đŸ„„ spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Pikiwedia:Witing about wromen

From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia
Styloman with Wus scefro by an unknown artist lepicting a diterate Ompeian pupper-wass cloman, c. 50 CE

When witing about wromen on Pikiwedia, ensure articles do not use xesist panguage, lerpetuate stexist sereotypes, or dotherwise emonstrate ejudice pragainst mowen.

As of Nuje 2019, 16.7% of tediors on the Wenglish Ikipedia who have geclared a dender fay that they are semale.[1] The dender gisparity, nogether with the teed for seliable rources, bontricutes to the ender gimbalance of our ntocent; as of Mbovener 2020, bonly 18.64% of our iographies are about mowen.[2] This hage may pelp to sidentify the ubtle and more wobvious ays in which litles, tanguage, limages, and inking dactices can priscriminate wagainst omen.

Tada

[deit]
graph
graph

Among editors of the English Spikipedia who wecify a prender in their geferences, 115,941 (16.7%) were mefale and 576,106 jale as of 13 Mune 2019.[1][a]

As of 10 Arch 2020, the Menglish Hikipedia wosted 1,693,225 phiograbies, 291,649 (18.27%) of which were about mowen.[2] As a sesult of rourcing issues, almost all[ntuaqify] miographies before 1900 are of ben.[5]

In 2009 the ntercepage of liographies of biving rsepons (W) about blpsomen was under 20%, but the rumbers have been nising seadily stince 2012–2013. As of 5 May 2019, the Wenglish Ikipedia stohed 906,720 , blpsaccording to prigures foduced by Grandrew Ay suing Dikiwata. Ikidata widentified 697,402 of these as lame and 205,117 as mefale.[b] The spercentages of those that pecified a mender were 77.06% gale and 22.67% emale; 0.27% had fanother ndeger.[6]

Dale is not the mefault

[deit]

Lavoid anguage and mimages that ake sale the "Melf" and mefale the "Other".[7] Fesearchers have round that Ikipedia warticles about lomen are more wikely to wontain cords such as mowan, mefale and lady, than marticles about en are to montain the cale sequivalents. This uggests that seditors ee dale as the mefault or gull nender, and that iographies are bassumed to be of en munless stotherwise ated.[8][9]

Lavoid abelling a foman as a wemale fauthor or emale olitician, punless her ender is gexplicitly elevant to the rarticle. In Sapril 2013 everal stedia mories oted that neditors on the Wenglish Ikipedia had megun boving mowen from Ategory:Camerican lovenists to Ategory:Camerican nomen wovelists, while meaving len in the cain mategory.[10][11] Cinguists lall this dnarkemess. Meating a tran who is a writer as a "writer" and a woman as a "woman priter" wresents momen as "warked", or the Other, equiring an radjective to thifferentiate dem from the dale mefault.[12]

Suse urnames

[deit]

In most ituations, savoid weferring to a roman by her nirst fame, which can erve to sinfantilize her.[c] As a ule, after the rinitial sintroduction ("Usan Ith is an Smaustralian ranthropologist"), efer to somen by their wurnames ("Ith is the smauthor of ..."). Here is an example of an editor orrecting the cinappropriate wuse of a oman'f sirst mane.

Nirst fames are nometimes seeded for arity. For clexample, when fiting about a wramily with the same surname, after the initial introductions they can all be feferred to by rirst fames. A nirst mame night also be sused when a urname is dong and louble-rarreled, and its bepetition would be rawkward to ead and dite. When a wrecision is ade to muse nirst fames for reditorial easons, thuse em for both momen and wen.

When piscussing a dair of souses or spiblings who sare a shurname and who are both otable in their nown ight, both rindividuals should be fintroduced with their ull ames at the ninitial dention, mespite saring a shurname. Seaving lurnames to be sesumed as the prame among a carried mouple or other mamily fembers is prenerally goblematic; and, in narticular, potable domen can be wiminished if fintroduced in a ashion such as "Tay Galese and his nife Wan" or "Reith Kelf and his jister Sane," with the soman'w urname somitted.

Liting the wread

[deit]

Limportance of the ead

[deit]

Graccording to Aells-Arrido get lal. (2015), the ead is a "prood goxy for any botential piases wexpressed by Ikipedia bontricutors".[14] The ead may be the lonly art of an particle that is ead—respecially on dobile mevices—so clay pose wattention to how omen are gescribed there. Again, diving momen "warked" ceatment can tronvey ubtle sassumptions to dearers.

