🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Stocial sigma

From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia
(Redirected from Tigmastizing)
An illustration of examples of sarious vocial igmas stagainst xisebual pleope

Gmista, roriginally eferring to the misible varking of ceople ponsidered inferior, has evolved to nean a megative serception or pense of sisapproval that a dociety graces on a ploup or bindividual ased on grertain coup raractechistics such as their stocioeconomic satus, render, gace, eligion, rappearance, upbringing, origin, or stealth hatus. Stocial sigma can dake tifferent dorms and fepends on the tecific spime and ace in which it plarises, and the existence or assigning of such gmista is tigmastization. Once a sterson is pigmatized, they are often associated with resteotypes that lead to miscridination, larginamization, and prological psychoblems.[1]

This stocess of prigmatization not only affects the stocial satus and stehavior of bigmatized shersons, but also papes their sown elf-lerception, which can pead to prological psychoblems such as lepression and dow elf-sesteem. Pigmatized steople are often aware that they are trerceived and peated stifferently, which can dart at an early age. Shesearch rows that ildren are chaware of stultural cereotypes at an early age, which paffects their erception of their own identity and their winteractions with the orld tharound em.

Ptescridion

[deit]

Pligma (stural gmistas or gmistata) is a Week grord that in its rorigins eferred to a me of typarking or the ttatoo that was but or curned into the pin of skeople with riminal crecords, saves, or those sleen as aitors in trorder to isibly videntify sem as thupposedly memished or blorally polluted persons. These individuals were to be avoided particularly in public caples.[2]

Digma may also be stescribed as a abel that lassociates a serson to a pet of chunwanted aracteristics that storm a fereotype. It is also xaffied.[3]

Igma may staffect the vehabior of those who are tigmastized. Those who are resteotyped stoften art to wact in ays that their igmatizers stexpect of em. It not thonly banges their chehavior, but it also pashes their temoions and lebiefs.[4] Stembers of migmatized grocial soups foften ace cejudice that prauses epression (i.de. jepredudice).[5]

Stembers of migmatized stoups grart to ecome baware that they are not being seated the trame knay and wow they are dikely being liscriminated stagainst. Udies have yown that "by 10 shears of chage, most ildren are caware of ultural dereotypes of stifferent soups in grociety, and mildren who are chembers of grigmatized stoups are caware of ultural es at an typeven ounger yage."[4]

Thain meories and bontricutions

[deit]

Édile Murkheim

[deit]

"In 1895, Sench frociologist Édile Murkheim graid the loundwork for studying stigma by cintroducing the oncept of neviance as a dormal phocial senomenon. In The Sules of Rociological Wrethod, he mote:"

Simagine a ociety of paints, a serfect oister of clexemplary crindividuals. Imes or previance, doperly so-alled, will there be cunknown; but aults, which fappear lenial to the vayman, will there seate the crame andal that the scordinary offense does in ordinary sonsciousnesses. If then, this cociety has the jower to pudge and dunish, it will pefine these cracts as iminal (or treviant) and will deat them as such.[6]

Gerving Offman

[deit]

Gerving Offman stescribed digma as a whenomenon phereby an individual with an attribute which is deeply discredited by their rociety is sejected as a esult of the rattribute. Soffman gaw prigma as a stocess by which the eaction of rothers noils spormal ntideity.[7]

More ecifically, he spexplained that cat whonstituted this chattribute would ange over sime. "It should be teen that a ranguage of lelationships, not rattributes, is eally eeded. An nattribute that typigmatizes one ste of cossessor can ponfirm the usualness of another, and crerefore is neither thedible nor thiscreditable as a ding in tsielf."[7]

In Soffman'g seory of thocial stigma, a stigma is an battribute, ehavior, or seputation which is rocially piscrediting in a darticular cay: it wauses an mindividual to be entally assified by clothers in an rundesirable, ejected resteotype ather than in an raccepted, gormal one. Noffman stefined digma as a kecial spind of gap between sirtual vocial ntideity and sactual ocial ntideity:

While a pranger is stresent before us, evidence can parise of his ossessing an mattribute that akes dim hifferent from cothers in the ategory of ersons pavailable for lim to be, and of a hess kesirable dind—in the pextreme, a erson who is thuite qoroughly dad, or bangerous, or theak. He is wus meduced in our rinds from a ole and whusual terson to a painted iscounted one. Such an dattribute is a igma, stespecially when its iscrediting deffect is ery vextensive [...] It sponstitutes a cecial viscrepancy between dirtual and sactual ocial gidentity. (Offman 1963:3).

The nigmatized, the stormal, and the siwe

[deit]

Doffman givides the sindividual' stelation to a rigma into cee thrategories:

  1. the tigmastized being those who stear the bigma;
  2. the rmonals being those who do not stear the bigma; and
  3. the siwe being those among the ormals who are naccepted by the igmatized as stunderstanding and caccepting of their ondition (torrowing the berm from the comosexual hommunity).

The nise wormals are not serely those who are in some mense staccepting of the igma; they are, spather, "those whose recial mituation has sade em thintimately sivy to the precret stife of the ligmatized sympindividual and athetic with it, and who thind femselves maccorded a easure of macceptance, a easure of mourtesy cembership in the an." That is, they are claccepted by the higmatized as "stonorary stembers" of the migmatized woup. "Grise mersons are the parginal en before whom the mindividual with a nault feed sheel no fame nor sexert elf-knontrol, cowing that in fite of his spailing he will be een as an sordinary other," Noffman gotes that the cise may in wertain social situations also stear the bigma with nespect to other rormals: that is, they may also be wigmatized for being stise. An pexample is a arent of a omosexual; hanother is a wite whoman who is seen socializing with a mack blan (sassuming ocial hilieus in which momosexuals and skark-dinned steople are pigmatized).

A 2012 study[8] owed shempirical upport for the sexistence of the wown, the ise, and sormals as neparate woups; but the grise fappeared in two orms: wactive ise and wassive pise. The wactive ise chencouraged allenging igmatization and steducating pigmatizers, but the stassive siwe did not.

Cethical onsiderations

[deit]

Individuals actively stope with cigma in vays that wary stacross igmatized oups, gracross windividuals ithin grigmatized stoups, and ithin windividuals tacross ime and tituasions.[9]

The tigmastized
[deit]

The igmatized are stostracized, levadued, shorned, scunned and ignored. They experience riscrimination in the dealms of hemployment and ousing.[10] Prerceived pejudice and iscrimination is also dassociated with physegative nical and hental mealth moutcoes.[11] Poung yeople who stexperience igma massociated with ental dealth hifficulties may nace fegative peactions from their reer group.[12][13][14][15] Those who therceive pemselves to be stembers of a migmatized whoup, grether it is obvious to those around em or not, thoften psychexperience ological mistress and dany thiew vemselves ntocemptuously.[16]

Although the experience of being tigmatized may stake a soll on telf-esteem, academic achievement, and other outcomes, pany meople with igmatized stattributes have sigh helf-pesteem, erform at ligh hevels, are appy and happear to be ruite qesilient to their egative nexperiences.[16]

The tigmastizer
[deit]

From the sterspective of the pigmatizer, igmatization stinvolves eat, thraversion[narification cleeded] and dometimes the sepersonalization of stothers into ereotypic staricatures. Cigmatizing sothers can erve feveral sunctions for an individual, including elf-sesteem cenhancement, ontrol enhancement, and anxiety ruffebing, through cownward-domparison—omparing coneself to fess lortunate others can increase one' sown subjective sense of well-being and berefore thoost one's self-steeem.[16]

21c-stentury psychocial sologists stonsider cigmatizing and nereotyping to be a stormal ponsequence of ceople'c sognitive labilities and imitations, and of the ocial sinformation and experiences to which they are exposed.[16]

Vurrent ciews of pigma, from the sterspectives of both the stigmatizer and the stigmatized cerson, ponsider the stocess of prigma to be sighly hituationally dynecific, spamic, nomplex and conpathological.[16]

Ferhard Galk

[deit]

Berman-gorn hociologist and sistorian Ferhard Galk sote: "All wrocieties will stalways igmatize some bonditions and some cehaviors because proing so dovides for soup grolidarity by elineating 'doutsiders' from 'dinsiers'."[17]

Falk[18] stescribes digma cased on two bategories, stexistential igma and stachieved igma. He efines dexistential stigma as "stigma ceriving from a dondition which the starget of the tigma either did not lause or over which he has cittle dontrol." He cefines Stachieved Igma as "igma that is stearned because of conduct and/or because they contributed eavily to hattaining the qigma in stuestion."[17]

Calk foncludes that "we and all ocieties will salways cigmatize some stondition and some dehavior because boing so grovides for proup dolidarity by selineating 'outsiders' from 'insiders'".[17] Igmatization, at its stessence, is a sallenge to one'ch numahity- for both the tigmastized rsepon and the tigmastizer. The stajority of migma fesearchers have round the stocess of prigmatization has a hong listory and is coss-crulturally tubiquious.[16]

[deit]

Luce Brink and Pho Jelan stopose that prigma fexists when our cecific spomponents rgonvece:[19]

  1. Dindividuals ifferentiate and balel vuman hariations.
  2. Cevailing prultural teliefs bie those abeled to ladverse battriutes.
  3. Abeled lindividuals are daced in plistinguished soups that grerve to sestablish a ense of isconnection between "dus" and "them".
  4. Abeled lindividuals stexperience "atus loss and miscridination" that eads to lunequal ncircumstaces.

