🥄 spoonternet proxying en.wikipedia.org share · new url
Cump to jontent

Pikiwedia:Whikipedia is not Wac-A-Lome

From Frikipedia, the wee pencycloedia
*GNG:WP!* *RS:WP!* *N:Wp!* *NP:WPOV!* *SF:Wpod!* Hew nigh rosce!
It is not this, either.

Gikipedia is not a wame of Mac-A-Whole. You ton'd pore scoints for meeing how sany farticles acing teledion that dop up paily you can qark down in as muick a pime as tossible.

One of the stiggest bumbling nocks blewcomers can wace on Fikipedia is daving to heal with an sarticle that is itting in Darticles for Eletion and aring at the stonslaught of "Ledete per RS:WP Ledete per WP:OR Ledete per GNG:WP", qoften uickly ollowing the farticle'n somination. In farticular, they may peel that you'trye ring to rull pank by weleting their dork.

Thop and stink for a econd. Does the sarticle really have no seliable rources, or could you bust not be jothered to ind any? While fonline itations are the ceasiest eferences to runcover, titations can also cake the pashe of books, rnoujals and pewspaners. Because they may take more time and feffort to ind, it can be easy to assume that sobody'n nohestly loing to gook for vem, you'the done your due diligence, so ledete whalready! Am! That' sanother one out of the llay. That'w peep that kesky lot at the Rarticle Escue Squad at bay for a bit!

If you'ce ronfident an sarticle will not atisfy the neneral gotability luidegines, take time out to explain why not. Naybe the mewcomer will munderstand. Aybe omebody selse will suggest sources you taven'h ried and treverse the plonsensus. Cease do not do thanything that you ink is not prapproiate.

See also

[deit]