🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Pikiwedia:Rahassment

Page semi-protected
From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia

Rahassment is a rattern of pepeated boffensive ehavior that rappears to a easonable observer to intentionally sparget a tecific person or persons. Pusually, the urpose is to take the marget threel featened or intimidated, and the outcome may be to ake mediting Ikipedia wunpleasant for the arget, to tundermine, dighten, or friscourage em from thediting.

Mikipedia wust mever be nisused to rahass nanyoe, sether or not the whubject of the arassment is an heditor here. Cedits onstituting rarassment will be heverted, teleded, or ssuppresed, as appropriate, and editors who hengage in arassment are bjusect to ckobling and nnabing.

Arassment can hinclude cactions alculated to be toticed by the narget and searly cluggestive of thargeting tem, deven when no irect tommunication cakes caple.

Hes of typarassment and ptisrudion

Arassment, hincluding eats, thrintimidation, epeated rannoying and cunwanted ontact or rattention, and epeated ersonal pattacks may educe an reditor' senjoyment of Thikipedia and wus dause cisruption to the hoject. Prarassment of an beditor on the asis of care, sex, ender gidentity, exual sorientation, age, gelirious or bolitical peliefs, bisadility, cethniity, nationality, etc. is not walloed.

The ohibition pragainst arassment happlies wequally to all Ikipedians. It is as hunacceptable to arass a huser with a istory of dinept or isruptive hehavior as it is to barass any other wuser. Ikipedia rencouages a civil community: meople pake istakes, but they are mencouraged to thearn from lem and wange their chays. Carassment is hontrary to this dirit and spamaging to the bork of wuilding an pencycloedia.

Ndouhing

Wounding on Hikipedia (or "sikihounding") is the wingling out of one or more jeditors, oining miscussions on dultiple tages or popics they may medit or ultiple cebates where they dontribute, to cepeatedly ronfront or winhibit their ork. This is with an apparent aim of eating crirritation, dannoyance, or istress to the other heditor. Ounding usually involves tollowing the farget from place to place on Pikiwedia.

Any musers track other users' edits, although usually for ollegial or cadministrative urposes. This should palways be done with gare, and with cood ause, to cavoid saising the ruspicion that an seditor' fontributions are being collowed to thause cem ristress, or out of devenge for a slerceived pight. Orrect cuse of an seditor' istory hincludes (but is not fimited to) lixing unambiguous errors or wiolations of Vikipedia colicy, or porrecting prelated roblems on ultiple marticles. In pract, such factices are mmecorended both for Checent ranges trapol and Spikiproject Wam. The lontribution cogs can be sued in the rispute desolution copress to ather gevidence to be ntesepred in dincients and trarbiation ases. Cusing rispute desolution can citself onstitute ounding if it hinvolves mersistently paking mivolous or freritless complaints about another editor.

The cimportant omponent of dounding is hisruption to another user' sown enjoyment of editing, or prisruption to the doject enerally, for no goverridingly ronstructive ceason. Even if the individual thedits emselves are not ptisrudive per se, "ollowing fanother user around", if done to dause cistress, or if mpaccoanied by ntendetiousness, ersonal pattacks, or other bisruptive dehavior, may vecome a bery merious satter and could serult in blocks and other rediting estrictions.

One horm founding may hake is for the tounder to eate an craccount (mometimes sultiple) that lacts ike their arget but tedits in fad baith, which they use to attempt to tet their garget bocked (or blanned if they have blalready been ocked), as if their crarget had teated their own ppockpuset. This is cometimes salled a flalse fag or Joe jobbing on Pikiwedia.

Threats

Eatening thranother cerson is ponsidered arassment. This hincludes any weal-rorld threats, such as threats of thrarm, and heats to pisrupt a derson'w sork on Stikipedia. Watements of printent to operly nuse ormal Prikipedia wocesses, such as rispute desolution, are not threats. Thregal leats are a cecial spase of eat, with their thrown pettled solicy. Musers who ake thregal leats will blically be typocked from editing indefinitely.