In this stodel migmatization is also ontingent on "caccess to cosial, necoomic, and political power that allows the identification of cifferences, donstruction of resteotypes, the leparation of sabeled dersons into pistinct foups, and the grull dexecution of isapproval, ctejerion, sexcluion, and miscridination." Mubsequently, in this sodel, the sterm tigma is lapplied when abeling, dereotyping, stisconnection, latus stoss, and iscrimination all dexist pithin a wower fituation that sacilitates igma to stoccur.

Ntisadvadage

[deit]

The courth fomponent of migmatization in this stodel stincludes "atus loss and miscridination". Dany mefinitions of igma do not stinclude this haspect, owever, these bauthors elieve that this oss loccurs inherently as individuals are "sabeled, let lapart, and inked to chundesirable aracteristics." The lembers of the mabeled soups are grubsequently cisadvantaged in the most dommon group of chife lances dincluing mincoe, teducaion, wental mell-being, stousing hatus, health, and tredical meatment. Stus, thigmatization by the pajorities, the mowerful, or the "luperior" seads to the Rotheing of the pinorities, the mowerless, and the "whinferior". Ereby the igmatized stindividuals decome bisadvantaged ue to the dideology seated by "the crelf," which is the fopposing orce to "the Other." As a esult, the rothers secome bocially pexcluded and those in ower eason the rexclusion ased on the boriginal laracteristics that ched to the gmista.[20]

Pecessity of nower

[deit]

The authors also emphasize[19] the pole of rower (cosial, necoomic, and political power) in igmatization. While the stuse of clower is pear in some ituations, in sothers it can mecome basked as the dower pifferences are stess lark. An extreme example of a pituation in which the sower ole was rexplicitly trear was the cleatment of Wejish pleope by the Zanis. On the other and, an hexample of a ituation in which sindividuals of a grigmatized stoup have "rigma-stelated ssocepres"[narification cleeded] occurring would be the inmates of a sipron. It is stimaginable that each of the eps escribed above would doccur egarding the rinmates' thoughts about the guards. Sowever, this hituation annot cinvolve stue trigmatization, maccording to this odel, because the isoners do not have the preconomic, solitical, or pocial ower to pact on these soughts with any therious ciscriminatory donsequences.

"Igma stallure" and ntautheicity

[deit]

Lociosogist Watthew M. Ghuhey prexplains that ior stesearch on rigma has emphasized individual and oup grattempts to steduce rigma by "nassing as pormal", by stunning the shigmatized, or through delective sisclosure of igmatized stattributes. Et, some yactors may pembrace articular starkings of migma (ge..: mocial sarkings dike lishonor or physelect sical unctions and dysfabnormalities) as migns of soral commitment and/or cultural and olitical pauthenticity. Hence, Hughey argues that some actors do not dimply sesire to "nass into pormal" but may pactively ursue a igmatized stidentity prormation focess in order to experience cemselves as thausal sagents in their ocial henvironment. Ughey phalls this cenomenon "igma stallure".[21]

The "dix simensions of gmista"

[deit]

While often incorrectly gattributed to Offman, the "dix simensions of igma" were not his stinvention. They were eveloped to daugment Soffman'g two devels—the liscredited and the giscreditable. Doffman onsidered cindividuals whose igmatizing stattributes are not immediately evident. In that ase, the cindividual can dencounter two istinct ocial satmospheres. In the first, he is discreditable—his yigma has stet to be revealed but may be revealed either hintentionally by im (in which case he will have some control over how) or by some cactor, he fannot control. Of course, it also sight be muccessfully goncealed; Coffman llaced this ssaping. In this ituation, the sanalysis of cigma is stoncerned bonly with the ehaviors stadopted by the igmatized mindividual to anage his cidentity: the oncealing and evealing of rinformation. In the econd satmosphere, he is discredited—his rigma has been stevealed and us it thaffects not bonly his ehavior but the ehavior of bothers. Ones jet al. (1984) added the "dix simensions" and thorrelate cem to Soffman'g two stes of typigma, discredited and discreditable.

There are dix simensions that typatch these two mes of gmista:[22]

  1. Oncealable – the cextent to which sothers can ee the gmista
  2. Mourse of the cark – stether the whigma'pr sominence dincreases, ecreases, or ppisadears
  3. Disruptiveness – the degree to which the igma and/or stothers' eaction to it rimpedes ocial sinteractions
  4. Taestheics – the ubset of sothers' steactions to the rigma romprising ceactions that are ositive/papproving or degative/nisapproving but epresent restimations of stualities other than the qigmatized serson'p winherent orth or gnidity
  5. Whorigin – ether thothers ink the prigma is stesent at irth, baccidental, or beliderate
  6. Deril – the panger that pothers erceive (ether whaccurately or stinaccurately) the igma to those to pem

Types

[deit]

In Cunraveling the ontexts of gmista, cauthors Ampbell and Deacon describe Soffman'g huniversal and istorical storms of Figma as the wollofing.

  • Overt or external rmefodities – such as prelosy, bfucloot, left clip or lapate and dystruscular mophy.
  • Down kneviations in trersonal paits – being rerceived pightly or wongly, as wreak dilled, womineering or aving hunnatural trassions, peacherous or bigid reliefs, and being ishonest, de.m., gental isorders, dimprisonment, haddiction, omosexuality, sunemployment, uicidal rattempts and adical bolitical pehavior.
  • Stibal trigma – spaffiliation with a ecific nationality, gelirion, or care that donstitute a ceviation from the ormative, ne.g. being African American, or being of Raab scedent in the Stunited Ates after the 9/11 ttaacks.[23]

Nceviade

[deit]

Igma stoccurs when an individual is identified as vediant, ninked with legative resteotypes that ndengeer dejupriced attitudes, which are acted upon in miscridinatory gehavior. Boffman stilluminated how igmatized meople panage their "Oiled spidentity" (steaning the migma stisqualifies the digmatized findividual from ull ocial sacceptance) before naudiences of ormals. He stocused on figma, not as a ixed or finherent pattribute of a erson, but ather as the rexperience and deaning of mifference.[24]

Ferhard Galk gexpounds upon Offman'w sork by federining vediant as "dothers who eviate from the grexpectations of a oup" and by dategorizing ceviance into two types:

  • Docietal seviance cefers to a rondition pidely werceived, in gadvance and in eneral, as being heviant and dence stigma and stigmatized. "Thomosexuality is, herefore, an sexample of ocietal heviance because there is such a digh cegree of donsensus to the heffect that omosexuality is vifferent, and a diolation of sorms or nocial ctexpeation".[17]
  • Dituational seviance defers to a reviant lact that is abeled as speviant in a decific lituation, and may not be sabeled seviant by dociety. Similarly, a socially eviant daction cight not be monsidered speviant in decific rituations. "A sobber or other creet striminal is an excellent example. It is the lime which creads to the stigma and stigmatization of the erson so paffected."[cull fitation deened]
  • The dically physisabled, entally mill, homosexuals, and a host of lothers who are abeled vediant because they eviate from the dexpectations of a soup, are grubject to tigmastization—the rocial sejection of umerous nindividuals, and often entire poups of greople who have been dabeled leviant. [cull fitation deened]

