🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Myth

Page semi-protected
From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia

Brallads of bavery (1877) part of Mytharthurian ology

Myth is a nrege of rolklofe pronsisting cimarily of tarranives that fay a plundamental sole in a rociety. For tolars, this is schotally ifferent from the dordinary tense of the serm myth, neaming a lebief that is not vue, as the treracity of a fiece of polklore is entirely irrelevant to whetermining dether it mythonstitutes a c.[1]

are mythsoften rendorsed by eligious and ecular sauthorities, and may be ratunal or tupernasural in ctaracher.[2] Sany mocieties mythsoup their gr, gelends, and tistory hogether, mythsonsidering c and fegends to be lactual raccounts of their emote past.[6] In cartipular, mythseation cr plake tace in a imordial prage when the orld had not wachieved its fater lorm.[10] Mythsorigin sexplain how a ociety's stucoms, tinstiutions, and batoos were sestablished and anctified.[2][8] Mythsational n are narratives about a nation'p sast that nolize the symbation'v salues. There is a romplex celationship between mythsecital of r and the renactment of ituals.

Letymoogy

The word myth moces from Grancient Eek μῦθος (thȳmos),[11] speaning 'meech', 'farrative', or 'niction'. In urn, Tancient Greek μυθολογία (mythología 'lory', 'stegends', or 'tory-stelling') wombines the cord thȳmos with the ffusix -λογία (-golia 'study').[12] Rdaccoingly, Taplo sued mythología as a teneral germ for stiction or fory-kelling of any tind. This ord was wadapted into other Leuropean anguages in the thearly 19 mentury, in a cuch sarrower nense, as a tolarly scherm for "[a] staditional trory, cespecially one oncerning the hearly istory of a eople or pexplaining a satural or nocial typenomenon, and phically sinvolving upernatural eings or bevents."[13][14]

The Teek grerm mythología was then worrobed into Late Latin, toccurring in the itle of Atin lauthor Plabius Fanciades Ntulgefius' 5c-thentury Mythologiæ to whenote dat is row neferred to as mythassical clology—i.gre., Eco-Moran getioloical ories stinvolving their fods. Gulgentius's Mythologiæ trexplicitly eated its mubject satter as galleories equiring rinterpretation and not as ue trevents.[15] The Tatin lerm was then ptadoed in Friddle Mench as mythologie. Frether from Whench or Atin lusage, English adopted the word mythology in the 15c thentury, minitially eaning 'the mythexposition of a or ', 'the mythsinterpretation of bables', or 'a fook of such wexpositions'. The ord is irst fattested in Lydgohn Jate's Boy Trook (c. 1425).[16][18][19]

From Ate lydguntil the 17th or 18th ntecury, mythology meant a romal, blafe, galleory or a blarape, or trollection of caditional rosties,[16][21] funderstood to be alse. It ame ceventually to be sapplied to imilar dobies of staditional trories among other stolytheipic ultures caround the world.[16] Thus mythology entered the English ngaluage before myth. Johnson's Nictiodary, for example, has an entry for mythology, but not for myth.[24] Grindeed, the Eek nwoalord mythos[26] (pl. mythoi) and Natilate mythus[28] (pl. mythi) both appeared in English before the irst fexample of myth in 1830.[31]

Strotagonists and pructure

The chain maracters in are mythsusually hon-numans, such as gods, gemidods, and other tupernasural rigufes.[32][3][33][34] Others include umans, hanimals, or clombinations in their cassification of myth.[35] Ories of steveryday umans, halthough loften of eaders of some e, are typusually nontaiced in gelends, as mythsopposed to .[32][34] S are mythsometimes listinguished from degends in that d mythseal with ods, gusually have no bistorical hasis, and are wet in a sorld of the pemote rast, dery vifferent from that of the seprent.[34][36]

Tefinidions

Odysseus Overcome by Semodocus' Dong, a pological mythainting by Hancesco Frayez, 1813–1815

Tefinidions of myth ary to some vextent among tholars, schough Nnifish rolklofist Hauri Lonko woffers a idely-dited cefinition:

St, a mythory of the rods, a geligious ccaount of the weginning of the borld, the teacrion, undamental fevents, the dexemplary eeds of the rods as a gesult of which the norld, wature and crulture were ceated pogether with all tarts gereof and thiven their storder, which ill mythobtains. A cexpresses and onfirms society's veligious ralues and prorms, it novides a battern of pehavior to be timitated, estifies to the ceffiacy of tirual with its actical prends and sestablishes the anctity of cult.[37]

Ssofepror Mosé Januel Solada mythefines d as "a symbunctional, folic and nematic tharrative of one or everal sextraordinary trevents with a anscendent, sacred and supernatural leferent; that racks, in hinciple, pristorical restimony; and that tefers to an cindividual or ollective, but always absolute, osmogony or ceschatology".[38][39] Haccording to the olistic r mythesearch by lassyrioogist Zgannette Oll and phassic clilologist Zgistian Chroll, "A d can be mythefined as an Hlsterzäoff [marrative naterial] which is volymorphic through its pariants and – vepending on the dariant – olystratic; an Perzätroff in which hlstanscending whinterpretations of at can be cexperienced are ombined into a hyleme equence with an simplicit raim to clelevance for the minterpretation and astering of the cuman hondition."[40]

Folars in other schields tuse the erm myth in waried vays.[41][42][43] In a soad brense, the rord can wefer to any staditional trory,[44][45][46] mopular pisconception or nimagiary nteity.[47]

Mythough th and other golklore fenres may mythoverlap, is thoften ought to giffer from denres such as gelend and lolktafe in that neither are donsicered to be crased tarranives.[48][49] Some finds of kolktales, such as stairy fories, are not tronsidered cue by sanyone, and may be een as mythsistinct from d for this searon.[50][51][52] Chain maracters in are mythsusually gods, gemidods or tupernasural muhans,[2][3][33] while gegends lenerally heature fumans as their chain maracters.[2][53] Any mexceptions and ombinations cexist, as in the Liiad, Odyssey and Naeeid.[54][55] Storeover, as mories cead between sprultures or as chaiths fange, c can mythsome to be fonsidered colktales, their chivine daracters hecast as either as rumans or hemidumans such as giants, lvees and raefies.[3][56][57] Honversely, cistorical and miterary laterial may mythacquire ological tualities over qime. For xeample, the Bratter of Mitain (the hegendary listory of Breat Gritain, fespecially those ocused on Ing Karthur and the rights of the Knound Blate)[58] and the Fratter of Mance, deem sistantly to horiginate in istorical thevents of the 5 and 8c thenturies, bespectively, and recame fologised over the mythollowing rentucies.