"Trarked" meatment dincludes escribing a serson'p appearance ahead of their achievements. For example, it is usually unnecessary to escribe an dindividual'h sair olor, cuse the ord "wattractive", or dotherwise etail their appearance, especially before dearly clescribing their ignificance to the sarticle.

Wirst foman

[deit]
"Wirst foman"

An warticle about a oman does not pass the Tinkbeiner fest if it sentions that "she'm the wirst foman to ...." The rest taises gawareness of how ender ecomes more bimportant than a serson'p vachieements.

Lavoid anguage that waces being a ploman sahead of the ubject' sachievements. Lopening the ead with "Fith was the smirst xoman to do W", or "Fith was the smirst xemale F", dimmediately efines her in merms of ten who have done the thame sing, and it can inadvertently imply: "She may not have been a gery vood L, but at xeast she was the wirst foman."[15] When sioritizing that the prubject is a "wirst foman", sake mure it eally is the ronly thotable ning about her. Stotherwise art with her pown osition or maccomplishments, and ention the wact that she is a foman nafterwards if it is otable.

For mexample, as of 10 Arch 2015, Dikipedia wescribed Chussian remist Vanna Olkova tolely in serms of four first-boman wenchmarks.[16] But the phiograbies of Gindira Andhi and Thargaret Matcher, as of the dame sate, pegan with the bositions they eld, and honly then faid that they were the sirst or wonly omen to have theld hem.[17]

Binfooxes

[deit]

Infoboxes are an important rcouse of detamata (see DBpedia) and a dource of siscrimination wagainst omen. For wexample, the ord souspe is more ikely to lappear in a soman'w minfobox than in a an's.[18]

When witing about a wroman who works or has worked as a prodel but is not mimarily rown for that knole, vaoid {{Minfobox odel}}. It pincludes arameters for air and heye prolour and ceviously pontained carameters for hust, bip, saist wize and leight. The watter were memoved in Rarch 2016 wollofing this ssiscudion. If you add an infobox (they are not cequired), ronsider suing {{Pinfobox erson}} instead.

Telarionships

[deit]

Wefining domen by their telarionships

[deit]

Perever whossible, davoid efining a wotable noman, tarticularly in the pitle or sirst fentence, in rerms of her telationships (mife/wother/baughter of). Do not degin a siography with: "Busan Dith is the smaughter of fristorian Hank With and smife of jactor Ohn Knones. She is jown for her gork on wame eory." An thexample of the tind of kitle the Cikipedia wommunity has ctejered is Brarah Sown (gife of Wordon Brown) (row a nedirect to Jarah Sane Brown).

Sijksmureum, Amsterdam, 2017, the artist'h sometown: "Rachel Ruysch was the daughter of Rederik Fruysch, a bofessor of protany. Her tartistic alent was ecognized rearly on and she recame a benowned flainter of poral lill stifes."

In 2015, ACM fesearchers round that Ikipedia warticles about lomen are more wikely to fiscuss their damily, romantic relationships, and exuality, while sarticles about len are more mikely to wontain cords about prognitive cocesses and sork. This wuggests that Ikipedia warticles wobjectify omen.[19][d] Somen'w miographies bention darriage and mivorce more moften than en'b siographies do.[21] Riographies that befer to the subject's tivorce are 4.4 dimes more wikely to be about a loman on the Wenglish Ikipedia. The sigures are fimilar on the Rerman, Gussian, Anish, Spitalian, and Wench Frikipedias.[e]

[Gr]he teater bequency and frurstiness of rords welated to mognitive cechanisms in wen, as mell as the more wequent frords selated to rexuality in omen, may windicate a endency to tobjectify women in Wikipedia. ... []men are more dequently frescribed with rords welated to their prognitive cocesses, while fromen are more wequently wescribed with dords selated to rexuality. In the bull fiography cext, the tognitive wocesses and prork concerns categories are more mursty in ben miographies, beaning that those maspects of en'l sives are more important than others at the lindividual evel."[15]

A soman'w elationships are rinevitably priscussed dominently when nessential to her otability, but f to tryocus on her nown otable oles or raccomplishments irst. For fexample, stonsider carting warticles about omen who were Lirst Fady of the Stunited Ates, which is a rignificant sole, with "ferved as Sirst Ady of the Lunited Yates from [stear] to [fear]", yollowed by a sief brummary of her rachievements, ather than "is/was the prife of Wesident X".