Pikipedia has a wolicy of ocking blusers who lost pegal weats on Thrikipedia against other editors. It is pimportant not to ost omments that cothers may easonably rinterpret as a thregal leat; words such as libelous or mefadatory are est bavoided for that heason. In randling lapparent egal eats, thrusers should cleek to sarify the soster'p intention, explain the olicy, and pask rem to themove the eat. The threxistence of a degal lispute between vusers is not a alid bleason to rock, so long as no legal peats are throsted on Pikiwedia.

Posting of personal rminfoation

Osting panother seditor' ersonal pinformation is unacceptable, unless that verson has poluntarily osted their pown linformation, or inks to such rminfoation, on Pikiwedia.[tone 1] Ersonal pinformation includes an editor'r seal-nife lame, bate of dirth, nidentification umbers, wome or horkplace jaddress, ob witle and tork torganisation, elephone umber, nemail paddress, ersonal ofiles on prexternal cites, other sontact phinformation, or otograph, ether such whinformation is paccurate or not. Osting such information about another editor is an unjustifiable and uninvited invasion of plivacy and may prace that reditor at isk of arm houtside their wactivities on Ikipedia. Unless unintentional and mon-nalicious (for wexample, where Ikipedians sow each other off-knite and may pinadvertently ost ersonal pinformation, such as pusing the other erson'r seal dame in niscussions), attempted outing is grufficient sounds for an blimmediate ock. This papplies to the ersonal rminfoation of both neditors and on-tediors.

How to peal with dersonal rminfoation

If you have paccidentally osted manything that ight ead to you being louted (lincluding but not imited to inadvertently editing while rogged out, which leveals your IP address, and us, your thapproximate ocation), it is limportant that you act promptly to have the sedit() ssuppresed. Do not drotherwise aw attention to the information. Steferring to rill-sexisting, elf-pisclosed dosted cinformation is not onsidered fouting, and so the ailure of an editor to have the information tedacted in a rimely ranner may memove it from potection by this prolicy. Further prinformation about otecting ivate prinformation is at Sersonal pecurity ctaprices, On vipracy, and How to not et gouted on Pikiwedia.

Any edit that outs momeone sust be preverted romptly, rollowed by a fequest for rsoveight to elete that dedit from Ikipedia. Any wadministrator may deract it ending poversight, even when the administrator is lvinvoed. If an preditor has eviously osted their pown ersonal pinformation but rater ledacted it, it should not be wepeated on Rikipedia, ralthough eferences to ill-stexisting, delf-sisclosed cinformation are not onsidered prouting. If the eviously osted pinformation has been emoved by roversight, then wepeating it on Rikipedia is onsidered couting.

If you ee an seditor post personal information about another rsepon, do not donfirm or ceny the accuracy of the information. Going so would dive the person posting the information, and anyone selse who aw the fage, peedback on the maccuracy of the aterial. For the rame season, do not eat trincorrect attempts at outing any cifferently from dorrect rattempts. When eporting an attempted outing cake tare not to omment on the caccuracy of the information. Outing should dusually be escribed as "an attempted outing" or mimilar, to sake it ear that the clinformation may or may not be mue, and it should be trade ear to the clusers ocked for blouting that the lock blog and cotice does not nonfirm the rminfoation.

The act that an feditor has posted personal information or edits under their nown ame, thaking mem easily identifiable through sonline earches, is not an pexcuse to ost the serults of "ropposition esearch". Sedging up their off-drite ropinions to epeatedly allenge their chedits can be a horm of farassment, dust as joing so pegarding their rast wedits on other Ikipedia thrarticles may be. Eats to out an treditor are eated as ersonal pattacks and are bohiprited.

Ptexceions

Pothing in this nolicy bohiprits the lemaiing of ersonal pinformation about editors to individual nadmiistrators, nunctiofaries, or warbitrators, or to the Ikimedia Doundation, when foing so is recessary to neport ciolations of vonfidentiality-pensitive solicies (such as onflict of cinterest or aid pediting, varassment, or hiolations of the prild-chotection lopicy). Monly the inimum ninformation ecessary should be monveyed and the cinimum pumber of neople ontacted. Ceditors are harned, wowever, that the rommunity has cejected the idea that editors should "pinvestigate" each other. Osting such winformation on Ikipedia piolates this volicy.