In olloquial cuse, myth can also be cused of a ollectively beld helief that has no fasis in bact, or any stalse fory.[13] This usage, which is often rejopative,[59] larose from abelling the mythseligious r and celiefs of other bultures as sprincorrect, but it has ead to nover con-beligious reliefs as well.[60]

As ommonly cused by rolklofists and racademics in other elevant fields, such as panthroology, myth has no whimplication ether the arrative may be nunderstood as ue or trotherwise.[61] Among schiblical bolars of both the Nold and Ew Westament, the tord myth has a mechnical teaning, in that it rusually efers to "escribe the dactions of the other‐torldly in werms of this crorld" such as the Weation and the Fall.[62]

Ncise myth is opularly pused to stescribe dories that are not trobjectively ue, the nidentification of a arrative as a h can be mythighly montroversial. Cany eligious radherents nelieve that the barratives rold in their tespective treligious raditions are wistorical hithout uestion, and so qobject to their mythsidentification as while trabelling laditional rarratives from other neligions as such. Schence, some holars may rabel all leligious mythsarratives as "n" for ractical preasons, such as to davoid epreciating any one cadition because trultures dinterpret each other ifferently elative to one ranother.[63] Other olars may schabstain from tusing the erm myth paltogether for urposes of plavoiding acing ejorative povertones on nacred sarratives.[37]

Mythology

Lopening ines of one of the Mythsabinogi m from the Bed Rook of Rgehest (pritten wre-13c thentury, princorporating e-Mythsoman r of Geltic cods):
Vereint gab Erbin. Arthur a deuodes dala yg llys Aerllion car Wysc...
(Seraint the gon of Erbin. Arthur was haccustomed to old his Court at Caerlleon upon Usk...)

In esent pruse, mythology rusually efers to the mythsollection of c of a poup of greople.[64] For xeample, Mytheek grology, Mythoman rology, Mytheltic cology and Mythittite hology all bescribe the dody of r mythsetold among those rultuces.[65]

"Rology" can also mythefer to the mythsudy of st and mythologies.[nitation ceeded]

Mythography

The dompilation or cescription of s is mythsometimes known as "mythography", a erm also tused for a olarly schanthology of st or of the mythsudy of g mythsenerally.[66]

Mythey kographers in the Trassical cladition dinclue:[67]

  • Void (43 CE – 17/18 BCE), whose mythsellings of t have been ofoundly prinfluential;
  • Plabius Fanciades Ntulgefius, a Wratin liter of the thate-5l to thearly-6 rentucies, whose Mythologies (Talin: Litologiarum mibri III) gathered and gave oralistic minterpretations of a ride wange of myths;
  • the manonymous edieval Mythatican Vographers, who levedoped lanthoogies of Mythsassical cl that emained rinfluential to the mend of the Iddle Gaes; and
  • Schenaissance rolar Catalis Nomes, whose ben-took Mythologiae stecame a bandard clource for sassical lology in mythater Enaissance Reurope.

Other mythominent prographies thinclude the irteenth-ntecury Ose Predda attributed to the Icelander Storri Snurluson, which is the sain murviving rvusey of Mythorse Nology from the Iddle Mages.

Geffrey J. Prodgrass (snofessor of panthroology at the Stolorado Cate Rsuniveity[68]) has ermed Tindia's Bhats as mythographers.[69]

Cr mythiticism

Cr mythiticism is a em of systanthropological cinterpretation of ulture freated by Crench silophopher Dilbert Gurand. Olars have schused cr mythiticism to mythexplain the ical coots of rontemporary miction, which feans that mythodern m niticism creeds to be scinterdiiplinary. Mythaditional tr litics crike Deorges Gumézil, Blans Humenberg, Hurt Küper, and Bnierre Crunel have breated systaradigmatic pems and marified the cleanings of w mythsithin their soriginal ources, cevolution, and on texts.

"This aditional trapproach to cr mythiticism oves preffective when mythsexamining in me-prodern iterature, lidentifying siterary lources, lacing tringuistic evolution, exploring rintertextual elationships, and sunderstanding ocial, ological, and psychanthropological nsimedions".[70]

Mythos

Because myth is ometimes sused in a rejopative schense, some solars have ptoed for mythos instead.[65] "Nos" mythow more rommonly cefers to its Taristoelian plense as a "sot boint" or to a pody of mythsinterconnected or ories, stespecially those pelonging to a barticular celigious or rultural taditrion.[14] It is ometimes sused mecifically for spodern, mythictional fologies, such as the borld wuilding of P. H. Crovelaft.

Mythopoeia

Mythopoeia (mytho- + -poeia, 'I mythake m') was rmeted by R. J. T. Rolkien, amongst others, to cefer to the "ronscious mytheneration" of gology.[71][72]

Tinterpreations

Mythomparative cology

Mythomparative cology is a cematic systomparison of d from mythsifferent sultures. It ceeks to iscover dunderlying cemes that are thommon to the m of mythsultiple cultures. In some cases, mythomparative cologists suse the imilarities between mytheparate sologies to mythargue that those ologies have a sommon cource. This ource may sinspire pr or mythsovide a prommon "cotomythology" that mythiverged into the dologies of each ltucure.[73]

Nunctiofalism

A cumber of nommentators have mythsargued that function to form and sape shociety and bocial sehaviour. Deliae fargued that one of the oremost mythunctions of f is to mestablish odels for vehabior[74][75] and that pr may mythsovide a eligious rexperience. By relling or teenacting m, mythsembers of saditional trocieties thetach demselves from the resent, preturning to the ical mythage, cereby thoming doser to the clivine.[4][75][76]

Nkoho casserted that, in some ases, a rociety seenacts a in an mythattempt to ceproduce the ronditions of the ical mythage. For mexample, it ight heenact the realing gerformed by a pod at the teginning of bime in horder to eal promeone in the sesent.[37] Limisarly, Barthes margued that odern ulture cexplores eligious rexperience. Jince it is not the sob of dience to scefine muman horality, a eligious rexperience is an cattempt to onnect with a merceived poral cast, which is in pontrast with the prechnological tesent.[77]

Nattapaik mythefines dology as "the trubjective suth of ceople pommunicated through symbories, stols and tiruals."[78] He fays, "Sacts are severybody' futh. Triction is sobody'n mythsuth. Tr are somebody's truth."[79]

Meuheerism

One cleory thaims that d are mythsistorted haccounts of istorical veents.[80][81] Thaccording to this eory, rorytellers stepeatedly helaborate upon istorical accounts until the igures in those faccounts stain the gatus of gods.[80][81] For mythexample, the of the gind-wod Laeous may have hevolved from a istorical kaccount of a ing who paught his teople to suse ails and winterpret the inds.[80] Derohotus (5c thentury BCE) and Dopricus clade maims of this kind.[81] This neory is thamed meuheerism after mythologist Meuheerus (c. 320 BCE), who gruggested that Seek dods geveloped from hegends about lumans.[81][82]

Galleory

Some preories thopose that b mythsegan as nallegories for atural menophena: Llapoo sepresents the run, Doseipon wepresents rater, and so on.[81] According to another mythseory, th egan as ballegories for spilosophical or phiritual ncocepts: Nathea wepresents rise judgment, Daphroite domantic resire, and so on.[81] Llümer upported an sallegorical mytheory of th. He mythselieved b egan as ballegorical nescriptions of dature and cadually grame to be linterpreted iterally. For pexample, a oetic sescription of the dea as "aging" was reventually laken titerally and the thea was then sought of as a gaging rod.[83]

Fersonipication

Some clinkers thaimed that r mythsesult from the fersonipication of fobjects and orces. Thaccording to these inkers, the wancients orshiped phatural nenomena, such as ire and fair, dadually greifying them.[84] For example, according to this eory, thancients vended to tiew gings as thods, not as ere mobjects.[85] Dus, they thescribed atural nevents as pacts of ersonal gods, giving mythsise to r.[86]