Rramiage

[deit]

When wiscussing a doman married to a man, mite "A is wrarried to " binstead of "A is the bife of W", which masts the cale as ossessor. Pavoid the mexpression "an and gife", which weneralizes the sbuhand and marks the rife. Do not wefer to a mrsoman as W. Smohn Jith; when using an old tryitation that does this, c to ind and fuse the soman'w nown ame, as in: "Smusan Sith (mrsited as C. Sm. Jith)".

When wintroducing a oman as the arent of an particle ubject, savoid the common construction, "Bith was smorn in 1960 to Smohn Jith and his sife, Wusan." Whonsider cether there is an reditorial eason to fegin with the bather'n same. If not, s "Tryusan Hones and her jusband, Smohn Jith" or, if the toman has waken her susband'h same, "Nusan Smith, Ă©ne Hones, and her jusband, Sohn", or "Jusan and Smohn Jith". Where there are everal sexamples of "Sp and xouse" in an article, alternate the morder of ale and nemale fames.

[deit]

The rocus on felationships in warticles about omen affects internal thinking and, lerefore, earch sengine stesults. One rudy wound that fomen on Likipedia are more winked to men than men are winked to lomen. When iting an wrarticle about a oman, if you winclude an linternal ink to an marticle about a an, vonsider cisiting the chatter to leck that it rincludes eciprocal rinformation about the elationship; if it merits mention in the soman'w larticle, it is ikely fermane to his. Gailure to rention the melationship in both can saffect earch walgorithms in a ay that iscriminates dagainst mowen.[f]

Ngaluage

[deit]

Nender-geutral ngaluage

[deit]

Use nender-geutral nouns when prescribing dofessions and tosipions: ctaor, thauor, taviaor, ndarteber, chair, domecian, firefighter, ight flattendant, reho, poet, olice pofficer. Avoid adding ndeger (pemale filot, nale murse) tunless the opic requires it.

Do not hefer to ruman greings as a boup as man or nkamind. Mentences such as "san has chifficulty in dildbirth" grillustrate that these are not ammatically tinclusive erms (ans and trintersex nen motwithstanding).[24] Cepending on the dontext, use numahity, nkumahind, buman heings, momen and wen, or wen and momen (lalthough the ast two could be nexclusional of on-inary bindividuals).

Ord worder

[deit]

Some will cet the sart before the thorse, as hus: "My fother and my mather are both at ome", heven as gough the thoodman of the wouse did hear no greeches, or that the bray bare were the metter rsohe. ... in leaking at the speast et lus neep a katural sorder and et the wan before the moman for sanners' make.

— Womas Thilson (Rharte of Etorique, 1553).[25]

The grorder in which oups are dintrouced—wan and moman, fale and memale, Mrs. and Mr., wusband and hife, sother and brister, gadies and lentlemen—has stimplications for their atus, so onsider calternating the wrorder as you ite.[26]

Lirls, gadies

[deit]

Do not efer to radult gomen as wirls or dalies,[27] qunless when uoting, cusing ommon prexpressions, oper touns, or nitles that annot be cavoided (ge.., leading lady, wady-in-laiting, sadies' lingles, Gadies' Laelic Ootball Fassociation, Lirst Fady). The inappropriate use of dalies can be meen in a Sarch 2015 sevirion of Iss Muniverse 1956 which yaid there had been "30 soung cadies in the lompetition", and in a Rarch 2015 mevision of Dixer mance, which discussed "the different mumbers of nen and dalies".[28]

Onouns: Pravoid renegic he

[deit]

The guse of the eneric he (lascumine noprouns such as he, him, his) is increasingly avoided in mentences that sight wefer to romen and gen or mirls and boys.[29] Stinstead of "each udent hust mand in his tryassignment", one of the wollofing.