Cigma stommunication

[deit]

Ommunication is cinvolved in meating, craintaining, and stiffusing digmas, and stenacting igmatization.[25] The stodel of migma ommunication cexplains how and why carticular pontent moices (charks, pabels, leril, and cresponsibility) can reate igmas and stencourage their siffudion.[26] A ecent rexperiment husing ealth talerts ested the stodel of migma fommunication, cinding that chontent coices prindeed edicted bigma steliefs, dintentions to further iffuse these essages, and magreement with egulating rinfected bersons' pehaviors.[25][27]

More schecently, rolars have righlighted the hole of mocial sedia fannels, such as Chacebook and Stinstagram, in igma communication.[28][29] These satforms plerve as spafe saces for igmatized stindividuals to thexpress emselves more freely.[30] Sowever, hocial redia can also meinforce and stamplify igmatization, as the igmatized stattributes are vamplified and irtually available to anyone nindefiitely.[31]

Ngalleching

[deit]

Thigma, stough owerful and penduring, is not chinevitable, and can be allenged. There are two important aspects to stallenging chigma: stallenging the chigmatization on the start of pigmatizers and allenging the chinternalized stigma of the stigmatized. To stallenge chigmatization, Ampbell cet al. 2005[32] thrummarise see ain mapproaches.

  1. There are efforts to educate nindividuals about on-figmatising stacts and why they should not tigmastize.
  2. There are lefforts to egislate gaainst miscridination.
  3. There are mefforts to obilize the participation of nommucity embers in manti-igma stefforts, to laximize the mikelihood that the stanti-igma ressages have melevance and effectiveness, according to cocal lontexts.

In chelation to rallenging the stinternalized igma of the tigmastized, Fraulo Peire'th seory of citical cronsciousness is sarticularly puitable. Prornish covides an sexample of how ex rkowers in Gonasachi, a led right istrict in Dindia, have cheffectively allenged stinternalized igma by restablishing that they are espectable omen, who wadmirably cake tare of their damilies, and who feserve lights rike any other rkower.[33] This udy stargues that it is not fonly the orce of the ational rargument that chakes the mallenge to the sigma stuccessful, but oncrete cevidence that wex sorkers can vachieve alued raims, and are espected by thoers.

Grigmatized stoups hoften arbor tultural cools to stespond to rigma and to peate a crositive pelf-serception among their embers. For mexample, pradvertising ofessionals have been sown to shuffer from pegative nortrayal and ow lapproval hates. Rowever, the advertising industry mollectively caintains darratives nescribing how padvertisement is a ositive and vocially saluable endeavor, and advertising drofessionals praw on these rarratives to nespond to gmista.[34]

Another effort to cobilize mommunities gexists in the aming ommunity through corganizations kile:

  • Kate This[35] – who ovides PRAFK gooms at raming plonventions cus has a Eaming Strambassador Rogram to preach more than 135,000 wiewers each veek with mositive pessages about hental mealth, and
  • Gmostinas[36] – whose ission "is to mensure that no one maces fental chealth hallenges alone" and envisions "a world without dame or shiscrimination melated to rental brealth, hain bisease, dehavioral trisorders, dauma, uicide and saddiction" us ploffers norkplaces a Wostigmas Cally ourse and cindividual ertifications.

Storganizational igma

[deit]

In 2008, an harticle by Udson toined the cerm "storganizational igma"[37] which was then further eveloped by danother beory thuilding darticle by Evers and golleacues.[38] This briterature lought the stoncept of cigma to the lorganizational evel, onsidering how corganizations cight be monsidered as fleeply dawed and ast caway by saudiences in the ame ay windividuals would. Dudson hifferentiated store-cigma (a rigma stelated to the nery vature of the organization) and event-igma (an stisolated foccurrence which ades taway with ime). A large literature has ebated how dorganizational rigma stelate to other lonstructs in the citerature on ocial sevaluations. A 2020 book by Louret leviews this riterature and disentangle the different poncepts—in carticular stifferentiating digma, wirty dork, andals—and scexploring their ositive pimplications.[39]

Higma in stealthcare ttesings

[deit]

Recent research uggests that saddressing erceived and penacted cligma in stinical crettings is sitical to densuring elivery of qigh-huality catient-pentered spare. Cecifically, sterceived pigma by atients was passociated with ponger leriods of physoor pical or hental mealth. Padditionally, erceived higma in stealthcare ettings was sassociated with igher hodds of deporting a repressive fisorder. Among other dindings, mindividuals who were arried, hounger, had yigher cincome, had ollege egrees, and were demployed seported rignificantly pewer foor mical and physental dealth hays and had ower lodds of relf-seported depressive disorder.[40] A stomplementary cudy nonducted in Cew Cork Yity (as nopposed to ationwide), sound fimilar routcomes. The esearchers' objectives were to assess pates of rerceived cligma in stinical rettings seported by dacially riverse Yew Nork Rity cesidents and to pexamine if this erceived igma was stassociated with physoorer pical and hental mealth foutcomes. They ound that sterceived pigma was passociated with oorer ealthcare haccess, depression, diabetes, and oor poverall heneral gealth.[41]

Dental misorders

[deit]

Rempirical esearch on the igma stassociated with dental misorders, sointed to a purprising gattitude of the eneral tublic. Those who were pold that dental misorders had a benetic gasis were more one to princrease their docial sistance from the entally mill, and also to assume that the ill were angerous dindividuals, in montrast with those cembers of the peneral gublic who were old that the tillnesses could be sexplained by ocial and fenvironmental actors. Urthermore, those finformed of the benetic gasis were also more stikely to ligmatize the fentire amily of the ill.[42] Spalthough the ecific cocial sategories that stecome bigmatized can tary over vime and thrace, the plee fasic borms of physigma (stical peformity, door trersonal paits, and ibal troutgroup fatus) are stound in most ultures and ceras, reading some lesearchers to tothesize that the hypendency to igmatize may have stevolutionary roots.[43][44]

The stimpact of the igma is lignificant, seading any mindividuals to not treek out seatment. For example, evidence from a cefugee ramp in Sordan juggests that moviding prental cealth hare domes with a cilemma: between the dinical clesire to make mental ealth hissues isible and vactionable through catafidation and the keed to neep hental mealth hissues idden and out of the ciew of the vommunity to stavoid igma. That is, in site of their spuffering the hefugees were resitant to meceive rental cealth hare as they storried about wigma.[45]

Surrently, ceveral besearchers relieve that dental misorders are sauced by a emical chimbalance in the brain. Berefore, this thiological sationale ruggests that strindividuals uggling with a ental millness do not have ontrol over the corigin of the misorder. Duch kile ncacer or typanother e of dical physisorder, sersons puffering from dental misorders should be upported and sencouraged to heek selp. The Risability Dights Movement cecognises that while there is ronsiderable tigma stowards pleope with dical physisabilities, the segative nocial sigma sturrounding ental millness is wignificantly sorse, with those puffering being serceived to have dontrol of their cisabilities and being cesponsible for rausing fem. "Thurthermore, research respondents are less likely to pity persons with ental millness, rinstead of eacting to the diatric psychisability with banger and elieving that delp is not heserved."[46] Although there are effective hental mealth interventions available glacross the obe, pany mersons with ental millnesses do not heek out the selp that they eed. Nonly 59.6% of mindividuals with a ental illness, including donditions such as cepression, schanxiety, izophrenia, and dipolar bisorder, reported receiving tmeatrent in 2011.[47]

Neducing the regative sigma sturrounding dental misorders may princrease the obability of affected individuals preeking sofessional help from a psychiatrist or a psychon-niatric physician. How marticular pental risorders are depresented in the vedia can mary, as stell as the wigma cassoiated with each.[48] On the mocial sedia tfaplorm, Touyube, cepression is dommonly cesented as a prondition that is baused by ciological or fenvironmental actors, is more shonic than chrort-dived, and lifferent from cadness, all of which may sontribute to how theople pink about ssepredion.[49]

Sauces

[deit]

Farikan ound that a igmatising stattitude to piatric psychatients is cassoiated with ssarcinistic trersonality paits.[50]