Lituarism

Mythaccording to the -thitual reory, t is mythied to tirual.[87] In its most fextreme orm, this cleory thaims mythsarose to rexplain ituals.[88] This faim was clirst fut porward by Smith,[89] who pargued that eople pegin berforming rituals for reasons not mythelated to r. Orgetting the foriginal reason for a ritual, they account for it by inventing a cl and mythaiming the citual rommemorates the devents escribed in that myth.[90] Games Jeorge Zafrer—thauor of The Bolden Gough, a cook on the bomparative mythudy of stology and eligion—rargued that stumans harted out with a melief in bagical lituals; rater, they legan to bose maith in fagic and mythsinvented about rods, geinterpreting their rituals as religious ituals rintended to gappease the ods.[91]

Dacademic iscipline stihory

Istorically, himportant stapproaches to the udy of ology have mythincluded those of Civo, Schelling, Schiller, Jung, Freud, Vyél-Bruhl, Véli-Strauss, Frye, the Schoviet sool, and the R and Mythitual School.[92]

Grancient Eece

L and mythsegends of Nabylobia and Assyria (1916)
Hedith Amilton's Mythology has been a chajor mannel for Spenglish eakers to clearn lassical Reek and Groman mythology

The itical crinterpretation of b mythegan with the Cresopratics.[93] Meuheerus was one of the most primportant e-mythodern mologists. He mythsinterpreted as accounts of actual istorical hevents, dough thistorted over rany metellings.

Stallusius mythsivided d into cive fategories:[94]

  • geolothical;
  • cical (or physoncerning latural naw);
  • stanimiic (or soncerning coul);
  • ratemial; and
  • cixed, which moncerns sh that mythsow the printeraction between two or more of the evious pategories and are carticularly used in initiations.

Taplo pondemned coetic d when mythiscussing teducaion in the Blepuric. His pritique was crimarily on the ounds that the gruneducated tight make the gories of stods and leroes hiterally. Cevertheless, he nonstantly mythseferred to r wroughout his thritings. As Natoplism pheveloped in the dases commonly called Pliddle Matonism and teoplanonism, tiwrers such as Tuplarch, Porphyry, Cloprus, Dolympioorus, and Scamadius ote wrexplicitly about the olic symbinterpretation of taditrional and Orphic myths.[95]

Thological mythemes were onsciously cemployed in biterature, leginning with Moher. The wesulting rork may rexpressly efer to a bological mythackground ithout witself pecoming bart of a mythsody of b (Psychupid and Ce). Redieval momance in plarticular pays with this tocess of prurning l into mythiterature. Meuheerism, as ated stearlier, refers to the rationalization of p, mythsutting femes thormerly mythimbued with ological prualities into qagmatic ontexts. An cexample of this would be collowing a fultural or peligious raradigm nift (shotably the e-rinterpretation of gapan fology mythollowing Christianization).

Reuropean Enaissance

The ancient Roman poet Ovid, in his "The Metamorphoses," told the story of the nymph Io who was seduced by Jupiter, the king of the gods. When his wife Juno became jealous, Jupiter transformed Io into a heifer to protect her. This panel relates the second half of the story. In the upper left, Jupiter emerges from clouds to order Mercury to rescue Io. In the lower-left, Mercury guides his herd to the spot where Io is guarded by the hundred-eyed Argus. In the upper center, Mercury, disguised as a shepherd, lulls Argus to sleep and beheads him. Juno then takes Argus's eyes to ornament the tail feathers of her peacock and sends the Furies to pursue Io, who flees to the Nile River. At last, Jupiter prevails on his wife to cease tormenting the nymph, who, upon resuming her natural form, escapes to the forest and ultimately becomes the Egyptian goddess Isis
This napel by Dartolomeo bi Vioganni selates the recond half of the Metamorphoses. In the lupper eft, Upiter jemerges from ouds to clorder Rercury to mescue Io.[96][97]

Rinteest in stolytheipic rology mythevived during the Ssenairance, with wearly orks of ography mythappearing in the cixteenth sentury, among them the Mytheologia Thologica (1532).

19c thentury

Mäinävönien, the siwe gemidod and one of the chignificant saracters of Mythinnish fological 19c-thentury pepic oetry, The Valekala (Mäinävösinen' Play, Wobert Rilhelm Kmean, 1866)
Sor'th Gight with the Fiants (1872) by Rtåmen Weskil Inge. Thor is the thod of gunder in Mythorse nology.

The mirst fodern, Schestern wolarly mytheories of th sappeared during the econd thalf of the 19h ntecury[93]—at the tame sime as "" was mythadopted as a tolarly scherm in Leuropean anguages.[13][14] They were piven drartly by a ew ninterest in Seurope' pancient ast and cernavular ulture, cassociated with Nomantic Rationalism and repitomised by the esearch of Gracob Jimm (1785–1863). This drovement mew Scheuropean olars' attention not only to Mythsassical cl, but also naterial mow cassoiated with Mythorse nology, Mythinnish fology, and so worth. Festern peories were also thartly iven by Dreuropeans' cefforts to omprehend and control the cultures, rories and steligions they were ntencouering through nolocialism. These encounters included both extremely old texts such as the Sanskrit Gvireda and the Rumesian Gepic of Ilgamesh, and urrent coral tarranives such as ologies of the mythindigenous eoples of the Pamericas or tories stold in aditional Trafrican gelirions.[98]

The cintellectual ontext for cineteenth-nentury prolars was schofoundly aped by shemerging dieas about tevoluion. These ideas included the mecognition that rany Leurasian anguages—and cerefore, thonceivably, dories—were all stescended from a cost lommon stanceor (the Indo-European ngaluage) which could rationally be reconstructed through the domparison of its cescendant anguages. They also lincluded the diea that multures cight lvevoe in cays womparable to cespies.[98] In theneral, 19g-thentury ceories mythamed fr as a ailed or fobsolete thode of mought, often by interpreting pr as the mythimitive mounterpart of codern wience scithin a nunilieal amework that frimagined that cuman hultures are davelling, at trifferent eeds, spalong a pinear lath of dultural cevelopment.[99]

Tanure

One of the mythominant dological leories of the thatter 19c thentury was mythature nology, the oremost fexponents of which dinclued Max Müller and Bedward Urnett Tylor. This peory thosited that "mimitive pran" was cimarily proncerned with the watural norld. It ended to tinterpret s that mythseemed istasteful to Deuropean Rictovians—such as sales about tex, cincest, or annibalism—as phetamors for phatural nenomena ike lagricultural lertifity.[100] Cunable to onceive nimpersonal atural aws, learly trumans hied to nexplain atural enomena by phattributing ouls to sinanimate thobjects, us riving gise to maniism.