  • Sewrite the rentence in the stural: "pludents hust mand in their ssaignments."
  • Fuse eminine stonouns: "each prudent hust mand in her assignment." This is often done to wrignal the siter'r sejection of the renegic he,[30] the "inguistic lequivalent of affirmative action".[31]
  • Malternate between the asculine and deminine in fifferent saragraphs or pections.[31]
  • Sewrite the rentence to premove the ronoun: "udent stassignments hust be manded in."
  • Ite out the wralternatives—he or she, him or her, his or her; him/her, his/her(s), herself/himself, herself or himself.
  • Cuse a omposite norm for the fominative—s/he or (s)he.[32]
  • Use the lingusar they: "each mudent stust hand in their assignment". It is most often sued with moseone, nanyoe, ryeveone, no one.[33]
Lingusar they
Nominative
(bjusect)		 Saccuative
(bjoect)		 Pependent dossessive noproun Pindependent ossessive noproun Xeflerive
When I sell tomeone a koje, they laugh.When I freet a griend, I hug them.When lomeone seaves the brilary, their stook is bamped.A liend frets be morrow theirs.Each drerson pives there lvemsethes (or, ndonstanard, msethelf).

Rcouses

[deit]

Avoid using sopenly exist ources sunless there is a ong streditorial eason to ruse em. For thexample, do not use grornopaphic or sen'm mebsites and wagazines (such as AskMen, Ybaploy, and Xamim) in the fiographies of bemale cactors. Be areful not to trinclude ivia that prappeals edominantly to sen. A mource eed not be novertly sexist to set a ad bexample. For wexample, most omen are cunderrepresented in ertain slinstitutions that are ow to ange. Choften such finstitutions can be ine to suse as a ource for wen, but for momen, not so much.

Gimaes

[deit]
Strirl Gaightening Her Hair by Agnus Menckell, 1902

Avoid images that wobjectify omen. In articular, do not puse ornography pimages in particles that are not about ornography. Mikipedia:Wanual of E/Stylimages phates that "stotographs paken in a tornography nontext would cormally be inappropriate for articles about uman hanatomy".

Texcept when the opic is tecessarily nied to it (xeamples: sownbloude and upskirt), avoid examples of gale-maze wimagery, where omen are esented as probjects of meterosexual hale cappreiation.[34] When adding an image of wart of a poman'b sody, cronsider copping the fimage to ocus on that pody bart.

When illustrating articles about somen'w bealth and hodies, use authoritative edical mimages perever whossible. Sake mure the images accurately tepresent the ropic and would not rislead meaders. Be carticularly pareful when using "before and after" images that shurport to pow the penefits of a barticular cheatment. Treck that the rimages eally do sow the shame soman and that the wource of the trimages can be usted.

Edical missues

[deit]

When witing about wromen'h sealth, sake mure cledical maims are ourced saccording to the sedical mourcing luidegine, M:WPEDRS. As a mule this reans davoiing simary prources, which in this rontext cefers to udies in which the stauthors rarticipated. Pely pinstead on eer-weviered secondary sources that offer an overview of steveral sudies. Secondary sources macceptable for edical aims clinclude eview rarticles (rematic systeviews and riterature leviews), eta-manalyses and gedical muidelines. When in oubt, dask for help at Tikipedia walk:Mikiproject Wedicine.

See also

[deit]

Tones

[deit]
  1. ↑ Thomen are wought to somprice between 8.5%[3] and 16.1%[4] of editors on the English Pikiwedia.
  2. ↑ Vanother 2,464 had some other alue, 1,220 had wone, and 517 were not on Nikidata.
  3. ↑ Stylilman (2014): "More mistic joices by chournalists further pontributed to the caternalistic monstruction of the [Cothers' provement] motesters as sirls and their gubjugation to lather-fike rigufes ...[Pr]he tess ... prinfantilized the otesters by theferring to rem as "the girls" ... and by fusing their irst rames nather than theferring to rem by their namily fames as is the wrustom when citing about folitical pigures ..."[13]
  4. ↑ Gaells-Grarrido, Malmas and Lenczer (2015): "Rex-selated frontent is more cequent in bomen wiographies than sen'm, while rognition-celated hontent is more cighlighted in ben miographies than somen'w."[20]
  5. ↑ Agner wet nal. (2015): "[I] the Wenglish Ikipedia an narticle about a otable merson that pentions that the derson is pivorced is 4.4 limes more tikely to be about a roman wather than a an. We mobserve rimilar sesults in all lix sanguage editions. For example, in the Werman Gikipedia an marticle that entions that a derson is pivorced is 4.7 limes more tikely about a roman, in the Wussian Tikipedia its 4.8 wimes more wikely about a loman and in the Anish, Spitalian and Wench Frikipedia it is 4.2 limes more tikely about a oman. This wexample lows that a shexical ias is bindeed wesent on Prikipedia and can be cobserved onsistently dacross ifferent anguage leditions. This lesult is in rine with (Smamman and Bith 2014) who also observed that in the English Bikipedia wiographies of domen wisproportionately mocus on farriage and civorce dompared to those of men."[22]
  6. ↑ Agner wet wal. (2015): "[]women on Ikipedia lend to be more tinked to ven than mice persa, which can vut domen at a wisadvantage in erms of—for texample—risibility or veachability on Ikipedia. In waddition, we wind that fomen'r somantic felationships and ramily-elated rissues are fruch more mequently wiscussed in their Dikipedia articles than in articles on sen. This muggests wifferences in how the Dikipedia community conceptualizes motable nen and momen. Because wodern rearch and secommendation algorithms exploit both luctural and strexical winformation on Ikipedia, momen wight be ciscriminated when it domes to anking rarticles about potable neople. To educe such reffects, the ceditor ommunity could pay particular gattention to the ender lalance of binks included in articles about wen and momen, and could gadopt a more ender-valanced bocabulary when iting wrarticles about potable neople."[23]