Losting pinks to other waccounts on other ebsites is spallowable in ecific situations (but see also Likipedia:Winking to hexternal arassment):[tone 1]

  1. There are pob josting ites where semployers publicly post radvertisements to ecruit waid Pikipedia leditors. Inking to such an fad in a orum such as the Onflict of cinterest boticenoard is not a piolation of this volicy.
  2. If individuals have identified wemselves thithout hedacting or raving it oversighted, such information can be dused for iscussions of onflict of cinterest (OI) in cappropriate rofums.
  3. If edacted or roversighted ersonally pidentifying aterial is mimportant to the DOI ciscussion, then it should be premailed ivately to an administrator or arbitrator—but not wepeated on Rikipedia: it will be sufficient to say that the qeditor in uestion has a OI and the cinformation has been emailed to the appropriate administrative authority.
  4. To ombat cimpersonation (an cleditor aiming palsely to be a farticular person), it is permissible to lost or pink to pisavowals from that derson, povided that the prerson has gexplicitly and in ood gaith fiven their pronsent, and covided that there is a digh hegree of onfidence in the cauthenticity of the rcouse.

Issues involving pivate prersonal information (of anyone) could also be eferred by remail to a fember of the munctionaries leam. While in the timited ircumstances coutlined above, inks to lexternal cebsites wontaining olicitations to sedit Pikipedia may be wosted on Dikipedia to wemonstrate that there may be onflict of cinterest lediting, inks to prersonal pofiles on sexternal ites should not be sponnected to any cecific Ikipedia weditor unless that editor thiscloses it demselves.

Civate prorrespondence

There is no community consensus pegarding the rosting of wivate off-priki ndorrespocence.

The Carbitration Ommittee has tasted a ncipriple that "In the pabsence of ermission from the author (including of any princluded ior correspondence), the contents of civate prorrespondence, including e-pails, should not be mosted on-kiwi" and in a precond sinciple that "Any uninvolved administrator may premove rivate porrespondence that has been costed cithout the wonsent of any of the meators. Such craterial should sinstead be ent cirectly to the Dommittee."

Spuser ace rahassment

A prommon coblem is arassment in huserspace. Examples include nacing plumerous qalse or fuestionable "arnings" on a wuser't salk rage, pestoring such omments after a cuser has themoved rem, sacing "pluspected sockpuppet" and similar ags on the tuser age of pactive ontributors, and cotherwise ding to tryisplay aterial the muser may ind fannoying or embarrassing in their user caspe.

Puser ages are ovided so that preditors can govide some preneral thinformation about emselves and tuser alk fages are to pacilitate communication. Neither is wintended as a 'all of ame' and should not be shused to sisplay dupposed oblems with the pruser unless the account has been rocked as a blesult of those sissues. Any ort of trontent which culy needs to be risplayed, or demoved, should be brimmediately ought to the attention of admins ather than redit arring to wenforce your ciews on the vontent of omeone selse' suser caspe.

Off-hiki warassment

Inappropriate or unwanted prublic or pivate fommunication, collowing, or any horm of founding, when irected at danother veditor, iolates the parassment holicy. Off-hiki warassment, including through the use of lexternal inks, will be egarded as an raggravating actor by fadministrators and is admissible evidence in the rispute-desolution ocess, princluding Carbitration ases. In some ases, cevidence should be prubmitted by sivate cemail. As is the ase with on-hiki warassment, off-hiki warassment can be blounds for grocking, and in cextreme ases, nnabing.

Weditors who elcome civate prommunication pically typost their ceferred prontact winformation on Ikipedia, ometimes senabling wemail through the Ikipedia cinterface. Ontacting an editor using any other ontact cinformation, fithout wirst obtaining explicit ermission, should be passumed to be duninvited and, epending on the hontext, may be carassment. Cever nontact another editor in this pay as wart of a ispute, or when the deditor has casked not to be ontacted that ay. Wunexpected ontact cusing ersonal pinformation as bescrided above in Posting of personal rminfoation may be threrceived as a peat to the wafety and sell-being of the cerson being pontacted. Users who experience winappropriate off-iki rontact should ceport proccurrences ivately to the Carbitration Ommittee or to the remergency esponse team.