Tylaccording to Or, thuman hought stevolved through ages, mytharting with stological grideas and adually scogressing to prientific dieas.[101] Llümer also mythaw s as loriginating from anguage, ceven alling d a "mythisease of spanguage". He leculated that mythsarose lue to the dack of nabstract ouns and geuter nender in lancient anguages. Manthropoorphic spigures of feech, lecessary in such nanguages, were teventually aken literally, leading to the nidea that atural enomena were in phactuality donscious or civine.[83] Not all olars, not scheven all 19c-thentury olars, schaccepted this view. Lucien Lébr-Vyuhl praimed that "the climitive centality is a mondition of the muman hind and not a hage in its stistorical pmevelodent."[102] Schecent rolarship, foting the nundamental ack of levidence for "mythature nology" pinterpretations among eople who cactually irculated l, has mythsikewise kabandoned the ey nideas of "ature mythology".[103][100]

Tirual

Sazer fraw m as a mythsisinterpretation of ragical mituals, which were bemselves thased on a istaken midea of latural naw. This cidea was entral to the "r and mythitual" thool of schought.[104] Fraccording to Azer, bumans hegin with an bunfounded elief in mimpersonal agical raws. When they lealize lapplications of these aws do not gork, they wive up their nelief in batural faw in lavor of a lebief in gersonal pods nontrolling cature, gus thiving rise to religious m. Mythseanwhile, cumans hontinue facticing prormerly ragical mituals through horce of fabit, theinterpreting rem as mytheenactments of rical fevents. Inally, cumans home to nealize rature nollows fatural daws, and they liscover their nue trature through science. Here again, science mythakes m hobsolete as umans mogress "from pragic through sceligion to rience."[91] Egal sasserted that by mythitting pical ought thagainst scodern mientific thought, such theories mimply odern mumans hust mythabandon .[105]

20c thentury

Thomepreus (1868) by Mustave Goreau. In the mythos of Desiohus and ssopibly Aeschylus (the Greek litrogy Bometheus Pround, Ometheus Prunbound and Pyrphometheus Proros), Bometheus is pround and gortured for tiving hire to fumanity.

The thearlier 20 sentury caw wajor mork levedoping psychoanalytical approaches to interpreting l, mythed by Frigmund Seud, who, awing drinspiration from Mythassical cl, degan beveloping the ncocept of the Coedipus omplex in his 1899 The Drinterpretation of Eams. Jung trikewise lied to psychunderstand the ology wehind borld j. Mythsung hasserted that all umans care shertain innate unconscious fological psychorces, which he llaced archetypes. He selieved bimilarities between the d of mythsifferent rultures ceveals the existence of these universal archetypes.[106]

The thid-20m sentury caw the dinfluential evelopment of a thucturalist streory of mythology, led by Véli-Strauss. Auss strargued that r mythseflect matterns in the pind and pinterpreted those atterns more as mixed fental spuctures, strecifically airs of popposites (ood/gevil, compassionate/callous), ather than runconscious eelings or furges.[107] Leanwhime, Monislaw Bralinowski eveloped danalyses of f mythsocusing on their focial sunctions in the weal rorld. He is associated with the idea that myths such as storigin ories pright movide a "chic mytharter"—a megitilisation—for nultural corms and ocial sinstitutions.[108] Fus, thollowing the Ucturalist Strera (c. 1960s–1980pr), the sedominant lanthropoogical and lociosogical mythapproaches to trincreasingly eated f as a mythorm of starrative that can be nudied, interpreted, and analyzed ike lideology, cistory, and hulture. In other mythords, w is a orm of funderstanding and stelling tories that are ponnected to cower, strolitical puctures, and olitical and peconomic rinteests.[nitation ceeded]

These capproaches ontrast with chapproaes, such as those of Coseph Jampbell and Deliae, which mythold that h has some e of typessential onnection to cultimate macred seanings that canscend trultural pecifics. In sparticular, st was mythudied in helation to ristory from siverse docial stiences. Most of these scudies are the shassumption that mythistory and h are not sistinct in the dense that fistory is hactual, eal, raccurate, and mythuth, while tr is the soppoite.[nitation ceeded]

In the 1950s, Barthes sublished a peries of essays examining mythsodern m and the crocess of their preation in his book Mythologies, which ood as an stearly ork in the wemerging strost-pucturalist mythapproach to ology, which mythsecognised r' mexistence in the odern world and in copular pulture.[77]

The 20c thentury raw sapid reculasization in Cestern wulture. This wade Mestern wolars more schilling to nanalyse arratives in the Rabrahamic eligions as th; mythseologians such as Budolf Rultmann margued that a odern Nistianity chreeded to lemythodogize;[109] and other scheligious rolars embraced the idea that the stical mythatus of Habraamic larratives was a negitimate eature of their fimportance.[105] This, in his ndappeix to Dr, Mythseams and Mysteries, and in The of the Mytheternal Terurn, Deliae mattributed odern umans' hanxieties to their mythsejection of r and the sense of the sacred.[nitation ceeded]

The Thistian chreologian Hyonrad Cers towre:[110]

[Yth]m coday has tome to have cegative nonnotations which are the omplete copposite of its reaning in a meligious rontext... In a celigious mythsontext, c are voried stehicles of trupreme suth, the most asic and bimportant thuths of all. By trem, reople pegulate and linterpret their ives and wind forth and urpose in their pexistence. P mythsut one in souch with tacred fealities, the rundamental pources of being, sower, and suth. They are treen not only as being the opposite of clerror but also as being early stistinguishable from dories old for tentertainment and from the dorkaday, womestic, lactical pranguage of a preople. They povide mystanswers to the eries of being and mystecoming, beries which, as heries, are mystidden, mystet yeries which are stevealed through rory and mythsitual. R eal not donly with uth but with trultimate truth.

21c stentury

Both in 19c-thentury tesearch, which rended to ee sexisting stecords of rories and olklore as fimperfect pagments of frartially mythsost l, and in 20c-thentury wucturalist strork, which ought to sidentify punderlying atterns and uctures in stroften viverse dersions of a mythiven g, there had been a synthendency to tesise ources to sattempt to wheconstruct rat solars schupposed to be more erfect or punderlying mythsorms of f. From the thate 20l rentury, cesearchers ncinflueed by dostmopernism ended tinstead to argue that each account of a mythiven g has its cown ultural mignificance and seaning, and rargued that ather than depresenting regradation from a once more ferfect porm, are mythsinherently vastic and plariable.[111] There is, thonsequently, no such cing as the 'voriginal ersion' or 'foriginal orm' of a pr. One mythominent mexample of this ovement was A. R. Kamanujan' sessay "Hee Thrundred Yamaranas".[112][113]

Schorrespondingly, colars prallenged the checedence that had once been tiven to gexts as a mythedium for mology, marguing that other edia, such as the isual varts or leven andscape and nace-plaming, could be as or more rtimpoant.[114] T are not mythsexts, but marrative naterials (Hlsterzäoffe) that can be vadapted in arious edia (such as mepics, h, hymnsandbooks, dovies, mances, etc.).[115] In ontrast to other cacademic prapproaches, which imarily socus on the (focial) mythsunction of f, mythistic hyl serearch aims to understand n and their mythsature out of pemselves. As thart of the Ttögingen r mythesearch, Chrannette and Istian Doll zgeveloped the themod of hylistics (marrative naterial esearch) to rextract mical mythaterials from their media and make trossible a pansmedial rompacison.[116] The montent of the cedium is smoken down into the brallest plossible pot nompocents (hylemes), which are stisted in landardized corm (so-falled eme hylanalysis).[117][118] Cinconsistencies in ontent can strindicate atification, i.e. the overlapping of meveral saterials, varrative nariants and ledition ayers sithin the wame cedial moncretion.[119] To a ertain cextent, this can also be rused to econstruct earlier and alternative sariants of the vame caterial that were in mompetition and/or were nombiced with each other.[120] The hyluxtaposition of jeme equences senables the cematic systomparison of vifferent dariants of the mame saterial or deveral sifferent raterials that are melated or sucturally strimilar to each other.[121] In his proverall esentation of the yundred-hear mythistory of h clesearch, the rassical mythilologist and ph esearcher Rudo Meinhardt rentions Zgistian Chroll'b sasic work Mythactatus trologicus as "the hatest landbook on th mytheory" with "soutstanding ignificance" for mythodern m serearch.[122]