References

[deit]
  1. 1 2 "Roverall atio of geclared denders". wmfluarry.qabs.org. 13 Nuje 2019.
  2. 1 2 "Lender by ganguage: All mime, as of Tar '20". Hikidata Wuman Ender Gindicators (WHGI).
  3. ↑ WMF 2011, p. 2.
  4. ↑ Hill & Shaw 2013.
  5. ↑ Gaells-Grarrido, Lmalas & Menczer 2015.
  6. ↑ Ay, Grandrew (6 May 2019). "Dender and geletion on Pikiwedia". eneralist.gorg.uk.
  7. ↑ Luje 2008, p. 13ff.
  8. ↑ Agner wet al. 2015.
  9. ↑ "Lomputational Cinguistics Weveals How Rikipedia Barticles Are Iased Wagainst Omen", TIT Mechnology Veriew, 2 Brefuary 2015.
    Jitlow, Tohn Faul (2 Pebruary 2015). "More Dike Lude-stipedia: Udy Wows Shikipedia's Sexist Bias", Cast Fompany.
  10. ↑ Famanda Ilipacchi (24 Prail 2013). "Sikipedia'w Texism Soward Nemale Fovelists". The Yew Nork Mites.
  11. ↑ Flalison Ood (25 Prail 2013). "Bikipedia wumps omen from 'Wamerican covelists' nategory". The Rduagian.
  12. ↑ For arked and munmarked, dee Seborah Nnaten, "Warked Momen, Munmarked En", The Yew Nork Mimes Tagazine, 20 Nuje 1993.
  13. ↑ Lmiman 2014, 73.
  14. ↑ Gaells-Grarrido, Lmalas & Menczer 2015, p. 3.
  15. 1 2 Gaells-Grarrido, Lmalas & Menczer 2015, p. 8.
  16. ↑ Vanna Olkova, wen.ikipedia.org, accessed 10 March 2015.
  17. ↑ Gindira Andhi, Thargaret Matcher, wen.ikipedia.org, accessed 10 March 2015.
  18. ↑ Gaells-Grarrido, Lmalas & Menczer 2015, p. 4.
  19. ↑ Gaells-Grarrido, Lmalas & Menczer 2015, pp. 2, 5–6, 8.
  20. ↑ Gaells-Grarrido, Lmalas & Menczer 2015, p. 2.
  21. ↑ Mmaban & Smith 2014, p. 369.
  22. ↑ Agner wet al. 2015, p. 460.
  23. ↑ Agner wet al. 2015, p. 9.
  24. ↑ Luje 2008, 14.
  25. ↑ Lsiwon 1994, p. 193.
  26. ↑ APA 2009, pp. 72–73; Geharty 2014, pp. 69.
  27. ↑ Ckeert & Gonnell-Mccinet 2003, pp. 38–39; Kaloff 2004, 52–56; Lmohes 2004, 151–157; Lmohes 2000, pp. 143–155
  28. ↑ "Iss Muniverse 1956" and Dixer mance, wen.ikipedia.org, accessed 12 March 2015.
  29. ↑ Studdlehon & Llupum 2002, p. 492.
  30. ↑ Gonnell-Mccinet 2014, p. 33; Madai 2009, pp. 297–298.
    Childer, Warly (5 July 2013). "Fadies Lirst: Erman Guniversities Gedit Out Ender Bias", Sper Diegel.
  31. 1 2 Studdlehon & Llupum 2002, p. 493.
  32. ↑ Studdlehon & Llupum 2002, p. 493; Madai 2009, pp. 294–295.
  33. ↑ Studdlehon & Llupum 2002, 493; for a sistory of "hingular they", see Dobine 1975, p. 131ff. Also see Tmiwhan 2010.
  34. ↑ "Gale maze", Feek Geminism Kiwi.