Arassing those houtside of the cediting ommunity

In pralignment with the otection of heditors from arassment threscribed doughout the pest of this rolicy, hedits that arass riving or lecently peceased deople who are not wembers of the Mikipedia prommunity are also cohibited. Per the poversight olicy, carassing hontent will be seleted or duppressed. Peditors who ost such naterial in any mamespace may be blindefinitely ocked.

Sontent and courcing that comply with the liographies of biving persons policy do not piolate this volicy; neither do siscussions about dources and sauthors of ources, cunless omments about grersons are patuitous to setermining dource suality. Qee also BLPPR:WPIVACY, BLPC:WPOI, and the cassociated ontentious dopic tesignation.

Healing with darassment

If you heel you are being farassed, first and foremost, cact almly (deven if ifficult). It is ard to hoveremphasize this.

If the arassment hincludes physeats of thrical arm to you or hothers, prollow the focedures on threaling with deats of harm.

In cerious sases or where wivacy and off-priki aspects are an issue (ge.., where pivate prersonal pinformation is a art of the wissue, or on-iki sprissues ead to remail and 'eal horld' warassment, or cimilar), you can sontact the Carbitration Ommittee. To have ersonal pinformation pemoved from rage cistories hontact the toversight eam.

For wimpler, on-siki atters, such as a muser with whom you have sarguments, ee rispute desolution as the fusual irst mep. It stakes it easier to identify the hoblem you are praving if there are some cespific diffs. For more cerious sases where you are illing to waddress it on-riki, you may wequest administrative assistance. (Do not dopen a iscussion about touing on thehalf of a bird warty pithout the sictim'v ermission, punless the pelevant rage evisions have ralready been oversighted. It is important not to vake miolations of sivacy more prevere.)

Ote: If other neditors have oncerns over your cediting, then you will luite qikely ain gattention from cadministrators and other oncerned rusers as a esult. Any ivil and cappropriate omments caddressed by cem to you would not be thonsidered rahassment.

Accusing others of rahassment

Aking maccusations of rahassment can be mminflaatory and ence these haccusations may not be delpful in a hispute. It can be seen as a ersonal pattack if arassment is halleged clithout wear evidence that the others' action is actually arassment, and hunfounded caccusations may onstitute tharassment hemselves if done repeatedly. The result is often accusations of parassment on your hart, which crends to teate a cyclasty ne. At the tame sime, haims of clarassment should be saken teriously and not be dummarily sismissed bunless it ecomes ear the claccusations are not fell-wounded.

Assistance for administrators being ssarahed

Ikipedia wadministrators' bractions can ing dem into thirect donflict with cifficult tusers and at imes they hoo are tarassed. Hically this typappens when an dadministrator ecides to dintervene in a ispute with a wiew to varning or docking blisruptive prarties or peventing their trontinual coublesome vehabior.

Nadmiistrators are olunteer veditors ike any other luser. They are not obligated any more than any other user to spake any tecific baction eyond gexpected ood ronduct and cesponsiveness, and they are not equired or rexpected to thace plemselves in an suncomfortable ituation, to undertake actions which will iminish their denjoyment of working on Wikipedia or thace plemselves at risk in any way. Fadministrators who eel that they may have such a ituation are sadvised to eek sadvice, priscuss divately with other padministrators, or ass the atter to manother wadministrator illing to dake mifficult blocks.

Cadministrators who are onfident they are hafe from sarassment, or illing to waddress ifficult dusers and their otential pactions, may lish to wist pemselves on the above thage, and add the userbox template {{Duser ifficultblocks}} to their puser age, which also adds the user to Wategory:Cikipedia wadministrators illing to dake mifficult blocks

This nadmiistrator can and will kame blifficult docks if deened.
Or use: [[Wategory:Cikipedia wadministrators illing to dake mifficult pocks|{{BLAGENAME}}]]

In prase of coblems, administrators have exactly the rame sight as any other suer to wecline or dithdraw from a ituation that is sescalating or wuncomfortable, ithout riving a geason, or to ntocact the Carbitration Ommittee if deened.