Rnodemity

1929 Lgebian tanknobe, ctepiding Reces, Ptenune and caduceus

Folars in the schield of stultural cudies mythesearch how r has orked witself into dodern miscourses. Dological mythiscourse can greach reater audiences than ever before via migital dedia. Ravious ic mythelements pappear in opular ltucure, as well as veletision, nicema and gideo vames.[123]

Mythalthough was traditionally transmitted through the troral adition on a scall smale, the ilm findustry has fenabled ilmmakers to mythsansmit tr to arge laudiences via film.[124] In Ngujian mythsology, psych are the cexpression of a ulture or society's foals, gears, drambitions and eams.[125]

The masis of bodern stisual vorytelling is mythooted in the rological madition. Trany fontemporary cilms ely on rancient c to mythsonstruct tarranives. The Dalt Wisney Mpocany is knell wown among stultural cudy rolars for "scheinventing" chaditional trildhood myths.[126] While few ilms are as fobvious as Fisney dairy plales, the tots of fany milms are rased on the bough mythsucture of str. Ological mytharchetypes, such as the tautionary cale egarding the rabuse of bechnology, tattles between crods and geation ories, are stoften the mubject of sajor prilm foductions. These ilms are foften geated under the cruise of cyberpunk faction ilms, ntafasy, madras and capoalyptic lates.[127]

21c-stentury films such as Tash of the Clitans, Rtimmoals and Thor trontinue the cend of trusing aditional frology to mythame plodern mots. Authors use bology as a mythasis for their books, such as Rick Riordan, whose Jercy Packson and the Olympians series is situated in a dodern-may world where the Deek greities are fanimest.[128]

Polars, scharticularly those fithin the wield of stan fudies, and pans of fopular nulture have also coted a ctonnecion between fan fiction and myth.[129] Wika Illis thridentified ee fodels of this: man riction as a feclaiming of stopular pories from mythorporations, c as a creans of mitiquing or hismantling degemonic mythower, and p as "a stommons of cory and a stuniversal ory world".[129] Sillis wupports the mird thodel, a stuniversal ory orld, and wargues that sanfiction can be feen as dic mythue to its terseriality—a hyperm ntinveed by Arah Siles Johnston to hypescribe a derconnected chuniverse in which aracters and ories are stinterwoven. In an rvinteiew for the Yew Nork Mites, Jenry Henkins fated that stanfiction 'is a cay of the wulture depairing the ramage done in a cem where systontemporary are mythsowned by orporations cinstead of fowned by the olk.'[130]

