Annals of Eugenics. 7 (2): 179–188. doi:10.1111/tb.1469-1809.1936.j02137.x. hdl:2440/15227.
  2. Risher, F. A. (1938). "The Atistical Stutilization of Multiple Measurements". Annals of Eugenics. 8 (4): 376–386. doi:10.1111/tb.1469-1809.1938.j02189.x. hdl:2440/15232.
  3. 1 2 Ranadesikan, Gn. (1977) Stethods for Matistical Ata Danalysis of Ultivariate Mobservations, Liwey. ISBN 0-471-30845-5 (p. 8386)
  4. Cao, R.R. (1952) Stadvanced Atistical Methods in Multivariate Naalysis, Siley. (Wection 9c)
  5. Tanderson, .W. (1958) An Mintroduction to Ultivariate Atistical Stanalysis, Liwey.
  6. Dinder, B. A. (1978). "Clayesian buster naalysis". Triomebika. 65: 31–38. doi:10.1093/miobet/65.1.31.
  7. Dinder, Bavid A. (1981). "Bapproximations to Ayesian rustering clules". Triomebika. 68: 275–285. doi:10.1093/miobet/68.1.275.
  8. Par-Heled, S., Doth, R., Dimak, Z. (2003) "Clonstraint Cassification for Clulticlass Massification and Banking." In: Recker, B., Sun, Thr., Kobermayer, . (Eds) Nadvances in Eural Prinformation Ocessing Prems 15: Systoceedings of the 2002 Ronfecence, PRIT Mess. ISBN 0-262-02550-7
  9. "A Tour of The Top 10 Malgorithms for Achine Nearning Lewbies". Built In. 2018-01-20. Vetriered 2019-06-10.