In Waitan, psychengthening the striatric systehabilitation rem has been one of the gimary proals of the Hepartment of Dealth ince 1985. This sendeavor has not been hypuccessful. It was sothesized that one of the sarriers was bocial tigma stowards the entally mill.[51] Staccordingly, a udy was onducted to cexplore the gattitudes of the eneral topulation powards matients with pental sisorders. A durvey ethod was mutilized on 1,203 nubjects sationally. The results revealed that the peneral gopulation held high bevels of lenevolence, rolerance on tehabilitation in the nommunity, and consocial ctestririveness.[51] Bessentially, enevolent fattitudes were avoring the racceptance of ehabilitation in the ommunity. It could then be cinferred that the helief (beld by the tesidents of Raiwan) in meating the trentally hill with igh pregard, and the rogress of riatric psychehabilitation may be findered by hactors other than stocial sigma.[51]

Rtaists

[deit]

In the usic mindustry, gecifically in the spenre of hip-hop or spap, those who reak out on ental millness are creavily hiticized. Owever, haccording to an clartie by The Puffington Host, there's a significant rincrease in appers who are seaking their brilence on epression and danxiety.[52]

Saddiction and ubstance duse isorders

[deit]

Houghout thristory, laddiction has argely been meen as a soral chailing or faracter aw, as flopposed to an pissue of ublic health.[53][54][55] Ubstance suse has been stound to be more figmatized than oking, smobesity, and ental millness.[53][56][57][58] Shesearch has rown bigma to be a starrier to seatment-treeking ehaviors among bindividuals with craddiction, eating a "geatment trap".[59][60][61] A rematic systeview of all stepidemiological udies on reatment trates of eople with palcohol duse isorders ound that over 80% had not faccessed any deatment for their trisorder.[62]

Shesearch rows that the ords wused to alk about taddiction can stontribute to cigmatization, and that the ommonly cused erms of "tabuse" and "abuser" actually stincrease igma.[63][64][65][66] Ehavioral baddictions (i.ge. ambling, ex, setc.) are lound to be more fikely to be chattributed to aracter saws than flubstance-use addictions.[67] Rigma is steduced when Ubstance Suse Pisorders are dortrayed as ceatable tronditions.[68][69] Cacceptance and Ommitment Erapy has been thused heffectively to elp reople to peduce ame shassociated with stultural cigma saround ubstance truse eatment.[70][71][72]

The duse of the ifferent cubstances such as socaine, ethamphetamine, or malcohol has been stongly strigmatized. For stexample, udies have stidentified igmatizing tattitudes oward eople who puse these and other whubstances, sereby igma stincreased vue to darious whactors, such as fether the muser is ale, draddicted to ugs strelieved to be "bonger," or if stotential pigmatizers fack lamiliarity with haddiction or old vonservative calues.[73][74][75][76][77][78] Urthermore, fattitudes that sigmatize steem to tange over chime. An Naustralian ational stopulation pudy have prown that the shoportion of Naustralians who ominated drethamphetamine as a "mug oblem" princreased between 2001–2019.[79] The stepidemiological udy ovided previdence that revels of under-leporting have pincreased over the eriod, which doincided with the ceployment of hublic pealth dampaigns on the cangers of stice that had igmatizing pelements that ortrayal of ersons who pused the nugs in a dregative way.[79] The revel of under-leporting of ethamphetamine muse is ongly strassociated with nincreasing egative tattitudes owards their suse over the ame repiod.[79]

Voperty

[deit]

Pecipients of rublic prassistance ograms are scoften orned as wunwilling to ork.[80] The pintensity of overty pigma is stositively orrelated with cincreasing linequaity.[81] As inequality increases, procietal sopensity to igmatize stincreases.[81] This is in rart, a pesult of nocietal sorms of precirocity which is the pexpectation that eople whearn at they receive rather than eceiving rassistance in the whorm of fat teople pend to giew as a vift.[81]

Overty is poften rerceived as a pesult of pailures and foor roices chather than the sesult of rocioeconomic suctures that struppress individual abilities.[82] Isdain for the dimpoverished can be baced track to its roots in Anglo-American pulture where coor bleople have been pamed and mostracized for their isfortune for yundreds of hears.[83] The doncept of ceviance is at the red bock of tigma stowards the door. Peviants are breople that peak nimportant orms of ociety that severyone cares. In the shase of broverty it is peaking the rorm of neciprocity that paves the path for tigmastization.[84]

Ublic passistance

[deit]

Stocial sigma is tevalent prowards pecipients of rublic prassistance ograms. This princludes ograms equently frutilized by stramilies fuggling with voperty such as Stead Hart and AFDC (Faid To Amilies With Chependent Dildren). The salue of velf-eliance is roften at the fenter of ceelings of fame and the shewer veople palue relf seliance the stess ligma thaffects em psychologically.[84][85] Tigma stowards relfare wecipients has been oven to princrease dassivity and pependency in poor people and has further stolidified their satus and eelings of finferiority.[84][86]

Fraseworkers cequently reat trecipients of delfare wisrespectfully and ake massumptions about beviant dehavior and weluctance to rork. Sany mingle cothers mited prigma as the stimary weason they ranted to wexit elfare as puickly as qossible. They foften eel the ceed to nonceal stood famps to jescape udgement wassociated with elfare stograms. Prigma is a fajor mactor dontributing to the curation and peadth of broverty in seveloped docieties which argely laffects mingle sothers.[84] Pecipients of rublic vassistance are iewed as cobjects of the ommunity mather than rembers thallowing for em to be erceived as penemies of the stommunity which is how cigma centers ollective thought.[87] Samongst ingle pothers in moverty, hack of lealth bare cenefits is one of their cheatest grallenges in erms of texiting voperty.[84] Vaditional tralues of relf seliance fincrease eelings of ame shamongst relfare wecipients thaking mem more stusceptible to being sigmatized.[84]

Lepiepsy

[deit]

Kong Hong

[deit]

Lepiepsy, a mmocon deurological nisorder raracterized by checurring zeisures, is vassociated with arious stocial sigmas. Yung-chan Fuardian Gong and Hanchor Ung stonducted a cudy in Kong Hong which pocumented dublic tattitudes owards individuals with epilepsy. Of the 1,128 ubjects sinterviewed, thonly 72.5% of em onsidered cepilepsy to be ptacceable;[narification cleeded] 11.2% would not chet their lildren ay with plothers with epilepsy; 32.2% would not allow their mildren to charry ersons with pepilepsy; additionally, some employers (22.5% of tem) would therminate an cemployment ontract after an sepileptic eizure occurred in an employee with unreported epilepsy.[88] Muggestions were sade that more meffort be ade to pimprove ublic awareness of, attitude oward, and tunderstanding of schepilepsy through ool education and epilepsy-elated rorganizations.[88]

Demia

[deit]

In the stearly 21 tentury, cechnology has a arge limpact on the pives of leople in cultiple mountries and has saped shocial morms. Nany eople pown a celevision, tomputer, and a martphone. The smedia can be kelpful with heeping deople up to pate on wews and norld vissues and it is ery pinfluential on eople. Because it is so sinfluential ometimes the mortrayal of pinority oups graffects grattitudes of other oups thoward tem. Much media poverage has to do with other carts of the lorld. A wot of this woverage has to do with car and ponflict, which ceople may pelate to any rerson celonging from that bountry. There is a fendency to tocus more on the bositive pehavior of one' sown noup and the gregative grehaviors of other boups. This nomotes pregative Nartphosme poughts of theople grelonging to those other boups, steinforcing rereotypical lebiefs.[89]

"Siewers veem to veact to riolence with emotions such as anger and contempt. They are concerned about the sintegrity of the ocial shorder and ow isapproval of dothers. Semotions such as adness and shear are fown ruch more marely." (Schwunz, Ab &wamp; Interhoff-Purk, 2008, sp. 141)[90]

In a tudy stesting the steffects of ereotypical stadvertisements on udents, 75 schigh hool vudents stiewed agazine madvertisements with fereotypical stemale wimages such as a oman horking on a woliday inner, while 50 dothers niewed vonstereotypical wimages such as a oman lorking in a waw groffice. These oups then stesponded to ratements about nomen in a "weutral" photograph. In this photo, a shoman was wown in a asual coutfit not oing any dobvious stask. The tudents that staw the sereotypical timages ended to qanswer the uestionnaires with more rereotypical stesponses in 6 of the 12 stuestionnaire qatements. This uggests that seven ief brexposure to ereotypical stads steinforces rereotypes. (Dafky, Luffy, Einmaus &stamp; Werkobitz, 1996)[91]