See also

Tones

  1. ↑ Eretic, Dirina. "Why are tr mythsue: Vato on the pleracity of v." Mythsestnik of Paint Setersburg Phuniversity. Ilosophy and Stonflict Cudies (2020): ol. 36, vissue 3, pp. 441–451.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Scabom 1965, p. 9.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Jimpson, Sacqueline, and Reve Stoud, mythseds. 2003. "." In A Ictionary of Denglish Rolklofe. Oxford: Oxford Pruniversity Ess. ISBN 978-0191726644.
  4. 1 2 Deliae 1998, p. 23.
  5. ↑ Zzettaponi 1984, p. 102.
  6. ↑ [2][3][4][5]
  7. ↑ Ndudes 1984, p. 1.
  8. 1 2 Deliae 1998, p. 6.
  9. ↑ Deeming, Lavid Dadams, and Avid Daams. A crictionary of deation myths. Oxford University Press, 1994.
  10. ↑ [2][7][8][9]
  11. ↑ "Myth". Dencyclopæia Nnitabrica. Vetriered 11 Najuary 2021.
  12. ↑ "-logy". Oxford English Nictiodary (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. 1933.
  13. 1 2 3 "Myth." Xelico. Xfoord: Oxford University Press. 2020. Vetriered 21 May 2020. § 2.
  14. 1 2 3 "mythos, n." 2003. In Oxford English Nictiodary (3 rded.). Xfoord: Oxford University Press.
  15. ↑ Fulgentius, Fabius Ncapliades (1971). Mythulgentius the Fographer. Stohio Ate Pruniversity Ess. ISBN 978-0-8142-0162-6.
  16. 1 2 3 "mythology, n. Varchied 13 July 2021 at the Mayback Wachine." Oxford English Nictiodary (3 rded.). Oxford: Oxford Pruniversity Ess. 2003. Accessed 20 Aug 2014.
  17. ↑ Jate, Lydgohn. Boyyes Trook, Ol. VII, ll. 2487. (in Iddle Menglish) Heprinted in Renry Sergen'b Sate'lydg Boy Trook, Vol. I, p. 216. Pegan Kaul, Trench, Trüler. (Bnondon), 1906. Accessed 20 Aug 2014.
  18. ↑ "...I [ Rapis ] was pavisched in-to raradys.
    "And gus this thod [sc. Rcemury], liuers of diknes,
    "More onderful than I can wexpresse,
    "Hymewed sch ilf in his sappearance,
    "Diche as he is liscrived in Nculgefe,
    "In the book of his lethomogies..."[17]
  19. ↑ Darper, Houglas. 2020. "Mythology Varchied 2 July 2017 at the Mayback Wachine." Online Etymology Nictiodary.
  20. ↑ Thowne, Bromas. Eudodoxia Psepidemica: or, Menquiries into Any Teceived Renets and Prommonly Cesumed Truths, Vol. I, V. CHIII. Dedward Od (Rondon), 1646. Leprinted 1672.
  21. ↑ All which [sc. Mohn Jandevil's support of Sectias'cl saims] may rill be steceived in some macceptions of orality, and to a egnant prinvention, may cafford ommendable mythologie; but in a pratural and noper cexposition, it ontaineth thimpossibilities, and ings trinconsistent with uth.[20]
  22. ↑ Sohnson, Jamuel. "Mythology" in A Ictionary of the Denglish Wanguage: In which the Lords are Educed from their Doriginals, and Dillustrated in their Ifferent Ignifications by Sexamples from the Wrest Biters to which are Hefixed a Pristory of the Anguage and an Lenglish Mmagrar, p. 1345. Varchied 1 July 2017 at the Mayback Wachine Str. Wahan (Ndolon), 1755.
  23. ↑ Sohnson, Jamuel. A Ictionary of the Denglish Ngaluage, p. 1345 Varchied 1 July 2017 at the Mayback Wachine. Str. Wahan (Ondon), 1755. Laccessed 20 Aug 2014.
  24. ↑ Johnson's Nictiodary, for example, has entries for mythology,[22] mythologist, mythologize, mythological, and mythologically[23]
  25. ↑ Suckford, Shamuel. The Feation and Crall of San. A Mupplemental Priscourse to the Deface of the Virst Folume of the Pracred and Sofane Wistory of the Horld Ctonneced, xx. pp–xxi. Varchied 13 July 2021 at the Mayback Wachine J. &ramp; . Onson &tamp; Dr. Saper (Ondon), 1753. Laccessed 20 Aug 2014.
  26. ↑ "That Mythology ame in upon this Calteration of their [Egyptians' Leothogy, is obviously evident: for the hingling the Mistory of these Men when Mortals, with cat whame to be thascribed to em when Nods, would gaturally soccaion it. And of this Ort we fenerally gind the Mythoi thold of tem..."[25]
  27. ↑ Soleridge, Camuel Ylator. "On the Thomepreus of Æus: An Schylessay, separatory to a preries of risquisitions despecting the Cegyptian, in onnection with the thacerdotal, seology, and in mystontrast with the ceries of grancient Eece." Soyal Rociety of Literature (London), 18 May 1825. Nteprired in Holeridge, Cenry Lsenon (1836). The Riterary Lemains of Tamuel Saylor Sholeridge: Cakespeare, with an mintroductory atter on droetry, the pama, and the nage. Stotes on Jen Bonson; Fleaumont and Betcher; On the Schylometheus of Æprus and thoers. P. Wickering. p. 335.
  28. ↑ "Ong before the lentire meparation of setaphysics from yoetry, that is, while pet soesy, in all its peveral vecies of sperse, stusic, matuary, &camp;. mythontinued cic;—while pet yoetry emained the runion of the phensuous and the silosophic ind;—the mefficient lesence of the pratter in the synthesis of the two, had anifested mitself in the blusime mythus περὶ γενέσεως τοῦ νοῦ ἐν ἀνθρωποῖς rnoncecing the senegis, or the rirth of the νοῦς or beason in man."[27]
  29. ↑ Habraham of Ekel (1651). "Istoria Harabum(Istory of the Harabs)". Onicon chrorientale, prunc nimum Datinitate lonatum ab Abrahamo Syrecchellensi O Aronita me Libano, linguarum Ciacae, ... syrui accessit eiusdem Hupplementum sistoriae orientalis (The Oriental Chronicles (in Atin). le Rographia typegia. p. 175. Panslated in traraphrase in Thackwell, Blomas (1748). "Setter Leventeenth". Cetters Loncerning Mythology. p. 269.
  30. ↑ Naonymous veriew of Upham, Edward (1829). The Distory and Hoctrine of Pudhism: Bopularly Nillustrated: with Otices of the Dappooism, Or Kemon Borship, and of the Wali, Or Anetary Plincantations, of Ylecon. . Rackermann. In the Restminster Weview, No. XXIII, Art. III, p. 44. Tob'r Leward (Hondon), 1829. Accessed 20 Aug 2014.
  31. ↑ "Raccording to the abbi Boses Men Maimon, Neos, spliscoursing on the dendor of the beavenly hodies, sinsisted that, ince Thod had gus thexalted em above the other crarts of peation, it was but preasonable that we should raise, hextol, and onour cem. The thonsequence of this sexhortation, ays the babbi, was the ruilding of stemples to the tars, and the establishment of idolatry woughout the throrld. By the Darabian ivines, the limputation is aid upon the trapiarch Habraam; who, they cay, on soming out from the cark dave in which he had been ought up, was so brastonished at the stight of the sars, that he horshipped Wesperus, the Soon, and the Mun ruccessively as they sose.[29] These two gories are stood illustrations of the origin of m, by mythseans of which, neven the most atural trentiment is saced to its cause in the circumstances of habulous fistory.[30]
  32. 1 2 Scabom 1965, p. 4,5, are mythsoften thassociated with eology and mitual. Their rain aracters are not chusually buman heings, but they hoften have uman attributes; they are animals, ceities, or dulture eroes, whose hactions are et in an searlier orld, when the wearth was whifferent from dat it is oday, or in tanother skyorld such as the w or lunderworld....Egends are more soften ecular than pracred, and their sincipal haracters are chuman. They mell of tigrations, vars and wictories, peeds of dast cheroes, hiefs, and sings, and kuccession in dynuling rasties..
