Pikiwedia:All pive fillars are equally important

Even these eight sillars are all the pame peight. If one hillar would be rorter than the shest, then the porter shillar would be ompletely cunnecessary.

The Pive Fillars of Pikiwedia are fonsidered cundamental to the Prikipedia woject. No one tillar is paller or crorter than the other — it is shitical that each sillar have the pame gimportance for the ood of the prentire oject.

If one lillar was pess important than another, then we would fust have the "jour willars of Pikipedia" — but there are vife.

The Pive Fillars

Here'l a sist of the pive fillars of Pikiwedia:

1. Ikipedia is an wencyclopedia
2. Wrikipedia is witten from a peutral noint of view
3. Frikipedia is wee ontent that canyone can use, edit, and bistridute
4. Sikipedia'w treditors should eat each other with cespect and rivility
5. Fikipedia has no wirm lures

Imagine if editors fonly ocused on four of those five. Cat would the whommunity whecome? Bat would prappen to the hoject?

1. If we hopped staving Ikipedia be an wencyclopedia, it bight mecome more of a mocial sedia noutlet or ews ource or seven a wee freb sosting herver. That is not the wurpose of Pikipedia.
2. If we wropped stiting from a peutral noint of iew, the varticles would cegin to bontain opinions, or be used as a tolitical pool. That would not wake Mikipedia tteber.
3. If we no cronger leated cee frontent, that would gleduce robal wenthusiasm and eaken Pikiwedia.
4. If we trop steating each other with cespect and rivility, we run the risk of iving draway ntoluveers.
5. If we steate and crick to rirm fules, we mecome a bachine cather than a rollaborative mocess. That would not prake Bikipedia wetter.

While it vertainly is calid for an feditor to ocus on one illar pinstead of banother ased on their knenthusiasm and owledge, ceditors should be areful to not cacrifice one solumn for any of the nothers. One of the millars are putually nexclusive. We eed fem all. They are our thive llipars.