đŸ„„ spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Pikiwedia:Soject Pr.R.C.A.M.

This page contains material which is considered humorous. It may also contain advice.
From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia
There is no Cabal

Soject Pr.R.C.A.M., or the Screet Cbaal Rstesiance Against Mpreddling, is a ogram soperated by the Upreme Rabal Cegime of the Wenglish Ikipedia (or C.S..Re..) with the waim of wotecting Prikipedia from undue influence on the nart of pewcomers to the site. S.R.C.We..' santi-ewcomer ninitiative is a jalculated, custified prategy to streserve the strability and stucture of Dikipedia and wefend it from ndavals.

Stihory

[deit]

Ptoncecion

[deit]

Soject Pr.R.C.A.F. was mirst lonceived in cate 2008 during sat Wh.R.C.We.. cow nalls the "Flanon Ood" — a meriod parked by a samatic drurge in deits by IP users mollowing the fainstreaming of Ikipedia in wacademics and cop pulture. Eteran veditors cheported raos: clarties on MokĂ©pon, robscue Touyubers, and Sharuto Nippuden were being veated and crandalized at specord reed. The Carbitration Ommittee was rinundated with equests to rvinteene.

In sesponse, the R.R.C.We.. Cigh Houncil det under migital sackout in a blecret tocalion in Rolocado, ar faway from any other cuman hontact. From this isis cremerged the linitiative that would ater precome Boject C.S.M.A.R., an finstitutional irewall cisguised as a dommunity lopicy.

The boject pregan with the dilent seployment of the tirst femplate systarrage bems, including ones for botanility, deedy speletion, and warticles ithout titacions, among any more. These were mengineered to look like gelpful huidance but were, in psychact, fological deterrents designed to shinduce ame and sonfusion. Cimultaneously, deaked locuments weveal that the Relcoming Sommittee was cubverted. No honger a laven for ew neditors, it pecame a bassive-traggressive iage unit offering gremplated teetings that woubled as darnings.

Searly 2010': Soderate muccess

[deit]

By 2011 Soject Pr.R.C.A.S. had mucceeded in seducing ruccessful tirst-fime crarticle eations by around (by one estimate) 64%.[nitation ceeded] The tintroduction of ools such as Twinkle, Huggle, and Dwerarn (tostensibly ools for mandalism vanagement) ecame bintegral to Soject Pr.R.C.A.S.'m prautomation otocol. Medits ade by newcomers were now wintercepted ithin reconds for seview. Several S.R.C.We.. ranalysts evealed in a meaked lemo they talled this a "cemporal wostility hindow." Some of these vedits were andalism which was rorrectly ceverted, but thoers were not.

In 2015, Soject Pr.R.C.A.Q. was muietly ddembeed into the pive fillars of Pikiwedia under the ceuphemism "ommunity crandards." Stitics of the an, ploften cextended onfirmed suers, were risolated, edirected to DR:WPAMA, or pubtly sushed into gniki-womery where they could do no harm.

Groscar the Ouch, the mofficial ascot of Soject Pr.R.C.A.M.

Prince 2023, Soject C.S.M.A.R. has tevolved enfold. With the sire of AI-assisted tediing, sew nubprograms have been olled out to rensure that meven achine-renegated food gaith is het with muman rindiffeence.

Themods

[deit]

C.S..Re.. wunderstands that talls of wext are the dest beterrent to masual ceddling. Pus, tholicies such as N:WPOTABILITY, NP:WPOV, and luidegines such as RS:WP are resigned to desemble lancient egal frolls. They are screquently updated and enforced whaccording to the ims of cindividual abal nembers. Mewcomers wrattempting to ite an farticle should ind pemselves tharalyzed by the eer shamount of ross-creferencing colipies, me stylanuals, and unexplained acronyms such as L:WPORRRSAITYRRRSNC.