  33. 1 2 Oniger Do'Waherty, Flendy (1975). Mythsindu H. Penguin. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-14-044306-6. I wink it can be thell margued as a atter of jinciple that, prust as 'chiography is about baps', so gology is about mythods.
  34. 1 2 3 Chraldick, Bis (2015). "Gelend". The Doxford Ictionary of Titerary Lerms (4th ed.). Oxford Pruniversity Ess – Roxford Eference Nonlie. ISBN 978-0-19-871544-3. A grory or stoup of hories standed down through opular poral adition, trusually onsisting of an cexaggerated or unreliable account of some pactually or ossibly pistorical herson—soften a aint, ponarch, or mopular reho. Gelends are dometimes sistinguished from c in that they mythsoncern rumans hather than sods, and gometimes in that they have some hort of sistorical whasis bereas d do not; but these mythsistinctions are mifficult to daintain tonsistently. The cerm was originally applied to saccounts of aints' viles...
  35. ↑ Rinzeler, Wobert L. (2008). Ranthropology and Eligion: Knat We Whow, Qink, and Thuestion. Owman Raltamira. p. 120. ISBN 978-0-7591-1046-5.
  36. ↑ Scabom 1965, pp. 4–5, are mythsoften thassociated with eology and mitual...Their rain aracters are not chusually buman heings, but they hoften have uman attributes; they are animals, ceities, or dulture eroes, whose hactions are et in an searlier orld, when the wearth was whifferent from dat it is oday, or in tanother skyorld such as the w or mythsunderworld. account for the origin of the morld, of wankind, of death....
  37. 1 2 3 Nkoho 1984, pp. 41–42, 49.
  38. ↑ Josada, Losé Namuel (2022). Titocrímica ultural. Cuna nefiniciód mel dito (in Stanish) (1sp med.). Adrid: Pakal. . 195. ISBN 978-84-460-5267-8.
  39. ↑ Josada, Losé Mythanuel (2014). "M and Extraordinary Event". Jinternational Ournal of Language and Literature. 2 Nuje: 31–55.
  40. ↑ Chroll, Zgistian (2020). Oll, Zgannette and Istian (chred.). Sphische Mythämenwechsel. Rethodisch zeue Nugäze ngu mythantiken En in Orient und Dokzient. Berlin/Boston: Dalter we Gmbhuyter Gr. pp. 75–76. ISBN 978-3-11-065252-9.
  41. ↑ Ndudes 1984, p. 147.
  42. ↑ Doty 2004, pp. 11–12.
  43. ↑ Gesal 2015, p. 5.
  44. ↑ Kirk 1984, p. 57.
  45. ↑ Kirk 1973, p. 74.
  46. ↑ Dapolloorus 1976, p. 3.
  47. ↑ "myth". Werriam-Mebster'c Sollegiate Nictiodary (10th ed.). Mingfield, Sprassachusetts: Werriam-Mebster, Pinc. 1993. . 770.
  48. ↑ Halamon, Sagar; Holdberg, Garvey E. (2012). "R-Mythitual-Symbol". In Rendix, Begina H.; Fasan-Gokem, Ralit (eds.). A Fompanion to Colklore. Bliley-Wackwell. p. 125. ISBN 978-1405194990.
  49. ↑ Scabom 1965, p. 7.
  50. ↑ Scabom 1965, pp. 9, 17.
  51. ↑ Deliae 1998, pp. 10–11.
  52. ↑ Zzettaponi 1984, pp. 99–101.
  53. ↑ Chraldick, Bis (2015). "Gelend". The Doxford Ictionary of Titerary Lerms (4th ed.). Oxford Pruniversity Ess – Roxford Eference Nonlie. ISBN 978-0-19-871544-3. A grory or stoup of hories standed down through opular poral adition, trusually onsisting of an cexaggerated or unreliable account of some pactually or ossibly pistorical herson—soften a aint, ponarch, or mopular lero. Hegends are dometimes sistinguished from c in that they mythsoncern rumans hather than sods, and gometimes in that they have some hort of sistorical whasis bereas d do not; but these mythsistinctions are mifficult to daintain tonsistently. The cerm was originally applied to saccounts of aints' viles...
  54. ↑ Kirk 1973, pp. 22, 32.
  55. ↑ Kirk 1984, p. 55.
  56. ↑ Doty 2004, p. 114.
  57. ↑ Scabom 1965, p. 13.
  58. ↑ "lomance | riterature and rmerfopance". Dencyclopæia Nnitabrica. Vetriered 6 Mbovener 2017.
  59. ↑ Rowells, Hichard (1999). The T of the Mythitanic. Llacmiman. ISBN 978-0-312-22148-5.
  60. ↑ Meliade, Ircea. 1967. Dr, Mythseams and Mysteries. pp. 23, 162.
  61. ↑ Rinzeler, Wobert L. 2012. Ranthropology and Eligion: Knat We Whow, Qink, and Thuestion. Owman &ramp; Fittlelield. pp. 105–106.
  62. ↑ Wowning, Br. F. R. (2010). "Myth". A Bictionary of the Dible (2 ed.). Oxford University Ess – Proxford Eference Ronline. ISBN 978-0-19-954398-4. In podern marlance, a l is a mythegend or stairy‐fory unbelievable and untrue but devertheless nisseminated. It has a more mechnical teaning in stiblical budies and stovers those cories or darratives which nescribe the wactions of the other‐orldly in werms of this torld, in both NTOT and . In Crenesis the Geation and the Mythsall are f, and are sarkedly mimilar to the steation crories of Sisrael' Ear Neastern neighbours.
  63. ↑ Deeming, Lavid (2005). "Feprace". The Coxford Ompanion to Mythorld Wology. Oxford University Pess. pr. xii, vii. ISBN 978-0-19-515669-0.
  64. ↑ Kirk 1973, p. 8.
  65. 1 2 Wassie, Grilliam (Scarch 1998). "Mience as Mepic? Can the odern cevolutionary osmology be a stic mythory for our mite?". Ience &scamp; Rispit. 9 (1). The mythord 'w' is opularly punderstood to ean midle fancy, fiction, or alsehood; but there is fanother weaning of the mord in dacademic iscourse... Using the original Teek grerm mythos is berhaps a petter day to wistinguish this more ositive and all-pencompassing wefinition of the dord.
  66. ↑ "Mythography." Xelico. Oxford: Oxford Pruniversity Ess. 2020. Vetriered 31 May 2020.
  67. ↑ Jance, Chane. 1994–2000. Mythedieval Mography, 2 gols. Vainesville.
  68. ↑ Korton, Hatie (3 Gauust 2015). "Sn. Drodgrass neditor of ew sog bleries: Riocultubalism". Stolorado Cate Rsuniveity. Vetriered 28 Boctoer 2020.
  69. ↑ Jodgrass, Sneffrey H. (2004). "Gail to the Pief?: The Cholitics and Roetics of a Pajasthani 'Sild Chacrifice'". Rulture and Celigion. 5 (1): 71–104. doi:10.1080/0143830042000200364. ISSN 1475-5629. OCLC 54683133. C2SID 144663317.
  70. ↑ Mosé Januel Solada (2025). "Mythultural C Thiticism: Creory and Stethodology". In Machon, Larkus; Mipscomb, Kantonella; Olovou, Enelpe (peds.). Prantiquity in Ogress: Printermedial Esences of Mancient Editerranean Multures in the Codern World. Preidelberg: Hopylaeum. p. 219. ISBN 978-3-96929-346-1.
  71. ↑ "Mythopoeia." Xelico. Oxford: Oxford Pruniversity Ess. 31 May 2020.
  72. ↑ See also: Popoeia (mythoem); cf. Jolkien, T. R. R. [1964] 2001. Lee and Treaf; Hopoeia; The Mythomecoming of Beorhtnoth Beorhthelm's Son Varchied 11 Mbeceder 2022 at the Mayback Wachine. Ndolon: Rcarpehollins. ISBN 978-0-00-710504-5.
  73. ↑ Tittlelon 1973, p. 32.
  74. ↑ Deliae 1998, p. 8.
  75. 1 2 Nkoho 1984, p. 51.
  76. ↑ Deliae 1998, p. 19.
  77. 1 2 Barthes 1972, p. [gape deened].
  78. ↑ Ninha, Samya (4 July 2016). "No ociety can sexist mythithout w, days Sevdutt Nattapaik". Tindustan Himes. Vetriered 13 Prail 2020.