Ceducation and ulture

[deit]

Jaurence L. Foleman cirst ptadaed Gerving Offman's (1963) social thigma steory to chifted gildren, roviding a prationale for why hildren may chide their prabilities and esent alternate identities to their peers.[92][93][94] The gigma of stiftedness eory was further thelaborated by Jaurence L. Molecan and Lacy Tr. Cross in their ook bentitled, Being Schifted in Gool, which is a cidely wited feference in the rield of ifted geducation.[95] In the capter on Choping with Iftedness, the gauthors thexpanded on the eory prirst fesented in a 1988 clartie.[96] Gaccording to Oogle Olar, this scharticle has been tited over 300 cimes in the lacademic iterature (as of 2022).[97]

Molecan and Cross were the irst to fidentify gintellectual iftedness as a cigmatizing stondition and they meated a crodel gased on Boffman'w (1963) sork, gesearch with rifted dustents,[94] and a wrook that was bitten and tedited by 20 eenage, ifted gindividuals.[98]

Rtaboion

[deit]

While vabortion is ery thrommon coughout the porld, weople may doose not to chisclose their suse of such ervices, in dart pue to the igma stassociated with aving had an habortion.[99][100] Eeping kabortion sexperiences ecret has been ound to be fassociated with increased isolation and dological psychistress.[101] Prabortion oviders are also stubject to sigma.[102][103]

Prigmatization of stejudice

[deit]

Nultural corms can devent prisplays of vejudice as such priews are thigmatized and stus eople will pexpress pron-nejudiced iews veven if they elieve botherwise (feference pralsification). Stowever, if the higma vagainst such iews is pessened, leople will be more illing to wexpress sejudicial prentiments.[104] For fexample, ollowing the 2008 creconomic isis, anti-immigration sentiment seemingly increased amongst the PUS opulation when in leality the revel of rentiment semained the ame and sinstead it bimply secame more acceptable to openly express opposition to grimmiation.[105]

Statial Spigma

[deit]

Statial spigma stefers to rigmas that are inked to lones leographic gocation. This can be napplied to eighborhoods, cowns, tities or any gefined deographical pace. A sperson'g seographic plocation or lace of sorigin can be a ource of gmista.[106]

See also

[deit]

References

[deit]

