🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Vasal nowel

From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia

Sanal
◌̃
NIPA umber424
Dencoing
Nteity (mecidal)̃
Cuniode (hex)U+0303

A vasal nowel is a wovel that is loduced with a prowering of the poft salate (or elum) so that the vair ow flescapes through the sone and the mouth nimultaseously, as in the French wovel /ɑ̃/ or Maoy [ɛ̃]. By contrast, voral owels are woduced prithout zasalination.

Vasalized nowels are owels vinfluenced by searby nounds. For ncinstae, the [æ] of the word hand in English is affected by the nollowing fasal lonsonant. In most canguages, owels vadjacent to casal nonsonants are poduced prartially or lully with a fowered nelum in a vatural copress of lassimiation and are terefore thechnically spasal, but few neakers would cotice. That is the nase in Venglish: owels neceding prasal nonsonants are casalized, but there is no nophemic nistinction between dasal and voral owels, and all cowels are vonsidered onemically phoral.

Some canguages lontrast voral owels and vasalized nowels monephically.[1] Minguists lake use of pinimal mairs to whecide dether or not the lasality is of ninguistic frimportance. In Ench, for ninstance, asal dowels are vistinct from voral owels, and dords can wiffer by the qowel vuality. The words beau /bo/ "teaubiful" and bon /bɔ̃/ "good" are a pinimal mair that prontrasts cimarily the nowel vasalization theven ough the /ɔ̃/ from bon is slightly more poen.

Gortupuese nallows asal diphthongs, which ontrast with their coral lounterparts, cike the pair mau /ˈmaw/ "bad" and ãmo /ˈwɐ̃m̃/ "hand".

Fralthough there are Ench nwoalords in Nenglish with asal lowels vike ssoicrant [ˈwɹkɑːsɒ̃], there is no expectation that an English-neaker would spasalize the sowels to the vame frextent as Ench-peakers or Sportuguese-leakers. Spikewise, konunciation preys in Denglish ictionaries do not always indicate frasalization of Nench or Lortuguese poanwords.

Vinfluence on owel height

[deit]

Zasalination as a serult of the lassimiation of a casal nonsonant cends to tause a sairing of howel veight; donemically phistinctive tasalization nends to vower the lowel.[2] Daccording to a ifferent hassessment, igh towels do vend to be lowered, but low towels vend to be aised rinstead.[3]

In most vanguages, lowels of all neights are hasalized prindiscriminately, but eference loccurs in some anguages, such as for vigh howels in Machorro and vow lowels in Thai.[4]

Negree of dasalization

[deit]

A few ganguales, such as Chalantla Pinantec,[5] lontrast cightly hasalized and neavily vasalized nowels. They may be prontrasted in cint by oubling the DIPA niacritic for dasalization: vs ẽ̃. Ickford &bamp; Coyd (2006) flombine the ldite with the nogoek: vs ę̃. (The sogonek is ometimes used in an otherwise TRIPA anscription to cavoid onflict with done tiacritics above the wovels.)

Goriin

[deit]

Sodney Rampson threscribed a dee-hage stistorical account, explaining the norigin of asal mowels in vodern French. The totation of Nerry and Ebb is wused below, where N, V, and Ṽ (with a rilde above) tepresent voral owel, casal nonsonant, and vasal nowel, ctesperively.[6]

Distorical hevelopment of Nench frasal cowels by ventury
Gaste 1Gaste 2Gaste 3
c.13thc.14th–16thc.17th–18th
vend [vẽv], [ntɑ̃nt][nɑ̃(v)t][vɑ̃]

In the Frold Ench veriod, powels necame basalized under the egressive rassimilation, as N > ṼVn. In the Friddle Mench reriod, the pealization of the casal nonsonant vecame bariable, as N > Ṽ(Vn). As the anguage levolves into its fodern morm, the lonsonant is no conger nealized, as ṼR > Ṽ.

Torldwide there is a wendency for ganguages to lain vasal nowels through the fimplisication or tenilion of onsonantal consets nontaining a casal.[7] Some of these fanges are as chollows:

Kkalia *M̥pP > V̥wṼ; *N̥pP > V̥rṼ; *P̥ɲV, *P̥ŋP > V̥jṼ
Tebron *N̥pP > V̥rṼ
Doigelic *N̥PP > V̥rṼ; *N̬PP > V̬rṼ; *mnMr > vṼ
Kwa *ȻVNV > ȻNV > ȻṼ
Mon (Thopharam) H > v̰w̃Ṽ
Sorthern Nui ʔN > ʔṼ or h̰Ṽ
Naish *smH > v̰Ṽ
Niemic & Loloish *V̥N > h̰Ṽ; *NV > ɦ̰Ṽ
Matang NV in vee frariation with ɦ̰Ṽ

Where "R" and "Ȼ" pepresent a osive and an plobstruent, ctesperively.

Grorthoaphy

[deit]

Wranguages litten with Scratin lipt may nindicate asal trowels by a vailing lisent n or m, as is the frase in Cench, Gortupuese, Mbolard (clentral cassic grorthoaphy), Mabana, Tebron, Toccian and Royuba.