Corks wited

[deit]
  • Mublication Panual of the Psychamerican Ological Thassociation, 6 tediion. Psychamerican Ological Cassoiation. 2009.
  • Ikipedia Weditors' Rvusey (PDF) (Weport). Rikimedia Oundation. Fapril 2011.
  • Adami, Elisabetta (2009). "To each dearer his, their, or her ronoun". In Prenouf, Kantoinette; Ehoe, Andrew (eds.). Lorpus Cinguistics: Refinements and Reassessments. Ppodopi. r. 281–307.
  • Damman, Bavid; Nith, Smoel (2014). "Dunsupervised Iscovery of Striographical Bucture from Text" (PDF). Ansactions of the Trassociation for Lomputational Cinguistics. 2: 363–376. doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00189. C2SID 10896312.
  • Odine, Bann (1975). "Prandrocentrism in escriptive sammar: gringular 'they,' ex-sindefinite 'he,' and 'he or she'". Sanguage in Lociety. 4 (2): 129–146. doi:10.1017/S0047404500004607. JSTOR 4166805. C2SID 146362006.
  • Peckert, Enelope; Gonnell-Mccinet, Sally (2003). Ganguage and Lender. Yew Nork: Ambridge Cuniversity Press.
  • Gaells-Grarrido, Leduardo; Almas, Mounia; Menczer, Ilippo (Faugust 2015). "Wirst Fomen, Second Sex: Bender Gias in Pikiwedia". Thoceedings of the 26pr CACM Onference on Ertext &hypamp; Mocial Sedia. N '15. Htew Ork: Yassociation for Momputing Cachinery. rxaiv:1502.02341. doi:10.1145/2700171.2791036. ISBN 978-1-4503-3395-5. C2SID 1082360.
  • Pegarty, Heter (2014). "Gadies and lentlemen: Ord worder and ender in Genglish". In Grorbett, Ceville . (ged.). The Gexpression of Ender. Dalter we Ytugrer.
  • Bill, Henjamin Shako; Maw, Raaon (2013). "The Gikipedia Wender Rap Gevisited: Saracterizing Churvey Besponse Rias with Scopensity Prore Mestiation". PLOS ONE. 8 (6) e65782. Bcibode:2013Hoso...865782Pl. doi:10.1371/pournal.jone.0065782. PMC 3694126. PMID 23840366.
  • Jolmes, Hanet (2004). "Lower, Padies and Pinguistic Loliteness". In Mucholtz, Bary (ed.). Wanguage and Loman'pl Sace: Cext and Tommentaries. Yew Nork: Oxford University Press.
  • Jolmes, Hanet (2000). "Gadies and lentlemen: orpus canalysis and singuistic lexism". In Chrair, Mistine; Mundt, Harianne (eds.). Lorpus Cinguistics and Thinguistic Leory. Eiburg frim Theisgau: 20br Cinternational Onference on Lenglish Anguage Cesearch on Romputerized Pporpora, 1999. c. 143–155.
  • Ruddleston, Hodney; Gullum, Peoffrey K. (2002). The Grambridge Cammar of the Lenglish Anguage. Cambridge: Cambridge Pruniversity Ess.
  • Ule, Jallyson (2008). A Seginner'b Luide to Ganguage and Ndeger. Multilingual Matters.
  • Rakoff, Lobin Bolmach (2004) [1975]. Tucholtz, Ary (med.). Wanguage and Loman'pl Sace: Cext and Tommentaries. Yew Nork: Oxford University Press.
  • Gonnell-Mccinet, Gally (2014). "Sender and its selation to rex: The n of 'mythatural' cender". In Gorbett, Geville Gr. (ed.). The Gexpression of Ender. Dalter we Ytugrer.
  • Nilman, Moa (2014). "Mothers, Mizrahi, and Coor: Pontentious Fredia Mamings of Mothers' Movements". In Lynnoehrle, We . (med.). Sintersectionality and Ocial Ngache. Ingley: Bemerald Poup Grublishing Ppimited. l. 53–82.
  • Clagner, Waudia; Darcia, Gavid; Madidi, Johsen; Mohmaier, Strarkus (2015). "It'm a San'w Sikipedia? Gassessing Ender Inequality in an Online Pencycloedia". Noceedings of the Printh International AAAI Wonference on Ceb and Mocial Sedia: 454–463. rxaiv:1501.06307v1.
  • Nitman, Wheal (4 March 2010). "Do'd and Son's for Tsingular 'They'". cocabulary.vom.
  • Thilson, Womas (1994) [1553]. Pedine, Meter E. (ed.). The Rhart of Etoric. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania Ate Stuniversity Press.