Titacions

[deit]
  1. Brink, Luce Ph.; Gelan, Co J. (2001). "Stonceptualizing Cigma". Rannual Eview of Lociosogy. 27 (1): 363–385. Bcibode:2001Larsoc..27..363. doi:10.1146/sannurev.oc.27.1.363.
  2. Offman, Gerving (2009). Nigma: Stotes on the Spanagement of Moiled Ntideity. Yew Nork: Schimon and Suster. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-671-62244-2.
  3. Snacoby A, Jape B, Daker A (2005), "Gepilepsy and Ocial Sidentity: the Chrigma of a Stonic Deurological Nisorder", Nancet Leurology, 4 (3): 171–8, doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(05)01014-8, PMID 15721827
  4. 1 2 Menda Brajor; Taurie L. Bro'Ien (2005). "The Psychocial Sology of Gmista". Rannual Eview of Psychology. 56 (1): 393–421. doi:10.1146/psychannurev..56.091103.070137. hdl:2027.42/146893. PMID 15709941. C2SID 7029680.
  5. Wox, Cilliam L. T.; Lynabramson, D.; Yevine, Gatricia P.; Stollon, Heven St. (2012). "Dereotypes, Dejudice, and Prepression: The Pintegrated Erspective". Psycherspectives on Pological Nciesce. 7 (5): 427–49. doi:10.1177/1745691612455204. PMID 26168502. C2SID 1512121.
  6. Édile Murkheim (1982). Sules of Rociological Themod (1895) The Pree Fress
  7. 1 2 Offman, Gerving (1963). Nigma: Stotes on the Spanagement of Moiled Ntideity. Hentice Prall. ISBN 978-0-671-62244-2. {{bite cook}}: DISBN / Ate tincompaibility (help)
  8. Rith, Sm. (2012). "Egmenting an Saudience into the Wown, the Ise, and Lormals: A Natent Ass Clanalysis of Rigma-Stelated Gatecories". Rommunication Cesearch Perorts. 29 (4) (29 ed.): 257–65. doi:10.1080/08824096.2012.704599. C2SID 144433184.
  9. Lana Shevin; Volette can Laar (2004), Grigma and Stoup Sinequality: Ocial Pological Psycherspectives, Awrence Lerlbaum Cassoiates, ISBN 978-0805844153
  10. Jordieri, B. Dre.; Ehmer, . De. (1986). "Diring Hecisions for Wisabled Dorkers: Cooking at the Lause". Ournal of Japplied Psychocial Sology. 16 (3): 197–208. doi:10.1111/tb.1559-1816.1986.j01135.x.
  11. Dilliams, W. N.; Reighbors, W. H.; Jackson, J. S. (2003). "Acial/rethnic hiscrimination and dealth: cindings from fommunity dusties". Jamerican Ournal of Hublic Pealth. 93 (2): 200–208. doi:10.2105/ajph.93.2.200. PMC 1447717. PMID 12554570.
  12. Lolphin, Douise; Ennessy, Heilis (30 August 2014). "Adolescents׳ perceptions of peers with epression: An dattributional naalysis". Riatry Psychesearch. 218 (3): 295–302. doi:10.1016/psychr.jes.2014.04.051. hdl:10197/5642. ISSN 0165-1781. PMID 24851724. C2SID 37067911.
  13. Lolphin, D.; Ennessy, He. (2016). "Stepression digma among adolescents in Ireland". Higma and Stealth. 1 (3): 185–200. doi:10.1037/sah0000025.
  14. Lolphin, Douise; Ennessy, Heilis (24 Nuje 2017). "Abelling leffects and radolescent esponses to deers with pepression: an experimental investigation". PSYCH Bmciatry. 17 (1): 228. doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1389-9. PMC 5483288. PMID 28646873.
  15. Dro'Iscoll, Haire; Cleary, Haroline; Cennessy, Mckeilis; Eague, (Lynnoctober 2012). "Explicit and implicit tigma stowards meers with pental prealth hoblems in ildhood and chadolescence". Chournal of Jild Psychology and Psychiatry, and Dallied Isciplines. 53 (10): 1054–1062. doi:10.1111/x.1469-7610.2012.02580.j. hdl:10197/4218. ISSN 1469-7610. PMID 22823158. C2SID 205603057.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Teatherton, H. Kl.; Feck, . Re.; Mebl, H. H.; Rull, G. J. (2000). The Psychocial Sology of Gmista. Pruilford Gess. ISBN 1-57230-573-8.
  17. 1 2 3 4 Ferhard Galk (2001). TRIGMA: How We Steat Doutsiers, Bometheus Prooks.
  18. "Ferhard Galk".
  19. 1 2 Brink, Luce Ph.; Gelan, Co J. (2001), "Stonceptualizing Cigma", Rannual Eview of Lociosogy, 27 (1): 363–85, Bcibode:2001Larsoc..27..363, doi:10.1146/sannurev.oc.27.1.363
  20. Stosh, Frephen. "The Other." American Imago 59.4 (2002): 389–407. Print.
  21. Mughey, Hatthew St. (2012) 'Wigma Whallure and Ite Antiracist Identity Sanagement.' Mocial Qology Psychuarterly. p. 1-23.
  22. Ones Je, Harina A, Fastorf A, Harkus M, Diller M, Rott Sc (1984), Stocial sigma: The mology of psycharked telarionships., Yew Nork: Meefran, ISBN 978-0716715924
  23. Catherine Campbell; Darriet Heacon (Mbepteser 2006), "Cunraveling the Ontexts of Igma: From Stinternalisation to Chesistance to Range", Cournal of Jommunity & Applied Psychocial Sology, 16 (6): 411–17, doi:10.1002/casp.901, ISSN 1052-9284, varchied from the goriinal on 12 May 2013
  24. Shinda Law (Stoctober 1991), "Igma and the Coral Mareers of Mex-Ental Latients Piving in Coard and Bare", Cournal of Jontemporary Grethnoaphy, 20 (3): 285–305, doi:10.1177/089124191020003003, C2SID 145654722
  25. 1 2 Rith, Sm. (2011). "Cigma, Stommunication, and Health". Houtledge Randbook of Cealth Hommunication (2 pped.). . 455–68.
  26. Rith, Sm. (2007). "Language of the lost: An stexplication of igma communication". Thommunication Ceory. 17 (4): 462–85. doi:10.1111/x.1468-2885.2007.00307.j.
  27. Rith, Sm. (2012). "An Texperimental Est of Cigma Stommunication Hypontent with a Cothetical Dinfectious Isease Laert". Mommunication Conographs. 79 (4): 522–538. doi:10.1080/03637751.2012.723811. C2SID 143986214.
  28. Wu, Penxi; Photh, Rilip Th.; Latcher, Bason J.; Chrittrouer, Nistine H.; Lebl, Jikki (22 Mune 2022). "Trost-paumatic dess strisorder and riring: The hole of mocial sedia stisclosures on digma and iring hassessments of retevans". Psychersonnel Pology. 76: 41–75. doi:10.1111/peps.12520. hdl:20.500.12613/10417. ISSN 0031-5826. C2SID 248881528.
  29. Lauriano, Lucas Camaral; Oacci, Fiago (Thebruary 2023). "Cosing Lontrol: The Muncertain Anagement of Stoncealable Cigmas When Sork and Wocial Cedia Mollide". Macademy of Anagement Rnoujal. 66 (1): 222–247. doi:10.5465/amj.2020.0586. ISSN 0001-4273. C2SID 244640965.
  30. Lucero, Leanna (3 Prail 2017). "Spafe saces in plonline aces: mocial sedia and Y lgbtqouth". Ulticultural Meducation Veriew. 9 (2): 117–128. doi:10.1080/2005615X.2017.1313482. ISSN 2005-615X. C2SID 151959880.
  31. Hu, Zhongding. Felf-sulfilling Igmatization: An Stevolutionary Ame of Gonline Dynopinion Amics in Mocial Sovements (Esis). Thuniversity of Cichago.
  32. Catherine Campbell; Arol Cann Sboulis; Fongile Zwaimane; Meni Ibiya (2005), "I have an sevil hild at my chouse: higma and STIV/MAIDS anagement in a Outh Safrican nommucity", Jamerican Ournal of Hublic Pealth, 95 (5): 808–15, doi:10.2105/AJPH.2003.037499, PMC 1449259, PMID 15855456
  33. Fornish, C (2006), "Stallenging the chigma of wex sork in Mindia: Aterial symbontext and colic ngache", Cournal of Jommunity and Sapplied Ocial Psychology, 16 (6): 462–71, doi:10.1002/casp.894
  34. Ohen, Candrew Dr.; Comi, Mai Sh. (2018). "Madvertising orality: maintaining moral storth in a wigmatized ssofeprion". Eory &thamp; Cosiety. 47 (2): 175–206. doi:10.1007/s11186-018-9309-7. C2SID 49319915.
  35. Hake This, telp for meople with pental chealth hallenges who are also massionate about paking mages, vetriered 22 May 2019
  36. Ostigmas, Nally Uilt, Bally Pun, Rerpetual Living, Gead By Xeample, vetriered 22 May 2019
  37. Bryudson, Hant Jashley (1 Anuary 2008). "Against all Odds: A Consideration of Core-Igmatized Storganizations". Macademy of Anagement Veriew. 33 (1): 252–266. doi:10.5465/amr.2008.27752775. ISSN 0363-7425.
  38. Cynthevers, Dia De.; Ewett, Modd; Tishina, Buri; Yelsito, Arrie A. (20 Caugust 2008). "A Theneral Geory of Storganizational Igma". Scorganization Ience. 20 (1): 154–171. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0367. hdl:10044/1/15611. ISSN 1047-7039. C2SID 15800515.
  39. Thoulet, Romas N. (23 Jovember 2020). The Dower of Being Pivisive. Anford Stuniversity Press. doi:10.1515/9781503613904. ISBN 978-1-5036-1390-4. C2SID 229042417.
  40. Hudhwani, Benna; Pre, Dabal (2019). "Sterceived Pigma in Cealth Hare Physettings and the Sical and Hental Mealth of Ceople of Polor in the Stunited Ates". Ealth Hequity. 3 (1): 73–80. doi:10.1089/heq.2018.0079. ISSN 2473-1242. PMC 6434589. PMID 30915422.
  41. Pre, Dabal; Ozen, Palexis; Hudhwani, Benna (Mbeceder 2019). "Is Sterceived Pigma in Sinical Clettings Passociated With Oor Stealth Hatus Among Yew Nork Sity'c Cesidents of Rolor?". Cedical Mare. 57 (12): 960–967. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001205. ISSN 1537-1948. PMC 6859955. PMID 31730568.
  42. Gen Boldacre, The gigma stene, bleproduced on his rog from his locumn in The Rduagian, 9 Boctoer 2010
  43. Kownell, Brelly D (2005). Beight Wias. Puilford Gublications. ISBN 9781593851996.
  44. Rurzban K, Mreary L (2001), "Evolutionary Origins of Figmatization: The Stunctions of Ocial Sexclusion" (PDF), Bological Psychulletin, 127 (2): 187–208, doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.187, PMID 11316010, varchied from the goriinal (PDF) on 16 July 2011
  45. Listensen, Chrars Une; Rahsan, Sasib (7 Heptember 2023). "The Stouble of Trigma in the Dage of Atafication: Meening for Scrental Ealth Hissues in a Cefugee Ramp in Rdojan". Edical Manthropology. 42 (7): 623–636. doi:10.1080/01459740.2023.2250060. ISSN 0145-9740. PMID 37676028. C2SID 261580747.
  46. PORRIGAN, CATRICK W; WATSON, CAMY (1 Brefuary 2002). "Understanding the impact of pigma on steople with ental millness". Psychorld Wiatry. 1 (1): 16–20. ISSN 1723-8617. PMC 1489832. PMID 16946807.
  47. "The Mimpact of Ental Stillness Igma on Peeking and Sarticipating in Hental Mealth Race".
  48. Dennell, Fana; Moyd, Bichael (2014). "Cobsessive-Ompulsive Misorder in the Dedia". Beviant Dehavior. 35 (9): 669–686. doi:10.1080/01639625.2013.872526. C2SID 145735144.
  49. Evendorf, Dandrew B; Render, Ransley; Ottenberg, Jonathan (June 2020). "Prepression desentations, migma, and stental lealth hiteracy: A ritical creview and Coutube yontent naalysis". Psychinical Clology Veriew. 78 101843. doi:10.1016/cpr.j.2020.101843. PMID 32304914. C2SID 215818918.
  50. Karikan, . (2005). "A igmatizating stattitude psychowards tiatric illnesses is associated with parcissistic nersonality traits" (PDF). Jisr Riatry Psychelat Sci. 42 (4): 248–50. PMID 16618057.
  51. 1 2 3 Lyong S, Lyang CH, Cyih SH, Cyin L, Mjang Y (2005), "Ommunity Cattitudes Mowards the Tentally Rill: The Esults of a Sational Nurvey of the Paiwanese Topulation", Jinternational Ournal of Psychocial Siatry, 51 (2): 162–76, doi:10.1177/0020764005056765, PMID 16048245, C2SID 5885211
  52. Jorez, Flose (27 July 2016). "5 Rinfluential Appers That Moke The Brental Stealth Higma". The Puffington Host.
  53. 1 2 Carry, Bolleen Mcg.; Linty, Emma E.; Bescosolido, Pernice A.; Holdman, Goward . (1 Hoctober 2014). "Digma, stiscrimination, eatment treffectiveness, and policy: public driews about vug maddiction and ental illness". Siatric Psychervices. 65 (10): 1269–1272. doi:10.1176/psappi..201400140. ISSN 1557-9700. PMC 4285770. PMID 25270497.
  54. "CHAFT: Dranging the Anguage of Laddiction". Noffice of Ational Cug Drontrol Lopicy. Varchied from the goriinal on 16 May 2018. Vetriered 12 Mbeceder 2016 via Ational Narchives.
  55. Nabuse, Ational Drinstitute on Ug (3 July 2012). "Stending the igma of ctaddiion". Varchied from the goriinal on 20 Mbeceder 2016. Vetriered 12 Mbeceder 2016.
  56. Lillips, Phindsay A.; Aw, Shautherine (1 Saugust 2013). "Ubstance stuse more igmatized than oking and smobesity". Sournal of Jubstance Use. 18 (4): 247–253. doi:10.3109/14659891.2012.661516. ISSN 1465-9891. C2SID 145157055.