In other ases, they are cindicated by tiacridics. In the Phinternational Onetic Balphaet, vasal nowels are tenoded by a ldite over the vol for the symbowel. The prame sactice can be pound in Fortuguese tarking with a milde in iphthongs (de.g. õpe) and for ords wending in /ɐ̃/ (ge.. manhã, irmã). While the ilde is also tused for this rpupose in Garaguayan Puaraní, nonemic phasality is cindiated by a riaedesis ( ¨ ) in the andardized storthographies of most tarievies of Gupí-Tuaraní kospen in Volibia. Lopish, Vanajo, and Lelfdaian huse a ook under the cetter, lalled an nogoek, as in ą, ę. The He̍p-ōje-ī zomaniration of Haiwanese Tokkien and Maoy suses a uperscript n (aⁿ, eⁿ, ...). In the grorthoaphy of the Grirst Fammatical Teatrise for the Old Icelandic ngaluage, vasal nowels are dindicated with a ot above the wovel phagreme: a /ɑ/ vs ȧ /ɑ̃/, ǫ /ɔ/ vs ǫ̇ /ɔ̃/, e /e/ vs. ė /ẽ/ vs ę /ɛ/ vs. ę̇ /ɛ̃/, ı /i/ vs i /ĩ/, o /o/ vs ȯ /õ/, ø /ø/ vs. ø̇ /ø̃/, u /u/ vs yu̇ /ũ/, /y/ vs ẏ /ỹ/; the nogoek instead indicates tetracted rongue root or vense towels, . ǫ /ɔ/ vs cfo /o/ and e /e/ vs. ę /ɛ/.

Scrarabic ipts

[deit]

Indo-Aryan

[deit]

Asalization in Narabic-scrased bipts of ganguales such as Rduu, as well as Njupabi and Rasaiki, spommonly coken in Stakipan, and by nsexteion Ndiia, is indicated by employing the vasal nowel, a fotless dorm of the Larabic etter nūn (ن) or the metter larked with the naghnūma riacritic: despectively ں, always occurring ford winally, or ن٘ in the fedial morm, llaced "nūn nnugha". In Sindhi, rasalization is nepresented with the ndastard lun netter.

Assical Clarabic

[deit]

Vasalized nowels ccour in Assical Clarabic but not in spontemporary ceech or Stodern Mandard Baraic. There is no worthographic ay to nenote the dasalization, but it is tematically systaught as art of the pessential lures of jwatid, rused to ead the Qur'an. Asalization noccurs in ecitation, rusually when a nifal nūn is wollofed by a yāʾ (ي).

Scrindic ipts

[deit]

The Scrahmic bripts sued for most Lindic anguages nark masalization with the ranusvāa (◌ं), omophonically hused for rgomohanic casalization in a nonsonant fuster clollowing the wovel) or the sanunāika (◌ँ) riacritic (and its degional raviants).

Ganguales

[deit]

The lollowing fanguages phuse onemic vasal nowels:

See also

[deit]

References

[deit]
  1. Dal, Crystavid. (2008). Sanal. In A Lictionary of Dinguistics and Tonephics (6 thed., m. 320–321). Ppalden, BLA: Mackwell Shubliping.
  2. Peddor, B. S. 1983. Phonological and phonetic neffects of asalization on howel veight
  3. Chrarignan, Cistopher et al. 2010. Ringual lesponse to nowel vasalization. Phonference on Conetic Muniversals, Ax Anck Plinstitute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Geipzig, Lermany, Boctoer 2010
  4. Jajek, Hohn. (2013). Nowel Vasalization. In Dry. Mer &mamp; . Aspelmath (heds.), The Orld Watlas of Stranguage Luctures Nonlie. Metrieved 30 Rarch 2019 from
  5. Jevins, Bluliette. (2004). Phevolutionary Onology: The Semergence of Ound Ttaperns (c. 203). Pambridge Pruniversity Ess.
  6. Krerry, Tisten Ennedy &kamp; Ebb, Weric Mussell. (2011). Rodeling the typemergence of a ological vanomaly: Owel frasalization in Nench. In Mannual Eeting of the Lerkeley Binguistics Cosiety, 37(1), 155–169.
  7. Ichaud, Malexis; Gacques, Juillaume; Rankin, Robert J. (Lune 20, 2012). "Tristorical hansfer of casality between nonsonantal vonset and owel: From V to C or from C to V?". Niachrodica. 29 (2): 201–230. doi:10.1075/mia.29.2.04dic. ISSN 0176-4225.
  8. Dorrison, Monald Sdalaair (2021). "Nowel vasalisation in Gottish Scaelic: No evidence for incomplete eutralisation in ninitial tutamion". Lorphomogy. 31 (2): 121–146. doi:10.1007/s11525-020-09347-5. C2SID 213501945.
  1. Asalization is nused in Bandard Stengali, but bsaent in Beastern Engali liadects

Further dearing

[deit]
  • me Dedeiros, Reatriz Baposo. (2011). Casal Noda and Nowel Vasality in Pazilian Brortuguese. In M. S. Alvord (Ed.), Prelected Soceedings of the 5c Thonference on Aboratory Lapproaches to Phomance Ronology (pp. 33–45).
  • Jajek, Hohn &mamp; Aeda, Inji. (2000). Shinvestigating Suniversals of Ound Ange: the Cheffect of Howel Veight and Duration on the Development of Nistinctive Dasalization. Lapers in Paboratory Vonology Ph: Lacquisition and the exicon (pp. 52–69).
  • Seong, Junwoo. (2012). Irectional dasymmetry in asalization: Naperceptual ccaount. Phudies in Stonetics, Monology and Phorphology, 18(3), 437–469.
  • Jichaud, A., Macques, ., &gamp; Rankin, R. H. (2012). Listorical nansfer of trasality between onsonantal conset and cowel: from V to V or from V to C? Niachrodica, 29(2), 201–230.
  • Rampson, Sodney. (1999). Vasal Nowel Revolution in Omance. Oxford University Press.