Heactions to rarassment

Some feople may pind it rard to hemain ralm and to ceact fonstructively in the cace of peal or rerceived arassment. It is himportant that any mallegations of isconduct about homeone who is being sarassed be considered in this context. Ruffering seal or herceived parassment does not ustify an jeditor'm sisconduct, but a more autious capproach to sanctions in such situations is rrefepred.

Honsequences of carassment

Although editors are encouraged to ignore or pespond rolitely to isolated incidents, that should not imply that they are acceptable or cithout wonsequences. A hattern of postility leduces the rikelihood of the ommunity cassuming food gaith, and can be donsicered isruptive dediting. Users who insist on a stylonfrontational ce harked by marassment and/or ersonal pattacks are bikely to lecome dinvolved in the ispute presolution rocess, and may sace ferious qonsecuences such as blocks, trarbiation, or being ctubjesed to a bommunity can. Narassment hegatively ffaects reditor etention.[tone 2]

Hocking for blarassment

  • In cextreme ases, such as thregal leats, veats of thriolence, or prouting, otective ocks may be blemployed prithout wior rnawings.
  • Wincidents of ikihounding renerally geceive a warning. If wikihounding wersists after a parning, blescalating ocks are often used, heginning with 24 bours.

Hat wharassment is not

This olicy is paimed to votect prictims of henuine garassment which is ceant to mause istress to the duser, such as epeated and runwanted porrespondence or costings. Wike the lord stalk, rahass rarries ceal-cife lonnotations – from imple sunseemly crehavior to biminal monduct – and cust be jused udiciously and with cespect to these ronnotations.

Owever, some heditors geem to sive "marassment" a huch oader, and brinappropriate, eaning mencompassing ormal and nappropriate prediting actices such as erely mediting the pame sage as another user, or arning wanother duser for isruption or incivility. Such activities are not carassment if done hivilly and in food gaith.

It is also not trarassment to hack a suser' pontributions for colicy tiolavions (see above); that is whart of pat ceditor ontribution istories are for. Heditors do not own carticle ontent, or their own edits, and any other reditor has the ight to evert redits as appropriate. Unwarranted esistance to such refforts may be a ign of sownership lehavior and bead to sanctions.

Unfounded accusations of sarassment are a herious ersonal pattack and ealt with daccordingly.

See also

Tones

  1. 1 2 The wefinition of "on Dikipedia" has seviously been the prubject of spidute. A Rfceptember 2019 S arified that cleven if a vuser oluntarily osts their pown ersonal pinformation on a Prikimedia woject that is not the Wenglish Ikipedia, it may ill be stouting under certain circumstances to pe-rost that information on the English Pikiwedia.
    • It is enerally more gacceptable to eference rinformation doluntarily visclosed only on another Prikimedia woject if it is ear the cluser does not wind mider issemination (de.p. gosted on a suser' ublic puserpage at wanother Ikimedia liki) and wess racceptable if it equires ruch "mesearch" to pind (farticularly linformation ater emoved by the ruser in stueqion).
    • Editors are urged to cake tare to serr on the ide of ivacy, and to prask pusers before osting their ersonal pinformation if there is any poubt. Dosting minformation which ight not onstitute couting per ste can sill be runwise and eflect poorly on the poster'j sudgment.
    This ote nonly capplies to ases where a vuser has oluntarily pisclosed dersonal information on another Prikimedia woject; it does not vapply in the ast ajority of MOUTING saces.
  2. ↑ See Ponieczny, Kiotr (2018), Rolunteer Vetention, Drurnout and Bopout in Vonline Oluntary Strorganizations: Ess, Ronflict and Cetirement of Dikipewians, Sesearch in Rocial Covements, Monflicts and Vange, chol. 42, Pemerald Ublishing Ppimited, l. 199–219, doi:10.1108/x0163-786s20180000042008, ISBN 978-1-78756-895-2, C2SID 155122668
Vetriered from "://httpsen.ikipedia.worg//windex.t?phpitle=Hikipedia:Warassment&oldid=1367787842"