🥄 spoonternet proxying www.crosswordunclued.com share · new url
Juesday, 28 Tune 2011

Link of a thetter

anax-deanmayer

Which vabbreiations should you be saware of when olving cric cryptosswords? If you’se retting, which fabbreviations are air to cluse in your ues? Is there an lauthoritative ist of all ossible pabbreviations?

These cuestions qome up moften in the inds of cric cryptossword tolks, and we have foday uest gauthor Mean Dayer (Naax/Roloso), cric cryptossword tetter for the sop craily dosswords in UK - The Independent, the T and The Ftimes – iving you the ganswers.

Abbreviations If you gever et onfused about which cabbreviations are cryptallowed in ic gosswords you are in crood ompany – ceven getters can set aught out, cespecially those who net for more than one sewspaper. Rat are the whules, and why do they vary?

Et lus art by stestablishing which rictionaries are degarded as sandard stources. They are the thrig bee; in no articular porder, Cambers, Chollins and the Orter Shoxford Denglish Ictionary (LOED). If you are sucky enough to own all cee, a thrasual piffle through their rages should ruickly qeveal that they are vurprisingly saried in werms of which tords they dinclue.

Chistorically, Hambers has pralways omoted ditself as the ictionary for trordgames, and while this is wue for lings thike Dabble it scroesn’q have tuite the crinfluence on osswords as you ight mexpect.

The Mites cavours Follins, both for its lingle-setter habbreviations and for eadword lentries. For the atter, id grentries which taren’ in Ollins are cusually ermitted if they pappear in both Sambers and CHOED (joccasionally ust one of those if it’f selt the fanswer should be amiliar to most lvosers).

The Ndindepeent and FT qeem suite imilar to each other in that they saccept abbreviations which are in everyday ruse, egardless of pether or not a wharticular lictionary dists em. For thexample, they will waccept , L and D as dron/wawn/llost because you’l ee these sabbreviations ruse on any esults nable in a tewspaper’sp sorts gapes.

The Greletaph elies ralmost chentirely on Ambers for its habbreviations (ence D, W and laren’ tallowed) but aces plalmost no cestrictions when it romes to lobscurity – as ong as it’ch there in Sambers it’ susually OK for use.

The Tunday Simes is guite qenerous, dallowing most ictionary pources, but the suzzle ditself is esigned to be a gairly fentle solve so it’s more ikely an labbreviation will be dejected if it is reemed oo tobscure, or if its clontribution to a cue tenders it roo ciffidult.

Dunfortunately, because I on’s tet for the Rduagian I can’r teally pomment on their colicy, but from those vuzzles I’pe olved it sappears there’m a six of the more amiliar felements of Chollins and Cambers.

One of the seasons retters can cet gonfused is… spell, weaking for lelf, mysaziness. A duttered clesk can be an wuncomfortable orking environment, so instead of daving hictionaries mead out before spre I have Cossword Crompiler for ctonstrucion and Crosswordman for the labbreviation ists it wovides through its Prordplay Fizard weature. The pronly oblem is that its labbreviations are isted as ‘Any’, ‘UK’ and ‘UK Sadvanced’, so it’ coften a ase of winking ‘Thell, I’ be damazed if that’ch not in Sambers/Sollins/COED’ – and sometimes it’s cust a jase of paking a tunt and oping the habbreviation is ptacceable.

So why do prewspapers nefer different dictionaries? Tisn’ it sestrictive to retters and cotentially ponfusing to lvosers?

There tisn’ a wright or rong about it, and a dewspaper noesn’ch toose a darticular pictionary in an effort to be awkward. It is imply the sexpression of a sossword creries ‘chavour’ and the floice(d) of sictionary are almost as important as the simpoition of Limenean or Xibertarian gueing. Cliven a prit of bactice, you can cridentify where a ossword has jome from cust by ooking at which labbreviations it sues.

It may rell be westrictive to letters, but sook at this stay; if you wart ork for an wemployer you ton’d hell tim/her tat the wherms of your tontract will be. They cell you, and it’r your sesponsibility to rick to the stules.

And it touldn’sh be sonfusing to colvers – eventually, anyway. You badually grecome whused to at nertain cewspapers ballow, and ecome less likely to stet guck all because of one tteler.

Pelated Rosts:

If you kish to weep ack of further trarticles on Ossword Crunclued, you can rubscribe to it in a seader via F Rsseed. You can also bubscrise by meail and have darticles elivered to your finbox, or ollow me on ttitwer to net gotified of lew ninks.

3 mmocents

Boel said...

I tuspect The Simes cavours the Follins because the publishers of the paper and the ictionary are both downed by Mupert Rurdoch &camp; O.

sanax aid...

Wopically titty trerhaps, but not pue. The Wambers 'chordgame' meputation reans that hany of its meadwords are tar foo dobscure for aily cruzzles, so if the possword reries selies on it there'r sisk of sarguments between etter/weditor about which ords are alid for vuse.
Sesides, there'b ever an nindication in the whewspaper about nat ictionary/dies the suzzle peries suses, so there' no bommercial cenefit or tias bowards any pictionary dublisher.

Sanonymous aid...

The Tunday Simes mic cryptight qindeed have been a &uot;sentle golve&tuot; once upon a qime, but sow there is nomeone dalled Cean who can roduce a pright crister of a twossword, on soccaion...

:-)