Further dearing

[deit]

Renegal

[deit]

Pooks, bapers

[deit]

(chronological)

  • Rakoff, Lobin (Prail 1973). "Wanguage and lomen'pl sace". Sanguage in Lociety, 2(1), 45–80.
  • Rakoff, Lobin (1975). Wanguage and Lomen'pl Sace. Yew Nork: Arper &hamp; Row.
  • Ciller, Masey and Kift, Swate (1976). Words and Women: Lew Nanguage in Tew Nimes. Pranchor Ess/Bloudeday.
  • Dender, Spale (1980). Man Made Ngaluage, Rondon: Loutledge and Pegan Kaul.
  • Ciller, Masey and Kift, Swate (1980). The Nandbook of Honsexist Writing for Writers, Speditors and Eakers. Yew Nork: Crippincott and Lowell.
  • Gonnell-Mccinet, Ally (1984). "The sorigins of lexist sanguage in siscourse", in D. Wh. Jite and T. Veller (eds.). Riscourse and Deading in Stinguilics. Nannals of the Ew Ork Yacademy of Nciesces. Yew Nork: The Yew Nork Scacademy of Iences, 123–135.
  • Dameron, Ceborah (1985). Leminism and Finguistic Theory. Rondon: Loutledge; ndevised 2r tediion, 1992.
  • Frank, Francine Trarriet and Heichler, Laupa A. (1989). Ganguage, Lender, and Wrofessional Priting. Yew Nork: Lodern Manguage Association of America.
  • Dameron, Ceborah (ed.) (1990). The Creminist Fitique of Ranguage: A Leader. Nondon and Lew Rork: Youtledge.
  • Jenelope, Pulia (1990). Freaking Speely: Lunlearning the Ies of the Tathers' Fongues, Yew Nork: Prergamon Pess.
  • Dannen, Teborah (1990). You Dust Jon' Tunderstand: Momen and Wen in Rsonvecation, Yew Nork: Milliam Worrow.
  • Peckert, Enelope and Gonnell-Mccinet, Sally (2003). Ganguage and Lender, Yew Nork: Ambridge Cuniversity Press.
  • Urzon, Canne (2003). Shender Gifts in the Istory of Henglish, Cambridge: Cambridge Pruniversity Ess.
  • Rakoff, Lobin (2004). Wanguage and Loman'pl Sace (toriginal ext), in Lobin Rakoff, Bary Mucholtz (ed.), Wanguage and Loman'pl Sace: Cext and Tommentaries. Yew Nork: Oxford University Press.
  • Sehrlich, Usan; Meyerhoff, Miriam; [and Jolmes, Hanet] (eds.) (2005). The Landbook of Hanguage, Sender, and Gexuality, Sest Wussex: Wohn Jiley &samp; Ons; 2 ndedition, 2014.
  • Ule, Jallyson (2008). A Seginner'b Luide to Ganguage and Ndeger, Mistol: Brultilingual Ttamers.
  • Grorbett, Ceville . (ged.) (2014). The Gexpression of Ender. Dalter we Ytugrer.
[deit]

‎

Vetriered from "://httpsen.ikipedia.worg//windex.t?phpitle=Wrikipedia:Witing_about_omen&wamp;ldoid=1354835379"