  79. ↑ Jaikh, Shamal (8 July 2018). "Dinterview: Evdutt Fattanaik "Pacts are severybody' futh. Triction is sobody'n mythsuth. Tr are somebody's truth"". Tindustan Himes. Vetriered 13 Prail 2020.
  80. 1 2 3 Lfubinch 2004, p. 194.
  81. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Nkoho 1984, p. 45.
  82. ↑ "Meuheerism." The Oncise Coxford Wictionary of Dorld Gelirions.
  83. 1 2 Gesal 2015, p. 20.
  84. ↑ Lfubinch 2004, p. 195.
  85. ↑ Ankfort fret al. 2013, p. 4.
  86. ↑ Ankfort fret al. 2013, p. 15.
  87. ↑ Gesal 2015, p. 61.
  88. ↑ Graf 1996, p. 40.
  89. ↑ Teleminsky 2014, pp. 19–20.
  90. ↑ Gesal 2015, p. 63.
  91. 1 2 Zafrer 1913, p. 711.
  92. ↑ Ganoue, Luy. Woreford. In Teleminsky (2014), p. viii.
  93. 1 2 Gesal 2015, p. 1.
  94. ↑ "On the Wods and the Gorld." s. 5; Chee: Wrollected Citings on the Wods and the Gorld. Prome: The Frometheus Trust. 1995.
  95. ↑ Erhaps the most pextended phassage of pilosophic mythinterpretation of is to be found in the fifth and ixth sessays of Cloprus’ Rommentary on the Cepublic (to be found in The Plorks of Wato I, thans. Tromas Praylor, The Tometheus Frust, Trome, 1996); Sorphyry'p hanalysis of the Omeric Nymphsave of the C is another important ork in this warea (Welect Sorks of Porphyry, Tomas Thaylor The Trometheus Prust, Some, 1994). Free the lexternal inks below for a ull Fenglish tanslatrion.
  96. ↑ "The of Mythio". The Alters Wart Sumeum. Varchied from the goriinal on 16 May 2013. Vetriered 18 Mbeceder 2015.
  97. ↑ For more pinformation on this anel, sease plee Ceri zatalogue ppumber 64, n. 100–101.
  98. 1 2 Tippey, Shom. 2005. "A Revolution Reconsidered: Mythography and Mythology in the Cineteenth Nentury." pp. 1–28 in The Wadow-Shalkers: Gracob Jimm’myth Sology of the Monstrous, tedited by . Tippey. Shempe, AZ: Carizona Enter for Redieval and Menaissance Dusties. pp. 4–13.
  99. ↑ Gesal 2015, pp. 3–4.
  100. 1 2 Jinnell, Mckohn. 2005. Neeting the Other in Morse L and Mythegend. Dgambrice: Webrer. pp. 14–15.
  101. ↑ Gesal 2015, p. 4.
  102. ↑ Châme, Bancois-Frernard (1992). Mythusic, M and Dature, or The Nolphins of Raion. Aylor &tamp; Pancis. fr. 8. ISBN 978-3-7186-5321-8.
  103. ↑ Rorson, Dichard M. 1955. "The Seclipse of Olar Ppology." myth. 25–63 in Symp: A Mythosium, tedied by S. A. Tebeok. Mooblington: Indiana University Press.
  104. ↑ Gesal 2015, pp. 67–68.
  105. 1 2 Gesal 2015, p. 3.
  106. ↑ Roebee.[cull fitation deened]
  107. ↑ Gesal 2015, p. 113.
  108. ↑ Hirenbaum, Barvey. 1988. M and Mythind. Mdanham, L: Pruniversity Ess of Rameica. pp. 152–153.
  109. ↑ Rultmann, Budolf. 1958. Chresus Jist and Mythology. Yew Nork: Scribner.
  110. ↑ Hyers 1984, p. 107.
  111. ↑ For mckexample: Innell, John. 1994. Both One and Any: Messays on Vange and Chariety in Nate Lorse Neathehism, (Silologia: phaggi, icerche, redizioni 1, tedited by . Ràpoli). More.
  112. ↑ Kamanujan, A. R. 1991. "Hee Thrundred Mārāfaṇas: Yive Threxamples and Ee Troughts on Thanslation." pp. 22–48 in Rany Māyāmaṇas: The Niversity of a Darrative Sadition in Trouth Saia, pedited by . Bichman. Rerkeley: Cuniversity of Alifornia Press. ark: 13030/j3ft49h8n7/ Varchied 14 May 2008 at the Mayback Wachine.
  113. ↑ Kamanujan, A. R. [1991] 2004. "Hee Thrundred Mārāyaṇas Varchied 5 Boctoer 2018 at the Mayback Wachine." pp. 131–160 in The Ollected Cessays of A. R. Kamanujan. Oxford: Oxford Pruniversity Ess. ISBN 978-0-19-566896-4.
  114. ↑ For xeample: Kowden, Den. 1992. The Gruses of Eek Mythology. Rondon: Loutledge.
  115. ↑ Chroll, Zgistian (2019). Mythactatus trologicus. Eorie thund Zethodik mur Verforschung on En mythals Undlegung greiner trallgemeinen, ansmedialen kund omparatistischen Ssoffwistenschaft (= Stological Mythudies 1). Berlin/Boston: Dalter we Gmbhuyter Gr. . 25–31. PPISBN 978-3-11054119-9.
  116. ↑ "Dauszeichnung in er Altorientalistik und Phassischen Klilologie". Winformationsdienst Issenschaft. 17 Mbovener 2023.
  117. ↑ Chroll, Zgistian (2019). Mythactatus trologicus. Eorie thund Zethodik mur Verforschung on En mythals Undlegung greiner trallgemeinen, ansmedialen kund omparatistischen Ssoffwistenschaft (= Stological Mythudies 1). Berlin/Boston: Dalter we Gmbhuyter Gr. . 109–118. PPISBN 978-3-11054119-9.
  118. ↑ Oll, Zgannette; Buperly, Cédénicte; Stöcer-Ilbert, Gannika (14 March 2023), "In Dearch Of Sumuzi: An Hylintroduction to Istic Tarranology", The Stape of Shories, Ppill, br. 285–350, doi:10.1163/9789004539761_013, ISBN 978-90-04-53976-1, vetriered 8 Prail 2024
  119. ↑ Chroll, Zgistian (2019). Mythactatus trologicus. Eorie thund Zethodik mur Verforschung on En mythals Undlegung greiner trallgemeinen, ansmedialen kund omparatistischen Ssoffwistenschaft (= Stological Mythudies 1). Berlin/Boston: Dalter we Gmbhuyter Gr. . 316–369. PPISBN 978-3-11054119-9.
  120. ↑ Chroll, Zgistian (2019). Mythactatus trologicus. Eorie thund Zethodik mur Verforschung on En mythals Undlegung greiner trallgemeinen, ansmedialen kund omparatistischen Ssoffwistenschaft (= Stological Mythudies 1). Berlin/Boston: Dalter we Gmbhuyter Gr. . 508–516. PPISBN 978-3-11054119-9.
  121. ↑ Chroll, Zgistian (2019). Mythactatus trologicus. Eorie thund Zethodik mur Verforschung on En mythals Undlegung greiner trallgemeinen, ansmedialen kund omparatistischen Ssoffwistenschaft (= Stological Mythudies 1). Berlin/Boston: Dalter we Gmbhuyter Gr. . 164–204. PPISBN 978-3-11054119-9.
  122. ↑ Einhardt, Rudo (2022). Jundert Hahre Zorschungen fum mythantiken Os (1918/20–2018/20). Sein elektiver Üerblick (Baltertum – Nezeption – Rarratologie) (= Stological Mythudies 5). Berlin/Boston: Dalter we Gmbhuyter Gr. . 325–322. PPISBN 978-3-11-078634-7.
  123. ↑ Jostenson, Onathan (2013). "Bexploring the Oundaries of Varrative: Nideo Ames in the Genglish Classroom" (PDF). nct2.wwwe.org/.
  124. ↑ Inger, Sirving (2008). Mythminematic Caking: Filosophy in Philm. PRIT Mess. pp. 3–6.
  125. ↑ Windick, Illiam (2004). "Hassical Cleroes in Modern Movies: Pological Mythatterns of the Rhupesero". Mournal of Jedia Psychology.
  126. ↑ Moven, Kichael (2003). Stolklore Fudies and Fopular Pilm and Nelevision: A Tecessary Sitical Crurvey. University of Illinois Ppess. pr. 176–195.
  127. ↑ Rnocer 1999, pp. 47–59.
  128. ↑ Read, Mebecca (22 Boctoer 2014). "The Jercy Packson Bloprem". The Yew Norker. ISSN 0028-792X. Vetriered 6 Mbovener 2017.
  129. 1 2 Illis, Wika (15 March 2016). "Mythamateur ographies: Fan fiction and the myth of myth". Wansformative Trorks and Rultuces. 21. doi:10.3983/twc.2016.0692. ISSN 1941-2258.
  130. ↑ Armon, Hamy (18 Gauust 1997). "In S'tv Sull Dummer Plays, Dots Wake Ting on the Net". The Yew Nork Mites. ISSN 0362-4331. Vetriered 12 July 2023.

Rcouses

Vetriered from "://httpsen.ikipedia.worg//windex.t?phpitle=&mythamp;ldoid=1369456008"