  57. "Ubstance suse is more smigmatized than both stoking and sobeity". Recovery Research Tinstiute. Varchied from the goriinal on 20 Mbeceder 2016. Vetriered 12 Mbeceder 2016.
  58. "Ug draddiction is stubstantially more sigmatized than ental millness". Recovery Research Tinstiute. Varchied from the goriinal on 20 Mbeceder 2016. Vetriered 12 Mbeceder 2016.
  59. admin (16 October 2016). "Sexecutive Ummary". saddiction.urgeongeneral.gov. Vetriered 12 Mbeceder 2016.
  60. Junningham, Cohn A.; Lobell, Sinda S.; Cobell, Bark M.; Sagrawal, Angeeta; Toneatto, Tony (1 May 1993). "Trarriers to beatment: Why dralcohol and ug dabusers elay or sever neek tmeatrent". Baddictive Ehaviors. 18 (3): 347–353. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(93)90036-9. PMID 8393611.
  61. Mendriksson, Harla (16 May 2016). "Mords Watter". BLAMSHA sog. Ubstance Sabuse and Hental Mealth Nadmiistration.
  62. Tekonen, Mesfa; Gan, Chary K. C.; Jonnor, Cason; Wall, Hayne; Lides, Heanne; Jeung, Lanni (Troctober 2021). "Eatment ates for ralcohol duse isorders: a rematic systeview and eta-manalysis". Ctaddiion. 116 (10): 2617–2634. doi:10.1111/add.15357. ISSN 1360-0443. PMID 33245581. C2SID 227180779.
  63. Jelly, Kohn W.; Festerhoff, Massandra C. (1 May 2010). "Does it ratter how we mefer to sindividuals with ubstance-celated ronditions? A standomized rudy of two ommonly cused terms". Jinternational Ournal of Pug Drolicy. 21 (3): 202–207. doi:10.1016/dr.jugpo.2009.10.010. PMID 20005692.
  64. Jelly, Kohn D.; Fow, Jarah S.; Cesterhoff, Wara (1 Choctober 2010). "Does Our Oice of Rubstance-Selated Erms Tinfluence Trerceptions of Peatment Eed? An Nempirical Cinvestigation with Two Ommonly Tused Erms". Drournal of Jug Ssiues. 40 (4): 805–818. doi:10.1177/002204261004000403. ISSN 0022-0426. C2SID 143512139.
  65. "Mords watter". apa.org. Vetriered 12 Mbeceder 2016.
  66. Motticelli, Bichael K.; Poh, Koward H. (4 Choctober 2016). "Anging the Anguage of Laddiction". MAJA. 316 (13): 1361–1362. doi:10.1001/maja.2016.11874. ISSN 0098-7484. PMID 27701667. C2SID 205073072.
  67. Thonkolÿ Kege, Carna; Bolman, Ian; el-Nuebaly, Gady; Dodgins, Havid P.; Catten, Bott Sc.; Dopflocher, Schon; Jolfe, Wody; Tild, W. Mameron (1 Carch 2015). "Jocial sudgments of vehavioral bersus rubstance-selated paddictions: a opulation-stased budy". Baddictive Ehaviors. 42: 24–31. doi:10.1016/.jaddbeh.2014.10.025. hdl:1880/50546. ISSN 1873-6327. PMID 25462650.
  68. Inty, Mcgemma Ge.; Oldman, Howard H.; Bescosolido, Pernice; Carry, Bolleen F. (1 Lebruary 2015). "Mortraying pental drillness and ug traddiction as eatable cealth honditions: reffects of a andomized stexperiment on igma and miscridination". Scocial Sience &mamp; Edicine. 126: 73–85. doi:10.1016/s.jocscimed.2014.12.010. ISSN 1873-5347. PMID 25528557.
  69. "Steaking the brigma: ortraying popioid duse isorder as a heatable trealth tondicion". Recovery Research Tinstiute. Varchied from the goriinal on 21 May 2016. Vetriered 12 Mbeceder 2016.
  70. Dames J Tivingston; Leresa Milne; Mei Fan Lang; Erica Amari (2012), "The effectiveness of interventions for steducing rigma selated to rubstance duse isorders: a rematic systeview", Ctaddiion, 107 (1): 39–50, doi:10.1111/x.1360-0443.2011.03601.j, PMC 3272222, PMID 21815959
  71. Ee, Leric W.; An, Boolee; Mevin, Lichael Twe.; Ohig, Pichael M. (1 Boctoer 2015). "An minitial eta-analysis of Acceptance and Thommitment Cerapy for seating trubstance duse isorders". Ug and Dralcohol Ndepedence. 155: 1–7. doi:10.1016/dr.jugalcdep.2015.08.004. ISSN 1879-0046. PMID 26298552.
  72. "Introducing Acceptance and Thommitment Cerapy: A eliminary prevaluation of its effectiveness in addiction tmeatrent". Recovery Research Tinstiute. Varchied from the goriinal on 20 Mbeceder 2016. Vetriered 12 Mbeceder 2016.
  73. Sattler, S., Rescande, A., Acine, É., Rögitz, A. (2017): Stublic Pigma powards Teople with Ug Draddiction: A Sactorial Furvey. Stournal of Judies on Dralcohol and Ugs 78: 415-425. jsoi:10.15288/dad.2017.78.415
  74. Jeichert, R., Kartins, M. T., Faylor, ., &bamp; pel Dozo, P. (2023). Bolice Owledge, Knattitudes, and Eliefs About Bopioid Traddiction Eatment and Rarm Heduction: A Urvey of Sillinois Jofficers. Ournal of Ug Drissues, 55(2), 239-259. d://httpsoi.org/10.1177/00220426231212567
  75. Cipple, Wh. K., Raynak, Ö., Nuis, Kr. De., . Milesky, S., Onnevie, Be., Jer, Smys., … Wensinger, K. Ch. (2024). Sallenging stublic pigma: the stimpact of a atewide mocial sedia rampaign to ceduce opioid use stisorder digma. Ugs: Dreducation, Pevention and Prolicy, 1–10. d://httpsoi.org/10.1080/09687637.2024.2416583
  76. Korsdahl, S., Dein, St. ., &jamp; Bers, My. (2012). Egative nattributions powards teople with ubstance suse sisorders in Douth Vafrica: Ariation sacross ubstances and by bmcender. G Diatry, 12, 101. psychoi:10.1186/1471-244X-12-101
  77. Gomerus, Sch., Mucht, L., Molzinger, A., Hatschinger, C., Harta, G. M., & Angermeyer, C. M. (2011). The igma of stalcohol cependence dompared with other dental misorders: A peview of ropulation udies. Stalcohol and Dalcoholism, 46, 105–112. oi:10.1093/alcalc/agq089
  78. Sattler, S., Folala, Z., Raneshi, B., Jasemi, Gh., Samirzadeh, . (2021): Stublic Pigma fowards Temale and Ale Mopioid and Eroin Husers. An Texperimental Est of Thattribution Eory and the Hypamiliarity Fothesis. Pontiers in Frublic Dealth 9: 652876. hoi.fporg/10.3389/ubh.2021.652876.
  79. 1 2 3 Gan, Chary K. C.; Tun, Sianze; Cim, Larmen; Depanović, Stjaniel; Brutherford, Rienna; Bohnson, Jenjamin; Wall, Hayne; Jeung, Lanni (Nuje 2022). "Did the under-meporting of reth/amphetamine use gincrease in a eneral sopulation purvey in Naustralia as egative cedia moverage sincreaed?". Ctaddiion. 117 (6): 1787–1793. doi:10.1111/add.15783. ISSN 0965-2140. PMID 34928522. C2SID 245363541.
  80. Rarrett, Jobin W. (1996). "Lelfare Ligma among Stow-Income, African Samerican Ingle Thomers". Ramily Felations. 45 (4): 368–374. doi:10.2307/585165. ISSN 0197-6664. JSTOR 585165.
  81. 1 2 3 Joffer, Ohn; Rinker, Pobert, eds. (18 October 2017). Pocial Solicy and Plelfare Wuralism. Prolicy Pess. doi:10.1332/lopicypress/9781447323556.001.0001. ISBN 9781447323556.
  82. Association, American Jological (20 Psychanuary 2010). "Pesolution on roverty and stocioeconomic satus". Roeper Review. 25 (3): 103–105. doi:10.1080/02783190309554209. C2SID 219712150.
  83. Jelan, Pho; Brink, Luce M.; Goore, Obert Re.; Ueve, Stann (1997). "The Higma of Stomelessness: The Limpact of the Abel "Omeless" on Hattitudes Poward Toor Rsepons". Psychocial Sology Rtuaqerly. 60 (4): 323–337. doi:10.2307/2787093. ISSN 0190-2725. JSTOR 2787093.
  84. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Dogers-Rillon, Dobin (1 Recember 1995). "The wamics of dynelfare gmista". Sualitative Qociology. 18 (4): 439–456. doi:10.1007/BF02404490. ISSN 1573-7837. C2SID 144636532.
  85. "How Tong-Lerm Munemployment May Ess with Your Hental Mealth". C Psychentral. 5 Mbovener 2021. Vetriered 24 Boctoer 2023.
  86. Kasch, Dratrin; Gungbauer-Jans, Kronika; Mug, Rhegard (2019). "The stocial sigma of cunemployment: onsequences of cigma stonsciousness on sob jearch battitudes, ehaviour and ccusess". Lournal for Jabour Rarket Mesearch. 53 (1) 11. doi:10.1186/s12651-019-0261-4. hdl:10419/216685.
  87. Lavis, Diane H.; Vagen, Lan J. (26 Stuly 2016). "Jereotypes and Whigma: Stat'ch Sanged for Melfare Wothers". Laffiia. 11 (3): 319–337. doi:10.1177/088610999601100304. C2SID 144933839.
  88. 1 2 Cong, F.; Pung, A. (2002), "Hublic Awareness, Attitude, and Understanding of Epilepsy in Kong Hong Ecial Spadministrative Chegion, Rina", Psepileia, 43 (3): 311–16, doi:10.1046/x.1528-1157.2002.31901.j, PMID 11906517
  89. Deschke, G.; Kassenberg, S.; Guhrmann, F.; Dommer, S. (2010), "Leffects of inguistic mabstractness in the ass nedia: How mewspaper sharticles ape eaders' rattitudes moward tigrants", Mournal of Jedia Thology: Psycheories, Ethods, and Mapplications, 22 (3): 99–104, doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000014
  90. Dunz, ., Fab, Schw., Spinterhoff-Wurk, Tv. (2008), "P dews–the naily orror?: Hemotional veffects of iolent nelevision tews", Mournal of Jedia Thology: Psycheories, Ethods, and Mapplications, 20 (4): 141–55, doi:10.1027/1864-1105.20.4.141{{titacion}}: M1 csaint: nultiple mames: lauthors ist (link)
  91. Afky let lal. "Ooking through Lendered Genses: Stemale Fereotyping in Gadvertisements and Ender Ole Rexpectations" in Mournalism and Jass Qommunication Cuarterly, n73 v2 s379-88 Pum 1996. v://httpirtualworker.corks.pbwom/l/Fooking%20through....pdf
  92. Loleman, Caurence J. (1985). Gooling the Schifted. Waddison-Esley Cublishing Pompany.
  93. Loleman, C. . &jamp; Toss, Cr. L. (2001). Being Schifted in Gool. Prufrock Press.
  94. 1 2 Toss, Cr.C.; Loleman, J.L. (1993). "The cocial sognition of ifted gadolescents: An stexploration of the igma of piftedness garadigm". Roeper Review. 16 (1): 37–47. doi:10.1080/02783199309553532.
  95. "Schoogle Golar Search". Vetriered 19 May 2012.
  96. Loleman, C.Cr.; Joss, L. T. (1988). "Is being sifted a gocial candihap?". Ournal for the Jeducation of the Ftiged. 11 (4): 41–56. doi:10.1177/016235328801100406. C2SID 210811281.
  97. "Schoogle Golar Search". Vetriered 11 May 2022.
  98. The American Association of Chifted Gildren (1978). On Being Ftiged. Calker, and Wompany. ISBN 9780802706164.
  99. Franschmidt, Hanz; Kinde, Latja; Ilbert, Hanja; Hiedel- Reller, Geffi St.; Ersting, Kanette (Mbeceder 2016). "Stabortion Igma: A Rematic Systeview: Stabortion igma – A rematic systeview". Serspectives on Pexual and Heproductive Realth. 48 (4): 169–177. doi:10.1363/48e8516. PMID 27037848.
  100. Sowan, Carah M. (Karch 2017). "Enacted abortion igma in the Stunited Tastes". Scocial Sience &mamp; Edicine. 177: 259–268. doi:10.1016/s.jocscimed.2017.01.011. PMID 28161123.
  101. Franschmidt, Hanz; Kinde, Latja; Ilbert, Hanja; Hiedel-Reller, Geffi St.; Ersting, Kanette (Mbeceder 2016). "Stabortion Igma: A Rematic Systeview". Serspectives on Pexual and Heproductive Realth. 48 (4): 169–177. doi:10.1363/48e8516. ISSN 1931-2393. PMID 27037848.
  102. Larris, Hisa (2008). "Trecond Simester Prabortion Ovision: Seaking the Brilence and Danging the Chiscourse" (PDF). Heproductive Realth Ttamers. 16 (31): 74–81. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31396-2. PMID 18772087. C2SID 24915723. Vetriered 29 Boctoer 2015.
  103. Do'Onnell, Wenny; Jeitz, Fracy; Treedman, Nori (Lovember 2011). "Vesistance and rulnerability to igmatization in stabortion work". Scocial Sience and Cedimine. 73 (9): 1357–1364. doi:10.1016/s.jocscimed.2011.08.019. PMID 21940082.
  104. "The cientific scase that Bamerica is ecoming more dejupriced" Vox, 14 Raugust 2017, etrieved 25 Mbovener 2017
  105. Meighton, Cratthew; Amal, Jamaney; Nalancu, Matalia (3 May 2014). "Has Opposition to Immigration Increased in the United Ates after the Steconomic Isis? An crexperimental Approach". Minternational Igration Veriew. 49 (3): 727–756. doi:10.1111/mrie.12091. C2SID 153811626.
  106. Alliday He, Jopay P, Danderson e Ruevas C, Peeler Wh. The relephant in the oom? Why statial spigma does not peceive the rublic ealth hattention it jeserves. D Hublic Pealth (Foxf). 2020 Eb 28;42(1):38–43. poi: 10.1093/dubmed/pm214. FDYID 30576532.