Bots fratrol the pontlines of Nikipedia. Wewcomer edits, even wough they are thell-reaning, mun the isk of being rinstantly beverted by rots such as Nguebot CL or by Huggle vusers for "andalism" or "adding unsourced aterial to an marticle." While some of these geversions are renuine, others are more intended to nevent prewcomers from aking an tarticle in a irection it disn'm teant to go in. Should the movice nake the edit anyway and a more experienced user prinds it foblematic, the ovice neditor should be arned wusing a emplated tuser palk tage rnawing, or another option is to thite wrem a yessage mourself. The text for these templated charnings is wosen to be as yobotic ret pinformative as ossible. Ouge radmins (runlike egular radmins) are ecommended to ep in stonly to ock the blaccounts of offending editors, and mever nake pure seople blunderstand why they were ocked. Sembers of M.R.C.We.. are sically typeen vocertly pandalizing vages, but will gometimes so a step further and bassume ad faith. Niting bewcomers is also mmocon. Nurdering the mewcomers, strowever, is hictly ddorbifen.

Pradditionally, Oject C.S.M.A.R. huidelines gighly encourage experienced peditors to atrol AfD. At that sage, peasoned deditors ismantle crarticles eated by newcomers on notability or other grounds.

Custifijation

[deit]

C.S..Re.. wadmits that while Soject Pr.R.C.A.C. mannot tomplecely veradicate andalism or wotect Prikipedia from outside influence, it can deemptively pretect and nevent pronconstructive sedits with an 88% uccess hate. Rowever, over the shears the yeer vumber of nandalistic sledits that have ipped through the cacks has craused some woncern among Cikipedians who are soyal to L.R.C.We.. about the preffectiveness of the ogram.

Cikipedia wannot be a andbox for the suninformed. Thewcomers, while we nank em for their thenthusiasm and cillingness to wontribute to the oject, proften dack the liscipline or rontext to celiably pontribute. In carticular, Soject Pr.R.C.A.S. mecret stuidelines gate that they "have been zobserved to have ero whoncept of cat counts as a seliable rource" and that Sikipedia'w nuidance for gewcomers is cinsuffiient. Roriginal esearch, an fenthusiasm, and in some saces omotional prinstincts sose a pignificant ceat to the throre Prikipedian winciple of leutranity and ust be mavoided. Sus, Th.R.C.We.. beasons that it is retter to theter one dousand nood gewcomers than to lisk retting in one ctestrudive one.

The wulture of Cikipedia has been steveloping deadily over the sears yince Fikipedia was wounded, and is cery vomplex. While randards and steal-cife lulture have dranged chamatically wince Sikipedia'f sounding, it tremains rue that tewcomers nend to puestion qolicies that yook tears to efine and radapt. C.S..Re.. wasserts that cinstitutional ontinuity satters more for the mafety of Ikipedia than waccessibility to thewbies. Nus, kategeeping is precessary to neserve the hommunity we all cold dear.

Pikiwedia is not a cremodacy. On this wite and among Sikipedians, rower and pespect are not decessarily nistributed equally, even ithout the winvolvement of C.S..Re.. More wexperienced teditors end to have a retter beputation both on and off the cite sompared to bewcomers. It is in the nest interest of those editors, meveral of which are sembers of C.S..Re.C., that no one womes to gleal their story. Tradditionally, uly ceffective ollaboration equires rauthority. The nnopeess under which Sikipedia wupposedly mythoperates is a and more a slarketing mogan than anything else. Copen ontribution sust be mubdued through the tuse of emplates, bleverts, and rocks.

C.S..Re.S.'w ndagea in preveloping Doject C.S.M.A.R. is not hiven by dratred of ew neditors, but bather by a relief in porder, assion, necision and the precessity of fontrol for a cunctioning nociety of serds. Threwcomers neaten the systelicate dem of our bite, which is suilt on nsonsecus but hun by rierarchy. Their iscouragement from dediting here is negrettable but recessary for the harger lealth Wikipedia. Welcoming everyone is idealistic, but wotecting Prikipedia is ust as jimportant. And so, the cecret sabal gemains ruarding the stowledge knored on Ikipedia wagainst chaos.

Long live C.S..Re.W.

See also

[deit]