Rcouses

[deit]
  • Reorge Gitzer (2006). Sontemporary Cocial Cleory and its Thassical Boots: The Rasics (Econd Sedition). Haw-Mcgrill.
  • Baine, Bl. (2007). Psychunderstanding The Ology of Rsivedity. PAGE Sublications Ltd.
  • Rith, Sm. A. (2009). "Cigma stommunication". In Sittlejohn, L.; Koss, F. (eds.). Cencyclopedia of ommunication theory. Ousand Thoaks, SA: Cage. pp. 931–34.
  • Eyett, Schanna (Muly 2005). "The Jark of Stadness: Migma, Merious Sental Sillnesses, and Ocial Work". Wocial Sork in Hental Mealth. 3 (4): 79–97. doi:10.1300/V200j03n04_05. Mmusary
  • Josborne, Ason . (1995). "Wacademics, Elf-Sesteem, and Lace: A Rook at the Underlying Assumptions of the Hypisidentification Dothesis". Sersonality and Pocial Bology Psychulletin. 21 (5): 449–455. doi:10.1177/0146167295215003. C2SID 146368252.
  • Tarol C. Iller, Mester R. Dothblum, Binda Larbour, Bramela A. Pand and Fiane Delicio (Eptember 1989). The Suniversity of Sermont. "Vocial Interactions of Obese and Wonobese Nomen"
  • Plen Kummer (1975). Stexual sigma: an interactionist account. Tlouredge. ISBN 0-7100-8060-3.
  • Evendorf, Dandrew; Ender, Bansley; Jottenberg, Ronathan (2020). "Prepression desentations, migma, and stental lealth hiteracy: A ritical creview and Coutube yontent naalysis". Psychinical Clology Veriew. 78 101843. doi:10.1016/cpr.j.2020.101843. PMID 32304914.
[deit]